Can my younger husband claim on my Social Security at 62 while letting his benefit grow until FRA?
I've been researching spousal benefit options since my husband and I want to retire simultaneously despite our age gap. I'm 59 and he's 52 (7 years younger), and we're trying to map out the best Social Security strategy. My PIA will be around $2,650 while his will be approximately $2,900. If I claim at my FRA (67) and he claims at 62, could he initially take 50% of my benefit while allowing his own benefit to grow until he reaches his FRA? Would taking spousal benefits early permanently reduce his own retirement benefit when he switches to it? I've read conflicting information about whether this "claim now, claim more later" approach is still possible after the 2015 rule changes. Has anyone successfully navigated a similar spousal benefit situation with an age gap? Any alternative claiming strategies would be greatly appreciated!
20 comments
Ravi Sharma
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but what you're describing isn't possible anymore. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 eliminated the "restricted application" strategy for anyone born after January 1, 1954. Since your husband was born after that date, when he files for any Social Security benefit, he'll be deemed to be filing for all benefits he's eligible for and will receive the highest amount. He can't choose to take only spousal benefits while letting his own grow. In your situation, when your husband files at 62, he would receive his own reduced retirement benefit (about 70% of his PIA due to the early claiming reduction). He couldn't receive spousal benefits based on your record unless that amount was higher than his own benefit (which it wouldn't be since his PIA is higher than yours).
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•Oh no! I had a feeling those rule changes might affect our plans. Thank you for explaining this clearly. Given our situation then, would it make more sense for me to delay my benefits until 70 to maximize my monthly amount? And if my husband files at 62, would that impact any survivor benefits I might receive if he passes away first?
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
Speaking from experience, the SSA phone lines are nearly impossible to get through these days. After struggling for weeks to get specific answers about my own spousal benefit situation, I discovered Claimyr (claimyr.com) which got me connected to an actual SSA agent in about 15 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours or getting disconnected. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU Once I actually spoke with an agent, I learned that my situation (similar to yours with an age difference) was much more complex than online resources suggested. The personalized information made a $430/month difference in my planning!
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•Is this a legit service? Sounds too good to be true after spending HOURS trying to get through last month.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Since your husband has the higher PIA, you might consider this strategy instead: 1. Your husband waits until his FRA (67) to claim his full benefit of $2,900 2. You claim at your FRA (67) and receive your full $2,650 3. This maximizes both your lifetime benefits and potential survivor benefits If budget constraints require earlier filing, then: 1. You claim at your FRA (67) to get your full $2,650 2. Your husband claims at 62, accepting the 30% reduction (about $2,030 monthly) Regarding survivor benefits: If your husband claims early and predeceases you, your survivor benefit would be limited by his reduced amount. However, if you've already claimed your own higher benefit, this wouldn't affect you financially.
0 coins
AstroAce
•This is SO FRUSTRATING!! Why did they change these rules?? My parents did the restricted application thing and it worked GREAT for them. Saved like $40k over 4 years. Now we younger folks get screwed again. I hate how they keep moving the goalposts on our retirement!!! 😡
0 coins
Chloe Martin
i think ur overthinking this. just have hubby wait til 67 and u take yours at 67 too. keep working til then. done. simple. lol
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•We'd ideally like to retire together, and I was hoping to find a creative way to maximize our benefits given our age difference. But you might be right - sometimes the simplest approach is best!
0 coins
Diego Rojas
We have a similar age gap (I'm 6 years older than my wife) and I spent months researching this. The old restricted application strategy would have been PERFECT but they eliminated it. After running calculations with different scenarios, we found that having the higher-earner spouse delay until 70 produced the best lifetime outcome, especially considering survivor benefits. Have you considered having your husband wait until 70? The 8% annual increase from FRA to 70 is hard to beat as an investment return.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•My sister and brother-in-law did exactly this - he waited until 70 while she claimed at 67. They're really glad they did because his monthly check is substantially larger, which gives them more flexibility now AND protects her if he dies first since she'd get his higher benefit amount as a survivor benefit. The survivor benefit aspect is often overlooked but SO important in planning.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
One thing nobody's mentioned is that you said you want to retire at the same time. Remember that retiring and claiming Social Security don't have to happen simultaneously! Many people bridge the gap with savings. If you retire together when you're 67 (husband at 60), he could live on savings/investments for 7 years until he reaches his FRA. This would protect his full benefit amount. Just wanted to point out that these decisions can be separated!
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•That's a really important point I hadn't considered! We do have some savings we could use to bridge the gap. I need to calculate whether we have enough to support him for several years without touching Social Security.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
u should prob look into the Government pention offset too... thats another thing they dont tell u that can mess up ur ss. my friend got like half what she thought she would. if either of u had a gov. job check that out too
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Good point about checking for potential WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision) or GPO (Government Pension Offset) issues! These can significantly reduce Social Security benefits for those who earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. It's definitely something to verify before finalizing any claiming strategy.
0 coins
AstroAce
Has anyone used one of those Social Security maximization software programs? I'm wondering if they're worth the money or just tell you what you could figure out yourself. I've been looking at one that costs $49 and claims to analyze hundreds of filing combinations.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
•I used MaxiFi and thought it was worth every penny. It looks at your entire financial picture, not just Social Security. Helped us see how different claiming strategies affected our overall retirement, taxes, and even estate planning. Much more comprehensive than the free calculators online.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Something else to consider in your planning: if you're both still working, make sure you understand how the earnings test might affect benefits claimed before FRA. In 2025, if you earn more than $22,750 (estimated based on current limits), Social Security will withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above that threshold if you're under FRA. This doesn't apply once you reach your FRA.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•Thank you for bringing this up! My husband might do some consulting work after we "retire," so we'll need to factor in the earnings test. Do you know if benefits withheld because of the earnings test are permanently lost or if they're added back somehow after reaching FRA?
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Good question about the earnings test! Benefits withheld due to the earnings test are NOT permanently lost. Once you reach FRA, Social Security recalculates your benefit amount to credit you for months when benefits were withheld. Your monthly benefit amount increases to account for those months you didn't receive benefits.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•That's a relief! So many nuances to understand with Social Security. I appreciate everyone's insights - you've given us several approaches to consider. I think we'll need to run some numbers based on our specific financial situation and life expectancies to determine our optimal strategy.
0 coins