Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is such an important topic to plan ahead for. I went through something similar with my husband a few years ago. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned much is the importance of understanding how survivor benefits work if your wife has her own Social Security record too. Since she's currently working and contributing to Social Security, she'll have her own benefit calculation when she reaches retirement age. The strategy many widows use is called "restrict and switch" - she could potentially claim the survivor benefit first (either at 60 with reduction or later at full amount), then switch to her own retirement benefit at 70 if it would be higher due to delayed retirement credits. Also, regarding that gap period before she turns 60 - I'd strongly recommend looking into increasing any life insurance you have specifically to cover those missing months of income. When my husband passed, I was 57 and that 3-year gap was financially devastating even though we thought we were prepared. The combination of funeral expenses, reduced household income, and having to wait for any Social Security help was overwhelming. One last tip: have her start tracking all of her work earnings and Social Security statements now. When the time comes to apply, having organized records of both your earnings histories will make the process much smoother.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful information about the "restrict and switch" strategy - I hadn't heard of that option before! It sounds like it could potentially maximize her benefits if her own Social Security record ends up being substantial by the time she reaches 70. Given that she's currently earning $34k annually and still has 8 years left before she turns 67, her own benefit could indeed grow significantly. Your point about increasing life insurance specifically for that gap period really resonates with me. We have some coverage, but I'm realizing it may not be adequate to replace the missing Social Security income for potentially 3+ years. I'm going to get quotes this week for additional term coverage to bridge that gap. The advice about tracking earnings and Social Security statements is also excellent - I'll help her set up a my Social Security account so we can monitor her projected benefits and make sure all her earnings are being recorded correctly. Having everything organized ahead of time will definitely reduce stress during what will already be a difficult period. Thank you for sharing your experience and these practical strategies. It's giving me a much clearer picture of how to properly prepare for this situation.

0 coins

I'm so glad you're thinking ahead about this - it shows how much you care about your wife's financial security. From reading everyone's experiences here, it's clear that the gap period between your passing and when she turns 60 is really the biggest challenge to prepare for. One thing I'd suggest is also looking into whether your wife might qualify for any pension survivor benefits through your work history, if you have any. Sometimes people focus so much on Social Security that they forget about other potential sources of survivor income. Also, since she's still working and building her own Social Security record, you might want to run some calculations to see what her own benefit would be at different claiming ages versus the survivor benefit. The my Social Security website has calculators that can help with this. Sometimes the math works out better to claim her own reduced benefit at 62 and then switch to survivor benefits later, depending on the amounts involved. The document preparation advice everyone's given is spot on. I'd also add that you should make sure she knows where all your important financial accounts are located and has access to them. When grief hits, even simple tasks become overwhelming, so having everything clearly organized and accessible will be a huge help.

0 coins

This is all such valuable information, thank you everyone for sharing your experiences and advice. As someone new to this community, I'm really impressed by how supportive and knowledgeable everyone is here. I'm actually in a similar situation - my husband is 72 and I'm 58, so I'm trying to learn as much as I can about what to expect. The point about pension survivor benefits is really important and something I hadn't considered. My husband has a small pension from his previous employer that I should probably look into. And the suggestion about running calculations comparing my own benefit versus survivor benefits at different ages is something I definitely need to do. One question for those who have been through this - did you find it helpful to meet with a financial advisor or Social Security specialist before the need arose? I'm wondering if getting professional guidance now while we have time to plan might be worth the investment, especially given all the different strategies and timing considerations involved.

0 coins

Just wanted to add one more thing that might help with your decision - you mentioned being 62 and planning to take benefits early. Have you considered whether you'll still be working? If you're planning to work while collecting Social Security before your full retirement age, you could hit the earnings test limit ($22,320 for 2024). If you earn more than that, they'll reduce your benefits by $1 for every $2 you earn over the limit. This applies to both your own retirement benefits AND any divorced spousal benefits you might receive. The earnings test goes away once you reach full retirement age, but it's something to factor into your timing decision. Also, when you do call SSA, ask them to run scenarios showing your benefit amounts at different claiming ages (62, full retirement age, and 70) so you can see the long-term impact of claiming early versus waiting. Sometimes seeing the actual dollar differences over your lifetime can help with the decision.

0 coins

Thanks for bringing up the earnings test! I hadn't fully considered that aspect. I was planning to work part-time for a few more years, probably earning around $15,000-18,000 annually, so it sounds like I'd be under the limit. But it's good to know this applies to both my retirement benefit AND any spousal top-up I might get. The idea of asking SSA to run scenarios at different claiming ages is really smart. I've been so focused on just getting something at 62 that I haven't actually calculated what waiting until my full retirement age (66 and 4 months) would mean in total dollars over my lifetime. Given that my ex's benefit is so much higher, maybe the survivor benefit calculation changes things enough that waiting could be worth it. Do you know if the earnings test also applies to survivor benefits when that time comes?

0 coins

Great question about survivor benefits and the earnings test! Yes, the earnings test does apply to survivor benefits if you're under full retirement age when you start collecting them. The same limits apply - for 2024 it's $22,320, and they reduce benefits by $1 for every $2 over that limit. However, here's something important to consider: survivor benefits have more flexible timing rules than retirement benefits. You can claim survivor benefits as early as age 60 (or 50 if disabled), but you might want to coordinate the timing strategically. Some people take their own reduced retirement benefit early, then switch to survivor benefits later, or vice versa depending on which strategy maximizes their lifetime benefits. Since your ex's benefit is significantly higher than yours, it might make sense to delay your own retirement benefit (letting it grow with delayed retirement credits) and potentially claim survivor benefits first when the time comes, if that occurs before you reach age 70. But this gets pretty complex and really depends on the specific timing and amounts involved. Definitely ask SSA to model different scenarios including survivor benefit timing when you call!

0 coins

I'm in a somewhat similar situation and found this thread really helpful! One thing I wanted to add is that you might want to double-check whether your ex-husband has already filed for benefits. If he has, you can apply for divorced spousal benefits immediately. But if he hasn't filed yet, you'll need to have been divorced for at least 2 years (which you definitely have been since 2001). Also, I learned the hard way that SSA doesn't always volunteer information about all the benefits you might be eligible for. When you call, specifically ask about "divorced spousal benefits" and "divorced survivor benefits" - don't just ask about "ex-spouse benefits" generally. The terminology matters and can help ensure you get complete information. One more tip: if you do decide to take your benefits at 62, make sure to ask SSA to put a note in your file about your interest in future divorced spousal and survivor benefits. This can help streamline the process when you're ready to apply for those additional benefits later.

0 coins

This is such valuable advice! I never would have thought about the specific terminology mattering when talking to SSA, but that makes total sense. I'll definitely ask specifically about "divorced spousal benefits" and "divorced survivor benefits" when I call. The tip about putting a note in my file is brilliant too - I can imagine how much easier it would be to apply later if there's already documentation of my interest and eligibility. Since you mentioned you're in a similar situation, did you end up finding out whether your ex had already filed? I'm curious how that process works - do they tell you right away when you apply, or is there some way to find out beforehand? Also, did you decide to take your benefits early or wait? I keep going back and forth on this decision, especially after reading about all the complexities with the RIB-LIM rule and how early claiming affects survivor benefits down the road.

0 coins

Just wanted to add a few more details that might help with your planning! When you apply, SSA will want to see proof that you're providing more than half support for the stepchildren. This could include things like receipts for their clothing, food, medical expenses, school supplies, etc. Keep good records of what you spend on them. Also, if either stepchild has any income from things like part-time jobs or Social Security survivor benefits from their biological father, that could affect their eligibility or benefit amounts. Even though you mentioned their father isn't in the picture, it's worth checking if they have any existing Social Security entitlements. One last tip - when you file at your local SSA office, ask specifically about protective filing dates. If there are any delays in processing the stepchildren's applications, you want to make sure their benefits start from the earliest possible date. Good luck with your retirement!

0 coins

Great summary of all the key points, Ava! One thing I'd add - make sure to ask SSA about applying for the stepchildren's benefits at the same time you file your retirement application. Sometimes people don't realize they need to specifically request benefits for dependents, and it can cause delays if you have to come back later. Also, since your wife is only 52, she won't be able to collect spousal benefits until she turns 62, but the good news is that won't affect your stepchildren's eligibility at all. The kids' benefits are completely separate from spousal benefits. Best of luck with your retirement planning!

0 coins

I'm new to this community and unfortunately experiencing the exact same situation with my 32-year-old son who has been on SSI since age 17 due to severe autism and intellectual disabilities. When I applied for his DAC benefits after starting my retirement last month, the SSA representative gave me the identical line about "updated procedures" and assured me that submitting medical records would actually delay the process. Reading through all these experiences has been incredibly eye-opening - it's clear that this isn't just poor training of individual representatives, but a systematic breakdown in how SSA is handling DAC applications for long-term SSI recipients. What really struck me is how confident these agents sound when providing information that's completely wrong. The representative I spoke with even told me I was "fortunate" to be applying during this period of "streamlined processing." I'm absolutely interested in joining the group complaint effort that several people have mentioned. The consistency of this misinformation across different offices and timeframes is compelling evidence of a widespread problem that needs administrative intervention. Based on the excellent professional guidance from @Natasha Kuznetsova and @Leo Simmons, I've already started gathering my son's medical records from before he turned 22. It's frustrating that we have to ignore official SSA advice and rely on community wisdom, but I'm grateful this resource exists. The potential transformation from SSI to DAC benefits would be life-changing for my son - not just financially, but the removal of asset restrictions and eventual Medicare coverage that could provide him with so much more security and independence. Thank you all for sharing your experiences and creating this supportive community. I'll definitely keep everyone updated on how my case progresses, and I hope together we can help prevent other families from going through this same frustrating ordeal.

0 coins

Welcome to the community! I'm so sorry you're dealing with this same frustrating situation with your son. As someone who's been following this thread, it's really alarming to see how many families are experiencing this identical pattern of misinformation from SSA representatives. Your experience with being told you were "fortunate" to be applying during this period of "streamlined processing" is almost word-for-word what several others have reported. It really demonstrates how systematic this problem has become - these aren't isolated incidents but a clear breakdown in training or communication within SSA. I'm definitely supportive of the group complaint effort too. With this many families documenting virtually identical experiences across different offices and timeframes, we have strong evidence of a widespread issue that needs to be addressed at the administrative level. Hopefully this could lead to better training for SSA staff and prevent future families from experiencing these same delays and stress. The professional insights from @Natasha Kuznetsova and @Leo Simmons about actual documentation requirements have been invaluable for all of us trying to navigate this process despite the incorrect official guidance. You re absolutely'doing the right thing by proactively gathering those medical records from before your son turned 22. The potential impact of DAC benefits really would be transformative - the higher payments, removal of asset limits, and eventual Medicare coverage could make such a difference in your son s independence'and quality of life. It makes these unnecessary delays even more heartbreaking when we know how much these benefits could help our children. This community has become such an important resource for supporting each other through this broken system. Please keep us all updated on your case progression!

0 coins

I'm new to this community but unfortunately going through the exact same situation with my 35-year-old daughter who has been on SSI since age 18 due to bipolar disorder and cognitive impairment. When I applied for her DAC benefits after starting my retirement six weeks ago, the SSA representative told me about these "new streamlined policies" that allow them to use existing SSI determinations without requiring additional medical documentation. The agent was so authoritative when explaining that medical records weren't needed and would actually "gum up the works" - I felt so relieved that the process would be simple! After reading through all these experiences, I'm now dreading the inevitable denial letter and have already started gathering medical records from before she turned 22. What's most shocking is how widespread and consistent this misinformation appears to be. The fact that families across different states and timeframes are receiving virtually identical incorrect guidance from SSA representatives clearly indicates a systematic training failure within the agency. I'm definitely interested in joining the group complaint effort that's been discussed throughout this thread. With so many documented cases of this exact pattern, we have compelling evidence of a problem that needs immediate administrative attention to prevent more families from experiencing these unnecessary delays. Thank you to everyone who shared professional insights about actual documentation requirements, especially @Natasha Kuznetsova and @Leo Simmons. It's disappointing that we have to ignore official SSA guidance and rely on community knowledge, but this information has been absolutely invaluable. The potential increase from SSI to DAC benefits would be transformative for my daughter's financial security and independence - the higher payments, removal of asset limits, and eventual Medicare coverage could change her entire quality of life. I'll keep fighting through this broken system and will definitely update everyone on my case progression.

0 coins

I just went through something very similar last month! The key thing to understand is that Social Security uses what's called a "dual entitlement" system. You're not getting two separate benefits - you're getting the higher of either your own benefit OR the spousal benefit calculation. When your own benefit increases (likely from those part-time earnings being added to your record), the system automatically recalculates to make sure you're still getting the correct total amount. The spousal portion isn't a fixed percentage - it's whatever additional amount is needed to bring you up to your full entitlement. So if you were entitled to, say, $1,500 total, and your own benefit went from $800 to $900, then your spousal add-on would decrease from $700 to $600 to keep your total at $1,500. This is exactly what should happen according to Social Security rules. The confusing part is how they present it on the statements, but mathematically it's working correctly. Your total benefit amount is what matters most!

0 coins

This dual entitlement explanation is really helpful! I think what was throwing me off was seeing the dollar amounts shift between the two categories on my statement, but now I understand it's just the system ensuring I get the correct total. It's actually pretty clever how it automatically rebalances. Thank you for breaking it down so clearly - the $1,500 example makes perfect sense!

0 coins

I experienced this exact same situation about 6 months ago and it really threw me for a loop initially! What you're seeing is actually a positive development - it means your work record has been updated to reflect those part-time earnings from your last 6 years of work. Here's what's happening: Social Security recalculates your benefit annually based on your highest 35 years of earnings. When those recent part-time years got factored into your calculation, it boosted your own Primary Insurance Amount (PIA). Since the spousal benefit formula ensures you get the higher of either your own benefit OR up to 50% of your spouse's PIA (both reduced for early claiming), the system automatically adjusted the split. Think of it like this - you have a "benefit ceiling" based on the spousal calculation. Your own benefit just got closer to that ceiling, so less spousal supplement is needed to reach your total entitled amount. The total staying the same confirms everything is working correctly. I'd recommend keeping your latest benefit statement for your records, and if you want peace of mind, you can always request a detailed benefit calculation from SSA. But based on what you've described, this sounds like a routine and correct adjustment!

0 coins

This is such a helpful perspective! I really appreciate you sharing your experience from 6 months ago. The "benefit ceiling" concept makes it so much clearer - I was thinking of it as two separate benefits when it's really one total benefit with different components that adjust to reach that ceiling. It's actually reassuring to know that my part-time work years are now contributing meaningfully to my record. I'll definitely keep this statement and may request that detailed calculation just to fully understand the numbers. Thank you for taking the time to explain this so thoroughly!

0 coins

Prev1...264265266267268...837Next