Can I front load my 403b contributions for the first half of the year?

Hey everyone, I'm thinking about front loading my 403b contributions for next year and maxing out the allowance from January through June. Just want to make sure I'm thinking about this correctly. Some quick facts about my situation: - I'm 53 years old - Live in Oregon - Filing single, taking standard deduction with 0 allowances on my W4 (paying maximum tax upfront) - Annual salary is $175K So with my monthly salary being around $14,583 ($175K/12), if I want to max out my 403b ($23,500 plus $7,500 catch-up), I'd do something like: Monthly Gross: $14,583 Pre-Tax Deduction: -$5,167 ($31,000/6 months) Taxable Income: $9,416 For July-December, I'd have a larger taxable amount since I'd have already used up all my pre-tax deductions for the year, right? I'm also planning to put about $8K into my Roth IRA using money from a different account. Is there anything else I should be thinking about with this approach? Any downsides to front loading rather than spreading contributions across the whole year? Thanks for any advice!

0 coins

24 comments

Collins Angel

•8M

Front-loading your 403b is definitely doable, but there are a few things to consider! First, your math looks correct. You'll max out your contributions ($23,500 + $7,500 catch-up) in the first 6 months, then have larger paychecks for the rest of the year since you won't have those deductions. The main thing to watch for is employer matching, if your employer offers it. Some employers only match per pay period, so if you max out early, you might miss out on some matching funds for the later months. Check your employer's specific matching policy before going this route. Also, consider cash flow - your take-home pay will be significantly lower those first 6 months, so make sure you have enough to cover your expenses. Then you'll have higher paychecks the second half of the year. For tax purposes, it doesn't matter whether you front-load or spread contributions throughout the year - the tax advantage is the same. You're still getting the full $31,000 pre-tax contribution for the year. Your Roth IRA plan sounds good too - just remember the income limits for Roth contributions.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•8M

Employer matching policies vary widely, so definitely check with your HR department. If they only match per paycheck and you've maxed out early, you could lose out on thousands in matching funds! There is some debate about dollar-cost averaging versus lump sum investing. Historically, lump sum investing tends to outperform dollar-cost averaging about two-thirds of the time because markets generally go up over time. However, dollar-cost averaging reduces the risk of investing everything right before a market drop. It really comes down to your risk tolerance. If you're worried about market timing, spreading contributions throughout the year gives you more entry points and potentially less stress.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•8M

I've been using taxr.ai for my retirement planning and it's been super helpful for figuring out these exact kinds of strategies. Last year I was trying to figure out how to optimize my 403b contributions while also managing my tax bracket, and I was getting so confused with all the different rules. I uploaded my pay stubs and tax documents to https://taxr.ai and it helped me understand exactly how front-loading would affect my tax situation throughout the year. It even showed me how my take-home pay would change month-to-month, which made budgeting so much easier. The nicest thing was getting personalized advice about whether front-loading made sense given my specific employer's matching formula. Turns out I would have missed out on about $2,000 in matching if I'd gone with my original front-loading plan!

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•8M

Yes, it absolutely handles catch-up contributions! When you enter your age, it automatically incorporates the catch-up amounts you're eligible for. It works for 401k, 403b, 457, and IRA accounts, showing you the maximum you can contribute based on your age. As for comparing it to a financial advisor, I actually use both. I found taxr.ai gives me quick answers to specific tax and contribution questions, while my financial advisor helps with broader investment strategy. The tool is really good at the numbers and tax implications, which is exactly what the original poster was asking about. My financial advisor actually recommended it to me because he said it would help me understand the tax side better between our meetings.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•8M

I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and wow - wish I'd known about this sooner! I was in a similar situation with front-loading my 403b, and I was about to make a big mistake. The tool analyzed my employer's matching formula and showed me that front-loading would have cost me about $3,600 in matching contributions I would have missed! It turns out my employer only matches up to a certain percentage per paycheck, so by maxing out early, I would've left free money on the table. It also helped me optimize exactly how much to contribute each month to maximize my match while still putting more in during the first half of the year. Now I'm set up to get my full employer match while still getting more money invested earlier. Their catch-up contribution calculator for us over-50 folks was super helpful too - showed me exactly how to incorporate the extra $7,500 into my contribution plan!

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•8M

If you're trying to front-load your 403b and also dealing with employer matching issues, I had the exact same problem last year. After spending HOURS on hold with my benefits department and getting nowhere, I found Claimyr and it literally saved me weeks of frustration. I needed to speak to someone at my retirement plan administrator about how front-loading would affect my employer match, but their phone lines were constantly busy. I used https://claimyr.com to get a callback in under 15 minutes instead of waiting on hold forever. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was able to talk directly with a specialist who explained exactly how my employer's contribution formula worked and helped me adjust my contribution percentages to maximize both front-loading AND my full employer match. This one call saved me from missing out on thousands in matching funds.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•8M

Claimyr works with virtually any customer service number, not just financial institutions. It uses a combination of phone system navigation and callback technology to essentially wait on hold for you. When it reaches a representative, it calls you and connects you immediately. I've used it for Fidelity, Vanguard, and even the IRS. There's no magic involved, just smart technology. The "catch" is that it's a paid service, but considering the hours of hold time it saved me (and the thousands in matching funds I would have missed without getting the right information), it was absolutely worth it. I understand being skeptical - I was too! But when you've been trying to get through for weeks like you mentioned with Fidelity, having a tool that can get you a callback in minutes instead of hours makes a huge difference.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•8M

I need to apologize to everyone here - especially to the person who mentioned Claimyr. I was extremely skeptical about it, but after another frustrating day of trying to reach my 403b administrator about front-loading questions, I decided to give it a try. I'm genuinely shocked at how well it worked. I had been on hold with TIAA for over an hour earlier that day, gave up, and then tried Claimyr. I got a callback in about 8 minutes and spoke directly with a retirement specialist who confirmed that front-loading would indeed cause me to miss some matching contributions with my specific plan. They walked me through a better contribution schedule that lets me put more in early in the year while still capturing all my employer match. This one conversation saved me about $2,100 in matching funds I would have missed. Sometimes being proven wrong is actually a good thing. Sorry for the skepticism - this service actually delivered exactly what it promised.

0 coins

Vince Eh

•8M

One thing to consider with front-loading your 403b that nobody has mentioned yet is potential impacts to your Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) status if your plan is subject to non-discrimination testing. With your income of $175k, you might be classified as an HCE depending on your organization's structure. If your plan fails testing, there could be limits placed on how much HCEs can contribute regardless of the IRS maximum. Front-loading tends to favor higher income employees, which can sometimes throw off the Average Contribution Percentage (ACP) testing that 403b plans have to go through.

0 coins

Vince Eh

•8M

403b plans at private tax-exempt organizations (like hospitals, universities, etc.) are subject to ACP testing similar to 401k plans. Government and church organizations are typically exempt from this testing. If your nonprofit is a government or religious organization, then you're right - HCE status wouldn't matter for contribution limits. But for other nonprofits, if a plan has too much contribution disparity between highly compensated and non-highly compensated employees, the plan could fail testing. The current threshold for HCE status is earning more than $135,000 (for 2022 testing in 2023) or $150,000 (for 2023 testing in 2024). With the original poster's $175k salary, they would be considered an HCE, which could potentially impact their ability to max out contributions if their plan is subject to testing and has low participation rates among lower-paid employees.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•8M

I actually did this last year! Front-loaded my 403b from January-April, then switched jobs in June. The good news is that the IRS doesn't care which employer you contribute through - the annual limit applies to you personally across all employers for the year. So if you max out your $23,500 (plus catch-up if applicable) at your first employer, you simply wouldn't be able to contribute to your new employer's plan for the rest of that calendar year. Just make sure to tell your new employer that you've already maxed out, otherwise you might contribute too much and have to deal with excess contribution corrections. The bigger issue is potentially missing out on employer matching at your new job if you can't contribute for the rest of the year!

0 coins

Statiia Aarssizan

•8M

Don't forget state tax implications with your front-loading strategy. Since you're in Oregon, your state tax withholding will also be affected by changing your taxable income throughout the year. The first half of the year, your state withholding will be lower because of your reduced taxable income. The second half, it'll be higher. This doesn't change your total tax obligation, but it does affect your cash flow and might require some additional budgeting adjustments to handle the variation in take-home pay. Also, if you're planning to do both max 403b AND $8k to Roth IRA, make sure you're not going to hit income limits for direct Roth contributions. With a $175k salary, you're very close to the phase-out range for single filers.

0 coins

Faith Kingston

•5M

Great question about front-loading! I did something similar last year and learned a few things the hard way. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - make sure you understand how your employer handles the timing of their match deposits. Some employers deposit matches quarterly or even annually rather than with each paycheck. In those cases, front-loading might not affect your total match as much since they're looking at your annual contribution rather than per-paycheck amounts. Also, consider the psychological aspect - having those lower paychecks for 6 months can be tougher than you expect, even when you know the higher paychecks are coming later. I found myself being more stressed about month-to-month budgeting than I anticipated. One strategy that worked well for me was doing a "modified front-load" - I contributed about 60% of my max in the first 6 months, then scaled back to normal contributions for the rest of the year. This gave me most of the benefits of getting money invested early while still maintaining some employer match and more consistent cash flow. The tax implications work out the same either way, so it really comes down to your cash flow comfort level and employer match structure.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•5M

The "modified front-load" approach you mentioned sounds really smart! I'm definitely leaning toward something like that now after reading everyone's responses. The idea of having such drastically different paychecks for 6 months straight does make me a bit nervous from a budgeting perspective. Your point about quarterly vs. per-paycheck employer match deposits is really interesting - I hadn't thought about that timing difference. I'll need to check with HR about exactly when they deposit matches. If it's quarterly, that could change my whole strategy. Did you find that contributing 60% early still gave you most of the investment timing benefits you were looking for? I'm trying to balance getting money in the market sooner with not creating too much financial stress for myself.

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•1M

Yes, the 60% front-loading definitely still gave me solid investment timing benefits! I ran some rough calculations afterward and found that getting that much invested in the first half of the year captured most of the potential gains I would have gotten from full front-loading, while avoiding the cash flow stress. The key insight for me was that the biggest benefit comes from getting a large chunk invested early - you don't necessarily need to go all the way to 100% front-loading to capture most of that advantage. Markets tend to trend upward over time, so having 60% of your annual contributions working for an extra 3-6 months still makes a meaningful difference compared to spreading everything evenly. Plus, I found that having some contribution room left for the second half of the year gave me flexibility. When I got a small bonus in September, I was able to bump up my contributions temporarily to take advantage of the extra income without worrying about hitting the annual limit too early. The quarterly match timing thing is definitely worth checking on. In my case, it turned out my employer did monthly matches, so the modified approach helped me avoid losing any of that free money while still getting most of the early investment benefits I was after.

0 coins

Angelina Farar

•7d

One thing to keep in mind with front-loading is how it might affect your Social Security and Medicare tax withholdings. Unlike income taxes, these payroll taxes don't benefit from pre-tax 403b contributions - they're calculated on your full gross pay. So while your federal and state income tax withholdings will be much lower during those first 6 months due to the large pre-tax deductions, your Social Security and Medicare taxes will stay the same throughout the year. This creates an interesting cash flow dynamic where the tax savings aren't quite as dramatic as they might first appear. With your $175k salary, you'll hit the Social Security wage base ($160,200 for 2023) sometime in late fall anyway, so your Social Security tax will stop being withheld at that point regardless of your contribution timing. But it's still worth factoring into your monthly budget calculations. Also, since you mentioned you're filing with 0 allowances to pay maximum tax upfront, you might want to reconsider that strategy if you're front-loading. The large pre-tax contributions in the first half of the year will significantly reduce your tax liability, so you might end up with a bigger refund than necessary. Could be worth adjusting your withholdings to optimize your cash flow throughout the year.

0 coins