

Ask the community...
Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact situation last year! I was 61 and divorced, and the SSA office was incredibly helpful with explaining all my options. They walked me through the divorced spouse benefit calculations and showed me exactly when it would make sense to claim vs. wait. One thing I learned that wasn't obvious - you can actually claim divorced spouse benefits at 62 even if your ex-spouse hasn't filed for their own benefits yet, as long as you've been divorced for at least 2 years. The in-person appointment was definitely worth it because they ran multiple scenarios and printed out a personalized benefit estimate sheet I could take home. Don't worry about the rumors - these appointments aren't going anywhere, especially for complex benefit decisions like yours!
This is so helpful to hear from someone who went through the same situation! I had no idea about the 2-year divorce rule for claiming benefits even if my ex hasn't filed yet - that's definitely something I'll ask about at my appointment. It sounds like the personalized benefit estimate sheet would be really valuable to have. Thanks for sharing your experience and reassuring me that these appointments will continue!
As someone new to this community, I want to thank everyone for sharing such helpful information! I'm approaching retirement age myself and had similar concerns about SSA services. It's really reassuring to hear from multiple people with direct experience that in-person appointments are continuing and even expanding. The detailed advice about what documents to bring and specific questions to ask is incredibly valuable. I'm bookmarking this thread for when I need to schedule my own appointment. It's great to see a community where people share practical, real-world experience rather than just speculation or rumors.
Welcome to the community! I'm also relatively new here and have been amazed by how knowledgeable and helpful everyone is. As someone who's still figuring out all the Social Security complexities, I really appreciate when experienced members share their real experiences like this. It makes such a difference to hear from people who have actually been through the process rather than just reading generic information online. Thanks for acknowledging how valuable this discussion has been - I feel much more confident about my upcoming appointment now!
Just wanted to add - if you're worried about the application process, SSA also has a retirement estimator tool on their website that can give you a rough idea of your benefit amounts at different claiming ages before you actually apply. It's at ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/estimator.html. Really helpful for planning! Also, once you do apply online, you'll get a receipt number - save that! You can use it to check the status of your application if needed.
This is such great advice! I had no idea there was an estimator tool. I'm going to play around with that first before I make any decisions about when to file. Having that receipt number tip is really helpful too - I'm the type of person who would definitely lose track of that information if I didn't know to save it ahead of time. Thank you!
As someone who just went through this process last year, I'd highly recommend taking your time to research all your options before applying at 62. The online application at ssa.gov is definitely legitimate and secure, but the financial implications of claiming early are permanent. I used the benefit estimator tool mentioned by others and was shocked at how much I'd be giving up by claiming at 62 vs waiting until my full retirement age. Also, if you're married and your husband is already collecting, definitely explore spousal benefits - sometimes that can be a better strategy than claiming on your own record right away. The SSA website has some great calculators that can help you run different scenarios. Good luck with whatever you decide!
I'm a case worker who's dealt with these SSI/DAC interaction issues many times. Based on your description, SSA definitely made an error by not including the allocation for your 12-year-old son. Here's what you should do immediately: 1. Call SSA and request an "informal conference" - this is faster than a formal reconsideration 2. Specifically state: "You failed to apply the ineligible child allocation for my 12-year-old son in the deeming calculation" 3. Have your son's birth certificate and proof he lives with you ready 4. Request continuation of benefits during the review (you have 10 days from the notice date) The math should be: Your DAC ($1640) - $20 general exclusion - $522 ineligible child allocation = $1098 subject to deeming, not the full amount they're currently using. This error could be costing you around $185/month in your daughter's SSI. Don't let them brush you off - this is a clear calculation error on their part.
This is exactly what I needed to hear from someone who works with these cases! Thank you for breaking down the specific steps and terminology. I had no idea about requesting an "informal conference" - that sounds much faster than going through a full reconsideration process. The $185/month difference you calculated makes perfect sense and shows just how significant this error is for our family budget. I'm calling first thing tomorrow morning with your exact wording about the failed ineligible child allocation. Really appreciate the professional insight!
This is such a common mistake by SSA! I went through the exact same thing when I started receiving DAC benefits and my younger sister was on SSI. They completely overlooked the allocation for my non-disabled brother who was living with us. Here's what worked for me: I called the 1-800 number first thing in the morning (around 8 AM seems to be the best time to get through) and immediately asked to speak with someone about a "deeming calculation error involving missing ineligible child allocation." Using those specific terms seemed to help get me transferred to someone who actually understood the issue instead of getting bounced around. The rep was able to see the error right away once I explained it, and they corrected it within about 2 weeks. I also got back pay for the months they had calculated it wrong. Make sure you emphasize that this is a calculation error, not a change in circumstances - that helped move things along faster in my case. Don't give up if the first person you talk to doesn't understand. I had to call back twice before I got someone who knew what they were talking about. Good luck!
btw if u really need the info before the 1099 comes u can calculate it yourself... just look at the deposit amount in his bank account, that's what my tax guy told us to do last year when we were in the same boat
While you can use the payment amount as an estimate, I would caution against filing taxes using only the bank deposit information. The SSA-1099 might include other adjustments or withholdings that aren't obvious from the payment amount alone. It's best to wait for the official form to ensure accuracy.
Welcome to the SSA community! I went through this exact situation with my father-in-law two years ago. Since your husband's first payment was in December 2024, he will definitely receive a SSA-1099 for that tax year. The key things to remember: 1) New beneficiaries are often processed in the final batch, so expect it by mid-February at the latest, 2) It will show up under "Replacement Documents" in his mySocialSecurity portal once available, and 3) The SSA will also mail a paper copy to your address on file. Don't stress too much - this delay is completely normal for December starters. The amount on the 1099 should match exactly what was deposited into his account that month.
Thank you for the warm welcome and detailed explanation! It's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this exact situation. I feel much better knowing that the delay is normal for December starters. We'll keep checking the portal over the next few weeks and won't panic if it takes until mid-February. Really appreciate all the community support here - you've all been so helpful!
Cynthia Love
One aspect that hasn't been mentioned is that tax debt can also affect your Medicare premiums. If you're enrolling in Medicare at the same time as starting Social Security at 70, be aware that unpaid tax debt can sometimes trigger issues with your Medicare enrollment if the IRS has filed liens. Additionally, if your payment plan with the IRS requires substantial monthly payments, this could impact which Medicare supplemental plans you can afford. I recommend speaking with both the IRS and a Medicare counselor (SHIP programs offer free Medicare counseling in every state) to understand how these systems might interact in your specific situation.
0 coins
Manny Lark
•Oh wow, I hadn't even considered the Medicare angle. I enrolled in Medicare at 65 but haven't had to deal with supplemental plans yet because I was still on my employer's insurance until recently. This is getting so complicated!
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
I went through something similar a few years ago, though my debt was smaller (about $25K). Here's what I learned from experience: 1. The IRS will send you several notices before they start taking from your Social Security - you won't wake up one day to find your check reduced without warning. 2. When I finally called them (after months of procrastinating like you), they were actually willing to work with me. I set up a payment plan for $150/month, which prevented any garnishment of my benefits. 3. The key thing is to contact them BEFORE your benefits start in September. Once the levy begins, it's much harder to stop or reduce. 4. Ask specifically about "Currently Not Collectible" status - if your only income will be Social Security and a small pension, you might qualify. This essentially puts your case on hold if paying would create financial hardship. Don't make the same mistake I did by waiting and hoping it would go away. The stress of dealing with it is actually much worse than the phone call itself. You've made a smart decision waiting until 70 for maximum benefits - now protect that decision by handling the tax situation proactively.
0 coins