Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm also a retired educator dealing with WEP - taught high school math in Virginia for 32 years before retiring in 2022. What helped me was creating a detailed timeline of ALL my work history, including exact dates and earnings from every job where I paid into Social Security. I found old W-2s, tax returns, and even contacted previous employers for records. When I finally got through to SSA with this documentation, they were able to verify I actually had 25 years of "substantial earnings" which reduced my WEP penalty significantly. The key is being persistent and organized. Also, don't rely on just phone calls - the online "my Social Security" account shows your complete earnings record which you can review for accuracy. If you find errors in your earnings history, you can request corrections with proper documentation. It's frustrating but worth the effort to ensure you're getting every dollar you've earned!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice! I'm definitely going to dig through my old records and create that timeline you mentioned. I never thought to check my online Social Security account for errors in my earnings history - that's a great tip. It's encouraging to hear that being organized and persistent actually paid off for you. Did you find any errors in your earnings record when you reviewed it online? I'm wondering if that might be part of my issue too.

0 coins

Yes, I actually found two significant errors in my earnings record! One year from the early 1990s was completely missing (apparently a W-2 never got reported properly), and another year showed about $3,000 less than what I actually earned. Both of those years ended up qualifying as "substantial earnings" once corrected, which helped reduce my WEP penalty. The correction process took about 6 months and required me to submit old tax returns and W-2s as proof, but it was worth an extra $85 per month in benefits. I'd definitely recommend printing out your entire earnings history from the SSA website and cross-checking it against any old records you can find - even small corrections can make a difference in the WEP calculation!

0 coins

As someone who's been navigating this maze for the past year after retiring from teaching, I want to echo what others have said about being persistent and organized. The Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 82) has actually gained more momentum this session than in previous years - it currently has over 300 cosponsors in the House, which is pretty significant. While we can't count on it passing, the bipartisan support is encouraging. In the meantime, I'd strongly recommend three things: 1) Get that in-person SSA appointment as others suggested - bring EVERYTHING (old W-2s, tax returns, employment records), 2) Double-check your earnings history online for any errors or missing years, and 3) Calculate exactly how many years of "substantial earnings" you have under Social Security. With your 12 years of retail/other work, you might be closer to that 21+ year threshold that reduces the WEP penalty than you think. Also, since you're in North Carolina, you might want to contact the North Carolina Retired School Personnel association - they often have resources and advocates who understand the WEP/GPO issues specific to NC educators. Don't give up - you earned those benefits and deserve to understand exactly what you're entitled to under current law!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I want to echo everyone's gratitude for this incredibly helpful discussion! I'm 62 and have been widowed for 18 months, and like so many others here, I had completely incorrect information about survivor benefits and remarriage. I actually turned down a date last month because I was convinced that even thinking about future relationships would jeopardize my financial security! Reading through all these responses - especially the regulatory details from Paolo and the real experiences from Zainab and others - has been both educational and emotionally liberating. It's heartbreaking to think about how many widows and widowers are isolating themselves unnecessarily because of these widespread misconceptions. Miguel, thank you for having the courage to ask this question publicly, and congratulations on finding love again! Your situation has helped so many of us realize we don't have to choose between companionship and financial stability. This is exactly why communities like this are so important - real people sharing accurate information based on actual experience rather than assumptions or hearsay.

0 coins

Welcome to our community, Madison! Your story about turning down a date because of these misconceptions really hits home - it shows how these widespread myths about survivor benefits are actually affecting people's daily lives and happiness. I'm also a newcomer here and have been amazed by how supportive and knowledgeable everyone is. Like you, I had been operating under completely wrong assumptions about remarriage and benefits. It's incredible to see how many of us were in similar situations, thinking we had to choose between love and financial security. The fact that Paolo took the time to provide actual regulatory citations and that Zainab shared her real-world experience shows what makes this community so special. Miguel's question has clearly opened up a conversation that was desperately needed! I hope you'll consider giving dating another chance now that you have accurate information. None of us should have to live in isolation because of incorrect assumptions about Social Security rules.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I want to add my heartfelt thanks for this incredibly valuable discussion! I'm 64 and was widowed 5 years ago, and I've been carrying around the same misconceptions about survivor benefits and remarriage that so many others have mentioned here. Just two weeks ago, I declined an invitation to dinner from a wonderful gentleman at my church because I was absolutely convinced that any romantic relationship could eventually lead to losing my late husband's benefits. Reading through Miguel's original question and all these detailed responses has been genuinely life-changing! The regulatory information from Paolo, the real-world confirmation from Zainab, and hearing so many similar stories from other community members has shown me that I've been unnecessarily limiting my life based on incorrect assumptions. It's both relieving and somewhat frustrating to realize I could have been open to companionship all this time. Miguel, congratulations on your engagement journey - your willingness to ask this question has clearly helped dozens of us in similar situations. This is exactly the kind of supportive, fact-based community discussion that can truly improve people's lives. Thank you all for sharing your knowledge and experiences so generously!

0 coins

Just to summarize for you (and anyone else with the same question): 1. For someone born in August 1958, FRA is 66 years and 8 months 2. This puts your FRA in April 2025 3. Your first benefit payment would be received in May 2025 (for April) 4. Apply 3-4 months before April 2025 (so December 2024 or January 2025) 5. Check your earnings record now to ensure it's accurate 6. Sign up for a my Social Security account at ssa.gov if you haven't already Following these steps should ensure a smooth transition to receiving your benefits at FRA.

0 coins

Thank you so much for this clear summary! This is exactly what I needed. I've set a reminder to apply in December 2024, and I'll be checking my earnings record this weekend. Really appreciate everyone's help!

0 coins

I'm also approaching retirement and found this thread super helpful! One thing I'd add is that you can actually estimate your monthly benefit amount using the SSA's online calculator before you apply. It's really useful for financial planning. Also, if you're married, don't forget to consider spousal benefits and survivor benefits in your decision - sometimes it makes sense for one spouse to file earlier than the other depending on your respective benefit amounts. The timing decisions can get complex when you factor in both spouses' benefits!

0 coins

That's a great point about spousal benefits! As someone new to all this retirement planning, I hadn't even considered how my spouse's benefits might factor into the timing decision. We're both around the same age, so I should probably look into whether it makes sense for one of us to file before the other. Do you know if there's a good resource for understanding all the different spousal benefit strategies? This is getting more complicated than I initially thought, but I really appreciate everyone sharing their knowledge here!

0 coins

As someone who just started learning about this issue, I'm amazed by how much this law is helping people! Reading through all these experiences really shows how unfair WEP and GPO were. I had no idea that teachers and government workers were getting their Social Security benefits reduced just because they also earned a pension from their jobs. It seems like such a basic fairness issue - if you paid into Social Security, you should get what you earned, period. Thank you everyone for sharing your experiences and updates. It's really helpful to see the real-world impact of this change, especially for those still waiting for their adjustments. The fact that some people are seeing increases of $800+ per month is incredible - that's life-changing money for retirees on fixed incomes!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! You're absolutely right - it really was a basic fairness issue. What made WEP and GPO particularly frustrating for people was that they were often blindsided by these reductions when they retired, having worked and paid into Social Security for years with no idea their benefits would be cut. The complexity of the formulas also made it nearly impossible for people to understand exactly how much they'd be affected until it was too late to do anything about it. Thanks for taking the time to learn about this issue - it's encouraging to see people who aren't directly affected still recognize how important this change is for millions of retirees!

0 coins

As a federal employee who worked under FERS (not CSRS), I want to clarify something important that might help others understand their situation better. The Social Security Fairness Act primarily affects people who worked in jobs that DIDN'T pay into Social Security - like CSRS federal employees, many state/local government workers, and teachers in certain pension systems. If you're a FERS employee like me, you've been paying into Social Security all along, so WEP and GPO likely don't affect you. However, if you had previous employment in a non-covered position (like working as a teacher in a state that doesn't pay into SS), then you could still be affected. It's worth checking your Social Security statement to see if there's any mention of WEP reduction. The key thing to look for is whether ALL of your employment history shows Social Security taxes being paid. If there are gaps where you worked but didn't pay SS taxes, that's when WEP might apply.

0 coins

This is really helpful clarification! I'm new to understanding all these different federal employment systems, and the distinction between FERS and CSRS is important. It sounds like the key is whether you were paying Social Security taxes during your employment or not. For someone like me who's just learning about this, it's good to know that most current federal employees under FERS shouldn't be affected since they've been paying into SS all along. I appreciate you taking the time to explain the difference - it helps newcomers like me understand who actually benefits from this law change versus who was already getting their full earned Social Security benefits.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly comprehensive! As someone who works with seniors navigating Social Security decisions, I wanted to add one practical consideration that often gets overlooked: the application processing time. If your wife decides to claim benefits, it can take 3-6 months for the first payment to arrive after filing. So if you're leaning toward having her claim now, don't wait until you absolutely need the income to start the application process. The SSA allows you to choose a benefit start date up to 4 months in the future, which can help with timing. Also, I'd strongly recommend creating accounts on ssa.gov for both of you if you haven't already. You can get fairly accurate benefit estimates there, though nothing replaces speaking with an actual SSA representative for complex situations like yours with spousal benefits involved. One last thought: given all the excellent analysis in this thread about optimal claiming strategies, remember that there's value in simplicity too. If claiming now gives you peace of mind and the financial difference isn't make-or-break for your retirement, sometimes the "good enough" decision beats the "perfect" decision that keeps you awake at night!

0 coins

This is such valuable practical advice about the processing timeline! I had no idea it could take 3-6 months for the first payment - that definitely changes the timing considerations if we decide to move forward with my wife claiming benefits. The point about creating ssa.gov accounts is great too. I've been putting that off, but getting those preliminary benefit estimates would really help with all the scenario planning everyone has suggested. It sounds like even though the online estimates might not capture all the nuances of spousal benefits, they'd at least give us a starting point for our calculations. Your final point about "good enough" vs "perfect" really resonates with me. After reading through all these responses, I'm realizing there's a risk of over-analyzing this decision. While I want to make an informed choice, you're right that sometimes peace of mind has its own value. If the financial impact truly isn't make-or-break for us, maybe I shouldn't stress too much about finding the absolute optimal strategy. Thanks for the practical perspective - it's helpful to hear from someone who regularly works with people facing these decisions!

0 coins

As someone who recently navigated this exact decision with my spouse, I wanted to share a few additional thoughts that might help with your planning. First, don't underestimate the psychological benefit of having that monthly Social Security income coming in, even if it's reduced. My wife claimed at 62 while I continued working, and there was real peace of mind in knowing we had that guaranteed income stream starting. It made my final working years less stressful knowing we weren't entirely dependent on my salary and employer benefits. Second, consider your overall retirement timeline holistically. You mentioned planning to work about another year - but what if your employer downsizes, you have health issues, or you simply decide you're ready to retire sooner? Having your wife's benefits already established gives you more flexibility in your own retirement timing. That said, everyone's advice about getting the actual SSA numbers is spot-on. We discovered my wife's spousal benefit would only be about $200/month higher than her own reduced benefit, which made claiming early a much easier decision. But for couples with bigger disparities in earnings history, waiting for the spousal benefit could mean significantly more money. The key is running those numbers and considering both the financial optimization AND the personal/lifestyle factors that matter to your family's specific situation.

0 coins

Prev1...185186187188189...837Next