Mark to market accounting examples for traders - how does MTM election work?
Hello everyone, I've been trading pretty actively over the last few years and I'm digging into the possibility of making the 475f election for mark to market accounting. I'm trying to understand exactly how mark to market works on a technical level. From what I've gathered (and please correct me if I'm wrong): On December 31st, any unrealized losses would be treated as "realized losses" for tax purposes (even though I haven't actually closed out these positions), and I could use these losses to offset any realized gains that show up on my 1099 from my brokerage. So essentially my taxable income would be: (Realized gains - unrealized losses on 12/31) Is this understanding correct? Can anyone share some concrete examples of how this plays out in practice or point me to some good resources? I want to make sure I fully understand the implications before making this election.
24 comments


Cedric Chung
You're on the right track, but there are some important nuances with mark to market accounting under Section 475(f). At year-end (December 31st), you treat all securities as if they were sold at fair market value - this applies to BOTH unrealized gains AND losses. So unrealized gains also become taxable, which is something many traders miss. Your formula should actually be: (Realized gains + Unrealized gains - Realized losses - Unrealized losses). The big advantage is that this election lets you treat all trading losses as ordinary losses rather than capital losses, which means you're not limited by the $3,000 capital loss deduction cap against other income. This can be huge if you have a bad year trading but significant other income. Remember that the election must be made by the tax filing deadline (not including extensions) of the year you want it to be effective. For existing traders, that's usually April 15th.
0 coins
Talia Klein
•Thanks for explaining this! I have a question - once you make the 475(f) election, can you ever go back to regular capital gains/losses treatment in future years? And what happens to positions you're holding when you first make the election?
0 coins
Cedric Chung
•Once you make the election, you can only revoke it with IRS permission, which typically requires showing a substantial change in your business circumstances. It's not something you can switch back and forth between years. For positions you're holding when first making the election, you'd recognize unrealized gains/losses on those positions as of the first day the election is effective. This is called the "beginning of year" mark, and these are treated as if sold and repurchased on that date. This means you could trigger tax liability on paper gains even before you've actually closed those positions.
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
After struggling to understand mark to market for my trading business, I found an incredible resource at https://taxr.ai that really spelled it all out for me in ways my CPA couldn't. I'm a pretty active trader (200+ trades/month) and was looking into the 475(f) election to escape the capital loss limitations. The system analyzed my trading patterns and tax situation, then showed me exactly how MTM would affect my specific portfolio with actual numbers. It even calculated the difference between capital gains treatment vs. MTM treatment based on my current open positions. For someone visual like me, seeing the side-by-side comparison for my specific situation made the decision crystal clear.
0 coins
PaulineW
•Does the system help with the actual 475(f) election paperwork? That's where I'm really stuck - figuring out exactly what needs to be filed and when.
0 coins
Annabel Kimball
•I'm skeptical about any service claiming to help with specialized tax elections like this. Does it actually give you proper legal advice or is it just general information that you could find anywhere?
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
•Yes, it actually provides the exact template for the 475(f) election statement that you need to include with your tax return. It pre-populates much of the information based on your specific situation and gives you step-by-step filing instructions including deadlines. I found this super helpful because I kept finding conflicting information online about the right format. The system isn't just providing general information - it analyzes your specific trading data to show the impact. It's not technically "legal advice" but rather tax analysis specific to your situation. What made it valuable for me was seeing exactly how much I would have saved last year if I had made the election (over $17k in my case) given my actual trading history.
0 coins
Annabel Kimball
Alright, I owe everyone an apology. I was the skeptic who questioned the taxr.ai service in a previous comment. I decided to try it myself, and I have to say I'm genuinely impressed. It showed me that I've been making a huge mistake by not making the 475(f) election. With my trading pattern (lots of short-term trades with some significant losses), I would have saved nearly $12,000 in taxes last year with MTM accounting. The visualization of unrealized gains/losses on my current positions and how they'd be taxed differently under MTM vs. capital gains treatment was eye-opening. I've spent hours trying to model this in spreadsheets and never got the clarity this system provided in minutes. It even flagged some wash sale issues I wasn't aware of that wouldn't exist under MTM. Consider me converted!
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
For anyone struggling to get answers about mark to market accounting from the IRS, I feel your pain. I spent WEEKS trying to reach someone who could actually help with my specific 475(f) questions. The generic phone line kept transferring me to people who barely understood what I was talking about. I finally found https://claimyr.com and their service was game-changing. They got me connected to an actual IRS tax law specialist who answered all my specific questions about mark to market accounting. She even explained exactly what documentation I needed to maintain as a trader using MTM accounting. You can see a demo of how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was especially concerned about whether my trading activity qualified as a "trading business" for the 475(f) election, and getting that straight from an IRS specialist was worth every penny.
0 coins
Jean Claude
•How exactly does this service work? Do they just keep calling the IRS for you until they get through?
0 coins
Charity Cohan
•This sounds too good to be true. I've been trying to get specific MTM guidance from the IRS for months. There's no way they can get you to an actual specialist that quickly. The IRS phone system is completely broken.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•They use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. Once they reach a human, they call you and connect you directly to the IRS agent. I was skeptical too, but it actually works. The key difference was that they knew exactly which department and which type of IRS agent handles trader tax status questions. Instead of getting bounced around to general tax help, I got connected directly to someone in the Business & Specialty Tax Line who actually understood Section 475 elections. It saved me literally days of frustration.
0 coins
Charity Cohan
I have to publicly eat my words. After expressing skepticism about Claimyr in my previous comment, I decided to try it anyway out of desperation. Within 45 minutes, I was talking to an IRS tax law specialist who answered my specific questions about mark to market and trading as a business. The agent confirmed that my trading activity (120+ trades per quarter, regular schedule, substantial account size) would likely qualify as a trading business eligible for MTM. She also explained that I needed to maintain separate accounts for investment positions vs. trading positions if I didn't want everything subject to mark to market. I've been confused about this distinction for months, and finally got a clear answer from an actual IRS specialist. This saved me from potentially making a costly mistake with my election.
0 coins
Josef Tearle
Here's a simple example of mark to market accounting that helped me understand it: Say on December 31st you have: - Realized gains for the year: $50,000 - Unrealized losses: $30,000 (positions still open) Under normal capital gains treatment, your taxable gains would be $50,000, and you couldn't use those paper losses yet. Under MTM with 475(f) election: - Taxable amount: $20,000 ($50,000 realized gains - $30,000 marked-to-market losses) - All gains/losses are ordinary income/loss, not capital The difference becomes even more significant if your unrealized losses exceed your realized gains. With normal treatment, you'd be limited to deducting $3,000 against other income. With MTM, you could offset all of it against other income.
0 coins
Shelby Bauman
•But what about the flip side? What if you have big unrealized gains at year end? Wouldn't you have to pay taxes on money you haven't actually received yet? That seems risky.
0 coins
Josef Tearle
•Yes, that's exactly the tradeoff that makes this decision so important. If you have substantial unrealized gains at year-end, you would indeed have to pay taxes on those paper profits before actually closing the positions. This is why MTM is generally most beneficial for active traders with frequent transactions rather than those who hold positions across tax years. If your strategy involves carrying large unrealized gains across year boundaries, MTM could create cash flow problems when you owe tax on money you haven't actually pocketed yet.
0 coins
Quinn Herbert
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is the impact on wash sale rules. If you make the 475(f) election, wash sale rules no longer apply to you! This was a game-changer for me as an active trader who frequently re-enters positions. With regular capital treatment, if you sell at a loss and buy substantially identical securities within 30 days before or after, the loss gets disallowed and added to the basis of the new position. This creates a tax nightmare for frequent traders. With MTM, this headache completely disappears.
0 coins
Salim Nasir
•Does the wash sale exemption apply to both securities and options under MTM? I trade a lot of options around core positions and the wash sale calculations have been a complete nightmare.
0 coins
Quinn Herbert
•Yes, the wash sale exemption under MTM applies to both securities and options, which is fantastic for options traders. Since options are marked to market at year-end anyway, the whole concept of wash sales becomes irrelevant. This is especially valuable for options traders who frequently roll positions or adjust strategies around core holdings. Under regular tax treatment, these adjustments can trigger wash sales that create massive headaches for tax reporting. With MTM, all those complications disappear - you simply mark everything to market on December 31st regardless of your trading activity throughout the year.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
This is such a helpful thread! As someone who's been considering the 475(f) election, I really appreciate all the detailed explanations and real-world examples. One question I haven't seen addressed: What happens if you're a part-time trader with significant W-2 income? I trade actively (about 80-100 trades per month) but it's not my primary source of income. Would the MTM election still make sense, or does it work better for full-time traders? I'm particularly interested in how the ordinary loss treatment would work against my regular salary income. If I had a bad trading year with net losses, could I use those to offset my W-2 income dollar-for-dollar instead of being limited to the $3,000 capital loss deduction? That could be a huge advantage even for part-time traders.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Great question! The MTM election can actually be very beneficial for part-time traders with W-2 income, especially in your situation with 80-100 trades per month. The key advantage you mentioned is exactly right - ordinary losses from MTM can offset your salary income dollar-for-dollar without the $3,000 capital loss limitation. For example, if you had a $20,000 trading loss in a bad year under MTM, you could deduct the full amount against your W-2 income, potentially saving you $5,000-7,000+ in taxes depending on your bracket. Under regular capital treatment, you'd only be able to deduct $3,000 per year and carry forward the rest. The IRS doesn't require trading to be your "primary" income source for the 475(f) election - you just need to qualify as being in the "trade or business" of trading. Your volume (80-100 trades/month) and regularity would likely support this classification. Many part-time traders successfully use MTM precisely because it provides this downside protection against their other income while still allowing them to maintain their primary career.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
This discussion has been incredibly enlightening! I've been trading for about 3 years now (150+ trades per month) and have been putting off learning about MTM accounting because it seemed too complicated. After reading through all these explanations and examples, I'm starting to think I've been leaving money on the table. My biggest concern has been the timing aspect - making sure I understand all the deadlines and requirements before committing to something I can't easily reverse. From what I'm gathering, the election needs to be made by April 15th for it to be effective for that tax year, and once made, it's essentially permanent without IRS permission to revoke. Does anyone know if there are any other important considerations for traders who primarily focus on swing trading (holding positions for days to weeks rather than intraday)? I'm wondering if the year-end mark-to-market requirement creates any specific challenges for swing traders who might have more positions open across the December 31st boundary compared to day traders who close everything daily. Also, for those who have made the election, how has it affected your record-keeping requirements? I assume you still need to track basis and holding periods for any non-trading investment accounts you maintain separately?
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•Great questions about swing trading and MTM! As someone who also holds positions for days/weeks rather than doing pure day trading, I can share some insights. The year-end mark-to-market actually works fine for swing traders - you just need to get fair market values for all your open positions as of December 31st. Most brokers provide this information automatically in year-end statements, so it's not as complex as it might seem. The key is making sure you're properly categorizing which accounts/positions are subject to MTM (your trading business) versus any separate investment accounts. For record-keeping, you're absolutely right that you need to maintain clear separation. I keep my long-term investments in a completely separate account that's not subject to the MTM election. For the trading account under MTM, the record-keeping is actually simpler in some ways since you're marking everything to market annually regardless of when you close positions. One timing consideration for swing traders: if you have large unrealized gains at year-end that you're planning to hold into the next year, you'll owe taxes on those gains even though you haven't closed them yet. This is different from day traders who typically close everything daily anyway. Just something to factor into your cash flow planning. The April 15th deadline is firm, so definitely don't wait if you're considering this for the current tax year!
0 coins
Maya Jackson
This has been an incredibly valuable discussion! I'm a newcomer to the MTM election topic and have been researching it for my trading activities (roughly 200 trades per month). One aspect I'm still trying to wrap my head around is the practical mechanics of the year-end valuation process. When you mark positions to market on December 31st, how do you handle securities that don't have clean closing prices - like thinly traded options or securities that might have stale quotes? Also, I noticed some mentions of needing to qualify as being in the "trade or business" of trading. Are there specific IRS guidelines or safe harbors for this determination, or is it more of a facts-and-circumstances test? With my trading volume, I'm confident I'd qualify, but I want to make sure I understand what documentation I should be maintaining to support this classification. Finally, for those who have gone through the MTM election process, did you work with a tax professional, or is this something a reasonably sophisticated trader can handle on their own? The complexity level seems manageable based on the discussions here, but I want to make sure I'm not underestimating anything important.
0 coins