


Ask the community...
I hate to say it, but 14 weeks is a long time even by ESD standards. If nobody is giving you a straight answer, you might want to consider filing for an adjudicative hearing. You have the right to appeal the "non-action" on your claim. It sounds extreme, but sometimes filing the appeal paperwork is what finally gets someone to look at your claim. Go to your eServices account, look for the "Submit an Appeal" option, and in your explanation say you're appealing the unreasonable delay in processing your redetermination. Include that it's been 14 weeks, you're facing eviction, and you've made multiple attempts to resolve it through normal channels. This creates a formal legal timeline that ESD has to respond to. I've seen it work when nothing else would.
I didn't realize I could appeal a delay - I thought appeals were only for denials. This is really helpful! I'm going to try this right away. How long did the appeal process take in the cases you've seen? I'm worried this will just add more waiting time.
In my experience, just filing the appeal often gets results before you even get to an actual hearing. Once you file it, someone has to review it to prepare for the hearing, which means they finally look at your claim. I've seen claims suddenly get processed within 1-2 weeks after filing an appeal. The system prioritizes appeals because they have legal deadlines attached to them.
UPDATE: I tried calling the main ESD number this morning at exactly 8:00am and asked for a Tier 3 specialist like someone suggested. After being transferred twice, I finally got someone who actually gave me some useful information! Apparently my former employer's final quarterly tax report showed different wages than what I reported on my application. Since the company went out of business, they're having trouble verifying which numbers are correct. The agent put a note in my file flagging it as a hardship case and said a specialist would review it within 5 business days. I'm also going to try the Claimyr service that was mentioned and file that appeal just to cover all bases. Thank you all for the suggestions - this has been the most progress I've made in months!
That's great news! When there's a wage discrepancy involving a closed business, having it marked as a hardship case can make a big difference. One more tip: if you have any pay stubs, W-2s, or bank statements showing deposits that can verify your wages, upload those to your eServices account right away. That can speed up the verification process.
I had a somewhat similar experience last month but with mixed results. I did get through to the Governor's office right away (called around 9:30am on a Tuesday), and they took all my information and said they'd send an urgent inquiry to ESD. The good news: I did get a call from ESD about a week later. The bad news: The ESD rep who called me said they still couldn't expedite my adjudication because they were handling cases in the order received and there were "thousands" ahead of mine. She said the only cases being expedited were those facing immediate eviction or utility shutoff with formal notices. So while the Governor's office did get ESD to call me, it didn't actually speed up my claim processing. I ended up waiting another 3 weeks before my adjudication was completed (9 weeks total). Just sharing so you have realistic expectations.
Just as an update to everyone following this thread - I called the Governor's office number that OP shared (360-902-4111) this morning and also got through right away. The person I spoke with was very professional and said they'd submit an inquiry about my claim. They gave me a reference number and everything, which already feels more promising than my previous attempts to contact ESD. I'll update here if/when I hear anything back!
After struggling with the ESD phone lines for weeks, I finally got through last month and asked this exact question about temp work. The agent told me that taking temporary work is actually ENCOURAGED by ESD and will not negatively impact your existing claim. When the temp job ends, you'll need to reopen your claim. The claims agent will ask if you're still unemployed through no fault of your own, and a scheduled end to temporary work fits that criteria perfectly. Regarding the commute - the agent said they consider reasonable commutes to be up to 1 hour one-way in the first 8 weeks of unemployment, then up to 30 minutes after that. So timing matters too!
This is SO IMPORTANT about the timing!!! I didn't know ESD changed what's considered "suitable work" based on how long you've been unemployed. That makes a huge difference for the OP's situation. If they've been laid off for less than 8 weeks, refusing a job that's a 1-hour commute could definitely jeopardize their benefits!
i think ur overthinking this. if the temp job pays ok just take it. they might even hire u permanent if u do good. unemployment is only like max $1100 a week anyway and dealing with esd is SUCH a pain!!
The current maximum weekly benefit amount in Washington is $1,051 in 2025, not $1,100. And very few claimants qualify for the maximum - the average is closer to $600-700 per week. But you're right that stable employment, even temporary, is often preferable to dealing with the unemployment system if it's financially comparable.
To answer your follow-up question about job search requirements - yes, he needs to start looking for work and recording his job search activities immediately. There is no automatic standby period when a business closes. He needs to complete at least 3 job search activities each week and document them. The only exceptions would be if: 1. He's in an approved training program 2. He specifically applies for and is granted standby status (typically for temporary layoffs where the employer plans to recall workers) 3. He has a definite return-to-work date within 4 weeks from an employer Since the business closed entirely, #2 and #3 wouldn't apply. So yes, job search requirements are in effect from week one.
Also if ur worried about waiting too long make sure he answers those fact-finding questionares ASAP. I got one about my job search activities that took me 3 days to notice and it delayed my claim by like 2 weeks!!
Luca Russo
Anybody else think its RIDICULOUS that they can fire ppl for medical reasons and then argue against unemployment?? The system is totally rigged against workers!!! My cousin went thru something similar and had to fight for months to get benefits even tho she had cancer treatments!!!
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Agreed! The way employers can just discard employees when they have health issues is awful. Workers have so few protections in practice, regardless of what the laws claim. Then they fight your unemployment as if you had a choice in the matter!
0 coins
Zara Mirza
•To be fair, there are FMLA protections and ADA accommodations that should help in these situations, but they're often poorly implemented or employers find loopholes. For unemployment purposes though, being unable to work due to medical reasons is actually a tricky area because technically you need to be able and available for work to qualify for UI. That's why documentation and timing are so important.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
One important distinction: There's a difference between being terminated because you were on approved medical leave versus being disqualified because you're currently unable to work due to medical conditions. If you were terminated for taking medical leave but are NOW able to work, that's generally covered by UI. If you're currently unable to work due to ongoing medical issues, that's typically not covered by regular UI (might need to look into disability instead). Based on your description, it sounds like you fall into the first category - you were terminated for taking leave, but are currently able to work. That's likely why your claim was approved. Just make sure when you answer the weekly claim questions about being able and available, you're answering based on your CURRENT status, not your status when you were terminated.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•You've hit the nail on the head. I was terminated for needing extended leave, but I'm fully recovered now and able to work. I've been answering the weekly claim questions based on my current ability to work, which is 100%. This is exactly my situation - terminated for past medical leave but currently able and available for work.
0 coins