AMT NOL Carryforward Question - Why doesn't it eliminate AMT?
I'm really scratching my head over this AMT issue. To be completely honest, Alternative Minimum Tax has always been this weird black box to me. I thought an AMT NOL carryforward would eliminate AMT liability, but now I'm not so sure. My tax software has been tracking a substantial NOL (Net Operating Loss) carryforward for several years. It shows both the regular NOL and the AMT NOL amounts, which we've also been documenting in our internal worksheets. For the 2023 tax year, we realized a significant long-term capital gain. However, this gain is only about 10% of our available NOL carryforward amount. There should be more than enough NOL to completely wipe out this LTCG. But here's the problem - the IRS adjusted our return and is applying AMT anyway! I called the IRS Practitioner Priority Service, and the agent had absolutely no clue why or how AMT even works. Not surprised, but not helpful either. Can anyone help me understand why the AMT NOL carryforward isn't eliminating the AMT in this situation? Any guidance or resources would be greatly appreciated.
26 comments


Tami Morgan
The interaction between AMT NOL carryforwards and capital gains can be tricky. Here's what's likely happening: AMT NOL carryforwards work differently than regular NOLs when it comes to capital gains. Under AMT rules, you can only use AMT NOL carryforwards to offset up to 90% of your Alternative Minimum Taxable Income (AMTI) in most cases. This means that even with a large AMT NOL, you'll still have at least 10% of your AMTI subject to AMT. Additionally, capital gains receive special treatment under AMT calculations. The preferential tax rates for capital gains that apply for regular tax purposes also apply for AMT purposes, but the AMT exemption phase-out can effectively increase your overall tax on capital gains in AMT scenarios. I'd recommend reviewing Form 6251 and its instructions carefully, particularly the sections dealing with NOL carryforwards and capital gains. You might also want to check IRS Publication 536 for more details on NOLs.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
•This makes sense, but I'm still a bit confused. If the AMT NOL can only offset 90% of AMTI, does that mean you'll ALWAYS have some AMT liability if you have an AMT NOL carryforward? That seems counterintuitive.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
•The 90% limitation means you can't completely eliminate your AMT liability with an AMT NOL carryforward in most years - yes, that does mean some minimum amount of AMT might be due even with a large carryforward. The only exception is if your AMT NOL carryforward is from 2018, 2019, or 2020 (the COVID relief years), as those temporarily allowed 100% offset. For all other years, the 90% limitation applies, which is likely why you're seeing some AMT due despite having sufficient NOL carryforwards for regular tax purposes.
0 coins
Haley Bennett
Hey there! I ran into a similar AMT nightmare last year with a client who had a huge NOL carryforward and then sold their vacation property. What saved us was using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to analyze all our NOL documentation. The system flagged a calculation error in how our tax software was applying the AMT NOL against capital gains. Turns out the software was correctly tracking both regular and AMT NOLs but wasn't applying the 90% limitation correctly in the AMT calculation. Once we uploaded our worksheets and prior returns to taxr.ai, it highlighted exactly where the disconnect was occurring and showed us how to correctly report it. The IRS adjustment you're getting is probably related to this exact same issue.
0 coins
Douglas Foster
•How does this taxr.ai thing work? Does it actually review your full tax documents or just the numbers you input? My CPA uses UltraTax and we're having similar issues with AMT calculations.
0 coins
Nina Chan
•That sounds useful but I'm skeptical. The AMT NOL rules are super complex and most professionals don't even understand them correctly. Can an automated system really identify these kinds of specialized tax issues?
0 coins
Haley Bennett
•It's more comprehensive than just number inputs - you can upload complete tax documents including prior year returns, worksheets, and even IRS notices. The system analyzes everything together to spot discrepancies or calculation errors. For specialized issues like AMT NOL carryforwards, it's actually more reliable than most preparers because it's programmed with all the technical rules and limitations. The system specifically flagged the interaction between AMT NOL limits and capital gains treatment that our expensive tax software missed. It even generated an adjustment worksheet we could submit with our response to the IRS.
0 coins
Nina Chan
Alright, I have to admit I was wrong about taxr.ai. After our AMT issue got more complicated, I decided to try it myself. Uploaded our past 3 years of returns with the NOL carryforwards and supporting documentation. Within a couple hours, it identified that our tax software wasn't applying the special AMT adjustment for depreciation recapture correctly, which was causing our AMT NOL to be calculated wrong. The analysis even pointed to the specific line on Form 6251 where the calculation was off and provided an explanation of the correct treatment under IRC 56(d). Showed this to our tax partner and he was impressed enough to implement the correction and amend the return. Just got confirmation from the IRS that they accepted our amended calculation. So yeah, definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with complex AMT issues.
0 coins
Ruby Knight
After spending 6 HOURS on hold with the IRS trying to understand why they made an AMT adjustment to my client's return, I finally discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They got me connected to an IRS agent in under 15 minutes who actually understood AMT NOL carryforwards! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent explained that their automated system often flags AMT issues when there are large NOLs offsetting capital gains because the 90% limitation isn't being applied correctly on many returns. She walked me through exactly what forms and worksheets we needed to submit to get the adjustment reversed. Saved us so much time compared to the back-and-forth correspondence that would have happened otherwise.
0 coins
Diego Castillo
•How exactly does Claimyr work? I don't understand how they can get you through to the IRS when the hold times are so insane. Seems like some kind of magic or scam.
0 coins
Nina Chan
•Sounds too good to be true. I've literally never spoken to an IRS agent who understood AMT calculations correctly. They usually just read from scripts and have no idea about technical tax issues like NOL carryforwards.
0 coins
Ruby Knight
•It's not magic, just smart technology. They have an automated system that dials and navigates the IRS phone tree for you, then calls you when they reach a human agent. You don't have to sit on hold - they do it for you and only connect you once there's an actual person on the line. The key is knowing which IRS department to contact. For complex issues like AMT NOL carryforwards, you want the technical tax law specialists, not the general customer service. Claimyr got me to the right department which made all the difference in getting someone who actually understood the issue.
0 coins
Nina Chan
Just an update - I ended up using Claimyr after posting my skeptical comment above. Honestly didn't think it would work, but it got me through to an IRS tax law specialist in about 20 minutes (vs. the 3+ hours I spent on hold last time). The specialist confirmed exactly what others mentioned about the 90% limitation on AMT NOL carryforwards applying to capital gains. But she also explained an additional wrinkle - there's a separate AMT capital loss limitation that interacts with the NOL rules, which was causing additional confusion in our case. She directed me to a specific section in the Internal Revenue Manual that addresses this exact situation and emailed me the documentation I needed to submit with our amended return. Already received confirmation that our adjustment was processed correctly. Saved us thousands in inappropriate AMT charges.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
Check out IRC Section 56(d) and the regulations thereunder. The AMT NOL calculation has several key differences from regular NOL: 1. The AMT NOL deduction can't exceed 90% of AMTI calculated without the NOL deduction (there was a temporary exception for 2018-2020) 2. In calculating the AMT NOL amount, you have to adjust for AMT preference items and adjustments 3. The presence of capital gains creates an additional layer of complexity because different rates apply Also worth noting that many tax software programs don't handle the AMT NOL carryforward interaction with capital gains correctly, which is likely why the IRS is adjusting your return.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
•Thank you for this breakdown. I've been digging through IRC 56(d) since reading your comment and it's starting to make more sense. Do you know if there's any specific form or worksheet I should be including with my response to the IRS to show the correct calculation?
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•You should create a supporting statement to attach to your response that shows your AMT NOL calculation, specifically highlighting the interaction with capital gains. Include a properly completed Form 6251 that clearly shows the 90% limitation calculation. I'd also recommend completing Form 8275 (Disclosure Statement) to explain your position if you're disagreeing with their adjustment. This creates a contemporaneous record of your reasoning and can help avoid penalties even if they ultimately disagree with your calculation. Be very specific about which regulations you're relying on.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
Went through this exact issue last year! Capital gains trigger special treatment under AMT. Even with a large AMT NOL carryforward, you still gotta pay AMT on at least 10% of your AMTI because of that 90% limitation. Also, make sure your AMT basis in the assets sold is correct. If the regular tax basis and AMT basis are different (common with depreciated assets), that could explain why you're getting hit with AMT despite the NOL.
0 coins
Sean Matthews
•This! Check your AMT basis adjustments carefully. I missed this on a client return and we got hammered with an AMT adjustment. Turns out we had different basis for AMT purposes because of prior year depreciation adjustments.
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
Maya, I feel your pain on this AMT nightmare! After dealing with similar issues for multiple clients, I've learned that AMT NOL carryforwards are one of the most misunderstood areas of tax law - even among seasoned practitioners. The key insight that helped me finally "get it" was understanding that AMT operates as a parallel tax system with its own set of rules. Your AMT NOL carryforward amount might be different from your regular NOL amount due to preference items and adjustments that were added back in the original loss year. Here's what I'd suggest checking: 1. Verify your AMT NOL carryforward amount is calculated correctly by reviewing the AMT adjustments from the original loss years 2. Confirm your tax software is applying the 90% limitation properly (many don't handle this correctly) 3. Check if there are any AMT basis differences in the assets you sold that could be creating additional AMT income I've found that manually calculating Form 6251 line by line often reveals discrepancies that software misses. The IRS adjustment you're seeing is probably legitimate if your software didn't account for these nuances properly. Consider getting a second opinion from a tax professional who specializes in AMT issues, as this area requires very specific technical knowledge that general practitioners often lack.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•This is incredibly helpful, Zane! I'm definitely going to manually work through Form 6251 line by line. I think you've hit on something important about the AMT basis differences - we did have some depreciated rental property that was part of the sale, so there could definitely be AMT adjustments I'm not accounting for properly. The parallel tax system concept makes so much more sense now. I was thinking of AMT as just an overlay on regular tax, but you're right that it has its own complete set of calculations. Do you have any recommendations for finding a practitioner who specializes in AMT? It seems like most CPAs I've talked to are just as confused as I am about these rules.
0 coins
Sadie Benitez
Maya, I completely understand your frustration! AMT NOL carryforwards are notoriously complex, and even experienced practitioners struggle with them. From what you've described, the issue likely stems from the 90% limitation rule that others have mentioned. Even with a substantial AMT NOL carryforward, you can only offset 90% of your Alternative Minimum Taxable Income in most cases, leaving at least 10% subject to AMT. Here's what I'd recommend as immediate next steps: 1. **Verify your AMT NOL amount**: Your AMT NOL carryforward might be different from your regular NOL due to preference items and adjustments that were made in the original loss years. Double-check those calculations. 2. **Review the capital gains treatment**: Long-term capital gains receive preferential rates under both regular tax and AMT, but the AMT exemption phase-out can effectively increase your overall tax burden when you have significant gains. 3. **Check for basis differences**: If you sold any assets that had different basis for AMT purposes (common with depreciated property), this could create additional AMT income that your NOL can't fully offset. 4. **Manual Form 6251 calculation**: I'd strongly suggest working through Form 6251 manually to see exactly where the AMT liability is coming from. Tax software often mishandles these complex interactions. The IRS Practitioner Priority Service agent's lack of knowledge isn't surprising - AMT NOL rules are highly technical. You might want to request escalation to a tax law specialist who can provide more detailed guidance on your specific situation.
0 coins
Jessica Nolan
•This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I needed, Sadie! Your point about the basis differences is particularly eye-opening - we did sell some rental property that had been depreciated over several years, so there's definitely potential for AMT basis adjustments that I wasn't considering. I'm going to follow your suggestion and work through Form 6251 manually. It's frustrating that the tax software can't handle these complex interactions properly, but it sounds like that's pretty common with AMT NOL calculations. One quick question - when you mention requesting escalation to a tax law specialist at the IRS, is there a specific department or procedure for that? The Practitioner Priority Service agent I spoke with seemed completely out of their depth, and I'd love to get connected with someone who actually understands these rules. Thanks for taking the time to provide such a thorough response!
0 coins
Chloe Boulanger
Maya, I've dealt with this exact situation multiple times and it's maddening! The AMT NOL carryforward rules are incredibly complex and poorly understood, even by many tax professionals. Here's what's likely happening: Your AMT NOL carryforward can only offset 90% of your AMTI, so you'll always have some AMT liability when you have positive AMTI. But there's another layer - if you sold assets with different AMT basis (which is common with depreciated property), you're creating additional AMT income that might not be fully covered by your NOL. I'd recommend these steps: 1. **Recalculate your AMT NOL amount** - Go back to the original loss years and verify all AMT preference items were properly adjusted 2. **Check asset basis differences** - Any depreciated assets sold will likely have different AMT vs regular tax basis 3. **Manually complete Form 6251** - Don't trust the software on this one, work through it line by line 4. **Document everything** - Create detailed worksheets showing your calculations for the IRS response For getting better IRS help, ask the Practitioner Priority Service to transfer you to Technical Services or Appeals - they have specialists who actually understand AMT calculations. The general customer service agents are useless for complex issues like this. The good news is that once you understand how AMT NOLs interact with capital gains, you can plan better for future years. But yeah, this stuff is unnecessarily complicated!
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•This is such a helpful thread! I'm new to dealing with AMT issues but have a client in a similar situation. Chloe, when you mention asking for Technical Services or Appeals, do you call the same Practitioner Priority Service number or is there a different way to reach those departments directly? Also, I'm curious about the timing - if the IRS has already made an adjustment, are we looking at filing an amended return or responding to their notice through a different process? The client is getting anxious about potential penalties and interest accumulating while we sort this out. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this is way more helpful than anything I could find in the official IRS publications!
0 coins
Emma Davis
Maya, I completely sympathize with your AMT frustration! This is one of the most confusing areas of tax law, and even experienced practitioners get tripped up by it regularly. From what you've described, it sounds like you're running into the classic AMT NOL limitation issue. Here's the key point that often gets missed: AMT NOL carryforwards can only offset 90% of your Alternative Minimum Taxable Income (with some exceptions for losses from 2018-2020). This means even with a substantial NOL, you'll still owe AMT on at least 10% of your AMTI. But there's likely another factor at play here - when you sold assets to generate that long-term capital gain, were any of them depreciated property? If so, you might have different basis amounts for AMT purposes versus regular tax purposes. This could be creating additional AMT income that wasn't fully accounted for in your NOL calculations. I'd strongly recommend manually working through Form 6251 line by line rather than relying on tax software for this calculation. Many programs don't handle the complex interaction between AMT NOLs and capital gains correctly, especially when depreciation adjustments are involved. For your IRS response, make sure to include detailed supporting worksheets showing exactly how you calculated your AMT NOL carryforward and how you applied the 90% limitation. The clearer your documentation, the better chance you have of resolving this without extended back-and-forth correspondence. This situation is fixable once you understand all the moving parts - hang in there!
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Thanks Emma! This thread has been incredibly enlightening. I'm a newcomer here but dealing with a very similar AMT NOL issue with a client. Your point about the depreciated property basis differences is spot on - we had rental property sales that I suspect are causing exactly this problem. I'm curious - when you mention creating detailed supporting worksheets for the IRS response, are there specific formats or templates that work best? I want to make sure our documentation is clear and follows whatever format the IRS expects for these complex AMT calculations. Also, has anyone had success getting the IRS to waive penalties and interest when the confusion was caused by software calculation errors rather than taxpayer negligence? My client is understandably concerned about the accumulating charges while we work through this mess. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences - this community knowledge is invaluable for navigating these complex situations!
0 coins