Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm completely frustrated with trying to get my delayed retirement credits added to my Social Security benefits. I waited until I was 68.5 before filing for retirement in April 2023, specifically to increase my monthly payment. The SSA rep assured me my DRCs would be automatically calculated and included in my benefit amount. Fast forward to now (September 2025) - still nothing! I've made at least 11 trips to my local office and called countless times. Each time they say "it's in the system" or "it should be fixed by next month," but nothing changes.In March, I submitted a Request for Reconsideration. The office manager said they'd send it to the "processing center" and an "algorithm would handle it." No meeting with a specialist as I requested. I've now spent 18 months trying to get what I'm legally entitled to - approximately $370 extra per month plus all the back payments.I even contacted my congresswoman who sent an inquiry in June. The SSA responded to her saying "it's being processed," but still nothing has changed.Is there an actual person with authority who can fix this? A supervisor's supervisor? An ombudsman? I'm losing thousands of dollars while this drags on. Has anyone successfully resolved something like this?
I'm another casualty of the Government Pension Offset (GPO). My husband passed away in 2022 after receiving his Social Security retirement benefits for only a year after claiming at his Full Retirement Age. I worked as a public school teacher for 31 years and have my pension, which triggered the dreaded GPO. Currently I'm only getting about 1/3 of what his survivor benefit would normally be - it's frustrating! With Congress ending the GPO soon, I've been wondering about the COLA increases that have happened since his death (8.7% in 2023, 3.2% in 2024, and 2.5% in 2025). Does anyone know if SSA will apply all these COLAs when they recalculate our benefits after GPO ends? The difference could be quite significant when you compound those increases on the original benefit amount. I've tried calling SSA twice but gave up after being on hold forever. So impatient for this unfair offset to finally end!!
One thing to be aware of regarding the COLA calculations: Social Security applies COLAs using compounding, not simple addition. So if your husband's original benefit was $2000, the 8.7% COLA in 2023 would make it $2,174. Then the 3.2% COLA in 2024 would be applied to $2,174 (not the original $2000), resulting in $2,243.57. The 2025 COLA of 2.5% would bring it to $2,299.66. This compounding effect makes a significant difference over time. When your GPO is removed, you should receive the full widow's benefit with this proper COLA compounding applied.
Thank you for explaining the compounding effect! I understand it better now. The difference between my reduced benefit and what I should be getting is substantial - probably around $1,400 monthly. Multiply that by however many months until I die (hopefully many years!), and the GPO has cost me a small fortune. I'm just grateful it's finally ending.
I'm so sorry for your loss and what you've been going through with the GPO. As a fellow widow affected by this unfair offset, I completely understand your frustration! I lost my husband in 2020 and have been dealing with the same reduced survivor benefits due to my state employee pension. The waiting and uncertainty has been incredibly stressful. I've been following the GPO repeal legislation closely, and from everything I've read and heard from others here, you should definitely receive the full survivor benefit with ALL those COLAs properly applied once the change is implemented. Those are some significant COLA increases you mentioned - that compounding effect will make a real difference in your monthly benefit! I know the wait is agonizing, but hang in there. We've suffered through this unfair penalty long enough, and relief is finally coming. Sending you strength and solidarity from someone who truly understands what you're going through.
I'm about to apply for Social Security spousal benefits and I'm getting conflicting information about submitting my documentation. I spoke with two different SSA representatives this week and got completely different answers! The first rep told me I NEED to submit certified copies of both my marriage certificate and divorce decree (from my previous marriage), and that these documents must be either physically taken to the local office or mailed. But when I called back with a question, another rep said I could just fax everything instead. Has anyone gone through this process recently? Do you know for certain whether the SSA will accept faxed copies of these documents for spousal benefits? I live about 75 miles from the nearest office, so faxing would save me a lot of hassle, but I don't want my application delayed because I submitted documents the wrong way.
One more thing to consider - even if they do accept faxed copies initially, they might still request the certified copies later in the process. I've seen this happen to several people. They think everything is proceeding fine with their application, then weeks later receive a notice requesting the original documents, essentially starting the clock over. If you're trying to maximize your benefits and avoid delays, I'd strongly recommend just following their official procedure from the start.
As someone who just went through this process successfully, I can share what worked for me. I called my local SSA office directly (not the 1-800 number) and spoke with a supervisor who clarified their specific office policy. They told me they would accept high-quality faxed copies as long as I followed up with a phone call to confirm receipt within 2 business days. I faxed my marriage certificate and divorce decree on a Monday, called Wednesday to confirm they received them clearly, and my spousal benefits were approved without any issues or requests for additional documentation. The key was getting the office's specific policy in writing via email and keeping detailed records of all communications. However, I completely understand why others recommend just going with the official procedure - it's definitely the safest route if you want to avoid any potential headaches.
My husband passed away last year and I've been trying to figure out the best time to file for survivor benefits. I'm planning to apply and start receiving survivor benefits on January 1, 2025, but I'm still working part-time. My full retirement age is July 2025, and I'll be 66 and 8 months then. I'm wondering what's the maximum I can earn per month from January through June before hitting the earnings limit? I work as a consultant with variable income each month, so I need to know the monthly limit to plan my work schedule properly. I've heard different things about annual vs. monthly limits and I'm confused about how it works in the year I reach my FRA. Thanks for any help!
You can report earnings changes by calling SSA, using your my Social Security account online, or visiting a local office. The online account is usually the easiest way - there's a section specifically for updating your earnings estimate. Just make sure you keep documentation of all your income in case there are questions later.
Just wanted to add one more important detail - make sure you understand how self-employment income is counted for the earnings limit. Since you mentioned you work as a consultant, SSA counts your net self-employment earnings (after business expenses) toward the limit, not your gross income. So if you invoice $60,000 but have $10,000 in legitimate business expenses, only $50,000 would count toward the $59,520 limit. Keep detailed records of all your business expenses throughout the year - things like equipment, software, travel, office supplies, etc. This could help you stay under the limit even if your gross consulting income is higher than expected.
Hi everyone! I'm trying to figure out my Social Security options and getting mixed information everywhere I turn. I'm turning 62 next month and currently debating whether to take my benefits. However, my ex-husband (we divorced 16 years ago after being married for 17 years) is 63 and still working full-time. His earnings were substantially higher than mine throughout our careers. My question is: Can I claim spousal benefits on his record NOW even though he hasn't filed for his benefits yet? Some friends say I have to wait until he files, others say I can file on his record regardless since we've been divorced so long. His benefit will be about $3,400 at his full retirement age while mine would only be around $1,850. I've tried calling SSA three times but keep getting disconnected after waiting for hours! Any insights from people who've dealt with ex-spouse benefits would be so appreciated!
Based on what you've shared, your own benefit at FRA ($1,850) is actually higher than what you'd get as an ex-spouse benefit (50% of $3,400 = $1,700). And remember that filing at 62 means you'd only get about 70% of either amount. This is a critical point many people miss: SSA doesn't give you both benefits added together. They give you the higher of the two. So in your case, you'd likely just get your own reduced retirement benefit if you file at 62. If you can afford to wait until your FRA or even age 70, your own benefit would grow substantially and almost certainly exceed anything you'd get on your ex's record.
Thank you for pointing this out! I hadn't considered that my own benefit at FRA might actually be higher than the ex-spouse benefit. This changes my calculations completely. I think I need to create that my Social Security account someone mentioned to see my exact benefit projections. I appreciate everyone's help!
I went through this exact situation about 3 years ago! The key thing to remember is that you CAN file for divorced spouse benefits even if your ex hasn't filed yet, as long as you've been divorced for at least 2 years and he's at least 62 (which you both meet). However, here's what I wish someone had told me: based on your numbers, your own benefit at FRA ($1,850) is actually HIGHER than what you'd get as a divorced spouse benefit (50% of his $3,400 = $1,700). So you'd end up getting your own benefit anyway, not his! My advice? Create that my Social Security account online ASAP to see your exact projections. I was surprised to find that waiting until my FRA made way more sense than filing early, even though I was tempted by the immediate income. The reduction for filing at 62 is pretty steep - you'd only get about 70% of your full benefit amount. Also, don't let the SSA phone struggles discourage you from getting proper information. The online account will give you most of what you need to make an informed decision.
Great question! Social Security will automatically pay you whichever benefit is higher - you don't have to choose or worry about being "locked in" to the wrong one. If your own retirement benefit ends up being higher than the divorced spouse benefit, that's what you'll receive. However, there are some important timing considerations. If you file for any benefit before your Full Retirement Age (FRA), that benefit will be permanently reduced. So if you file at 62 for your own benefit, it stays reduced even if you later become eligible for a higher divorced spouse benefit. The system is designed to maximize your benefit, but the timing of when you first file can impact the total amount. I'd definitely recommend using that online calculator to run different scenarios - filing at 62, at FRA, and even waiting until 70 if possible. The delayed retirement credits until age 70 can really add up on your own record!
Great question! Social Security automatically pays you whichever benefit is higher - you don't have to choose or worry about being "locked in" to the wrong one. If your own retirement benefit ends up being higher than the divorced spouse benefit, that's what you'll receive. However, there are some timing strategies to consider. For example, you could potentially file for divorced spouse benefits first (if eligible) and then switch to your own record later when it becomes more advantageous, especially if you're planning to delay your own retirement benefits to earn delayed retirement credits until age 70. The key is understanding that SSA will always pay you the maximum amount you're entitled to under their rules. I'd definitely recommend speaking with a Social Security representative (or using that callback service someone mentioned earlier) to discuss your specific timing options before making any filing decisions.
Zoe Dimitriou
Don't let administrative problems deter you from making the best financial decision. Delaying benefits is still mathematically advantageous for most people who can afford to wait. The lifetime difference between claiming at 66 vs. 68 could be tens of thousands of dollars. Most people don't experience these issues, but obviously those with problems are more likely to post about them online. If you do delay, just keep meticulous records of all your interactions with SSA.
0 coins
Victoria Jones
I'm so sorry you're going through this nightmare - 18 months is absolutely unacceptable for something that should be a straightforward calculation. Your situation highlights exactly why so many people are losing faith in the system. A few additional suggestions that might help: 1. Document EVERYTHING in a spreadsheet - dates, names, what was promised, reference numbers from calls. This creates a timeline that's hard for them to dismiss. 2. When you do get connected to someone with authority, ask them to put their promised resolution timeline IN WRITING via email or letter. No more verbal promises that disappear into the void. 3. Consider filing a complaint with your state's Department of Aging/Elder Affairs - they often have ombudsman programs that can advocate directly with federal agencies. 4. If you haven't already, request your complete file under the Freedom of Information Act. Sometimes seeing exactly what notes are (or aren't) in your file can reveal where the breakdown is occurring. The fact that you're out $6,660+ in back payments ($370 x 18 months) makes this a substantial financial hardship case. Keep pushing - you're entitled to those DRCs and they know it. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, unfortunately, but you shouldn't have to squeak this loud for this long. Stay strong and keep us updated on your progress!
0 coins