< Back to Social Security Administration

Can my older husband claim 50% of my Social Security at FRA while delaying his own benefits until 70?

I'm a bit confused about spousal benefits and how they work with delayed retirement credits. I'm 66 (reached my full retirement age) and currently receiving $2,124 monthly from Social Security. My husband is 67, so he's also past his FRA, but he hasn't filed for his benefits yet because he wants to wait until 70 to maximize his monthly amount. Someone at church mentioned that he might be able to collect 50% of my benefit while still letting his own benefit grow until he's 70. Is this true? Can he really receive half of my benefit now without triggering his own retirement benefit? We're trying to maximize our combined lifetime benefits since his are substantially higher than mine. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Keisha Jackson

•

Unfortunately, your friend at church is misinformed. The strategy you're describing (called "file and restrict" or sometimes "restricted application") is no longer available for most people due to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. To be eligible for that strategy, your husband would need to have been born before January 2, 1954. Since your husband was born after that date (he'd be 67 now, so born around 1958), he can't file for only spousal benefits while letting his own benefit grow. When he files for any benefit now, he'll be deemed to be filing for all benefits he's eligible for, and will receive whichever is higher - his own or the spousal benefit (which is unlikely to be higher).

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Oh, that's disappointing to hear! I was hoping this would be a good strategy for us. So basically, there's no way for him to get any benefits now without triggering his own retirement benefit? He'd just have to wait until 70 with nothing in the meantime?

0 coins

Paolo Moretti

•

This is WRONG advice!! My brother in law is doing EXACTLY what ur husband wants to do RIGHT NOW. He gets half his wife's check and is waiting til 70 for his own bigger check. SSA allowed it no problem!!! Go in person to ur local offic and ask for this specificly.

0 coins

Keisha Jackson

•

I need to respectfully correct this. Your brother-in-law must have been born before January 2, 1954 to qualify for this strategy. The rules changed with the 2015 Bipartisan Budget Act. If he's doing this now and was born after that date, there's either a misunderstanding about what's happening with his benefits, or possibly an error in how his benefits were processed.

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

The first response is correct. The "file and restrict" strategy was eliminated for people born on or after January 2, 1954. Since your husband is 67 now in 2025, he was born around 1957-1958, which means he cannot use this strategy. He has two options: 1. Continue waiting until 70 to maximize his own benefit (which grows by 8% per year after FRA) 2. File now for his own benefit, but this would mean giving up those delayed retirement credits If his benefit at FRA is significantly higher than yours, and you both have normal life expectancies, waiting until 70 is often the mathematically optimal choice, especially since his higher benefit would become your survivor benefit if he passes away before you.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Thank you for explaining this so clearly. We've been planning based on him waiting until 70 since his benefit would be substantially higher than mine. I guess we'll stick with that plan, even though it would have been nice to get some income for him in the meantime. Is there anything else we should be considering in our situation?

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

my sister had the same question last year and spend 3 WEEKS trying to get someone on the phone at SSA!!! kept getting busy signals and disconnected. complete nightmare.

0 coins

I had the same frustrating experience trying to get answers about my spousal benefits. After multiple failed attempts calling SSA, I found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real SSA agent in under 20 minutes. There's a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Saved me days of redial frustration, and I got a definitive answer on my spousal benefit question directly from SSA. For complicated questions like this one, talking directly to SSA is really the only way to get personalized accurate information.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

I'm in almost the exact same situation except I'm the husband! Born in 1958, and wanted to do what you're describing. When I went to the SSA office in person, they confirmed what others are saying here - those of us born after Jan 1, 1954 can't do the restricted application anymore. It stinks because my friend who's just 4 years older could do it, but we miss out. The government keeps changing the rules on us!!

0 coins

Javier Gomez

•

Yeah its crazy how they keep moving the goal posts on us!! My dad got to do this strategy but I cant eventhough we both paid in the same amount of years. How is that fair??

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

One important consideration: while your husband can't get spousal benefits while delaying his own, you should evaluate whether waiting to 70 is truly optimal in your specific situation. Factors to consider: 1. Health status and family longevity 2. Your need for income now vs. later 3. Other retirement assets you can draw from during the delay period 4. Tax implications of different claiming strategies For many couples, having the higher earner wait until 70 is mathematically optimal because: - It maximizes the higher benefit amount - It maximizes the survivor benefit (when one spouse dies, the surviving spouse keeps the higher of the two benefits) However, this isn't universally true for everyone's situation.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

This is helpful perspective. My husband is in excellent health with longevity in his family (his parents lived to 92 and 97), so waiting seems to make sense for us. We have some savings and I'm still working part-time, so we're managing financially. I just wanted to make sure we weren't missing out on benefits we could be receiving.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

Dont listen to all these "experts"!!! call SSA yourself...my neighbor thought she couldn't get something but then she called and actually qualified! the rules are super complicated and everybody's situation is different

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

You're right that everyone should verify their specific situation with SSA. However, the restricted application rule change is well-documented in the Social Security regulations. It specifically affects anyone born on or after January 2, 1954. This isn't a gray area in the rules, but definitely contacting SSA directly is always good advice for personalized information.

0 coins

Javier Gomez

•

I remember when they changed this rule in 2015...it was part of that budget bill thing. Caught a lot of us off guard who were planning this exact strategy! I missed the cutoff by 9 months and it cost me thousands. So frustrating.

0 coins

Paolo Moretti

•

wait wait wait i think you guys are cofusing SSA rules. isnt there still something he can do with a 'deemed filing' exception? My friend did something like that recently. Maybe ask about that specificaly?

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

You're thinking of the deemed filing changes that were also part of the 2015 law. Before that change, deemed filing only applied before FRA. After the change, it applies at any age for people born on or after January 2, 1954. So unfortunately, there's no deemed filing exception that would help in this case - it's actually the deemed filing rule itself that prevents the strategy the original poster was asking about.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Thank you all for your helpful responses! It seems clear now that my husband can't collect on my record while delaying his own benefits since he was born after January 1954. We'll stick with our plan to have him wait until 70 to maximize his benefit (and my potential survivor benefit). I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain this - Social Security rules can be so confusing!

0 coins

Keisha Jackson

•

You're making a wise choice. Since your husband is already 67, he only has 3 more years of waiting, and each year increases his benefit by 8%. That higher amount will last for his lifetime and potentially yours too (as a survivor benefit if he predeceases you), so the long-term gain is substantial. Best wishes with your retirement planning!

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,793 users helped today