Is the $1 between each tax bracket not taxed? Confused about tax bracket boundaries
So I might be overthinking this, but I'm a bit confused about how tax brackets work at the boundary points. I've been updating my tax planning spreadsheet for next year and noticed something weird with the calculations where I seem to be missing $1 from each bracket when doing the math. When I look at the official 2025 tax brackets, they're listed like: * 10% : $0 to $12,350 * 12% : $12,351 to $50,175 * 22% : $50,176 to $107,050 * etc. The way I understand it, this seems to indicate that the upper limit isn't included in the current bracket but is part of the next one. So when calculating taxes for income that spans multiple brackets, I've been subtracting the lower bound from the upper bound for completed brackets. But here's what's bugging me - this means I'm always coming up $1 short per bracket that my income fully passes through. So if my income is $65,000, am I calculating correctly or missing something? Does this mean the dollar amount exactly at each boundary (like exactly $50,175) is somehow not taxed? Or should I be reading the brackets differently? Am I overthinking this for what amounts to like 50 cents in actual tax difference? Would appreciate any clarification!
18 comments


Edwards Hugo
This is actually a really good question about how tax bracket boundaries work! The way the IRS presents the tax brackets can be confusing, but I can clear this up. You're right that the brackets are listed with a $1 difference between the end of one bracket and the beginning of the next. This is intentional and doesn't mean any income goes untaxed. The brackets are written this way to avoid any overlap or gaps. The way to think about it is that income is taxed in whole dollar amounts. So $12,350 is taxed at 10%, while $12,351 is the first dollar taxed at 12%. There's no "missing dollar" - it's just that the brackets are defined with precise boundaries. When calculating taxes in a spreadsheet, you shouldn't subtract the lower bound directly from the upper bound. Instead, you need to add 1 to the difference. So for the 12% bracket, instead of ($50,175 - $12,351), you should calculate ($50,175 - $12,351 + 1) to get the correct number of dollars taxed at that rate. The IRS Publication 17 and the instructions for Form 1040 use this exact notation for clarity about which dollars fall into which brackets. You're definitely not overthinking it - getting the calculations exactly right matters for accuracy!
0 coins
Gianna Scott
•Thanks for explaining this! I'm still a bit confused though. If I make exactly $50,175, is that dollar taxed at 12% or 22%? And do most tax calculators automatically account for this off-by-one error or should I be checking my software for this?
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•If you make exactly $50,175, that specific dollar is taxed at 12% because it falls within the 12% bracket, which covers $12,351 through $50,175 inclusive. The very next dollar ($50,176) would be the first one taxed at 22%. Most good tax software and online calculators do account for this correctly. They're designed to handle these boundary conditions properly. That said, if you're building your own spreadsheet (which is what it sounds like you're doing), you need to be careful about the formulas. The easiest approach is to use "less than or equal to" logic rather than doing straight subtraction. For example, count all dollars that are <= $50,175 and > $12,350 as being in the 12% bracket.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
After struggling with similar tax bracket calculation issues last year, I found an amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that completely solved this for me. I was manually calculating my estimated taxes each quarter for my freelance work and kept having small discrepancies. What's cool about taxr.ai is it handles all these edge cases automatically - including the exact bracket boundary issues you're talking about. I uploaded my previous calculations and it immediately identified several small errors in my formulas, including the bracket boundary issue. The tool actually explains exactly how the IRS calculates taxes at these boundary points and provides the correct formulas. Saved me tons of headaches for quarterly estimates!
0 coins
Sydney Torres
•Does it work if you have income from multiple states? My situation is complicated because I work remotely but my company is based in another state, and I'm never sure if I'm calculating the bracket transitions correctly for both state returns.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•I'm skeptical about these tax tools. How is this different from TurboTax or H&R Block? They always promise to be accurate but then when I double-check their math I find weird inconsistencies, especially with bracket calculations.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
•Yes, it absolutely handles multi-state income! That's actually one of the things I found most helpful. I do consulting work across three different states, and it correctly applied the different bracket structures and rates for each state, plus handled the credit for taxes paid to other states. It even flagged that I was using outdated brackets for one state. The big difference from TurboTax or H&R Block is that it's specifically designed for planning and calculations throughout the year, not just filing. It's more of an analytical tool that explains its math and shows you exactly how each dollar is being taxed. When I found small discrepancies in my calculations, it highlighted exactly which formula in my spreadsheet was off by a dollar or two and explained why. Much more transparent than the "black box" approach of most tax software.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
I was super skeptical about taxr.ai when I first heard about it, but I actually tried it after my accountant and I had a disagreement about how my bracket calculations should work for my S-corporation income. Hate to admit it, but I was wrong and the tool was right. What convinced me was how it visually showed exactly which dollars were being taxed in each bracket - including those boundary dollars we're discussing. My calculation error was exactly what the original poster described - I was off by $1 per bracket because I didn't account for the inclusive nature of the upper boundary. The tool has actually saved me about $2,200 this year because it helped me optimize when to take distributions vs. salary in relation to bracket thresholds. Not life-changing money but definitely worth it!
0 coins
Caleb Bell
If you're having trouble getting answers from the IRS about exact tax bracket calculations, I finally got clear guidance using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I had this exact same question last tax season and could NOT get a straight answer from any online resource. After waiting on hold with the IRS for nearly 2 hours and getting disconnected twice, I tried Claimyr which got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with confirmed exactly how these bracket boundaries work and explained that the IRS publication formatting is intended to show that each dollar amount belongs to exactly one bracket with no gaps. They also sent me a reference document that specifically addresses calculation methods for bracket boundaries.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•Wait, what is this service exactly? Does it somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? That sounds either miraculous or sketchy. I've literally never been able to get through to them during tax season.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•Feels like a scam. If this actually worked, everyone would use it. I spend HOURS every year trying to get through to the IRS. And even if you get through, half the time they give you wrong information anyway. Ask three different IRS agents the same question, get four different answers.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
•It's completely legitimate. It uses a callback system that continuously dials the IRS until it gets through, then calls you when an agent is on the line. It's not skipping any lines - it's just automating the frustrating redial process. I was skeptical too until I read that it was featured in The Wall Street Journal and other major publications. The reason everyone doesn't use it is that most people don't know about it yet. It was a game-changer for me because I needed specific guidance on this exact bracket boundary issue for my small business taxes, and the agent I spoke with was actually very knowledgeable and helped clear up my confusion entirely. The documentation they sent me afterward specifically addressed how bracket calculations work at the boundaries and saved me from both overpaying and making errors on my return.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it when I needed to resolve an issue with an incorrect 1099-K that was throwing off my bracket calculations. I was 100% convinced it wouldn't work, but literally within 28 minutes I was talking to an actual IRS representative who knew exactly how to handle my question about bracket boundary calculations. She confirmed what others have said - the dollar amount listed as the upper boundary of each bracket IS included in that bracket, and the next bracket starts at exactly $1 more. She also helped me correct the 1099-K issue which was potentially going to push me into a higher bracket incorrectly. Saved me potential auditing headaches and about $1,400 in taxes I didn't actually owe.
0 coins
Abigail Patel
The way I've always understood tax brackets (and how I built my spreadsheet) is using the "taxable income" concept: If your taxable income is LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO the upper limit of a bracket, then that's your bracket. So $50,175 is in the 12% bracket, while $50,176 is in the 22% bracket. For calculation purposes, I use this formula: - 10% of the first $12,350 - 12% of the amount over $12,350 up to $50,175 - 22% of the amount over $50,175 up to $107,050 And so on... This way there's no confusion about missing dollars. The key is to calculate the tax on the amount WITHIN each bracket, not the bracket boundaries themselves.
0 coins
Daniel White
•This is how I do it too, but I still run into small discrepancies when I check my work against online calculators. Is there a specific formula you use in Excel/Google Sheets? I feel like I'm still missing something.
0 coins
Abigail Patel
•I use nested IF statements in Excel to determine which portion of income falls into each bracket. For example: For the 12% bracket: =IF(Income>12350,IF(Income>=50175,50175-12350,Income-12350),0)*0.12 This says "if income is greater than $12,350, then either take the full bracket amount ($50,175-$12,350) if income exceeds the top of this bracket, or just take (Income-$12,350) if income falls within this bracket. Multiply the result by 12%." Do this for each bracket, then sum them all up. The key insight is treating the upper boundary as inclusive (using >= for comparing to the upper limit), so $50,175 gets taxed at 12%, not 22%. This matches official IRS calculations exactly.
0 coins
Nolan Carter
I think we're all overthinking this lol. The tax calculation difference you're seeing is probably just a rounding error in your spreadsheet. The IRS actually rounds to the nearest dollar anyway on the final tax owed, so being off by a few cents per bracket is meaningless in real life.
0 coins
Natalia Stone
•Actually, precision matters here. While the final tax amount is rounded, the calculations themselves need to be exact. I learned this the hard way when my "close enough" spreadsheet ended up being off by $237 compared to my actual return because of accumulated small errors in multiple bracket calculations.
0 coins