Can I claim spousal Social Security at 62 when my husband (64) isn't collecting yet?
I'm trying to figure out if I can start collecting spousal benefits now at age 62 while my husband waits until his full retirement age (67). He's 64 now and wants to delay his benefits to maximize his monthly amount. My own Social Security benefit would only be about $750 per month if I wait until my FRA, but only $530 if I take it now at 62. Meanwhile, half of his benefit would give me around $1,250. Would I actually be allowed to collect on his record before he files? We'd be much better off financially if I could draw the higher spousal amount now rather than taking my tiny benefit. Has anyone successfully done this? The SSA website is confusing me on this point.
19 comments
Jay Lincoln
Unfortunately, you cannot receive spousal benefits until your husband actually files for his own retirement benefits. This is one of the most misunderstood Social Security rules. Under current law (after rule changes in 2015), you cannot claim spousal benefits while your husband delays his claim - he must be receiving benefits for you to receive a spousal benefit. Your options are: 1) Take your own reduced benefit now at 62 and when he files at 67, you'll get the difference to bring you up to the reduced spousal amount, or 2) Wait until he files and then apply for spousal benefits. But waiting doesn't make much sense in your case given the small benefit amount.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Oh that's really disappointing! So I'd only get my tiny $530 for 3 years until he files? And then what happens exactly - would my payment automatically increase to the spousal amount? Would that spousal amount still be reduced because I started benefits at 62?
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
This is exactly what happened to my sister last year. She ended up taking her own tiny benefit at 62 ($640) because her husband was delaying until 70! The Social Security rep told her that once her husband files, she'll automatically be evaluated for the spousal benefit and will receive whichever is higher. But yes, because she took benefits early, her spousal amount will be permanently reduced too.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Thanks for sharing your sister's experience. Did she have any regrets about filing early? I'm worried about taking the reduction but waiting 5 years just doesn't make financial sense with such a small benefit amount.
0 coins
Marcus Williams
just fyi the rules changed few yrs ago... used to be able to do what ur asking but not anymore!! got burned by this myself...
0 coins
Lily Young
Have you considered whether your husband should file and suspend his benefits? I think that might be a strategy that could help in your situation.
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
•That strategy (file and suspend) was eliminated in 2016 with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Unfortunately it's no longer an option for couples. I've seen many clients disappointed to learn this, as it was a very valuable strategy. Under current rules, the husband must actually be receiving benefits for the spouse to collect on his record.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
This is a common situation and you've got a few things to consider. If you take your own benefit at 62, it will be permanently reduced to about 70% of your full retirement age benefit. When your husband files at 67, you'll get a spousal boost, but that amount will also be reduced because you claimed early. At that point, your total payment will be your reduced benefit PLUS the difference to get you to the reduced spousal level (about 35% of his FRA amount instead of 50%). One thing to calculate: take your $530/month for 5 years (about $31,800) versus waiting and getting a higher amount but missing those 5 years of payments. Often, it takes 12+ years to break even when waiting. Given your small benefit amount, taking it early is often mathematically advantageous.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Thank you for breaking down the math! So I'd get approximately 35% of his benefit instead of 50% because I'm claiming at 62, even though I'd be 67 when he actually files? That reduction seems unfair, but I guess those are the rules.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
EXACTLY the same boat!!! My husband is 63 and waiting til 70, I'm 62 with a tiny benefit ($640). I called SSA 8 TIMES trying to get answers about this and kept getting disconnected or waiting for hours!!! Most frustrating experience of my life. Finally got someone who explained I can't get spousal until he files, period. So I just took my tiny check now because waiting makes ZERO sense financially. The system is SO UNFAIR to spouses who raised kids instead of working.
0 coins
Justin Chang
•I was just going to recommend Claimyr for anyone having trouble reaching SSA by phone. After trying for weeks to get through on my own about a similar spousal benefits question, I used claimyr.com and had an agent on the phone in under 20 minutes. They have a demo video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Saved me so much frustration - especially when dealing with these complicated spousal rules that the website doesn't explain clearly.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
•Where was this a month ago when I needed it?! Bookmarking for next time because I'm SURE I'll have more questions as I navigate this mess.
0 coins
Lily Young
My wife just went through this exact dilemma! She decided to take her own benefit early and we calculated it would take about 14 years to break even if she had waited. Are you still working? Remember the earnings limit if you take benefits before FRA.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•I'm only working part-time, making about $14,000 a year, so I should be under the earnings limit. I think I'm going to follow your wife's approach and file for my own benefit now. Thanks for the reminder about the earnings limit though!
0 coins
Marcus Williams
my neighbor said u can file a restricted application for just spousal and keep ur own benefit growing, maybe ask about that?
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
•That's outdated information. Restricted applications are only available to people born on or before January 1, 1954. Anyone born after that date cannot file a restricted application. Additionally, as I mentioned above, the spouse must be collecting their own benefit before spousal benefits can be paid.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
Based on your situation, here's a clearer picture of what happens: 1. If you claim at 62, your own benefit is reduced to $530. 2. When your husband files at 67, your spousal benefit would be calculated as the difference between your reduced benefit and the reduced spousal amount. 3. The spousal benefit is reduced because YOU claimed early, not because of WHEN he files. 4. The reduction is permanent. For most people with small benefits, claiming early still makes mathematical sense despite the reduction. You'd need to live well into your 80s for delayed filing to pay off financially in your specific situation.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Thank you for explaining so clearly! I think I'm going to go ahead and file for my own benefits now. Five years of payments now seems more valuable than a slightly higher amount later, especially since the difference in my case is relatively small.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
One last thing to consider - even though your husband is delaying until 67, you might want to discuss if it makes sense for him to file earlier to enable your spousal benefits, especially if your family longevity isn't exceptional. Sometimes the combined strategy works better when one spouse has a very small benefit compared to the other. You might run the numbers both ways to see which gives you more total household income over time.
0 coins