< Back to IRS

Carmen Vega

Contributing to Roth IRA with only guaranteed payments as income from a partnership loss

So I've got this tax situation I'm trying to figure out. I'm a partner in a business and received about $26,500 in guaranteed payments last year. The thing is, our partnership took a pretty big loss for the year. When everything gets reported on my 1040, it actually shows a net loss because the guaranteed payments and partnership stuff all go on the same line. I really want to contribute to my Roth IRA this year but I'm confused if I can. I mean, I physically received income (those guaranteed payments), but on paper it looks like I didn't make anything. I don't have any other earned income sources - just these guaranteed payments from the partnership. Anyone know if the IRS considers my guaranteed payments as "earned income" for Roth contribution purposes even though my business had a loss? Or am I out of luck because everything together shows negative on my tax return?

This is an interesting situation! Guaranteed payments to partners are considered earned income for many tax purposes, including Roth IRA contributions. What makes your case unique is how everything gets reported on your tax return. For Roth IRA contribution eligibility, you need "compensation" as defined by the IRS. Guaranteed payments to partners generally qualify as compensation, even when the overall partnership has a loss. The key is that these payments represent compensation for services you personally provided to the partnership. The fact that your Schedule K-1 and guaranteed payments combine to show a net loss on your Form 1040 doesn't negate that you received earned income. For Roth contribution purposes, the IRS looks at the guaranteed payment amount itself, not the net result after losses. So based on your $26,500 in guaranteed payments, you should be eligible to contribute to your Roth IRA, up to the annual limit ($6,500 for 2025 if you're under 50).

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

That makes sense, but I'm still confused. So if the Schedule E shows a loss overall after combining guaranteed payments and the K-1 loss, do you just mentally separate out the guaranteed payments when determining Roth eligibility? Is there something specific in the tax code about this? I'm in a similar situation but my accountant is telling me I can't contribute.

0 coins

Yes, you should separate the guaranteed payments from the net partnership result when determining Roth eligibility. The key is in how the IRS defines "compensation" for IRA purposes. Guaranteed payments to partners are specifically included in this definition as compensation for services, separate from your share of partnership income or loss. If your accountant is saying you can't contribute, they may be looking at the net income line only. Show them IRS Publication 590-A, which discusses compensation for IRA purposes. Guaranteed payments for services (reported on Schedule K-1, box 4 and included on Schedule E) qualify as compensation even when the partnership has an overall loss. This is different from a regular partner's distributive share of income, which wouldn't qualify if there's a net loss.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Had this exact same issue last tax season! I uploaded my K-1 showing guaranteed payments and a big partnership loss to https://taxr.ai and they immediately flagged it as an area where errors commonly happen. Their analysis showed my guaranteed payments DO count as earned income for Roth eligibility purposes regardless of the overall loss. The software explained that unlike regular business losses that can wipe out your earned income, guaranteed payments are considered compensation for services you personally provided (like salary) rather than a share of business profits. So while everything might net to a loss on your 1040, those guaranteed payments still maintain their character as earned income for Roth contribution purposes.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

How does that service work exactly? Does it just review your tax forms or does it actually help you file? I'm wondering because I've got K-1s from multiple partnerships and last year my accountant said I couldn't contribute to my Roth because of losses...

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

I'm skeptical about this. If your Schedule E shows a net loss, wouldn't that mean you technically didn't have any earned income for the year? Does the IRS really separate out the guaranteed payments when the whole thing nets negative?

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

The service reviews your tax forms, explains the tax implications, and identifies potential issues - it's more of an analysis tool than a filing tool. You upload your documents and it uses AI to detect potential problems and explain complex tax situations in plain English. It saved me from missing out on my Roth contribution last year. Regarding the separation of guaranteed payments - yes, that's exactly what happens. The IRS treats guaranteed payments similar to wages for many purposes including Roth eligibility. They maintain their character as compensation even when combined with partnership losses on Schedule E. The tax code specifically defines these payments as payments for services, not as a share of partnership income.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Just wanted to update that I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here. I uploaded my tax documents from last year showing guaranteed payments and partnership losses, and the analysis confirmed I COULD have contributed to my Roth IRA! I'm actually eligible to make a prior year contribution still since we're before the tax deadline. The service explained exactly how guaranteed payments are treated differently from regular partnership income and showed the specific IRS references. Turns out my accountant was looking at the wrong line item (the net amount) instead of considering the guaranteed payments separately. I would have completely missed out on building my retirement savings for a whole year! Now I'm going to max out both last year's and this year's Roth contributions.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

For anyone dealing with IRS questions like this, I had a similar issue and spent WEEKS trying to get through to the IRS for a definitive answer. Eventually I found https://claimyr.com and used their service (there's a demo video at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes when I'd been trying for days on my own. The IRS agent confirmed exactly what others here are saying - guaranteed payments to partners count as earned income for Roth IRA purposes, regardless of whether the partnership has an overall loss. The agent explained that guaranteed payments are treated similar to W-2 wages for certain tax purposes including retirement contributions. Totally changed my understanding of how partnership compensation works!

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Wait, how is this even possible? The IRS phone lines are impossible to get through. Does this service just keep calling for you or something? Seems too good to be true considering how notoriously difficult the IRS is to reach...

0 coins

I'm really doubtful about this. I've literally never been able to get a straight answer from the IRS on complex questions like partnership taxation. Did they actually give you a definitive answer or just a general response? And did they put anything in writing?

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

The service basically holds your place in line with the IRS and calls you when they're about to connect you. They use some technology that keeps redialing and navigating the phone tree until they get through. It's not that they have special access - they're just automating the painful wait process. The IRS agent gave me a very specific answer about guaranteed payments qualifying as earned income for Roth contributions. They cited the relevant sections of the tax code and explained exactly how these payments are treated differently from regular partnership income. While they don't provide written documentation, I took detailed notes during the call and the agent provided their ID number for my records in case I needed to reference the conversation later.

0 coins

I need to eat some crow here. After being skeptical about Claimyr, I gave it a shot because I was desperate to figure out this exact guaranteed payment issue. Got connected to an IRS rep in about 15 minutes when I'd been trying for THREE DAYS on my own. The agent explained that guaranteed payments are considered "earned income" for retirement contribution purposes under Section 1402 of the tax code, separate from the partnership's profitability. They're essentially compensation for services and maintain that character regardless of partnership losses. The agent even emailed me the specific IRS reference materials after our call. This is a huge relief because I can now contribute to my Roth for 2025 despite my partnership's rough year. Guess not all tax questions have to be miserably complicated!

0 coins

I think there's some confusion here about how guaranteed payments get reported. These payments are on box 4 of your K-1, but they flow to Schedule E and the net amount (after combining with your share of partnership income/loss) shows up on line 17 of your 1040. For calculating what you can contribute to retirement accounts, you need to look at the guaranteed payment amount separately. The Tax Court has previously ruled that guaranteed payments are "earned income" for retirement plan purposes, even when the partnership has an overall loss. Think of it like getting a salary and then separately having an investment loss - the investment loss doesn't erase the fact that you earned income from your job.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

So in practicality, how do you document this for the IRS? If your 1040 shows a net loss on line 17, but you still contribute to a Roth based on guaranteed payments, won't that trigger flags since the IRS computer might just see the net number?

0 coins

Actually, the IRS systems are sophisticated enough to recognize this situation. The information about guaranteed payments is captured separately on your K-1 (Box 4) and flows through to your tax return. While the net amount shows on your 1040, the supporting schedules contain the detailed breakdown. If you were to get a notice or audit, you would simply point to your K-1 showing the guaranteed payments as evidence of your earned income for Roth contribution purposes. The IRS instructions and publications specifically address this situation - guaranteed payments to partners are considered earned income for retirement contribution purposes, regardless of the overall partnership result. It's not about what the net line on your 1040 shows, but rather the character of the income you received.

0 coins

Quick update to everyone - I actually had this exact issue come up during an IRS review last year! My partnership took a loss, but I had received guaranteed payments. The IRS initially questioned my Roth contribution, but once I provided documentation showing the guaranteed payments on my K-1, they confirmed these payments qualified as compensation for Roth contribution purposes, even though my overall Schedule E showed a loss. The key is making sure your tax software correctly captures those guaranteed payments. Also worth noting - this only applies to guaranteed payments for services. If you received guaranteed payments for capital (like interest on your investment in the partnership), those don't count as earned income for Roth purposes.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

How did you document this to the IRS? Did you have to write a letter or just send copies of your K-1? I'm worried about getting flagged for this exact issue.

0 coins

I had to provide a copy of my K-1 showing the guaranteed payments in Box 4, along with a brief explanation letter referencing IRS Publication 590-A. I cited the specific section that defines compensation for IRA purposes and explained that guaranteed payments for services qualify as earned income regardless of the partnership's overall profitability. The IRS agent handling my case said this is actually a common situation they see with partnerships, especially in professional service firms that have fluctuating income. They confirmed that as long as the guaranteed payments were for services (not capital), they count toward your Roth contribution limit even when the partnership loses money. The whole process took about 3 weeks to resolve once I provided the documentation. I'd recommend keeping good records of your K-1 and maybe even printing out the relevant pages from Publication 590-A just in case you need to reference them later.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

I've been following this thread and wanted to add some clarity from my experience as someone who's dealt with this exact situation multiple times. The confusion often comes from how partnership taxation works versus how IRA contribution eligibility is determined. Here's the key distinction: guaranteed payments to partners are reported on your K-1 (Box 4) and represent compensation for services you provided to the partnership. Even though these payments get combined with your share of partnership income/loss on Schedule E, they don't lose their character as "earned income" for IRA purposes. Think of it this way - if you work for a corporation and receive a W-2 salary, but the corporation loses money, your salary is still earned income for Roth contributions. Guaranteed payments work similarly - they're compensation for your services, separate from your ownership interest in the partnership's profits or losses. The IRS specifically addresses this in Publication 590-A under the definition of compensation. As long as your guaranteed payments were for services (not for use of capital), they count toward your Roth contribution limit regardless of whether the partnership had a net loss. So with your $26,500 in guaranteed payments, you should be able to contribute up to the annual Roth IRA limit, assuming you meet the income phase-out requirements.

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to partnership taxation and this whole thread has been eye-opening. One thing I'm still not clear on - when you say "guaranteed payments for services" versus "for use of capital," how do you tell the difference on your K-1? Is this something that should be clearly specified, or do you have to look at your partnership agreement to figure out what the payments were actually for? I'm asking because I received guaranteed payments last year but I'm not 100% sure if they were classified as payments for services or something else. The partnership agreement mentions both my work contribution and my capital investment, so I want to make sure I'm eligible before I contribute to my Roth.

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

Great question! The distinction between guaranteed payments for services versus capital is crucial for Roth eligibility. Your K-1 should ideally specify this, but it's not always clear from the form alone. Guaranteed payments for services are payments made to you for work you perform for the partnership - things like management duties, professional services, or other labor you contribute regardless of the partnership's profitability. These payments are similar to a salary and qualify as earned income for Roth contributions. Guaranteed payments for use of capital are essentially interest payments on money you've invested in the partnership. These are treated more like investment income and don't qualify as earned income for IRA purposes. If your K-1 doesn't clearly specify, you'll need to look at your partnership agreement or ask your partnership's tax preparer. The agreement should outline whether your guaranteed payments are compensation for services you provide or returns on your capital contribution. Many partnership agreements will have separate sections for "compensation" versus "return on capital investment." If you're still unsure, I'd recommend checking with the partnership's accountant or using one of those tax analysis services mentioned earlier in this thread. Getting this wrong could affect your Roth contribution eligibility, so it's worth clarifying before you contribute.

0 coins

This is such a common misconception that trips up so many partnership taxpayers! I went through this exact same situation a few years ago and initially thought I couldn't contribute to my Roth because my Schedule E showed a net loss. The key insight that finally clicked for me is that guaranteed payments maintain their character as compensation regardless of what happens with the rest of the partnership's operations. It's almost like having two separate tax events - you received compensation for services (the guaranteed payments), and separately, your ownership interest in the partnership experienced a loss. I'd strongly recommend double-checking with a tax professional who understands partnership taxation, because this is an area where many general practitioners get confused. The IRS publications are pretty clear on this, but it's easy to miss if you're just looking at the bottom-line numbers on your tax return. With $26,500 in guaranteed payments, you should definitely be able to make your Roth contribution (assuming you're under the income phase-out limits). Don't let a partnership loss cost you a whole year of retirement savings!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today