Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm in a complicated situation with my Social Security benefits. I was married to my first husband for 22 years before he passed away in 2018. I started receiving survivor benefits, but then remarried in 2020 (I was 58). That marriage unfortunately didn't work out, and we're finalizing our divorce next month. I've heard there are rules about claiming survivor benefits from a first spouse after a second marriage ends, but I'm confused about the timing. Do I need to be divorced for a certain period before I can reapply for my first husband's survivor benefits? Or can I apply immediately after the divorce is final? The benefits from my first husband were significantly higher than what I'd get on my own record. The SSA website is so confusing on this topic, and I can't get through on the phone. Any help would be appreciated!
My dad passed away about 4 months ago, and while going through his papers, my sister found his final Social Security retirement check that he never cashed (he was getting paper checks due to some banking issues). The check is for $1,875. We've submitted all the death certificate paperwork to SSA already, but I'm wondering how long we have to request this final check be reissued to his estate? The local office isn't answering calls, and when I tried the national number, I was on hold for 2+ hours before getting disconnected. Has anyone dealt with uncashed checks after a parent dies? Is there a specific time limit for this? I'm the executor of his estate and trying to tie up all the loose ends.
did anyone else notice they raised that death benefit to $325 starting in 2025? read it somewhere last week
That's incorrect information. The lump-sum death payment has been fixed at $255 since 1954 and there's currently no legislation that has been passed to increase it for 2025. There have been proposals to increase it over the years, but none have been enacted into law.
I'm going through something similar right now with my grandmother's estate. One thing I learned is that you should also check if your father had any direct deposit set up that might have been automatically returned to SSA when the bank account was closed after his death. Sometimes families don't realize there were additional payments that got sent back automatically. When you go to the SSA office, ask them to do a complete review of any payments made after the date you reported his death - there might be more than just that one paper check you found. Also, bring multiple copies of everything because they sometimes want to keep copies for their files.
I've been trying to figure out if the new WEP/GPO Fairness Act helps my situation. My husband passed away in 2023, just 3 weeks shy of reaching his Full Retirement Age. He hadn't filed for his SS benefits yet. I'm a retired public school teacher with a pension, and when I initially contacted Social Security after his death, the claims representative said I wouldn't qualify for survivor benefits because of GPO (Government Pension Offset). I was also told I couldn't receive child-in-care benefits for our children under 16, even though there was approximately $800 monthly available from the family maximum. What bothered me most was that the rep actually marked on my paperwork that I "chose not to apply" for survivor benefits due to GPO - but I HAD applied and was essentially rejected. Now with the Fairness Act passed, I've scheduled a phone appointment to apply properly for my survivor benefits. I'm 67 now, and I'm assuming I should qualify for the full amount my husband would have received plus maybe 6 months of retroactive benefits since this would technically be considered my first application (since the previous one was incorrectly processed). Does anyone know if I can now also receive the child-in-care benefits that were previously denied? Will I need to file a separate application specifically for those, or would they automatically be considered with my survivor application? My older son turns 18 this August, but my younger boy is still only 13.
Based on your situation, here's a calculation example to help you understand what to expect (approximate numbers): Let's say your husband's PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) would have been $2,500/month at his FRA. In 2025, the GPO offset will be reduced by 1/3, so instead of having your teacher pension fully offset your survivor benefits, only 2/3 of your pension would count against it. If your monthly teacher pension is $3,000, previously the GPO would have reduced your survivor benefit by $2,000 (2/3 of $3,000), leaving you with $500 in survivor benefits. With the first phase of reduction, the GPO offset would be approximately $1,333 (2/3 of the original offset), so you might receive around $1,167 in survivor benefits. For the child-in-care benefits, there's a separate calculation based on your husband's PIA and the family maximum, but these aren't subject to GPO. This is simplified, but hopefully helps you prepare for your appointment with realistic expectations.
Thank you for this example! That actually makes the phase-in much clearer to me. I think my husband's PIA would have been around $2,400, and my pension is about $2,800 monthly. So using your calculation method, I might expect around $933 in survivor benefits this year (after the first 1/3 reduction in the GPO offset). That's certainly better than nothing, which is what I've received so far.
I'm so sorry for your loss and the additional stress of dealing with the SSA bureaucracy during such a difficult time. As someone who has navigated similar issues with government benefits, I wanted to add a few practical tips for your upcoming appointment: First, consider recording the call (if legal in your state) or at least take detailed notes with timestamps. This can be crucial if you need to reference what was discussed later. Second, if the representative seems unfamiliar with the Fairness Act changes, you can reference Publication No. 05-10045 (the updated WEP/GPO fact sheet) and ask them to consult their Program Operations Manual System (POMS) for the most current guidance. Third, regarding the child-in-care benefits - these are paid at 75% of your husband's PIA and are NOT subject to GPO at all. So even before the Fairness Act, you should have been eligible for these benefits while caring for your 13-year-old. The fact that they denied this previously suggests the representative was misinformed. Finally, if you encounter resistance or confusion during your call, don't hesitate to end the call politely and try again with a different representative. Sometimes it takes a few tries to get someone who fully understands the current rules. You've got this! The Fairness Act was designed to help people in exactly your situation.
My mother just passed away on October 1st in her nursing home, and her Social Security payment ($2,105) was direct deposited on October 3rd as usual. I'm listed as a joint owner on her bank account and have POA for her finances, but I'm confused about what happens with this final payment. She was on Medicaid, has no estate to speak of, and I'm trying to do the right thing here. Do I need to return this payment to SSA? If they take it back automatically, can I file to get any portion of it? And am I eligible to apply for the lump-sum death benefit as her child? This is all new territory for me, and I want to handle her affairs properly while understanding what benefits might still be available.
Not exactly. The $255 death benefit can go to a surviving spouse who was living with the deceased, OR it can go to a surviving spouse or child who is eligible for certain benefits on the deceased's record. Also, if there's no eligible spouse or child, but someone paid the funeral expenses, they might be able to apply for reimbursement up to $255. The rules are a bit complicated, so it's best to ask SSA directly about your specific situation.
I was able to report my mother's death to Social Security today. They confirmed they'll be reclaiming the October payment. The agent also helped me apply for the lump sum death benefit since I paid for her funeral expenses. They said I'll receive a decision in about 30 days. Thanks to everyone for your guidance - it made this process much less confusing!
That's great you got through to them! How long did you have to wait on hold? When I had to call for my mom's benefits it took FOREVER.
I'm glad you were able to get through and take care of everything! It's such a relief when you can cross these difficult tasks off your list during an already stressful time. Hopefully the lump sum benefit comes through quickly for you. And don't worry too much about the reclaimed payment - it sounds like you handled everything exactly right by not touching those funds and reporting promptly.
I'm trying to make the right decision about when to claim Social Security. I'm 64 and the higher earner in our household (earned about $92,000 last year). I understand delaying until 70 would give me a larger benefit and eventually provide my wife with a higher survivor benefit if I pass before her. Here's the complicated part - my wife has been teaching for 22 years in a school district that doesn't participate in Social Security. Before teaching, she worked various jobs for about 12 years that DID pay into Social Security, so she has enough credits (40+) to qualify for her own SS benefit. Someone at my wife's retirement planning seminar mentioned something called a "windfall rule" that would reduce her benefits regardless of when I claim. Is this true? Will delaying my benefits until 70 actually help her survivor benefits, or will they get reduced anyway because of her teacher pension? I'm confused about whether this WEP or GPO (I think that's what they called it) would negate the advantage of me waiting. Can someone clarify how this works with teacher pensions from non-covered employment? Is it still worth me delaying to 70?
I called my wife's pension system today. Her projected pension after 24 years (when she plans to retire) will be about $3,850 monthly. So if I'm understanding correctly, the GPO reduction would be about $2,567 (2/3 of $3,850). My SS benefit at 70 would be around $3,940 vs. $2,950 if I claimed now at 64. So it looks like if I delay to 70, she would still get about $1,373 in survivor benefits after the GPO reduction. If I claim now, she'd only get about $383 after GPO. Does that math look right to everyone? Seems like delaying would still help her significantly in this case.
Your math is correct, and this is a perfect example of why personalized calculations matter. In your specific situation, delaying to 70 would give your wife about $990 more per month in survivor benefits after you pass ($1,373 vs $383). That's a significant difference that could greatly impact her financial security. Of course, you'll need to weigh this against your own needs, health outlook, and financial situation during the years you're delaying benefits. But from a pure survivor benefit perspective, the numbers make a strong case for delaying in your specific situation.
As a new member who's been researching this topic for my own family situation, I want to thank everyone for this incredibly detailed discussion. The math example that Camila provided really helps illustrate how these calculations work in practice. One thing I'd add for anyone reading this thread: make sure to also consider that your wife's own Social Security benefit (from her 12 years of covered employment) will likely be reduced by WEP when she starts collecting it. This is separate from the GPO impact on survivor benefits, but it's another piece of the puzzle that affects overall retirement planning. Also, I've found that many local SSA offices have staff who aren't fully versed in WEP/GPO calculations, so getting multiple opinions or using the online calculators on SSA.gov can be helpful to verify the numbers you're given. Your situation shows that even with these provisions, strategic timing decisions can still make a meaningful difference. The $990 monthly difference in survivor benefits you calculated is substantial over time.
Fatima Al-Sayed
Just to clarify a few points that have come up in this thread: 1. There is absolutely no waiting period after divorce to reclaim survivor benefits from a previous spouse. You can apply immediately once the divorce is final. 2. The rules are federal, not state-based. 3. You will not automatically receive back payments from the date of your divorce - benefits typically start from the month you apply, which is why applying promptly after divorce is important. 4. The COLA issue mentioned is correct - your benefit amount will be based on what you were receiving when you stopped getting benefits, without the COLAs that would have occurred during your remarriage. 5. Processing times vary, but 30-60 days is typical right now in 2025. And yes, having all documentation ready is crucial - final divorce decree, death certificate of your first husband, both marriage certificates, your ID, and Social Security card at minimum.
0 coins
Ella Cofer
I'm a widow who went through a similar situation about two years ago. One thing I'd add to all the great advice here is to make sure you understand exactly which benefit will be higher - your survivor benefit or your own retirement benefit when you reach full retirement age. In my case, my financial advisor helped me realize that while my survivor benefits were higher in the short term, my own retirement benefit would actually be higher if I waited until age 70 to claim it (due to delayed retirement credits). So I'm collecting survivor benefits now and plan to switch to my own record later. Since you mentioned your first husband's benefits were "significantly higher," this might not apply to your situation, but it's worth having SSA run the numbers for you when you meet with them. They can show you projections for both scenarios. Also, don't forget that once you're collecting survivor benefits again, you'll be eligible for Medicare at 65 based on those benefits if you're not already eligible through your own work record.
0 coins