Rental property depreciation recapture: What happens when demolishing a fully depreciated building to construct condos?
I've got a rental property where the house is completely depreciated (been at it for a long time), but it sits on a sizable piece of land. I'm considering knocking the old place down and building a small condo development on the property instead. My big question is about the tax implications, specifically regarding depreciation recapture. Since I've already taken full depreciation on the existing structure, what happens tax-wise when I demolish it and build something entirely new? Does the IRS still expect depreciation recapture on a building that no longer exists? Or does demolishing the old structure somehow change the equation? I understand the new condos would start their own depreciation schedule, but I'm fuzzy on what happens with the old building's depreciation when it's deliberately demolished rather than sold. Any insights from folks who've dealt with this situation would be super helpful.
26 comments


Henry Delgado
This is actually a very interesting tax situation. When you demolish a fully depreciated rental property, you're not triggering depreciation recapture because you're not selling the property - you're just removing the structure. The tax basis of your land stays the same, since land isn't depreciable. However, when you demolish the building, you'll need to write off any remaining undepreciated value of the old structure. Since you mentioned it's fully depreciated, there's likely no loss to recognize there. For the new condos, you'll establish a new cost basis based on your construction costs, and you'll begin a fresh depreciation schedule for the new buildings (27.5 years for residential rental property). The original depreciation recapture concern would only come into play when you eventually sell the property.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•So just to clarify - if the building is 100% depreciated and then demolished, there's no "recapture tax" at demolition time? What about all those years of depreciation deductions that were taken? The IRS just... forgets about them?
0 coins
Henry Delgado
•The IRS doesn't forget about the depreciation deductions you took over the years, but the recapture is only triggered upon sale of the property, not demolition. You've correctly claimed depreciation over the life of the asset, which reduced your basis in the building to zero. When you demolish the building, there's no sale transaction occurring, so there's no gain to which the recapture tax would apply. The tax benefit you received from those depreciation deductions remains yours unless and until you sell the land itself, at which point the gain calculations would factor in your adjusted basis.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
I wanted to share my experience with a similar situation. After hours of confusing research and conflicting advice from multiple accountants, I finally found https://taxr.ai which helped me understand my exact situation. I was planning to demolish a fully depreciated small apartment building and was worried about massive tax implications. The tool analyzed my property documents and depreciation history, then explained that demolition itself doesn't trigger recapture - it's only when you sell the property that recapture comes into play. They also helped me understand how to properly allocate costs between land (which keeps its original basis) and the new construction (which gets a new depreciable basis). The clarity I got saved me from making a costly mistake in my redevelopment planning. Worth checking out if you're struggling with the complexities of this kind of situation!
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•How exactly does this work? Do you upload documents or just describe your situation? I've been getting different answers from every tax person I talk to about a similar situation.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•Sounds too good to be true. How much does it cost? And can they actually give tax advice that's legally binding or is this just general information?
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
•You can upload your relevant documents (depreciation schedules, property records, etc.) and the AI analyzes them, or you can describe your situation in detail. I did both, uploading my depreciation history and property assessment, which helped get very specific guidance for my situation. It's not technically "tax advice" in the legal sense - it's more like having a brilliant tax researcher who can analyze your specific documents and explain how tax rules apply to your unique situation. I used their analysis to have a much more productive conversation with my CPA, who confirmed everything was accurate. The platform even cited specific IRS publications and tax court cases relevant to my demolition scenario.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after being skeptical in my earlier comment. I decided to try it anyway for my duplex demolition project. I uploaded my depreciation schedules and property documents, and the analysis I got back was incredibly detailed. The tool explained exactly how to handle the basis allocation between land and building, confirmed I wouldn't face recapture at demolition time, and provided guidance on setting up the new depreciation schedule for the townhomes I'm building. Everything was backed with specific tax code references. My accountant was actually impressed with the analysis and said it saved him hours of research. Definitely worth it for complicated real estate tax situations like this.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
If you're still confused after all this (I sure was with my similar project), I'd recommend actually talking to an IRS agent directly about your specific situation. After spending weeks trying to get someone on the phone, I used https://claimyr.com to get through to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was demolishing a fully depreciated office building to build apartments and needed clarity on several tax questions. The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed that demolition itself doesn't trigger recapture tax, but also advised me on how to properly document everything to avoid issues in future audits. They also clarified how to handle partial year depreciation for the new construction. Getting definitive answers directly from the IRS gave me confidence to move forward with my project - much better than relying on varied opinions from different sources.
0 coins
James Johnson
•Wait, you can actually get through to a real IRS person? I thought that was literally impossible these days. How does this actually work?
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•Sounds sketchy. Why would I pay someone to call the IRS when I can just call myself? I've heard the hold times aren't even that bad anymore.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•Yes, you get through to a real IRS agent - they use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent finally answers, you get a call connecting you directly to them. I got through in about 20 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. The hold times are still absolutely terrible for most tax topics. I tried calling myself multiple times and gave up after 1+ hour waits that often ended in disconnection. The last time I tried, the automated system actually told me to call back another day due to high call volume. With major tax questions about a development project worth hundreds of thousands, waiting weeks wasn't an option for me.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
I need to apologize for my skepticism about Claimyr in my previous comment. After another frustrating week of trying to reach the IRS myself about my own property demolition tax questions, I finally gave in and tried the service. I was connected to an IRS tax specialist within 15 minutes who gave me clear answers about my situation. They confirmed that demolishing my depreciated rental wouldn't trigger recapture, but also warned me about some documentation I'd need to maintain to prove the demolition date and value. They also explained how to handle the partially depreciated appliances and fixtures I was removing before demolition. I'm not someone who typically pays for services I can do myself, but the time saved and clarity gained was absolutely worth it. Considering I was making decisions about a $450k redevelopment project, getting direct IRS guidance was invaluable.
0 coins
Mia Green
Something nobody's mentioned yet - have you considered a 1031 exchange instead of demolition? If you sell the current property and buy a different one, you could defer all the capital gains and depreciation recapture taxes. Might be cleaner than demolishing and rebuilding, depending on your situation.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
•Interesting suggestion - wouldn't I still eventually face the depreciation recapture though? Or is there some advantage to the 1031 route vs. demolishing that I'm missing? Also, I'm really attached to this particular location, which is why rebuilding rather than relocating was my first instinct.
0 coins
Mia Green
•A 1031 exchange doesn't eliminate the depreciation recapture tax - it defers it until you eventually sell without doing another exchange. The main advantage is cash flow - you don't have to pay a large tax bill now, giving you more money to invest in the new property. If you're attached to the specific location, then demolition might make more sense. Remember though that with demolition you're looking at significant construction costs, possible delays, permits, and all the headaches of development. Sometimes it's cleaner to sell and buy something already built in a similar location, but that really depends on your specific goals and the market in your area.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
Don't forget about the basis of the land! Land doesn't get depreciated, so make sure your original purchase allocation between building and land was reasonable. If you're being audited, the IRS might question an allocation that put too much value on the building and not enough on the land. This is especially important with your demolition plan since you'll continue to use the same land. Make sure you have documentation supporting your original land/building allocation.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•This is super important! I learned this the hard way when I demolished a rental. My original allocation was 80% building, 20% land, which the IRS questioned during an audit since the property was in a high-value urban area. They forced a 60/40 split which meant I had been over-depreciating for years. Had to pay back taxes and penalties!
0 coins
Zoe Gonzalez
Great point about the land/building allocation! This is something I hadn't fully considered but it's crucial for my situation. When I originally purchased the property about 15 years ago, I think I allocated around 75% to the building and 25% to land based on the county assessment at the time. Given that land values have increased significantly in my area since then, I'm now wondering if that original allocation would hold up to IRS scrutiny. The lot is pretty substantial and in a desirable location, which is exactly why I want to develop condos there. Should I be getting a current appraisal to establish what the land/building split should be today? Or does the IRS stick with the original purchase allocation regardless of current market conditions? I definitely don't want to run into the same audit issues that Lucas mentioned - that sounds like a nightmare scenario when you're already invested in a major development project.
0 coins
Lucas Turner
•The IRS generally uses the original purchase allocation unless there's clear evidence it was unreasonable at the time of purchase. However, if your original 75/25 split seems out of line with comparable properties in your area from that time period, it could be questioned. I'd recommend getting a retrospective appraisal that shows what the land/building values were at your original purchase date, not current values. This can help support your original allocation if it's ever challenged. An appraiser can look at comparable sales from around your purchase date and provide documentation of what a reasonable split would have been then. Current market conditions don't change your historical basis allocation, but having professional documentation of your original split being reasonable can save you major headaches down the road. Better to spend a few hundred on an appraisal now than deal with audit adjustments later!
0 coins
Juan Moreno
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the impact of Section 280B regarding demolition expenses. When you demolish the old building, those demolition costs generally can't be deducted as a current expense - instead, they have to be added to the basis of the land. This means your demolition costs will increase your land basis, which could be beneficial when you eventually sell the entire property since it reduces your overall gain. However, since land isn't depreciable, you won't get any current tax benefit from those demolition expenses. Also, make sure to document everything thoroughly - dates of demolition, costs involved, permits obtained, etc. The IRS likes to see clear paper trails for major property changes like this, especially when depreciation schedules are involved. I've seen situations where poor documentation led to complications years later during audits. The good news is that your new condo construction costs will establish a fresh depreciable basis for the new structures, so you'll start getting depreciation benefits again once the new buildings are placed in service.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
•This is really helpful information about Section 280B that I hadn't come across before! So just to make sure I understand correctly - if I spend $50K on demolition costs, that $50K gets added to my land basis rather than being a deductible expense in the year of demolition? That actually makes sense from a tax perspective since the demolition is really part of preparing the land for new development, not just getting rid of an old building. And you're right that having a higher land basis will help reduce gain when I eventually sell the whole property. Your point about documentation is well taken too. I'm already thinking I should be taking before/after photos, keeping all contractor invoices, and maybe even getting a brief appraisal of the old structure's condition before demolition to show it had minimal remaining value. Better to over-document than under-document with something this complex!
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
As a newcomer to this discussion, I want to thank everyone for the incredibly detailed responses - this is exactly the kind of complex tax situation where getting multiple perspectives is invaluable. One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned is the potential impact on your local property taxes during the development phase. When you demolish the existing structure, your property assessment will likely change, which could affect your carrying costs during construction. Some jurisdictions reassess immediately upon demolition, while others wait until the new construction is complete. Also, regarding the documentation points that Juan and Natalie raised - you might want to consider having a professional photographer document the condition of the existing structure before demolition. This can help support the position that the building had little to no remaining value, especially if you're ever questioned about why it was demolished rather than renovated. The consensus here seems clear that demolition itself won't trigger depreciation recapture, but the devil is really in the details with proper documentation and basis allocation. Given the complexity and the significant investment you're making, having professional guidance from both a tax advisor and possibly a real estate attorney familiar with development projects could be worth the cost for peace of mind.
0 coins
Honorah King
•Excellent point about the property tax implications during development, Keisha! I hadn't thought about how demolition timing might affect carrying costs. In my area, the county typically reassesses within 30-60 days of receiving a demolition permit, so there could be a brief period where I'm paying taxes on vacant land rather than improved property - which should actually reduce my property tax burden during construction. Your suggestion about professional photography is spot-on too. I'm already planning to document everything, but having high-quality photos showing the building's deteriorated condition could definitely help justify the demolition decision if questioned later. It might also be worth having a contractor provide a written assessment of repair costs versus demolition/rebuild costs to further support the business rationale. The recurring theme in all these responses seems to be documentation, documentation, documentation. Between the basis allocation issues, Section 280B requirements, and potential future audits, this is clearly one of those situations where spending a bit more upfront on professional guidance and thorough record-keeping could save thousands down the road. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this has been incredibly educational!
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
This has been an incredibly thorough discussion! As someone who went through a similar demolition/rebuild project last year, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been fully stressed: the timing of when you place your new condos "in service" for tax purposes. The IRS considers rental property placed in service when it's ready and available for rent, not when construction is complete. This means if you finish construction in November but don't have your first tenant until February, your depreciation for the new buildings starts in February. This timing can significantly impact your first-year depreciation deduction, especially with the mid-month convention rules. Also, don't overlook the potential for bonus depreciation on certain components of your new construction. While the building structure itself follows the standard 27.5-year schedule, items like appliances, carpeting, and some other personal property components may qualify for accelerated depreciation or even immediate expensing under Section 179. One final tip: consider having your CPA help you set up a separate depreciation schedule for each condo unit if you plan to sell them individually later. This makes the accounting much cleaner if you decide to convert from rental to sale partway through the project. The extra bookkeeping complexity upfront can save significant headaches down the road. The consensus here is absolutely right - demolition won't trigger recapture, but the devil is in the details for everything that comes after!
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•This is such valuable insight about the "in service" timing, Natasha! I hadn't considered how the timing between construction completion and first tenant could impact my depreciation schedule. This could be a significant factor in my planning since I'm targeting completion in late fall, but the rental market in my area typically slows down during winter months. Your point about bonus depreciation on components is particularly intriguing - I had been thinking of the condos as single depreciable assets, but breaking out appliances, flooring, and fixtures for accelerated depreciation could provide some nice tax benefits in the early years. Do you know if this requires a cost segregation study, or can these components be reasonably estimated based on construction contracts? The suggestion about separate depreciation schedules for each unit is brilliant too. I'm initially planning to rent all units, but having the flexibility to sell some individually later without accounting headaches would be valuable. Did you find the additional bookkeeping burden to be manageable, or did it require specialized software/professional help to track everything properly? Thanks for sharing your real-world experience - it's exactly this kind of practical insight that makes these complex projects feel more manageable!
0 coins