< Back to IRS

CosmicCruiser

Understanding Stock Offset on Paystub from RSU Income - How is it Taxed?

Hey there tax folks! I'm trying to figure out something on my wife's end-of-year paystub that's confusing us. She gets a significant portion of her compensation through RSUs at her company. Looking at her final 2024 paystub, there's a section that shows her yearly "gross income," then lists "pre-tax deductions," "post-tax deductions," and finally her "net pay." The confusing part is there's this line item under "post-tax deductions" called "stock offset" with a pretty substantial amount. I'm not sure what this actually represents. Is this showing her RSU income, or is it showing taxes that were taken out specifically for those RSUs? We're a bit confused because her net pay seems way lower than expected based on our tax bracket. When we look at her W2, it doesn't show this "stock offset" amount as taxes paid. So I'm starting to think maybe her "net pay" doesn't include the value of the RSUs? Has anyone dealt with this before or know exactly what "stock offset" means on a paystub? We're trying to make sense of her actual take-home vs. reported income for our 2025 filing. Thanks for any help you can provide!

What you're seeing is normal for RSU compensation! The "stock offset" on a paystub typically represents the value of RSU shares that were sold automatically to cover the tax withholding when the RSUs vested. When RSUs vest, they're considered taxable income right away, even though they're stock and not cash. Here's what typically happens: When your wife's RSUs vest, the company counts the full market value as taxable income. Since taxes are due immediately, most companies automatically sell a portion of the shares to cover the tax withholding (often at supplemental wage rates around 22% federal plus state taxes). This automatic sale creates this "stock offset" line item. The reason her net pay seems much lower than expected is because the gross income likely includes the full RSU value, but the "net pay" only shows actual cash paid, not the shares she kept. So if she received $10,000 in RSUs, maybe $3,000 worth was sold for taxes (showing as "stock offset") and she kept $7,000 in shares, but that $7,000 won't appear in "net pay" since it wasn't cash.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

Thanks for explaining! So if I understand correctly, let's say her RSUs for the year were worth $20,000 total. That full $20,000 would be included in her "gross income" on the paystub. Then when they vested, the company automatically sold, say, $6,000 worth to cover taxes, which shows up as the "stock offset" amount. And she received the remaining $14,000 as actual shares, not cash. Is that right? If so, would her W2 Box 1 wages include the full $20,000 value of the RSUs, even though she only received $14,000 in shares?

0 coins

You've got it exactly right! The full $20,000 RSU value would be included in her gross income on the paystub. Then if $6,000 was sold for taxes (the "stock offset"), she'd keep $14,000 worth of shares. Yes, her W2 Box 1 would include the entire $20,000 RSU value, even though she only received $14,000 in actual shares. This is because the full value is considered taxable compensation when the RSUs vest, regardless of whether she receives it as shares or cash. The taxes withheld from the stock sale should appear in the appropriate withholding boxes on the W2.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

After struggling with similar RSU confusion on my paystubs, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which helped me make sense of all this. I uploaded my paystubs and W2, and it identified that my "stock offset" was indeed shares sold to cover tax withholding, not additional income. Their analysis showed how my company was calculating everything correctly - the stock offset was just an accounting mechanism that balanced the books. What made taxr.ai helpful was how it explained the specific tax implications of my RSUs and flagged a discrepancy between my W2 and what was actually withheld. Basically showed that I wasn't being under-taxed, but the reporting was just confusing. They can analyze your documents and tell you exactly what's happening with no guesswork.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

How does it work with multiple types of equity compensation? My situation includes both RSUs and ESPP purchases, and my paystub has weird entries for both. Can it handle that complexity or will it get confused?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

I'm skeptical of these services. How do you know they're interpreting everything correctly? My company's paystub format is pretty unique and even our own HR department sometimes gets confused about what certain line items mean.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

It handles multiple equity types really well. I actually had both RSUs and stock options, and it correctly identified how each was being reported on my paystubs and tax forms. It specifically explained how my ESPP discount was being reported as income too. Regarding accuracy, I was skeptical too at first. What convinced me was that it found a specific reporting issue that matched exactly what my company's stock admin team later confirmed was happening. It also provides explanations with references to specific tax rules, not just generic advice. Their system is trained on thousands of different company paystub formats, so it recognized mine despite being non-standard.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

I tried taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here and WOW it cleared up my confusion about stock offsets immediately! I uploaded my last paystub and W2, and within minutes it explained that my stock offset ($13,458) was exactly matching the shares that were sold to cover my tax withholding when my RSUs vested. The report even showed that my company withheld at a 37% rate (higher than my actual tax bracket), which explained why my net pay seemed so low! It also identified that some of my RSU income was being reported as supplemental wages but taxed correctly. The best part was the explanation of how my year-end W2 tied to my paystubs - something that had been driving me crazy trying to reconcile. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with RSU confusion!

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

After spending literally HOURS on hold with the IRS trying to get clarity on how RSU withholding should be reported (my company and I disagree on the reporting), I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent confirmed that "stock offset" entries on paystubs are industry-standard ways to show the shares sold to cover tax obligations, and that they should be reported as withheld taxes on your W2. The agent also explained that if my W2 doesn't match what was actually withheld, I should request a corrected W2 from my employer rather than trying to reconcile it myself on my tax return.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

How does this actually work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS these days. Is this some kind of priority line or something? Seems too good to be true.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Yeah right. I find it hard to believe any service can get you through to the IRS that quickly. I've tried calling dozens of times about RSU reporting issues and never got through. Even if you did get through, most IRS agents don't understand the complexities of equity compensation reporting anyway.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

It's not a priority line - they use an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent finally picks up, you get a call connecting you directly. I was skeptical too, but it literally saved me hours of waiting. As for the agent's knowledge, I specifically asked for a tax law specialist when connected, and they transferred me to someone who clearly understood equity compensation. You're right that not all agents understand RSUs, but when you get to the right department, they definitely have people who know this stuff. The agent I spoke with referenced specific sections of tax code about equity compensation reporting.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

I was completely wrong about Claimyr! After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I was desperate to resolve my RSU reporting issue before filing this year. Within 25 minutes, I was talking to an actual IRS agent who specialized in employer reporting. The agent confirmed exactly what others here said - the "stock offset" on my paystub represents shares sold to cover tax withholding. She explained that my company should have included the full RSU value in Box 1 of my W2, and the withholding from the stock sale should appear in Boxes 2, 4, and 6. In my case, the company had incorrectly reported some of the withholding, and she advised me to request a corrected W2. Without this call, I would have filed incorrectly and potentially faced penalties later. Definitely worth it for complex tax situations like equity compensation!

0 coins

Another thing to check is your brokerage statement where the RSUs are deposited. When RSUs vest, you should see both a deposit of shares and a removal of shares (for the tax withholding). The value of the removed shares should match your "stock offset" amount. Most companies withhold at supplemental wage rates (22% federal for amounts under $1M, plus applicable state/local taxes), which might not match your actual tax bracket. If you're in a higher bracket, you might need to pay additional tax when filing. If you're in a lower bracket, you'll get some back as a refund.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

I checked her brokerage statements and you're right - there's a transaction showing shares being sold for "tax withholding" on each vesting date. The amounts do seem to add up to approximately the "stock offset" total on her paystub. I'm guessing that confirms what others have said - this is just showing the shares sold for taxes. Do we need to report these stock sales on our tax return? Or since they were automatically sold for tax withholding, is that already handled?

0 coins

You don't need to separately report those automatic tax withholding sales. Since they were sold immediately upon vesting, there's no capital gain or loss to report - the shares were sold at the same fair market value that was used to calculate the income. The withholding itself should be reflected on the W2. However, for any RSU shares your wife kept after vesting, she'll need to track those carefully. When she eventually sells those shares, she'll report capital gains/losses based on the difference between the sale price and the original fair market value on vesting date (which was already taxed as income).

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

One thing that hasn't been mentioned - check if your company offers an ESPP (Employee Stock Purchase Plan) in addition to RSUs. Some companies use "stock offset" to refer to payroll deductions for ESPP contributions, which is completely different from RSU tax withholding.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

This is an important point! At my company, "stock offset" refers to ESPP contributions, not RSU withholding. The only way to know for sure is to ask your payroll or stock admin team what that specific term means at your company. Different companies use different terminology.

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

Great question! I went through this exact confusion last year with my RSUs. The "stock offset" on your wife's paystub is most likely the value of RSU shares that were automatically sold to cover tax withholding when they vested. Here's what's probably happening: When RSUs vest, the full market value becomes taxable income immediately. Your wife's company automatically sells some of those shares to cover the required tax withholding (federal, state, FICA, etc.) - this sale creates the "stock offset" entry. The remaining shares go to her brokerage account. So if she had $15,000 in RSUs vest and $5,000 shows as "stock offset," she likely received $10,000 worth of actual shares while $5,000 was sold for taxes. Her W-2 Box 1 should include the full $15,000 as wages, and the $5,000 in taxes should appear in the withholding boxes. This explains why her net pay seems low - the paystub gross includes the full RSU value, but net pay only shows actual cash received, not the shares she kept. I'd recommend checking her brokerage statements to confirm - you should see both share deposits and "tax withholding" sales that match the offset amounts.

0 coins

Dylan Evans

•

This is such a common source of confusion! I deal with RSU taxation frequently, and what you're seeing is completely normal. The "stock offset" represents shares that were automatically sold to cover tax withholding when your wife's RSUs vested. Here's the key thing to understand: when RSUs vest, they become taxable income at their full fair market value on that date. Since this creates an immediate tax liability, most companies automatically sell a portion of the vested shares to cover the required withholdings (federal income tax, state tax, FICA, etc.). This automatic sale is what shows up as "stock offset" on the paystub. The reason her net pay seems so low compared to her gross income is that the gross includes the full value of all RSUs that vested, but the net pay only reflects actual cash received - it doesn't include the value of shares she kept after the tax withholding sale. For example, if $20,000 in RSUs vested and $7,000 shows as "stock offset," she likely received $13,000 worth of actual shares while $7,000 was sold to cover taxes. Her W-2 should show the full $20,000 in Box 1 as wages, with the $7,000 in taxes appearing in the appropriate withholding boxes. You can verify this by checking her brokerage account - you should see transactions showing both share deposits and "tax withholding" sales that correspond to the offset amounts on her paystub.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

This is exactly what I was looking for - thank you for the detailed explanation! Your example really helps clarify things. I think we were getting confused because we expected her "net pay" to somehow reflect the value of the shares she kept, but it makes sense that it only shows actual cash. One follow-up question: you mentioned that the $7,000 in taxes should appear in the withholding boxes on her W-2. Should we expect to see that amount specifically called out somewhere, or will it just be included in the total withholding amounts in boxes 2, 4, and 6? I want to make sure we're reading the W-2 correctly when we get it. Also, do you know if there's typically any difference in how RSU withholding is calculated versus regular salary withholding? Her regular paychecks seem to withhold at our normal tax rate, but I'm wondering if RSUs get withheld at a different rate.

0 coins

Great questions! The RSU withholding will just be included in the total amounts in boxes 2, 4, and 6 on the W-2 - it won't be broken out separately. So if your wife had $15,000 in regular salary withholding plus $7,000 in RSU withholding, box 2 would show $22,000 total federal withholding. You're absolutely right about the withholding rates being different! RSUs are typically treated as "supplemental wages" and withheld at a flat 22% federal rate (plus applicable state taxes and FICA), regardless of your actual tax bracket. This is different from regular salary, which uses your W-4 withholding elections and considers your filing status, dependents, etc. This flat 22% rate often creates over-withholding or under-withholding depending on your actual tax situation. If you're in the 12% bracket, you'll likely get a nice refund. If you're in the 32% or 37% brackets, you might owe additional tax at filing time. Many people adjust their W-4 withholding or make quarterly estimated payments to account for this difference, especially if RSUs make up a large portion of their compensation.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I had the exact same confusion with my spouse's paystub showing a "stock offset" that made their net pay look ridiculously low compared to gross income. Just to add one more verification step that helped us: we compared the "stock offset" amounts on each paystub throughout the year to the actual vesting schedule from the equity compensation portal (usually accessible through your company's benefits site). The dates and amounts matched perfectly, confirming that these were indeed the automatic tax withholding sales. Also, if anyone is still confused about whether their company is withholding correctly, most equity portals show a "tax withholding" or "shares sold for taxes" section in the transaction history. This was the final piece that made everything click for us - we could see exactly how many shares vested, how many were sold for taxes at what price, and how many we actually kept. One last tip: if you're in a state with no income tax, your RSU withholding might be lower than the standard 22% federal rate since there's no state withholding. This can actually create under-withholding if you have other income sources or are in a higher federal bracket.

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive thread - thank you all for sharing your experiences! As someone who's been dealing with RSU confusion for the first time this year, it's reassuring to know this is a common issue. The tip about checking the equity portal transaction history is brilliant! I just logged into mine and can see the exact breakdown of shares vested vs. sold for taxes, and it matches perfectly with my paystub's "stock offset" entries. It's amazing how much clearer this makes the whole process. One thing I'm curious about - for those of you who've been through multiple RSU vesting cycles, do you find it gets easier to predict your tax situation over time? I'm trying to figure out if I should adjust my W-4 withholding for next year since it looks like we'll have a significant refund coming from the 22% supplemental wage withholding rate being higher than our actual bracket.

0 coins

Kai Rivera

•

Yes, it definitely gets easier to predict over time! After going through a few vesting cycles, you'll have a much better sense of how the withholding works and whether you need to adjust. For your W-4 adjustment question - if you're consistently getting large refunds due to the 22% supplemental withholding being higher than your actual rate, you have a couple options. You could increase your allowances/decrease withholding on your regular salary to roughly offset the RSU over-withholding. Or you could use the extra withholding box on the new W-4 to specify a smaller additional amount to withhold from regular paychecks. Just be careful not to under-withhold overall - you want to stay within the safe harbor rules (either owe less than $1,000 at filing, or pay at least 100% of last year's tax liability through withholding and estimated payments). I'd recommend tracking one full year of RSU activity first before making major W-4 changes, since vesting amounts can vary and you want to see the full picture. Many people also find it helpful to set aside some of their RSU shares specifically for tax purposes if they're worried about under-withholding in higher tax brackets.

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

This is really helpful advice about adjusting withholding over time! I'm in a similar situation where I'm expecting a large refund due to the 22% RSU withholding being higher than my actual bracket. One thing I've been wondering about - when you mention setting aside RSU shares for tax purposes, do you mean keeping some of the actual shares that weren't sold for withholding? I'm trying to decide whether to sell some of my remaining RSU shares before year-end to cover any potential additional tax liability, or if the automatic withholding is usually sufficient. Also, has anyone dealt with RSUs that vest in multiple tranches throughout the year? My company does quarterly vesting, and I'm finding it hard to track whether the cumulative withholding will be adequate since each vesting event gets withheld at that flat 22% rate regardless of how much has already been withheld year-to-date.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today