How exactly do Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) impact Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) calculations?
I've been trying to understand how LTCG interact with AMT calculations, and the explanations I've found online are driving me crazy. From what I gather, LTCG are counted in your AMTI (Alternative Minimum Taxable Income) but aren't actually taxed at the AMT rates of 26% or 28% - they still get their preferential rates. What's confusing me is how LTCG might trigger AMT by pushing more of your income into being taxable. I think this happens because the AMT exemption phases out at 25 cents for every dollar over the threshold (around $750,000). Let me try to understand with some examples: **Without LTCG:** - AMTI = $385,000 - Exemption = $81,300 - Actual Taxable Income = $303,700 - Tax Rate = 26% (Since income < $220,700) and 28% for the rest - AMT Tax = $79,776 **With LTCG (no phase-out):** - AMTI = $385,000 - LTCG = $130,000 - AMTI+LTCG = $515,000 (below phase-out threshold) - Exemption = $81,300 - Actual Taxable Income = $303,700 - AMT Tax = $79,776 + (0.15 × $130,000) = $99,276 **With LTCG (phase-out):** - AMTI = $385,000 - LTCG = $400,000 - AMTI+LTCG = $785,000 (above phase-out threshold) - Exemption = $81,300 - (0.25 × ($785,000 - $750,000)) = $72,550 - Actual Taxable Income = $312,450 - AMT Tax = (26% and 28% brackets) + (0.15 × $400,000) = $142,286 Am I understanding this correctly? Do LTCG affect AMT in any other ways I'm missing?
34 comments


Carmen Lopez
Tax professional here. Your understanding of how LTCG interact with AMT is generally on the right track, but let me clarify a few points. You're correct that LTCG are included in your AMTI but are still taxed at their preferential rates (0%, 15%, or 20% depending on your income bracket) even under AMT. The way LTCG primarily affect AMT is by potentially reducing your AMT exemption through the phase-out rules. For 2025, the AMT exemption amounts are higher than your examples. The exemption phase-out threshold for married filing jointly is around $1,351,000 and for single filers around $675,500. The exemption itself is about $126,500 for married filing jointly and $81,300 for single filers. Your calculations show the right concept, but you might want to update your numbers to reflect current exemptions and thresholds. Also, remember that state tax deductions, certain itemized deductions, and personal exemptions that are allowed on your regular tax return but disallowed under AMT can also trigger AMT liability - not just capital gains.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•Thanks for the clarification! So am I right that the LTCG themselves aren't taxed at 26/28% AMT rates, but they can push me over the exemption phase-out threshold? Also, are there any specific planning strategies to minimize this AMT impact when realizing large capital gains?
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•You're absolutely right that LTCG maintain their preferential tax rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) even under AMT calculations. They're never subjected to the 26% or 28% AMT rates directly. Their main impact is potentially pushing you over that exemption phase-out threshold, which can indirectly increase your AMT liability. As for planning strategies, timing is everything with capital gains. Consider spreading large gains across multiple tax years if possible. You might also look at harvesting capital losses to offset gains. Additionally, since certain deductions that are disallowed under AMT (like state taxes) can trigger AMT liability, you might want to time those payments strategically in years with large capital gains. Another option is to consider making larger charitable contributions in high-income years, as these are fully deductible under both regular tax and AMT.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
I've been pulling my hair out trying to figure out AMT after selling some company stock this year! I finally found a solution using https://taxr.ai which helped me understand exactly how my capital gains would affect my tax situation. The tool analyzed my specific scenario and showed me how close I was to the AMT exemption phase-out thresholds. What was super helpful is that it modeled different scenarios where I could see exactly how selling different amounts of stock would impact both regular tax and AMT. I realized I could split my stock sales between 2025 and 2026 to significantly reduce my overall tax burden. The visualization really made it click for me in a way that reading articles never did.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Did the tool actually help with the phase-out calculations? My accountant charges me extra for AMT calculations and I'm tired of the fees. Can it handle complicated situations with multiple investment properties and K-1 income?
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•I'm skeptical about tax tools. How accurate was it compared to what you actually ended up owing? Did it consider state taxes too? I've been burned before by oversimplified calculators.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•The tool handled the phase-out calculations perfectly - it showed exactly how much of my exemption I'd lose at different income levels. It was a huge relief not having to figure out those complex formulas manually. Regarding accuracy, it was spot on when I compared the results with what my CPA calculated. And yes, it definitely handles state taxes - you can see both federal and state tax implications of your decisions. What I appreciated most was seeing several scenarios side by side to make the best decision about timing my stock sales.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
I was super skeptical about using online tools for something as complex as AMT calculations with capital gains. But after struggling with a huge potential tax bill from selling my rental property, I decided to try https://taxr.ai based on the recommendation above. Honestly, it was eye-opening. The tool showed me that by adjusting the timing of my property sale and some charitable contributions, I could reduce my AMT liability by over $18,000. It handled all the phase-out calculations automatically and explained exactly how my LTCG were affecting my overall tax situation. What really helped was seeing multiple scenarios compared side-by-side. I could instantly see how different decisions would play out tax-wise. Ended up splitting my sale across two tax years which kept me below the exemption phase-out threshold both years. Best tax decision I've made!
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
After 17 calls and hours on hold trying to get someone at the IRS to explain how AMT works with my stock options, I finally found https://claimyr.com and got through to an actual IRS representative in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent was able to clarify exactly how the AMT exemption phase-out works with my specific situation involving ISOs and capital gains. They confirmed that while LTCG are included in AMTI calculations, they're still taxed at their preferential rates. The agent walked me through a calculation similar to the one in the original post but tailored to my numbers. Honestly, I was about to pay a CPA $500 for a consultation just to get this information. Speaking directly with the IRS gave me the confidence to proceed with my tax planning.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•How does this even work? I thought getting through to the IRS was basically impossible. Are you just paying for someone else to wait on hold for you?
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•This sounds too good to be true. The IRS agents I've spoken with barely understand basic tax concepts, let alone complex AMT calculations with capital gains. I doubt they provided accurate advice for your specific situation.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•The service basically navigates the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you. When they reach an agent, they call you and connect you directly. It's completely legitimate - you're still the one speaking with the IRS representative. The quality of the IRS agent definitely depends on who you get. I was fortunate to connect with someone in the advanced tax department who dealt specifically with investment income. You can actually request to speak with someone who specializes in your issue when you get connected. Not every agent will be an expert, but in my experience, asking for someone who specializes in AMT or investment income will get you to someone knowledgeable.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
I have to eat my words about the IRS advice. After my skeptical comment above, I decided to try Claimyr myself since I was struggling with understanding how my RSU vesting would impact AMT. The service connected me with an IRS tax law specialist in about 15 minutes (way faster than I expected). The agent walked me through exactly how my stock compensation would affect both regular tax and AMT. They even emailed me official documentation about the exemption phase-out thresholds for 2025. What surprised me most was the agent took time to explain the difference between how ISOs and RSUs are treated for AMT purposes - information I couldn't find clearly explained anywhere online. This saved me from a potential $12,000 tax planning mistake I was about to make. Never thought I'd say this, but speaking directly with the IRS was incredibly valuable.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
The examples in your original post are conceptually right, but your numbers need updating. For 2025, the AMT exemption for single filers is $81,300 and phases out starting at $675,500 (not $578,150). One important thing you're missing: the LTCG can also impact other tax calculations that feed into AMT indirectly. For example, large capital gains can trigger the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) of 3.8% on investment income above certain thresholds. Also, LTCG can affect your eligibility for certain credits and deductions that phase out based on AGI or MAGI, which indirectly impacts your overall tax situation even though those phase-outs aren't technically part of the AMT calculation.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Is the NIIT considered part of AMT calculation though? I thought they were completely separate taxes. And doesn't the NIIT apply to both short-term and long-term gains anyway?
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•You're right that the NIIT is technically separate from the AMT calculation - it's its own 3.8% tax on investment income (including capital gains) for higher-income taxpayers. I mentioned it because when people are doing tax planning around large capital gains, they need to consider both AMT implications and NIIT together for the full picture. The NIIT does apply to both short-term and long-term gains. My point was that when analyzing the tax impact of capital gains, you need to look beyond just the direct AMT calculations to get a complete understanding of your tax liability. Many people focus solely on AMT and miss the NIIT piece, which can be substantial when dealing with large capital gains.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
Has anyone figured out how to model this in Excel? I'm trying to create a spreadsheet that will let me compare different scenarios for selling my company stock over the next few years. I especially need to account for the AMT exemption phase-out but I'm not sure if my formulas are correct.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•I created an Excel model last year for this exact purpose. The tricky part is setting up the right IF statements to handle the phase-out thresholds and different tax brackets. I found it easier to separate the calculations into different sections: 1) Basic income and deduction inputs 2) Regular tax calculation 3) AMT calculation with phase-out formulas 4) Comparison to determine which tax applies Happy to share the template if you need it.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
One aspect nobody's mentioning is that state taxes complicate this further. In California, we don't have a preferential rate for capital gains - they're taxed as ordinary income up to 13.3%. And CA has its own AMT system that works differently from federal. Made the mistake of not considering this when I sold my startup shares and got hit with a MASSIVE combined tax bill. Make sure you're modeling state impacts too!
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
Great point about state taxes! I'm dealing with a similar situation in New York where we also don't have preferential capital gains rates. What's really frustrating is that NY's AMT calculation is different from federal, and some of the adjustments that trigger federal AMT don't apply at the state level (and vice versa). For anyone dealing with multi-state issues, it gets even more complex. I have investment properties in different states, and each state has its own rules for how they tax capital gains and whether they have AMT. Texas has no state income tax, but California will tax you on gains from CA properties even if you're not a resident. The key lesson I learned (the hard way) is that you really need to model both federal and state implications together. A strategy that minimizes federal AMT might actually increase your state tax burden significantly. I ended up paying about $8,000 more in combined taxes because I only focused on the federal side when timing my asset sales.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•This is exactly what I'm worried about! I'm planning to sell some inherited stock next year and I live in Massachusetts, which has its own AMT system. The more I read about this, the more complicated it gets. Did you end up finding any resources or tools that could model both federal and state AMT together? I've been trying to research MA's AMT rules but the documentation is pretty sparse compared to federal. It sounds like you learned this lesson the expensive way - any specific advice for someone trying to avoid the same mistake? Also, when you mention the $8,000 additional cost from focusing only on federal - was that mainly because the optimal federal timing actually triggered more state AMT liability, or was it something else entirely?
0 coins
Yara Assad
•@Carmen Diaz The $8,000 mistake came from timing my stock sales to minimize federal AMT without considering that Massachusetts has different exemption thresholds and phase-out rules. What looked optimal federally actually pushed me into MA s'AMT range when I could have spread the sales differently. For MA specifically, their AMT exemption is much lower than federal $40,000 (vs $81,300 for single filers and) phases out starting around $150,000 instead of $675,500 federal. So you can trigger MA AMT much easier than federal. I couldn t'find any tools that properly modeled both together - most tax software handles them separately. What helped was creating a simple spreadsheet with both calculations side by side, then testing different timing scenarios. The key insight was that sometimes paying a bit more federal tax to stay under MA AMT thresholds saved money overall. My advice: get MA s'AMT forms Form (3 and) work through the calculation manually with your expected numbers before making any major moves. The rules are buried in their technical information releases, but they re'there if you dig deep enough.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I need to sell some inherited assets next year and was completely overwhelmed by the AMT implications. One thing I've learned from reading everyone's experiences is that the interaction between LTCG and AMT isn't just about the direct calculation - it's about how those gains affect your entire tax picture. The phase-out of the AMT exemption seems to be the biggest trap, especially for those of us in high-tax states. What's particularly valuable is seeing the real-world examples of how timing can make such a huge difference. The $8,000 mistake mentioned by Keisha really drives home why you can't just focus on federal AMT in isolation. I'm curious - has anyone dealt with inherited assets specifically? I know there's the stepped-up basis benefit, but I'm wondering if there are any unique AMT considerations when the gains come from inherited property versus assets you purchased yourself. The timing flexibility might be different since I didn't choose when to "start the clock" on these investments.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
•Great question about inherited assets! The stepped-up basis is definitely a huge advantage since you essentially "reset" the cost basis to fair market value at the time of inheritance, which can eliminate or significantly reduce the capital gains you'd otherwise face. From an AMT perspective, the good news is that gains from inherited assets are treated the same as any other LTCG - they maintain their preferential tax rates and follow the same exemption phase-out rules everyone's been discussing. The key difference is that you have much more flexibility in timing since your gains are likely smaller due to the stepped-up basis. One thing to consider though: if you inherited assets in a high-value year, you might want to check if the estate was subject to AMT, as that could affect some of the tax attributes that carry over. Also, some inherited assets (like certain retirement accounts) have required distribution timelines that might limit your timing flexibility. The timing advantage you mentioned is real - you can essentially optimize when to sell based purely on your current and projected income without worrying about long-term holding periods. This makes the multi-year planning strategies others have mentioned even more powerful for inherited assets.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
This has been such an enlightening discussion! As someone who's been wrestling with AMT calculations for years, I really appreciate how everyone has shared their real-world experiences and specific numbers. What strikes me most is how the AMT exemption phase-out seems to be the biggest gotcha for most people dealing with significant capital gains. The fact that LTCG maintain their preferential rates but can still trigger AMT indirectly through the phase-out mechanism is something I wish was explained more clearly in tax guides. The state tax complications that Dylan and Keisha mentioned are particularly eye-opening. I'm in Florida so I don't have to worry about state income tax, but seeing how dramatically different state AMT rules can affect the optimal federal strategy really drives home why tax planning needs to be holistic. One thing I'm still unclear on: when you're doing multi-year planning to stay under AMT thresholds, how do you account for other income sources that might fluctuate? I have some rental properties and consulting income that varies year to year, which makes it hard to predict exactly where I'll land relative to the phase-out thresholds when planning capital gains timing. Has anyone found a good way to build in buffers or contingencies when the timing decisions need to be made months in advance?
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•That's such a great question about building buffers for variable income! I've been dealing with this exact challenge with my consulting business and stock options vesting. What I've found helpful is creating conservative, moderate, and optimistic income scenarios for each year, then testing how different capital gains timing would work under each scenario. I typically plan based on the moderate case but keep the conservative scenario in mind as a "safety net." For rental income specifically, I try to factor in potential vacancy periods and major maintenance expenses that could swing my income significantly. One strategy that's worked is keeping some flexibility in the timing - like having assets I could sell in either December or January depending on where my actual income lands that year. I also learned to pay closer attention to estimated tax payments throughout the year as an early warning system. If my quarterly payments are running higher than expected, it gives me a heads up that I might need to adjust my capital gains strategy before year-end. The other thing that's helped is building in about a $50k buffer below the AMT phase-out threshold when planning, since there always seem to be income surprises (both good and bad) that I didn't fully account for. Better to err on the side of caution with something as expensive as AMT!
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
This conversation has been incredibly valuable - thank you all for sharing your experiences! I'm facing a similar situation with some stock options that vest next year, and reading through these real-world examples has helped me understand the nuances way better than any tax guide I've found. What really resonates with me is how the AMT exemption phase-out seems to be the main way LTCG bite you, rather than the gains themselves being taxed at AMT rates. The timing strategies everyone's discussing make so much sense now - spreading gains across multiple years to stay under those phase-out thresholds. I'm particularly interested in the tools that Andre and QuantumQuasar mentioned. As someone who's been trying to model different scenarios in Excel (like NebulaNinja), I'm curious if these automated tools can handle more complex situations like stock options with different vesting schedules and potential AMT adjustments from ISO exercises. Also, the state tax complications that several people mentioned are making me realize I need to research my state's rules more carefully. I'm in Virginia, which I believe follows federal AMT more closely than states like California or Massachusetts, but I definitely don't want to make the same $8,000 mistake that Keisha did by only focusing on the federal side. Has anyone dealt specifically with planning around stock option vesting schedules and AMT? The timing is less flexible than selling existing positions, so I'm wondering what strategies work when you can't control exactly when the income hits.
0 coins
ApolloJackson
•Stock options definitely add complexity to AMT planning! I went through this exact situation when I had ISOs vesting over multiple years while also dealing with some inherited stock I wanted to sell. The key insight I learned is that while you can't control when your options vest, you often have some flexibility in when you exercise them (depending on your company's policy). With ISOs specifically, the spread between exercise price and fair market value gets added to your AMTI, which can push you into AMT territory even without selling the stock. What worked for me was mapping out my vesting schedule and then planning other capital gains around those fixed income events. For example, if I knew I'd have a big ISO exercise in 2026 that would push me near the AMT threshold, I made sure to realize any other capital gains in 2025 or 2027 instead. Virginia does generally follow federal AMT rules more closely than CA or MA, but you'll still want to double-check their conformity - sometimes they adopt federal changes with a delay. The good news is this makes your planning a bit simpler since you don't have to optimize for two completely different sets of rules. One thing to watch with stock options: if your company gets acquired, you might lose control over timing entirely as options often get accelerated. Worth having a contingency plan for that scenario too.
0 coins
Kara Yoshida
This has been such an educational thread! I'm a newcomer to dealing with significant capital gains and AMT, and reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly helpful. I'm particularly struck by how the AMT exemption phase-out seems to be the real "gotcha" rather than the LTCG being taxed at AMT rates directly. The original post's examples really helped me understand the mechanics, even though the numbers need updating for 2025. What I'm taking away from all these discussions is that AMT planning around capital gains is really about: 1. Understanding how LTCG can push you over exemption phase-out thresholds 2. Timing gains across multiple years when possible 3. Considering state tax implications alongside federal AMT 4. Building in buffers for variable income sources 5. Looking at the complete tax picture including NIIT I'm dealing with some company stock I need to sell and was initially focused only on federal taxes. After reading about Keisha's $8,000 mistake from not considering state AMT, I realize I need to research my state's rules more carefully. The tools that Andre and others mentioned sound promising for modeling different scenarios. Has anyone used them for relatively straightforward situations (just stock sales, no complex partnerships or rental properties)? I'm wondering if they're overkill for simpler cases or if the visualization benefits are worth it regardless of complexity. Thanks again to everyone who shared their real experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight that's hard to find in tax guides!
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•Welcome to the AMT world, Kara! Your summary really captures the key insights from this discussion perfectly. As someone who learned about AMT the hard way through trial and error, I wish I had understood these concepts earlier. For straightforward stock sales, the visualization tools are definitely not overkill. Even simple situations can have non-obvious tax implications when AMT is involved. I found that seeing side-by-side scenarios helped me catch potential issues I would have missed with manual calculations - like how selling in December vs January of the following year could save thousands in taxes due to the phase-out mechanics. One thing to add to your excellent summary: don't forget to factor in any other major life changes that might affect your income in the years you're planning capital gains. Things like job changes, bonuses, or even marriage can significantly shift where you land relative to those AMT thresholds. Since you mentioned company stock, also consider if there are any blackout periods or insider trading restrictions that might limit your timing flexibility. I've seen people create perfect tax plans only to realize they couldn't execute them due to company policies. Good luck with your planning - sounds like you're approaching it with the right comprehensive mindset!
0 coins
Angelina Farar
As someone who just went through their first year dealing with significant LTCG and AMT, I can confirm that the exemption phase-out is indeed the main trap. What caught me off guard was how quickly you can go from "no AMT impact" to "substantial AMT liability" once you cross those thresholds. One thing I learned that might help others: if you're close to the phase-out threshold, consider bunching charitable contributions into the high-income year. Since charitable deductions are allowed under both regular tax and AMT (unlike state tax deductions), this can be an effective way to reduce your AMTI without triggering the preference adjustments that cause AMT in the first place. Also, for those dealing with stock options or RSUs, remember that the timing of when you sell the shares is separate from when the compensation income hits (at vesting). You can have AMT liability from the vesting even if you don't sell, which complicates the multi-year planning strategies discussed here. I made the mistake of only focusing on when I'd sell shares, not when the vesting income would hit my tax return. The state tax angle several people mentioned is crucial. Even in states that generally follow federal AMT rules, there can be subtle differences in exemption amounts or phase-out thresholds that matter when you're doing precise planning around those cutoff points.
0 coins
Kevin Bell
•Thanks for sharing your real-world experience, Angelina! Your point about charitable contribution bunching is really insightful - I hadn't considered that strategy since I was so focused on the mechanics of how LTCG affect the phase-out calculations. The distinction you made about vesting vs. selling timing is crucial for anyone with equity compensation. I'm actually dealing with RSUs that vest next year, and I was making the same mistake of only thinking about when to sell the shares. The compensation income from vesting hits your AMTI regardless of whether you sell, which definitely complicates the multi-year planning approach. Your experience with being close to the phase-out threshold sounds nerve-wracking! When you say it goes from "no AMT impact" to "substantial liability" quickly, can you give a rough sense of the dollar impact? I'm trying to understand how much of a buffer I should build in when planning around these thresholds. The charitable contribution strategy is particularly appealing since it's one of the few deductions that works the same under both regular tax and AMT. Do you know if there are any limits on how much you can bunch in a single year, or other considerations when using this approach specifically for AMT planning?
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
This thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone new to dealing with substantial capital gains, I've been trying to wrap my head around AMT implications and this discussion has clarified so much. What really clicked for me is understanding that LTCG don't get taxed at the 26%/28% AMT rates - they keep their preferential rates but can trigger AMT by pushing you over the exemption phase-out thresholds. The original post's framework was helpful, though as others noted, the 2025 numbers are higher. I'm particularly grateful for the real-world examples everyone shared. The $8,000 mistake from not considering state taxes, the charitable contribution bunching strategy, and the distinction between vesting and selling timing for stock compensation - these are exactly the kinds of practical insights you can't find in tax guides. One question I have: for those using multi-year planning to stay under AMT thresholds, how do you handle the risk of tax law changes between now and when you plan to realize gains? I'm looking at potentially spreading stock sales over 2-3 years, but I'm nervous about betting on current AMT exemption amounts and phase-out thresholds staying the same. Also, has anyone found that financial advisors or CPAs are generally well-versed in these AMT/LTCG interactions, or is this something you've had to research largely on your own? The complexity everyone's describing makes me think specialized expertise might be worth paying for.
0 coins
Lucas Lindsey
•Welcome to this complex but important topic, Jabari-Jo! Your concern about tax law changes is really smart - it's something I wish I had considered more carefully when I started my own multi-year planning. The reality is that AMT exemption amounts and thresholds do get adjusted annually for inflation, and there's always the risk of more significant legislative changes. What I've learned is to build flexibility into the plan rather than locking in rigid timelines. For example, instead of committing to sell exactly X shares in 2026, I identify windows where sales would make sense and stay ready to adjust based on both tax law changes and my actual income situation. Regarding professional expertise - this has been one of my biggest frustrations! I've found that many CPAs understand basic AMT concepts but fewer have deep expertise in the strategic planning around LTCG and exemption phase-outs. The good news is that fee-only financial planners who specialize in tax planning tend to be much more knowledgeable about these interactions. One approach that's worked well is to do the initial research myself (like you're doing here), then use a professional to verify my analysis and catch anything I missed. This thread has been incredibly valuable for that initial research phase - the collective wisdom here rivals what I've gotten from some paid consultations! Don't underestimate the value of the specialized tools others mentioned either. Sometimes paying for good software is cheaper than multiple CPA consultations.
0 coins