Pennsylvania Unemployment

Can't reach Pennsylvania Unemployment? Claimyr connects you to a live PAUC agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the PAUC
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the PAUC drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I made a similar mistake a few months back - forgot to report about 5 hours of work from a weekend shift. I was terrified about calling but honestly it wasn't as bad as I expected. Got through after about an hour of calling (started at 8am sharp when they opened). The rep was actually pretty nice about it and said honest mistakes happen all the time. She corrected it on the spot and told me I'd get a notice about the overpayment amount in a few days. Ended up owing back around $45. The whole call took maybe 10 minutes once I got through. Just be honest, explain it was an oversight, and they should be able to fix it without any drama. Don't stress too much about it!

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

@Brooklyn Foley Thank you so much for sharing this! It s'really comforting to hear from another person who went through the same thing. $45 payback sounds very manageable, and I m'relieved to hear the rep was understanding about honest mistakes. Your tip about calling right at 8am is really helpful - I ll'definitely try that strategy tomorrow morning. It s'such a relief to know the actual call only takes about 10 minutes once you get through. I ve'been stressing about this all weekend but hearing these success stories is making me feel so much better about the whole situation!

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

I went through something very similar last year! Forgot to report 8 hours from a Saturday shift and didn't realize until after I'd already been paid. I was so worried about getting in trouble, but I called the UC office the next day and the representative was really understanding. She explained that since I was proactively reporting the error, it would just be treated as a simple overpayment adjustment rather than fraud. The whole process was pretty straightforward - they recalculated my benefit for that week and I had to pay back about $70. No penalties or anything scary like that. The hardest part was actually getting through on the phone - took me about 90 minutes of calling on and off, but once connected, the rep handled everything in under 15 minutes. My advice is to call first thing in the morning (I started calling at 8:01am) and just keep trying. Don't put it off - the sooner you report it, the better it looks on your record. Good luck!

0 coins

I went through the exact same thing last year! The key is definitely appealing ASAP and being super organized going forward. One thing that helped me was creating a weekly checklist to make sure I hit all 3 activities. I'd recommend mixing up your activities too - don't just apply for jobs. You can also attend virtual job fairs (CareerLink hosts them regularly), take online courses through PA CareerLink, or even contact employers directly about potential openings. The variety shows you're actively engaged in your job search. Also, when you do your appeal, be honest about the confusion but emphasize that you were genuinely trying to comply and will follow the rules correctly moving forward. Good luck!

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

This is really helpful advice! I never thought about mixing up the activities like that. I was just focused on applying for jobs but attending virtual job fairs and taking online courses sounds way more doable, especially when there aren't enough warehouse positions posted each week. Do you remember how long it took to get your appeal decision back? I'm worried about making rent if this drags on for months like some people are saying.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Hey Daniel! I'm really sorry you're going through this - the PA UC system can be super confusing for first-timers. I had a similar experience a few months ago and learned the hard way that the 3 activities per week rule is strictly enforced. The good news is that appeals do work if you can show good faith effort! When you file your appeal, make sure to explain that you genuinely misunderstood the requirements and include documentation of the job applications you did submit. Also, start doing your 3 weekly activities right away even during the appeal process - it shows you're taking it seriously. I'd suggest mixing it up: apply to 1-2 jobs, maybe attend a virtual CareerLink workshop, and update your resume or LinkedIn profile. Keep detailed records of everything! The whole process is stressful but you've got this. Keep us updated on how the appeal goes!

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Thanks Miguel! This gives me some hope that I can actually win this appeal. I already started documenting everything in a spreadsheet like others suggested and plan to do way more than 3 activities per week going forward. It's crazy how confusing they make this process - like why not just have a simple checklist or tutorial for first-time filers? Anyway, I really appreciate everyone's help here. Will definitely update once I hear back from the appeal!

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

I'm going through something very similar right now and this whole thread has been incredibly helpful! I was laid off from my accounting job in February and started doing some part-time bookkeeping for small businesses to make ends meet. Just got the same "ineligible due to self-employment" letter even though I'm only working about 10 hours a week and making maybe $400/month. The most frustrating part is that I've been diligently reporting every penny I earn, thinking I was doing the right thing. Meanwhile I'm spending 40+ hours a week applying for full-time positions and going to interviews. The UC system seems to punish honesty and people trying to responsibly transition back to work. Reading about everyone's appeal strategies gives me hope though. I'm definitely going to document my job search activities more thoroughly and emphasize the temporary nature of my bookkeeping work. The idea about framing it as skills maintenance rather than starting a business is brilliant - I'll use that approach too. It's ridiculous that we have to jump through all these hoops to prove we're genuinely looking for work when we're already struggling financially. Thanks to everyone sharing their experiences - at least we know we're not fighting this battle alone!

0 coins

Carmen Flores

•

I'm so sorry you're going through this too! It really is frustrating how the system penalizes people for being honest and trying to make responsible financial decisions while job searching. Your situation sounds almost identical to mine - reporting everything properly and spending way more time on job applications than the actual side work. One thing that might help your appeal case is to calculate and document the actual hourly breakdown. Like if you're doing 10 hours of bookkeeping versus 40 hours of job searching per week, that's a really compelling 4:1 ratio showing where your priorities truly are. Also, since you're doing bookkeeping which is directly related to your accounting background, you can definitely use the "skills maintenance" angle that others mentioned. Have you considered reaching out to any of your former colleagues or networking contacts? Sometimes they can provide written statements about your active job search efforts, which could be additional evidence for your appeal. The more documentation you have showing this is temporary bridge work while actively seeking permanent employment, the stronger your case will be. Hang in there - based on what others have shared, there's definitely hope if you put together a solid appeal with good documentation!

0 coins

This is such a widespread issue and it's heartening to see everyone sharing their experiences and strategies! I'm currently dealing with the exact same situation - was laid off from my marketing coordinator position in January and started doing some freelance social media management in March. Made the mistake of reporting my first $250 payment and immediately got hit with the "ineligible due to self-employment" determination. What really gets me is that I'm working maybe 8-10 hours a week on freelance projects while spending 35+ hours a week on job applications, networking events, and interviews. But apparently PA UC sees those 8 hours as equivalent to running a full-time business. Reading through all the successful appeal strategies here has given me a lot of hope though. I'm going to gather documentation showing: - My detailed job search log with hours spent - Contracts showing the limited scope of my freelance projects - Evidence that I'm actively turning down additional freelance work to focus on finding permanent employment - The huge income gap between my previous salary and current freelance earnings The "skills maintenance" angle is genius too - I can definitely frame my social media work as keeping current with platform changes and algorithm updates that I need to know for marketing positions. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories and advice. It's so valuable to know we're not alone in this frustrating situation, and that there are real strategies that have worked for successful appeals!

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Your strategy sounds really solid! The documentation you're planning to gather hits all the key points that seem to work for successful appeals. One thing I'd add - if you have any emails or messages where you've told potential freelance clients that you can only take on limited work because you're actively job searching, those could be really powerful evidence. It shows you're genuinely prioritizing finding permanent employment over building a freelance business. Also, make sure to emphasize in your appeal that social media platforms and marketing strategies change so rapidly that the freelance work is essentially required professional development to stay competitive for the marketing positions you're applying to. Good luck with your appeal - it sounds like you have a really strong case!

0 coins

I had my PA UC appeal hearing about 6 months ago and can definitely relate to your anxiety! My employer showed up with their manager and HR director - they came prepared with a whole stack of documentation, but honestly it wasn't as intimidating as I thought it would be. The referee was very professional and fair, giving both sides equal time to present their case. What really helped me was having my timeline of events written out clearly and all my documentation organized by date. When I got nervous during the call, I could just refer back to my notes. Your case sounds incredibly strong - terminating someone for a 5-minute lunch extension with NO prior warnings after 3 years of perfect attendance is going to be very difficult for them to justify as willful misconduct. The referee will likely focus heavily on why they skipped all progressive discipline steps (verbal warning, written warning, etc.) and jumped straight to termination. Make sure to emphasize your clean employment record and ask them specific questions about when and how this lunch timing policy was supposedly communicated to you. If they can't show you received clear training or warnings about exact timing requirements, their case falls apart. Stay calm, stick to the facts, and remember - they have the burden of proving you knowingly and willfully violated a clearly established policy despite prior warnings. From what you've described, they simply cannot meet that burden. You're going to do great!

0 coins

Annabel Kimball

•

This is such reassuring advice! I really appreciate you sharing your experience. You're absolutely right that they'll have a hard time justifying jumping straight to termination - especially when you put it that way about skipping all the progressive discipline steps. I've been getting my documentation organized chronologically like everyone has suggested, and seeing it all laid out really does make me feel more confident about my case. The specific questions about policy communication are great too - I'm definitely going to ask them to show exactly when and how I was supposedly trained on strict lunch timing requirements. It's so helpful to hear from someone who went through the same process and came out successful. This whole thread has been incredible for preparing me mentally and practically for what to expect. Thank you for taking the time to offer encouragement!

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

I'm going through my first PA UC appeal hearing in a few weeks and this entire thread has been absolutely invaluable! Reading everyone's detailed experiences has really helped me understand what to expect and how to prepare properly. @Kyle Wallace - Your case with the 5-minute lunch break violation honestly sounds like a prime example of an employer reaching for any excuse to terminate without following proper procedures. The fact that you have 3 years of perfect attendance with zero warnings about lunch timing is going to be incredibly difficult for them to justify as willful misconduct. Based on what everyone here has shared, it sounds like the key factors referees focus on are: 1) Was the policy clearly communicated? 2) Did you receive prior warnings? 3) Why didn't they follow progressive discipline? Your situation seems to fail on all three counts from their perspective. I've been taking notes from all the advice here - organizing documentation chronologically, preparing specific questions about their policies, practicing out loud, and planning for technical backup options. The mock hearing idea is brilliant - I'm definitely doing that this weekend. It's amazing how supportive this community has been. Going through this process alone would be so much more stressful. Thanks to everyone who has shared their experiences and advice. Kyle, I'm confident you have a really strong case - keep us posted on how it goes!

0 coins

Cass Green

•

I'm really sorry you're going through this - the stress of worrying about your kids and rent while dealing with legal issues and unemployment appeals is just overwhelming. I went through something very similar about 8 months ago when I got arrested for a minor assault charge (bar fight that got out of hand) and my employer at a nursing home fired me immediately citing their "zero tolerance for criminal activity" policy. The good news is I eventually won my UC case! The key things that helped me: 1) I documented my entire employment history - every performance review, commendation, attendance record I could find 2) I proved the arrest happened completely off-duty and had zero connection to my job responsibilities 3) I showed that I hadn't been convicted of anything yet - just charged 4) Most importantly, I found evidence that my employer had treated other similar situations inconsistently The referee ruling was really clear - she said that while employers can terminate for policy violations, PA unemployment law requires misconduct to be willful AND connected to work performance. Off-duty arrests that don't impact your job duties typically don't meet that standard, no matter what the employee handbook says. The process took about 6 weeks total, but I got full back pay for every week I had properly filed claims. Your 3-year perfect record is going to be incredibly powerful evidence in your favor. Keep filing those weekly claims no matter what status your case shows - you can't get back pay for weeks you didn't file. And definitely bring up that other employee who kept their job despite pending charges - inconsistent policy application really strengthens your case. Hang in there! I know how scary this is with kids depending on you, but based on everything you've described, you have a really strong case.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear today! Your situation sounds almost identical to mine - off-duty arrest, healthcare setting, perfect work record, and the same "zero tolerance" policy justification. The fact that you were in a nursing home (which probably has even stricter standards than my facility) and still won gives me so much hope. I've been collecting all my documentation over the past few days and you're right - when you see 3 years of spotless reviews and commendations all in one place, it really drives home how ridiculous this termination is. I'm definitely going to dig deeper into how my employer has handled similar situations in the past. Thank you for the reminder about filing weekly claims - I've been doing it but sometimes wonder if it's pointless while everything is pending. Knowing that you got full back pay makes it feel worth it. Six weeks feels manageable when I know there's a real chance of success at the end. Your message honestly made me tear up a little - it's been so isolating dealing with this, and hearing from people who've walked this exact path and come out okay means everything to me right now.

0 coins

Jace Caspullo

•

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this nightmare - I can only imagine how terrifying it must be with three kids and rent due. I went through something almost identical about 10 months ago. Got arrested for a DUI after my cousin's bachelor party, and my employer at a physical therapy clinic fired me the next week when they saw it in the police blotter. They cited their "moral character standards" policy too. I was absolutely panicking because I'm the sole provider for my family, but I want you to know - I WON my case! Here's what really helped me: 1) I gathered EVERYTHING - 5 years of performance reviews, patient testimonials, perfect attendance records 2) I proved the arrest was 100% unrelated to my job duties and happened on my personal time 3) I emphasized repeatedly that I was only CHARGED, not convicted 4) Most importantly, I found out through a coworker that someone else in our department had a pending disorderly conduct charge from 2 years ago and kept their job - inconsistent policy enforcement was huge for my case The referee was very clear that PA law requires misconduct to actually affect your work capacity. A DUI that happens off-duty with no conviction doesn't meet that standard, regardless of what employee handbooks say. The whole process took about 7 weeks from initial denial to getting my first payment, but I got full retroactive benefits. Your perfect 3-year record is going to be incredibly powerful - that shows this arrest is completely out of character and unrelated to your professional conduct. Keep filing those weekly claims religiously, document everything, and don't let your employer's intimidation tactics get to you. Based on everything you've described, you have a very strong case. Hang in there - better days are coming! 💪

0 coins

Prev1...3839404142...317Next