Will I get Social Security spousal benefits as a teacher with WEP/GPO after the 2024 changes?
I've been working as a public school teacher in Ohio for almost 28 years where we don't pay into Social Security (we have STRS instead). My husband has worked in the private sector his whole life and will get his full SS retirement next year when he turns 67. I've heard about the WEP/GPO reform that was passed this year and how it changes things for 2025. Does this mean I can now get spousal benefits based on his record? I'm so confused because I always thought I'd get nothing because of the Government Pension Offset. If I am eligible now, would it be 50% of his benefit amount or some reduced percentage? I'll be 62 when I retire in 2026.
35 comments


Ingrid Larsson
The Social Security provisions in the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 did modify the WEP/GPO rules, but it doesn't eliminate them entirely. The changes reduce the impact of GPO on spousal benefits, but you'd still face some reduction. With the new formula, instead of having your spousal benefit reduced by 2/3 of your pension amount, it will be reduced by a smaller percentage that varies based on your years of service. With 28 years of non-covered employment, you'd likely see about a 40-45% reduction instead of the previous 66.7% reduction. So yes, you might get some spousal benefits now, but it won't be the full 50% of your husband's PIA (Primary Insurance Amount).
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•Thank you for explaining! So if my husband's monthly benefit is around $2,800, and I'd normally get 50% as a spouse ($1,400), would they reduce that by 40-45% of my teacher pension? My pension should be about $4,200/month when I retire.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
My wife is also a teacher (in Illinois) and we talked to a SS rep last month about this exact thing! The new rules are super confusing but it sounds like you'll definitely get SOMETHING now, which is better than before when many of us got nothing at all because of GPO.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•That's encouraging! Did they give you any specifics on how much she might receive? I'm trying to do retirement planning and every dollar matters!
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
•They couldn't give us exact numbers yet. They said SSA is still writing up the procedures for calculating the new GPO reductions. But they did confirm she'll get some portion of spousal benefits now instead of zero.
0 coins
Zainab Mahmoud
The new WEP/GPO calculation is based on a sliding scale tied to your years of non-covered employment. With 28 years in a job not covered by Social Security, your reduction will likely be around 42-43%. If your husband's PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) is $2,800, and you'd normally qualify for spousal benefits of $1,400 (50%), then the GPO would reduce it by approximately $1,764 (42% of your $4,200 pension), leaving you with potentially no benefit. However, the new law also includes a $750/month exemption before the GPO reduction applies. This means the first $750 of your pension is not counted in the reduction calculation. So the actual reduction would be 42% of $3,450 ($4,200 - $750), which equals $1,449. So $1,400 - $1,449 = $0 in this scenario, though the exact numbers will depend on precise calculations of your husband's PIA and your pension amount.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•Oh no, so I still might get nothing? That's really disappointing. I thought these new changes were going to help teachers and other public servants.
0 coins
Ava Williams
My sister in law had the same issue! She tried for MONTHS to get someone at Social Security to explain the new rules to her. Nobody could give her a straight answer on the phone, offices were packed with long waits.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Have either of you tried using Claimyr to get through to an SSA agent? It helped me bypass the endless wait times. You book a call on claimyr.com and they get you connected to a Social Security rep in minutes instead of hours. There's a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. It was worth it for me because I needed specific answers about my WEP situation that only a knowledgeable agent could provide.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
Just to clarify a bit more on the new calculations, there's another important element: the law establishes a guaranteed minimum benefit for affected spouses. Even with the GPO reduction, you would be guaranteed to receive at least 40% of the spousal benefit you would have been eligible for without GPO. So in your case, if your standard spousal benefit would be $1,400 (50% of your husband's benefit), the minimum you should receive under the new law would be $560 (40% of $1,400). This minimum provision might help you receive some benefit even if the standard calculation would reduce it to zero. The implementation details are still being finalized by SSA, but this guaranteed minimum is a significant improvement from the old rules.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•That's a huge relief! So I should get at least $560/month? That's much better than nothing. Do you know if I need to wait until my full retirement age to apply, or can I get it at 62 when I retire?
0 coins
Lena Müller
I'm also a teacher affected by GPO/WEP and have been following the 2024 changes closely. If you claim at 62, your spousal benefit will be reduced for claiming early - down to about 32.5% of your husband's PIA instead of 50%. THEN the new GPO reduction would apply to that lower amount. Also, the new rules don't fully take effect until 2027! There's a phase-in period from 2025-2027. So if you retire in 2026, you'll get a blended calculation that year.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•I had no idea about the phase-in period or the early claiming reduction! This is even more complicated than I thought. Maybe I should delay my retirement until 2027?
0 coins
Lena Müller
•It's definitely worth considering. I'm in the same boat and decided to work until 2027 to get the full benefit of the new rules. The early claiming reduction is permanent too - it doesn't go away when you reach full retirement age. Each year you wait (until FRA) increases the percentage you'll receive.
0 coins
TechNinja
Just wanted to say THANK YOU for asking this question!! I'm a teacher in Texas with 31 years in and my husband gets SS. I had NO CLUE about these changes and have been assuming I'd get nothing from his record. Going to look into this more now!!!!
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•You're welcome! I'm glad it helped you too. This whole system is so complicated, especially for teachers and other public employees.
0 coins
Zainab Mahmoud
One final consideration: make sure you're looking at your true pension amount when doing these calculations. Some public pension systems offer annuity options with survivor benefits that reduce the monthly payment. The GPO calculation would be based on the pension amount before any such reductions. Also, don't forget that the spousal benefit maximum is 50% of your husband's PIA, not 50% of what he actually receives. If he delayed claiming past his FRA to increase his own benefit, your spousal benefit would still be based on his PIA at full retirement age, not his increased amount. I'd recommend scheduling an appointment with SSA in early 2025 once they've fully implemented the new calculation procedures. They should be able to provide you with personalized estimates based on your specific situation.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•Thank you for this additional information. I'll make sure to talk to my pension system about the exact amount they'll use for these calculations. And I'll definitely schedule that SSA appointment in early 2025!
0 coins
Nia Jackson
I'm a retired SSA claims representative and wanted to add some clarity on the implementation timeline. The 2024 law changes don't actually take full effect until January 2025, and SSA is still updating their systems and training staff on the new calculations. If you're planning to retire in 2026, I'd strongly recommend waiting until at least mid-2025 to get accurate benefit estimates. The early months of 2025 may still have some processing delays as field offices adapt to the new rules. Also, keep in mind that Ohio STRS allows you to purchase Social Security credits for some types of substitute teaching or part-time work. If you have any quarters of SS-covered employment, it could affect your WEP calculation favorably. Worth checking your Social Security Statement at ssa.gov to see if you have any covered quarters recorded.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Thank you so much for this insider perspective! I had no idea about the possibility of purchasing Social Security credits through STRS. I did do some substitute teaching early in my career and worked part-time at a retail job during summers when I first started teaching. I'll definitely check my Social Security Statement to see what quarters I have recorded. Even a few quarters of covered employment could help with the WEP calculation, right? And thanks for the tip about waiting until mid-2025 for accurate estimates - I'd rather have correct information than rush into anything.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
As someone who's been navigating the WEP/GPO maze for years, I wanted to share what I've learned from attending several retirement planning seminars specifically for educators. The key thing to remember is that the 2024 changes are definitely an improvement, but they're not a complete elimination of the penalties. One strategy that's worked for some teachers I know is to consider whether it makes sense to delay claiming spousal benefits until after your full retirement age, even if you retire earlier. Unlike your own Social Security benefits, spousal benefits don't increase with delayed retirement credits past your FRA, but waiting until your FRA means you avoid the early claiming reduction that stacks on top of the GPO reduction. Also, since you mentioned retirement planning - don't forget that your spousal Social Security benefits might be taxable depending on your total retirement income. With your STRS pension plus any spousal SS benefits, you'll likely be in the range where 50-85% of your Social Security benefits are subject to federal income tax. This is something to factor into your overall retirement budget planning. The fact that you're asking these questions now, well before your retirement, puts you way ahead of many people. Keep staying informed as SSA releases more specific guidance throughout 2025!
0 coins
Reina Salazar
•This is incredibly helpful advice! I hadn't thought about the strategy of delaying spousal benefits until FRA even if I retire earlier. That makes a lot of sense to avoid the double reduction. And you're absolutely right about the tax implications - I need to factor that into my planning too. Between my STRS pension and potential spousal benefits, I'll definitely be in a higher tax bracket than I initially calculated. Do you happen to know if there are any good resources or calculators specifically for teachers dealing with these WEP/GPO changes? I feel like I need to run multiple scenarios to figure out the best claiming strategy.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
I'm a retired financial planner who specialized in retirement planning for public employees, and I want to echo what others have said about being patient with the implementation process. The 2024 WEP/GPO reforms are indeed groundbreaking for teachers and other public servants, but SSA is essentially rebuilding their entire calculation system for these benefits. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you should also verify your husband's earnings record on his Social Security statement. His Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) that determines your spousal benefit is based on his highest 35 years of earnings, indexed for inflation. If there are any errors or missing years on his record, now is the time to correct them before you start receiving benefits. Also, consider this timing strategy: if your husband hasn't claimed his benefits yet and can afford to delay until age 70, his benefit will grow by about 8% per year due to delayed retirement credits. While this won't increase your spousal benefit (which is still capped at 50% of his PIA), it will increase his survivor benefit that you'd receive if he passes away first. As a teacher with a pension, you'd be eligible for the higher survivor benefit instead of spousal benefits, and the survivor benefit isn't subject to GPO under the new rules. The complexity of these decisions really highlights why it's worth consulting with someone who understands both Social Security and teacher retirement systems before making your final claiming decisions.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I was hoping to find! Thank you for mentioning the survivor benefit aspect - I hadn't even considered that angle. It's a bit overwhelming to think about, but you're absolutely right that the survivor benefit could potentially be much more valuable than spousal benefits, especially since it won't be subject to GPO. I'm definitely going to have my husband check his Social Security statement for any errors. We've been so focused on my teacher pension situation that we haven't paid as much attention to making sure his record is accurate. The idea of him delaying to age 70 is interesting but also scary financially - that would mean waiting 3 extra years beyond his planned retirement. But if it significantly increases the survivor benefit and we can manage financially during those years, it might be worth considering given our age difference and life expectancy. Do you know if there are financial planners who specialize in this intersection of teacher pensions and Social Security? I think we really need professional help to model out all these different scenarios properly.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
I'm a teacher in California with 25 years in CalSTRS and I've been following this thread with great interest! Thank you all for sharing such detailed information - it's been incredibly helpful. I wanted to add one important point that might affect your calculations: make sure you understand how your state's pension system coordinates with Social Security. Some states have different rules about how teacher pensions are calculated for GPO purposes. For example, in California, if you have both CalSTRS and Social Security covered employment (like I do from working summers in the private sector), the GPO calculation can be more complex. The portion of your pension that's based on Social Security-covered earnings might be treated differently under the new rules. Also, I've found that contacting your state teachers' retirement system directly can be really helpful. STRS Ohio should have specialists who understand how the federal WEP/GPO changes will interact with Ohio-specific pension rules. They might be able to give you better estimates than generic SSA calculators. One last tip: start keeping detailed records now of all your pension communications and benefit estimates. When you do finally apply for spousal benefits, having organized documentation will make the process much smoother, especially with these new complex calculations. The fact that we're all finally getting some relief from these penalties is amazing, even if it's not a complete elimination. After decades of being penalized for choosing public service careers, any improvement is welcome!
0 coins
Julia Hall
•Thank you so much for mentioning the coordination with state pension systems! I hadn't thought about how Ohio STRS might have specific rules that interact with the federal changes. That's a great point about contacting STRS directly - they probably have specialists who've been preparing for these changes and can give me Ohio-specific guidance. Your suggestion about keeping detailed records is spot-on too. I'm going to start a dedicated file right now for all pension and Social Security documentation. With all these complex calculations and phase-in periods, having everything organized will definitely be crucial. And I completely agree about this being a step in the right direction! Even though it's not perfect, it's such a relief to know that teachers and other public servants are finally getting some recognition that we shouldn't be penalized for our career choices. For so long it felt like we were being punished for dedicating our lives to public service. I'm curious - have you found any good resources through CalSTRS about the WEP/GPO changes? I'm wondering if STRS Ohio might have similar materials or workshops available that I should look into.
0 coins
Charlotte White
As a newer member of this community, I've been lurking and learning so much from all these detailed discussions about WEP/GPO changes! Thank you everyone for sharing your experiences and knowledge. I wanted to ask about something I haven't seen mentioned yet - what about teachers who might be eligible for their own Social Security benefits in addition to spousal benefits? I have a friend who taught for 20+ years but also worked in private sector jobs before and after teaching, accumulating about 15 years of Social Security-covered employment. Would someone in that situation potentially be eligible for both their own reduced Social Security benefit (due to WEP) AND spousal benefits (with the new GPO calculations)? Or does Social Security make you choose between the two? I know this thread is focused on spousal benefits specifically, but I'm trying to understand all the different scenarios that might apply to teachers with mixed work histories. The complexity of these rules is mind-boggling! Also, @Tyrone Johnson - given all the great advice you've received here, have you considered reaching out to any teacher advocacy groups? Organizations like NEA or AFT sometimes have resources or workshops specifically about Social Security issues for educators that might complement the individual consultations others have suggested.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•Great question about mixed work histories! You've touched on something really important that affects many teachers. When someone is eligible for both their own Social Security benefit and spousal benefits, Social Security doesn't make you "choose" exactly - instead, they pay you the higher of the two amounts. Here's how it typically works: If your friend's own WEP-reduced benefit is higher than the spousal benefit (after GPO reduction), they'd receive their own benefit. If the spousal benefit ends up higher, they'd get their own benefit PLUS the difference to bring them up to the spousal benefit amount. With 15 years of covered employment, your friend's WEP reduction would be less severe than someone with zero covered years - the reduction decreases as you approach 30 years of substantial earnings. So they might actually end up with a decent benefit from their own work record. This is definitely another reason why checking your Social Security statement is so crucial! Teachers with mixed work histories have more complex but potentially more favorable situations. @Tyrone Johnson, that's an excellent suggestion about NEA and AFT resources! I hadn't thought about teacher advocacy groups having specialized Social Security guidance, but they absolutely should given how many members are affected by these issues.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
This has been such an incredibly informative discussion! As someone new to this community, I'm amazed by the depth of knowledge everyone has shared about the WEP/GPO changes and how they affect teachers specifically. I'm a substitute teacher in Michigan who's been considering going back to get my teaching certificate and join the full-time ranks, but the Social Security implications have always been a concern. Reading through all these responses has given me so much insight into what the 2024 changes actually mean in practical terms. The point about the guaranteed minimum benefit of 40% is huge - that's something I hadn't seen explained clearly anywhere else. And the advice about timing strategies, like waiting until full retirement age to avoid stacking reductions, is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that's so hard to find. I'm curious - for those of you who are current teachers, have your school districts or unions been providing any information sessions about these changes? It seems like something that would benefit from organized education efforts, given how complex the calculations are and how much misinformation is out there. Thank you all for creating such a helpful resource for people trying to navigate these complicated waters!
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
•Welcome to the community! I'm also relatively new here but have found this discussion incredibly valuable. Your question about school districts and unions providing information sessions is spot-on - I've been wondering the same thing. In my experience (I'm in Pennsylvania), our union has mentioned the WEP/GPO changes briefly in newsletters but hasn't organized any detailed sessions yet. I think many districts are waiting for SSA to finalize their implementation procedures before investing in training sessions. But given how many teachers this affects, it really should be a priority. If you do decide to pursue your teaching certificate, I'd suggest starting to track any Social Security-covered employment you have now as a substitute. Those quarters could be valuable for WEP calculations down the road, especially if you end up with a mixed career like some others have mentioned here. The 40% guaranteed minimum really is a game-changer - it means teachers won't be completely shut out of spousal benefits anymore, which was such an unfair aspect of the old system. It's encouraging to see these changes finally happening after decades of advocacy! Have you looked into whether Michigan's teacher retirement system has any resources about the federal changes? It might be worth checking their website or calling them directly.
0 coins
NeonNinja
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm a librarian in a public school district in Georgia (also don't pay into Social Security - we have TRS) and my situation is very similar to yours, @Tyrone Johnson. My husband has been in private sector work his whole career and I've been assuming I'd get zero spousal benefits due to GPO. Reading through all these responses has given me so much hope and also highlighted how much homework I need to do! The guaranteed 40% minimum is news to me - that alone could mean the difference between having some financial cushion in retirement versus scraping by on just my pension. I'm particularly interested in what @Nia Jackson mentioned about checking for any Social Security quarters from substitute or part-time work. I worked retail during college and did some freelance work early in my career that might have been Social Security covered. Never thought those few quarters could matter decades later! Has anyone found a good resource that explains the year-by-year phase-in from 2025-2027? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth adjusting my retirement timeline based on when the full benefits of the new calculation would kick in. The timing piece seems just as important as understanding the calculations themselves. Thank you all for sharing your knowledge so generously - this is exactly why I love being part of this community!
0 coins
Charlie Yang
•Welcome to the discussion! Your situation as a Georgia TRS member sounds very similar to many of us here. I'm glad this thread has been helpful for you too! Regarding the phase-in timeline you asked about, I haven't found a detailed year-by-year breakdown yet, but from what I understand, 2025 will use a blend of old and new calculations, 2026 will move closer to the new formula, and 2027 will be fully implemented. The exact percentages for each year seem to still be worked out by SSA. You're absolutely right about checking those early work quarters! Even a few quarters of covered employment can help reduce your WEP impact if you ever become eligible for your own Social Security benefits. And who knows - you might have more covered quarters than you realize from various jobs over the years. The timing consideration is really smart strategic thinking. If you're close to retirement anyway, it might be worth modeling out scenarios for retiring in different years to see how the phase-in affects your potential benefits. Have you checked if Georgia TRS has any resources or webinars planned about these changes? It seems like all the state teacher retirement systems should be helping their members understand these federal changes, but implementation seems spotty across different states. Keep us posted on what you discover - your research will probably help other TRS members in similar situations!
0 coins
Brian Downey
As a new member here, I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm in a very similar situation. I'm a high school math teacher in Texas with 26 years in TRS, and my husband will be eligible for Social Security next year. What strikes me most about this conversation is how much uncertainty still exists even after the 2024 reforms passed. It sounds like we're all in this waiting period where we know things will be better, but the exact details are still being worked out by SSA. I wanted to add one resource that might be helpful - the National Education Association (NEA) has been tracking these WEP/GPO changes closely and has some good explainer materials on their website. They've been advocating for these reforms for years, so their resources tend to be written specifically for educators rather than the general public. Also, for anyone planning retirement timing around these changes, don't forget to factor in your state's specific retirement eligibility rules. In Texas, I need to meet the "rule of 80" (age plus years of service) to retire with full benefits, which might influence when it makes sense to claim Social Security benefits versus when I can actually afford to stop working. The complexity is overwhelming, but it's encouraging to see a community where we can share information and learn from each other's research. Thank you to everyone who's contributed such detailed insights!
0 coins
Elin Robinson
•Thank you for mentioning the NEA resources! As someone just joining this community, I really appreciate how everyone has been sharing both personal experiences and practical resources. The point about state-specific retirement rules is so important - I hadn't considered how those might interact with the timing of Social Security benefits. Your mention of Texas TRS and the "rule of 80" got me thinking about how many different variables we all have to juggle when planning retirement as teachers. It's not just the federal WEP/GPO changes, but also our individual state pension systems, spousal Social Security timing, and our own financial readiness to stop working. The uncertainty you mentioned really resonates with me. It feels like we're all trying to plan for retirement with half the information we need! But discussions like this one are so valuable for piecing together a clearer picture from everyone's research and experiences. I'm going to check out those NEA resources you mentioned - having materials written specifically for educators rather than generic Social Security guidance sounds incredibly helpful. Thank you for that tip! It's amazing how this thread started with one person's question about Ohio STRS and has expanded to help teachers from so many different states understand these changes better.
0 coins
Mei-Ling Chen
As a newcomer to this community, I'm absolutely blown away by the depth of knowledge and support shared in this discussion! I'm a speech therapist in a public school district in North Carolina, and like many of you, I don't pay into Social Security - we have the state retirement system instead. My husband works in the private sector and is planning to claim his Social Security benefits in the next few years. I had completely given up hope of ever receiving spousal benefits due to GPO, so reading about the 2024 changes and especially that guaranteed 40% minimum has been eye-opening. The strategic timing considerations that have been discussed here - like waiting until full retirement age to avoid stacking early claiming penalties on top of GPO reductions - are exactly the kind of practical insights I needed but couldn't find anywhere else. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned: do these WEP/GPO reforms affect disability benefits at all? I know it's not directly related to spousal retirement benefits, but as we're all getting older and thinking about various "what-if" scenarios, I wondered if anyone has looked into whether the changes extend to spousal disability benefits as well. Thank you all for creating such an incredibly informative resource. This discussion has given me hope and a clear action plan for researching my own situation. I'll definitely be checking my Social Security statement for any covered quarters and reaching out to our state retirement system for NC-specific guidance!
0 coins