Will the Social Security Fairness Act help me get spousal benefits without prior application?
My husband retired from teaching in 2019 after 31 years and receives his state pension (not covered by Social Security). I've worked in the private sector my entire career and will be eligible for my own Social Security retirement next year. We never had him apply for spousal benefits on my record because we knew the Government Pension Offset (GPO) would reduce them to basically nothing. Now with all this talk about the Social Security Fairness Act possibly passing, we're wondering if he'd be eligible if the GPO is eliminated. Here's my question: since he never applied for spousal benefits before (because it made no sense with the offset), would he be required to have applied previously to qualify if the law changes? Or can he just apply once the law passes (if it does)? Anyone been through anything similar or know how this works?
21 comments
Join the conversation
Emma Morales
Hi there! This is a really good question about the proposed Social Security Fairness Act and GPO/WEP reform. The answer is that your husband does NOT need to have previously applied for spousal benefits to be eligible if the law passes. The current bill would eliminate both the GPO and WEP penalties completely, allowing government pensioners to receive their full Social Security benefits without reduction. If it passes, your husband could apply at that time and receive the full spousal benefit he's entitled to based on your record, regardless of never having applied before. The bill has gained significant support but still faces hurdles to passage.
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
•Thank you so much for the clear answer! That's a huge relief. Do you know if there would be any retroactive payments available, or would benefits only start from the time he applies after the law passes?
0 coins
Katherine Hunter
my dad was in the same boat (firefighter pension) and my mom worked normal job with SS. they got SCREWED by this stupid rule!!! he paid into both systems but could only get one??? total scam by govt!!
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•It's actually a bit more complicated than that. The WEP/GPO rules were created to prevent "double dipping" since government employees with non-covered pensions didn't pay into Social Security for those jobs. But I agree the implementation is problematic - especially since many affected workers didn't understand these penalties would apply when planning for retirement.
0 coins
Donna Cline
To add some more details to the previous advice: The Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 82/S. 1872) would fully repeal both the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). If passed, your husband would be able to apply for spousal benefits at that time - no previous application is required. The bill has over 300 cosponsors in the House and strong bipartisan support, but funding remains a significant challenge since it would cost approximately $150 billion over 10 years according to estimates. While the prospects look better than in previous years, I'd suggest not counting on it until it actually passes.
0 coins
Harper Collins
•Wait I thought they already passed this?? My cousin said something about this being approved last month??
0 coins
Donna Cline
•No, it hasn't passed yet. There's been movement on the bill, including a discharge petition that garnered enough signatures to potentially force a floor vote in the House, but it hasn't been enacted into law. What your cousin might be referring to is this procedural progress, not final passage.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
I've been fighting with this GPO nonsense for 5 years now!!! I worked as a teacher for 29 years in Texas (no SS contributions) but ALSO worked summers and before teaching where I earned my 40 credits. My own SS benefit got reduced by almost 60% because of WEP even though I earned it fair and square! And when my husband passed away, I got ZERO survivor benefits because of GPO, even though HE paid into the system his ENTIRE life. The system is BROKEN!
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
•I'm so sorry you're going through this. It really doesn't seem fair. Did you ever try appealing the decision or was there no point because they were just following the rules as written?
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
•No point appealing - they just quote the law back to you. I wrote to my congressman twice and got form letters back about "reviewing the issue." Yeah right! The only hope is this Fairness Act passing.
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
I worked for Social Security for 22 years before retiring, and I can confirm that your husband does NOT need to have previously applied for benefits to qualify if the GPO is repealed. If/when the Social Security Fairness Act passes, he would simply apply at that time. However, I should note that benefits are rarely retroactive beyond 6 months, so there wouldn't be years of back payments available - just going forward from application. Also be aware that while the bill has significant support, similar legislation has stalled in previous sessions due to the substantial cost to the trust fund.
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
•Thank you for this insight! Very helpful to hear from someone with SSA experience. The 6-month retroactivity limit is good to know - I hadn't considered that aspect.
0 coins
Harper Collins
my mom had this problem to. we tried calling social security for weeks and couldnt get thru to ask questions. finally found a service called claimyr that got us connected to an agent in like 20 minutes. they have a video showing how it works https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU saved us so much frustration!!!! the agent confirmed that my mom could apply later if the law changes and wouldn't lose anything by waiting
0 coins
Katherine Hunter
•thanks for sharing this! been trying to get through on the phone for DAYS!!! will check this out
0 coins
Lucas Parker
I've been following the Social Security Fairness Act closely because I'm also affected by WEP (not GPO in my case). From my understanding, if the bill passes, there would likely be an implementation period where SSA would need to update their systems and procedures. While I agree with others that your husband wouldn't need a prior application, I'd recommend keeping documentation of his pension and your work history readily available to facilitate the process when/if the time comes. Also, consider that there may be a flood of applications if the legislation passes, so being prepared to apply quickly could be beneficial.
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
•Great suggestion about having documentation ready! I'll start gathering all our paperwork now so we're prepared if it passes. Do you think we should contact our Congressional representatives to express support for the bill?
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•Absolutely! Contacting your representatives does make a difference. The more they hear from constituents personally affected by GPO/WEP, the more likely they are to prioritize the legislation. Both phone calls and emails work, but personalized messages explaining your specific situation tend to be more impactful than form letters.
0 coins
Katherine Hunter
What's GPO? Is that different from WEP? I get so confused with all these letters lol
0 coins
Donna Cline
•GPO = Government Pension Offset (reduces spousal/survivor benefits if you get a non-covered government pension) WEP = Windfall Elimination Provision (reduces your own Social Security benefit if you also get a non-covered government pension) Both penalties affect government workers who didn't pay Social Security taxes for their government job but are eligible for Social Security based on other work or through a spouse.
0 coins
Harper Collins
my neighbor is in this exact situation and she just keeps checking the news every day hoping it'll pass. she's missing out on like $900 a month because of GPO! thats REAL money that could change her life
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
•It's criminal what they're doing to us! I'm losing over $1,200 a month between the WEP reduction on my own benefit and the GPO elimination of my survivor benefit. After 40+ years of working (partly in covered and partly in non-covered employment), this is how they treat us!
0 coins