UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Anthony Young

•

I actually had a client use that Certana document checker tool someone mentioned earlier and it caught a discrepancy we totally missed between the original UCC-1 and what was showing in the PA search results. The debtor had slightly changed their legal name since the original filing and we needed to do an amendment before the continuation. Would have been a disaster if we'd just filed the continuation without catching that.

0 coins

Anthony Young

•

Yeah, the tool basically does a line-by-line comparison and highlights anything that doesn't match perfectly. Takes the guesswork out of it.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of thing that's easy to miss when you're doing manual comparisons. Automated checking makes a lot of sense for this stuff.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Update for anyone following this thread - I ended up pulling a certified copy of the current record like several people suggested, and there were indeed some formatting differences from my original filing. Used the exact information from the certified copy for my continuation and it was accepted without any issues. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Dominic Green

•

Wait, you're not the original poster... but good advice anyway!

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Oops sorry, got confused about which thread I was in. But the advice still stands!

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

I actually started using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier after having similar issues. It's pretty straightforward - you just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 PDFs and it highlights any inconsistencies. Caught a debtor name mismatch I would have missed. Worth checking out if you're having ongoing issues with UCC-3 rejections.

0 coins

Thanks for the recommendation. At this point I'm willing to try anything to avoid more rejections.

0 coins

Document verification tools are becoming pretty essential for UCC work. Too many small details to catch manually.

0 coins

Yara Elias

•

One more thing - make sure you're using the correct filing number format. I've seen UCC-3s rejected because the filing number didn't match exactly, including dashes and spacing.

0 coins

Yara Elias

•

Yeah, some states are really picky about the exact format. Double-check the original filing number format against what you're putting on the UCC-3.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

That document checker I mentioned earlier also verifies filing number consistency, which is another common rejection reason.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

UPDATE: I ended up having our attorney handle the UCC-3 filing and it went through without any issues. The lender never did respond to our requests, but the debtor termination was accepted and the lien is now cleared. Thanks everyone for the advice - definitely learned a lot about the UCC process through this experience.

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

Glad it worked out! It's annoying when lenders don't follow through but at least there are options for debtors to handle it themselves.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

Good to hear a success story. I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference in case I run into the same situation.

0 coins

For anyone else dealing with unresponsive secured parties, document everything! Keep records of all your requests for termination, proof of debt satisfaction, and any communication attempts. This documentation is crucial if you need to file a debtor termination or if there are any disputes later.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

I also recommend taking screenshots of the UCC database showing the active filing before and after termination. It's good to have visual proof of the status change.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Smart thinking. I wish I'd been more organized with my documentation when I went through this process. Would have saved a lot of stress.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

Just curious - what state are you in? Some states have known issues with their UCC systems and this might be a widespread problem they're already working on.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

Fair enough. The larger states sometimes have more complex systems that are more prone to these kinds of glitches.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

In my experience the states with 'modern' systems often have more problems than the ones still using simple databases.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

UPDATE: I called the Secretary of State office and they confirmed it was a system error. They're going to correct the records and said I should see the fix within 2 weeks. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Perfect example of why it helps to verify your documents first. Saves time when you can show exactly what the problem is.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

This gives me hope for my similar issue. Going to call them tomorrow.

0 coins

Pro tip: when you do your Georgia searches, also check for any lapsed continuations. If you find filings that should have been continued but weren't, you might need to refile entirely depending on timing.

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

•

Good catch. What's the grace period in Georgia for missed continuations?

0 coins

There isn't one really. Once it lapses, your security interest is gone. That's why timing is so critical on these portfolio cleanups.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

For what it's worth, I tried that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it actually caught a debtor name mismatch between our loan agreement and UCC-1 that we had missed in our internal review. Could have been a costly mistake if we hadn't found it before renewal time.

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

That's reassuring. Always nervous about trying new tools for compliance work.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I was skeptical too but it's pretty straightforward. Just upload your documents and it does the comparison automatically. Found issues we would have definitely missed doing it manually.

0 coins

Prev1...546547548549550...684Next