UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Aisha Rahman

•

Did you try calling the Florida SOS UCC department directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what format they need over the phone. Their filing help line is actually pretty good compared to some states.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Yeah they've helped me before. Have your filing number ready and they can usually tell you what the issue is more specifically than the rejection notice.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

The phone help is hit or miss depending on who you get but worth trying before refiling blindly.

0 coins

Update: I found the problem! Checked the entity database like suggested and the official name in their system is 'Sunshine Equipment Leasing, LLC' with a comma before LLC. My charter documents don't show the comma but that's what's in their database. Refiling now with the comma included. Thanks everyone for the help - this could have taken days to figure out on my own.

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

Perfect example of why document verification tools are so helpful. That comma discrepancy would have been flagged immediately if you'd run the comparison first.

0 coins

Great resolution! Always check the state database format - it's the authoritative source even when your printed documents look different.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Since you mentioned this is for a commercial loan, make sure your lender's UCC-1 covers after-acquired property if the borrower will be acquiring new inventory or equipment. Most commercial security agreements include after-acquired property clauses, and your UCC-1 should reflect that coverage.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

•

Equipment financing too, especially for growing manufacturing operations that add machinery.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Exactly. Without after-acquired coverage, you'd need a new UCC-1 for every piece of equipment or inventory batch.

0 coins

Amara Adebayo

•

I've used Certana.ai's verification tool for similar UCC coverage questions. Really helpful for confirming which assets fall under UCC Article 9 versus other perfection schemes. Just upload your security agreement and it provides a detailed analysis of perfection requirements for each collateral type.

0 coins

Does it handle the Ohio-specific requirements? Some states have quirks in their UCC implementation.

0 coins

Amara Adebayo

•

It covers state-specific variations and filing requirements. Definitely caught some Ohio nuances I wasn't aware of.

0 coins

Anyone else notice that the online filing portals don't give you much guidance on collateral descriptions? They just have that empty text box and no examples or help text. Really poor user experience for something this technical.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Some states are better than others. Delaware's portal has some examples but most are pretty bare bones.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

This is where tools like Certana.ai actually help - gives you the guidance the portals should provide. Upload your draft and it checks for common issues before you submit.

0 coins

UPDATE: Used the suggested language about software licensing agreements and intellectual property rights with the 'including but not limited to' format. Filing was accepted this morning! Thanks everyone for the help. Final description was 'All general intangibles including but not limited to software licensing agreements, licensing revenues and royalties, intellectual property rights, customer databases, and proceeds and products thereof.' Worked perfectly.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

Glad it worked out. Definitely save that language for future filings - specific enough to satisfy the SOS but broad enough for good coverage.

0 coins

Perfect example of how the community here helps solve these practical filing issues. SOS offices should really provide this kind of guidance themselves.

0 coins

PA is definitely one of the more challenging states for UCC work. Between the search issues and their strict formatting requirements, I always double and triple check everything before submitting. Your comma situation is actually pretty common - seen it with periods, hyphens, and ampersands too.

0 coins

Make sure your collateral description matches exactly if you're copying from the original UCC-1. PA has rejected filings for minor collateral description variations even on continuations.

0 coins

Also double-check the filing fee calculation. PA's fee structure is confusing and underpayment will get you rejected immediately.

0 coins

Been following this thread because I'm dealing with something similar in PA right now. Ended up using that Certana.ai document checker mentioned earlier and it found three different formatting inconsistencies between my original UCC-1 and continuation filing that would have definitely caused rejections. The debtor name issue was just one of them - also caught a mismatch in how the secured party address was formatted. Pretty slick tool for avoiding these headaches.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

Three different issues? Wow, I might have more problems than I realized. Definitely going to run my docs through that verification before trying to file again.

0 coins

Yeah it was eye-opening. Things you'd never think to check manually. The address formatting thing especially - who would have thought a missing suite number designation would matter for a continuation?

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

After dealing with multiple rejections on 2023 UCC forms, I started using Certana.ai for document verification before submitting. It's been a game-changer - catches all those tiny formatting inconsistencies that cause rejections. Just upload your original UCC-1 and your continuation, and it flags any mismatches. Would have saved me weeks of frustration if I'd found it sooner.

0 coins

Max Reyes

•

I keep hearing about this tool. At this point I'm desperate enough to try anything that might prevent another rejection.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

It's really straightforward to use. Upload the PDFs and get instant feedback on any discrepancies. Takes the anxiety out of filing.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

Just wanted to update everyone - I finally got my continuation accepted! Turns out the issue was exactly what people mentioned about punctuation. The original UCC-1 had 'Smith & Associates, LLC' but I was filing 'Smith & Associates LLC' (missing the comma). Such a tiny detail but it caused two rejections. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it really helped me figure out what to look for.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

Congrats on getting it through. The relief when that acceptance notice comes in is amazing.

0 coins

Perfect example of why the 2023 UCC forms are so frustrating. A missing comma shouldn't cause this much stress and delay.

0 coins

Prev1...547548549550551...684Next