< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security claim timing regrets? Took SS at 62 vs waiting until 70 - need advice from seniors

I'm really struggling with the decision about when to start my Social Security benefits. I just turned 65 and am trying to decide whether to claim now, wait until my FRA (which is 66 and 8 months), or hold out until 70 for maximum benefits. My monthly benefit would be around $1,950 now, $2,600 at FRA, or about $3,380 if I wait until 70. I've heard so many different opinions from financial advisors, but I'd rather hear from actual retirees. For those who started collecting early (62-65), do you regret not waiting? And those who waited until FRA or 70, was it worth it? Some context: I'm still working part-time but could fully retire now if I wanted to. I have about $420,000 in retirement savings and a small pension of $1,100/month. My health is generally good (parents lived to late 80s), and I'm single with no children. I'm really torn between taking benefits now and enjoying the money versus waiting for a larger monthly check later. Would appreciate hearing about your real-life experiences rather than theoretical break-even calculations!

I claimed at 62 (now 74) and absolutely zero regrets. My monthly check was $1,430 instead of $2,510 had I waited until 70, but I've already collected $172,000 over these 12 years! I invested about 30% of those early benefits, which has grown nicely. My philosophy was always "bird in hand" - nobody knows how long we have, and I'd rather enjoy the money when I'm younger and healthier. Break-even calculations say I'd come out ahead around age 82-83 if I'd waited, but the quality of life I've enjoyed these past 12 years means more than a theoretical future benefit.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Thank you for sharing! I'm curious - did you continue working after filing at 62? I'm worried about the earnings limit since I'm still working part-time.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

This is a deeply personal decision that depends on multiple factors. As a financial planner who specializes in retirement income strategies, I'll offer some technical considerations: 1. Longevity - The longer you live past 82-84 (approximate break-even age), the more total lifetime benefits you'll receive by waiting. 2. Earnings test - If working before FRA, benefits are reduced $1 for every $2 earned above $22,320 (2025 limit). Those reductions aren't lost forever - they're recalculated at FRA. 3. Survivor benefits - If married, waiting increases potential survivor benefits for your spouse. 4. Tax considerations - Early SS can create tax issues if you have significant other income or Required Minimum Distributions. One strategy to consider: claim at FRA and use the retroactive lump sum option if you need funds unexpectedly (can get up to 6 months of past benefits).

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

my bro waited till 70 and died at 72!!!! only got 2 years of checks. what a waste, coulda had 8 YEARS of enjoying that money. you never know when your time is up!!!

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

I started taking mine at 64 and kinda regret it now. Im 69 now and those checks would be about $900 more per month if I waited till 70!!! That's a BIG difference when your on fixed income. Sure I got 6 yrs of smaller checks but now im stuck with this amount for life. And with inflation these days, the bigger check woulda been nice. My advise is if you can afford to wait DO IT.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

This is exactly what I worry about - if I live into my 90s like my grandmother did, that's potentially 25+ years of reduced benefits. But if I only make it to 75 like my father... then I'd have missed out on a decade of payments. Such a gamble!

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

I waited until 70 and so glad I did! I'm 78 now and that bigger monthly check (almost $1,100 more than if I'd taken at FRA) gives me so much peace of mind. I was fortunate to have enough savings to bridge the gap those last few years, so your situation may be different. My only unexpected issue was Medicare enrollment - you still need to sign up at 65 for Medicare even if delaying SS benefits! I missed that detail and paid higher premiums for a while. Don't make that mistake!

0 coins

I second this! Delayed until 70 and now at 82, I'm way ahead compared to taking early. My sister took hers at 62 and now she's struggling because inflation has eroded her smaller benefit. Plus the COLA increases are based on your benefit amount, so larger check = larger raises each year.

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

took mine early and it was GREAT! i say take the $$ now and enjoy life! we could all die tomorrow, who knows?? all those calculations assume u will live to be 90 but what if u dont?? my husband waited to file til 66 and had a stroke 8 months later and couldn't even enjoy the money. so sad......don't waste your good years being poor just to be rich when your to old to have fun!!!

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

I'm so sorry about your husband. That's heartbreaking and definitely gives me perspective. I do wonder how much I'd truly be able to enjoy those extra funds in my 80s versus having more flexibility now.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

has anyone tried using the ssa.gov calculators? i tried but the website kept crashing when i was trying to check my future benefits. spent 3 days trying to get through to someone at social security and its IMPOSSIBLE!!! they never answer!!

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

I gave up trying to call SSA after being on hold for 2+ hours multiple times. A friend told me about this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that gets you through to a Social Security agent quickly. There's a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. It really helped me get my benefit questions answered without the endless waiting. Might be worth checking out if you're still trying to get through.

0 coins

What everyone forgets about is TAXES! My situation: claimed at 62, but with my pension and required minimum distributions starting at 73, 85% of my SS gets taxed. If I'd waited, would have depleted more of my IRAs before starting SS and ended up with less taxable income later. Something to think about!

0 coins

This is an excellent point about tax planning. The tax implications vary significantly based on your overall income sources and timing. For someone with substantial qualified retirement accounts (401k/IRA), there can be advantages to either claiming early OR delaying, depending on your withdrawal strategy. This is where a tax professional's input is invaluable.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

My wife claimed at 62 and I waited until 70. We did this strategically - her early benefit provided some income while I let mine grow, and now she'll get my higher survivor benefit if I die first (which is likely since women typically outlive men). Something to consider if you're married - coordinating two claiming strategies can make a huge difference.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Thanks for sharing, but I'm single so survivor benefits aren't relevant for my situation. It's interesting how different the calculus is for married couples versus singles like me.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

Anybody check the current cost-of-living adjustments? The 2025 COLA is 2.5% which isn't keeping up with my actual expenses. If you're delaying benefits thinking inflation protection is great, just know the official COLA and real-life inflation aren't always aligned. Something else to factor in...

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

thats the TRUTH!! my meds went up 17% this year alone but ss only went up 2.5%!!! whos kidding who????

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

Sometimes I think all this overthinking about when to file is just silly. Just do what feels right and stop worrying! Life's too short for all these calculations. I flipped a coin and filed at 65. LOL!

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Haha, I wish I could be that carefree about it! But we're talking about potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars difference over a lifetime, so I feel like I should at least try to make an informed decision. But I do appreciate the perspective - sometimes we can get so caught up in optimizing that we forget to just live.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

One last strategy to consider: If you're still working part-time and don't urgently need the money, you might file a restricted application for just spousal benefits (if eligible) while letting your own retirement benefit grow until 70. This option is only available to people born before Jan 2, 1954, but it's worth checking if you qualify. Also, remember that delaying benefits acts as a form of longevity insurance. The biggest financial risk for many retirees isn't running out of money in their 70s - it's running out in their 90s when healthcare costs typically increase dramatically.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

I appreciate the advice, but I'm not eligible for spousal benefits as I've never been married. Your point about longevity insurance is compelling though. That's what keeps me leaning toward waiting - the protection against outliving my savings in very old age.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,611 users helped today