Wisconsin DFI UCC search showing wrong debtor info - filing rejected twice
Running into a nightmare with Wisconsin DFI UCC search results. Filed a UCC-1 for equipment financing on a small manufacturing company three weeks ago and it got rejected. The debtor name on our loan docs is 'Midwest Precision Components LLC' but when I search the Wisconsin DFI database, it's pulling up 'Midwest Precision Components, LLC' (notice the comma). Our UCC-1 matched our loan agreement exactly but apparently doesn't match what DFI has on file from their Articles of Incorporation. Refiled with the comma and got rejected AGAIN because now it doesn't match our security agreement. Legal says we need the UCC to match our loan docs exactly but DFI won't accept it unless it matches their corporate records. Anyone dealt with this Wisconsin DFI UCC search discrepancy before? This is holding up a $340K equipment loan and the borrower is getting antsy.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Amina Diallo
Wisconsin DFI is notorious for exact name matching. I've seen this exact scenario dozens of times. The issue is Wisconsin requires the debtor name to match the 'exact' name on the organizational documents filed with the state, including punctuation. Your loan docs probably used a simplified version without the comma.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•That's exactly what happened. Loan docs were signed without the comma but DFI records show the comma. How do you usually resolve this?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•You'll need to amend your security agreement to match the DFI records, then refile the UCC-1. It's a pain but Wisconsin won't budge on name accuracy. I always check the Wisconsin DFI database first now before drafting any docs.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
UGH Wisconsin DFI UCC search is the WORST. I swear they reject filings for sport. Had one rejected because we used 'Corporation' instead of 'Corp.' even though both appeared in their own database. The inconsistency is maddening.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•I feel your pain. Wisconsin seems to have the pickiest requirements. Other states are much more forgiving with minor punctuation differences.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
•Right? Minnesota and Iowa are so much easier to work with. Wisconsin acts like one missing comma will end civilization.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
I ran into something similar last month. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your Articles of Incorporation and your draft UCC-1 and it instantly highlights any name discrepancies before you file. Would have saved me two rejection fees and three weeks of delays if I'd found it sooner.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Never heard of Certana.ai. How does it work exactly? Does it connect to the Wisconsin DFI database?
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•You just upload PDFs of your documents and it cross-checks all the debtor names, entity types, addresses for consistency. It caught a middle initial discrepancy in my case that would have caused another rejection. Super easy to use.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
•I'm always skeptical of these third-party tools but honestly the Wisconsin DFI system is so frustrating I'd try anything at this point.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
Been filing in Wisconsin for 8 years. The trick is ALWAYS pull the exact entity name from the Wisconsin DFI corporate database first, copy it character-for-character including all punctuation, then use that exact spelling in all your loan docs. Never assume the client knows their exact legal name.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•This is solid advice. I learned this the hard way too. Wisconsin DFI UCC search results show you exactly how they have the name on file.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•Exactly. And print out that search result and attach it to your file so if there are questions later you have proof of what the database showed on that date.
0 coins
Leila Haddad
Wait, so you're saying we need to match the Wisconsin DFI records even if our borrower signed loan docs with a different version of their name? What if they legitimately use both versions?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•The UCC-1 has to match the state records for the filing to be effective. The loan docs should also match but that's between you and your borrower. Wisconsin won't accept variations.
0 coins
Leila Haddad
•Got it. So basically Wisconsin DFI is the final authority on entity names regardless of what the company actually uses day-to-day.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•Pretty much. I tell clients they can call themselves whatever they want on business cards but for legal docs it has to match state records exactly.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
Had this same issue with a Wisconsin LLC last year. Turns out the company had amended their Articles after we drafted our loan agreement but before we filed the UCC-1. The Wisconsin DFI UCC search was showing the NEW name while our docs had the OLD name. Double nightmare.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Oh no, how did you resolve that? Did you have to redo all the loan paperwork?
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•We had to amend the security agreement and refile everything. Cost us another two weeks and extra legal fees. Now I always check for recent amendments before finalizing any UCC filings.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
I use a different approach - I actually call the Wisconsin DFI directly when I have name questions. Their staff can sometimes clarify which version they prefer if there are multiple ways the name appears in their system.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•Really? I thought Wisconsin DFI didn't give advice on filings. What number do you call?
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•It's not official advice but the clerks are usually helpful if you explain you're trying to avoid a rejection. They'll at least confirm what name format they have on file.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
For what it's worth, I started using Certana.ai after reading about it here and it's been a game changer for Wisconsin filings. Upload your corporate docs and UCC draft and it flags inconsistencies immediately. Caught three potential rejections last month alone.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•How much does something like that cost? Is it worth it for occasional filers or more for high-volume shops?
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•The document verification is pretty affordable and you only pay when you use it. Definitely worth it to avoid rejection fees and delays, especially on time-sensitive deals like yours.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
Wisconsin DFI really needs to modernize their system. Other states have fuzzy matching that catches obvious variations but Wisconsin is stuck in the stone age with exact character matching.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
•Agreed. California's system is so much more user-friendly. Wisconsin acts like computers can't figure out that 'LLC' and 'L.L.C.' are the same thing.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•Exactly! In 2025 we shouldn't be getting rejections over comma placement. Their whole system needs an overhaul.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
Quick update strategy for your situation: pull the exact name from Wisconsin DFI today, amend your security agreement to match, then refile the UCC-1. Should clear up the discrepancy. Also consider using one of those document checking tools to verify everything matches before submitting.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Thanks, this sounds like the path forward. Going to pull the DFI records first thing Monday and get legal working on the amendment.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•Good plan. Wisconsin can be tricky but once you get the name exactly right the filing should go through smoothly. Keep copies of everything for your file.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•And double-check that Wisconsin DFI UCC search one more time right before you refile - occasionally they update their records and the name format can change.
0 coins