< Back to Social Security Administration

Should I take Social Security early at 62 or wait for full benefits? Torn about reduced payments vs. time to enjoy retirement

I'm struggling with the big Social Security decision - take reduced benefits at 62 or wait until my FRA (67). Several friends are insisting I should claim as early as possible. Their argument is 'why wait and risk dying before getting back what you paid in?' and 'better to have that money now to enjoy life while you're still healthy.' In my situation, I don't have any other retirement savings to fall back on (had to use what little I had during the pandemic). My monthly benefit would be about $1,450 at 62 versus $2,100 at full retirement age. I'm still working part-time making around $14,000/year, but the job is physically demanding and I'm not sure how much longer my body can handle it. Health is okay right now, but my parents both passed in their early 70s. No spouse or dependents to consider. What's the smarter play here? Anyone been faced with this same dilemma?

Zara Rashid

•

This is one of the most common questions in retirement planning, and there's no one-size-fits-all answer. Taking benefits at 62 means a permanent 30% reduction from your full retirement age benefit. The math works out that you'll come out ahead by claiming early if you don't live past around 80-82, depending on your specific situation. Since you're still working, be aware of the earnings test. In 2025, if you make more than $22,320 while claiming before FRA, SSA will withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above that limit. The withheld benefits aren't lost forever - they'll be added back after you reach FRA, but it can significantly reduce your monthly checks now. With no other retirement savings, you might want to consider working a few more years if possible, even at a less physically demanding job, and delaying benefits until at least your FRA. Each year you delay after FRA until 70 adds 8% to your benefit - that's guaranteed income for life.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Thanks for explaining the earnings test - I had no idea they'd withhold benefits if I'm still working! That $22,320 threshold isn't much higher than what I'm making now, so I guess I'd lose some of those early benefits anyway. The 30% reduction for life sounds scary when I have no other income sources. Are there any options for less physical jobs that might pay decent for someone in their 60s?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

take it early!! my hubby waited til 66 to claim and then dropped dead 8 months later. all those years of higher payments he could have had from 62-66 just GONE POOF. now i get survivors benefits but we missed out on like 4 yrs of him getting SS checks. nobody knows when their time is up.....bird in hand!!!!!

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I'm so sorry about your husband. Stories like yours are exactly why I'm leaning toward taking it at 62. My health is good now but who knows about tomorrow? I've worked hard my whole life paying into the system, and the thought of never getting to enjoy any of it is depressing.

0 coins

Mateo Hernandez

•

The answer depends entirely on your personal circumstances. Looking at your situation: 1. No other retirement savings - this is a major factor that leans toward waiting if you possibly can 2. Family history - parents passing in early 70s suggests claiming earlier might make sense 3. Still working - this actually complicates early filing due to the earnings limit Have you calculated your break-even age? That's the age where waiting to claim would start paying off more than claiming early. For most people it's somewhere in their early 80s. Also, since you mention having no retirement funds, have you checked if you might qualify for SSI in addition to retirement benefits? If your resources and income are low enough, you might be eligible for both programs to boost your monthly income.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

I hadn't thought about the break-even calculation. If it's around 80-82, that's a tough one since my parents didn't make it that far, but I've always been healthier than they were (they both smoked, I never have). I'm starting to think waiting might be smarter, especially learning about that earnings test. I did check on SSI once and was told I had too many assets (I own my mobile home outright), but maybe I should look into it again.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

YOUR WORKING STATUS CHANGES EVERYTHING!!! Don't listen to anyone telling you to take it early while still working at your income level! The earnings test will SLASH your benefits! I made this EXACT mistake. Started at 62 while still working part-time ($18k/year), and got a nasty surprise when my $1,350 monthly benefit got reduced to only $575 after the earnings limit deduction. The SSA took back $1 for every $2 I earned over the limit. Total disaster!! Either stop working completely, or wait until at least your full retirement age when the earnings test goes away. Wish someone had told ME this before I filed early.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

the SSA doesnt explain this stuff to anyone!!!! they should be REQQUIRED to tell people this before they file!!! ridicolous how they keep ppl in the dark about there own money!

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

Hey there, I was in almost your exact situation 3 years ago. I ended up splitting the difference - worked until 65 (found a less physical job as a part-time receptionist), then took my benefits 2 years early. This gave me a smaller reduction (about 13.3% instead of 30%) and let me get out of physically demanding work. Have you looked into whether you qualify for any other programs? Sometimes people don't realize they might qualify for additional assistance. Also, if your job is truly physical and taking a toll, you might want to talk to a doctor about whether you'd qualify for SSDI instead - that would give you your full benefit amount rather than a reduced retirement benefit.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

The receptionist idea is interesting - I hadn't thought about that kind of work. Mind if I ask how you found that job? As for SSDI, I don't think I'd qualify since I can still work, just getting more tired and sore each year. The idea of splitting the difference makes a lot of sense though - less reduction but still get to stop the physical labor sooner.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

If ur trying to reach the SSA to discuss your options good luck lol... i spent 3 weeks calling about my own retirement questions and couldnt get thru. Busy signals, disconnects, 4 hour holds. Finally used this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me thru to a agent in 20 mins. They have a video showing how it works https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with ran calculations for me at different ages and it REALLY helped me decide. Worth talking to them directly for your situation since you have the work income complication.

0 coins

Mateo Hernandez

•

That's actually good advice. Getting personalized calculations from an SSA representative is the best way to make an informed decision in a case like this with multiple factors (continued work income, health concerns, no other retirement funds). SSA has access to your complete earnings record and can give you exact figures for different claiming ages.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Thanks, I'll check this out. I tried calling SSA last month and gave up after sitting on hold for over an hour. Would definitely help to get actual numbers for my specific situation.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I took mine early and have zero regrets. For me life isnt about maximizing every dollar, its about TIME. I'd rather have less money for more years of freedom than more money but fewer years to enjoy it. Just my 2 cents :

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

But did you keep working? That's the critical factor here! If you fully retired when taking benefits at 62, that's completely different from OP's situation where they'd get hit with the earnings test penalties.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

Just to add to my earlier comment: many people don't realize there's a middle ground. You don't have to claim at either 62 or your full retirement age of 67. You can claim at any point in between. For instance, if you worked until 64 and then claimed, your reduction would only be about 20% instead of 30%. Or claim at 65 for roughly a 13.3% reduction. If your health is starting to make work difficult, but you're concerned about the lifetime reduction, this might be a good compromise. It also helps you avoid the worst of the earnings test issues if you plan to stop working completely at the time you claim.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

thats what my sister did! claimed at 64 and a half, was a good balance for her situation

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

One more consideration: have you looked into whether you might qualify for any needs-based assistance programs that could help bridge the gap until you reach your full retirement age? Things like SNAP benefits (food stamps), energy assistance programs, etc. might help you manage if you decide to stop working before claiming Social Security. Also, some states have additional supplemental programs for seniors with limited income. These resources could potentially help you delay claiming until at least 65 when Medicare kicks in, which would reduce your healthcare costs significantly compared to marketplace insurance before 65.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Good point about Medicare at 65. Healthcare costs are definitely a concern. I pay about $475/month for my marketplace insurance now, which is a huge chunk of my budget. Waiting until at least 65 to retire would make a big difference there. I'll look into the assistance programs you mentioned - thanks for the suggestion.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,731 users helped today