


Ask the community...
Has anyone used the "check the box" election (Form 8832) to treat their wholly owned LLC differently? My accountant mentioned this might give us more flexibility than just defaulting to disregarded entity status.
Be careful with that. If you elect to treat your LLC as a corporation using Form 8832, you'd create a parent/subsidiary relationship instead of having a disregarded entity. This would significantly complicate your tax situation, potentially requiring consolidated returns or creating double taxation issues depending on how it's structured.
I went through this exact same situation last year when our S-Corp acquired a small IT consulting firm. The confusion about where to report the disregarded entity's EIN on the 1120S is totally understandable - there really isn't a specific line item for it. What I learned from our tax preparer is that the key is in the EIN application process. When you applied for the disregarded entity's EIN (Form SS-4), you should have indicated the "responsible party" and the tax classification. Even though an individual SSN was required as the responsible party, the IRS systems link that EIN to your S-Corp for tax reporting purposes. One thing that helped us was keeping a detailed memo in our tax files explaining the acquisition, the disregarded entity election, and how we're treating the income. This documentation proved valuable when we had questions during our S-Corp examination last year. The IRS examiner appreciated having the clear paper trail showing the business relationship. Also, make sure you're consistent in how you handle the 1099 reporting - if the disregarded entity is receiving 1099s under its EIN, just include those amounts in the appropriate income categories on your 1120S. The IRS computer matching systems are pretty sophisticated at tracking these relationships now.
This is exactly the kind of detailed documentation I was looking for! The memo idea is brilliant - I hadn't thought about creating an internal paper trail explaining the acquisition and disregarded entity election. One quick question about the EIN application process - when you applied for the disregarded entity's EIN, did you specifically check the box for "disregarded entity" on Form SS-4, or was there another way you indicated this classification? I'm wondering if we missed something in our initial application that might be causing confusion. Also, can you share any details about what the IRS examiner specifically looked for regarding the disregarded entity during your S-Corp examination? I want to make sure we're prepared if we ever face a similar situation.
Has anyone else noticed that the IRS seems to be using multiple addresses in Kansas City? My 1099-INT from last year had a different address than what people are posting here. I think they have multiple facilities.
Yep, they definitely have multiple addresses. The main processing center is at Pershing Road, but they also have operations at 33 W. 11th Street in KC, and some specialized divisions at other locations. Depending on which department issued your 1099-INT, it might have come from a different physical location.
This is such a common issue! I had the exact same problem last year and it drove me crazy. The address format that finally worked for me was: Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service 333 W. Pershing Road Kansas City, MO 64108 Some tax software is really picky about how you format government addresses. If that doesn't work, try shortening it to just "Internal Revenue Service" on the first line. The key is making sure you have the full 9-digit ZIP code (64108-2203 or 64108-2223 depending on which division issued your form). Also, double-check that you're entering the payer information exactly as it appears on your 1099-INT form. Sometimes there are subtle differences in how the Treasury Department vs. IRS is listed that can cause e-filing rejections. Hope this helps and you can get your taxes submitted soon!
This is really helpful! I'm actually dealing with this exact issue right now and it's been so frustrating. I've been going back and forth with my tax software for hours. Quick question - how do you know which 9-digit ZIP code to use? My 1099-INT just shows "Kansas City, MO" without any ZIP code at all. Is there a way to figure out if it should be 64108-2203 or 64108-2223? I don't want to guess wrong and have my e-filing get rejected again. Also, when you say "exactly as it appears on the form" - mine says "DEPT OF TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE" all in caps. Should I enter it exactly like that, or is it okay to use normal capitalization?
I'm new to this community but unfortunately joining the Austin processing center waiting club as well! My amended return has been stuck at "Arrived at Post Office, Austin, TX 73301" for 7 days now, and I was starting to get really worried until I found this thread. Reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly eye-opening - it's both frustrating and strangely reassuring to learn that this 2-3 week delay at the post office stage is apparently just standard procedure for the Austin center. The fact that we can track a $20 Amazon package with precision but have zero visibility into tax documents worth thousands is honestly absurd. I'm definitely taking the collective wisdom here seriously about using certified mail with return receipt for future submissions. The extra cost seems insignificant compared to the stress of wondering if your important documents just disappeared. It's frustrating that we need to pay extra for basic accountability from the IRS, but clearly that's just the reality of their system. The advice about waiting until 5-6 weeks before calling and requesting case reference numbers even if they can't locate your documents yet seems really smart. Having that systematic approach gives me some hope that there's at least a way to be proactive during this seemingly endless waiting period. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread has been way more helpful than anything I could find through official channels!
Welcome to the community and this unfortunately familiar situation! I'm also new here but have been going through the exact same Austin processing center nightmare. My amended return has been sitting at that dreaded "Arrived at Post Office, Austin, TX 73301" status for about 8 days now. Reading through everyone's shared experiences in this thread has been incredibly valuable - it's both maddening and oddly comforting to know we're all dealing with the same bureaucratic black hole. The fact that we can get minute-by-minute updates on food delivery but have zero visibility into critical tax documents is honestly mind-boggling. I'm definitely planning to follow the certified mail with return receipt approach for any future submissions based on all the hard-earned wisdom shared here. The extra cost seems like nothing compared to the anxiety of wondering if your documents vanished into thin air. The strategic advice about waiting 5-6 weeks before calling and creating that paper trail with case reference numbers also seems like the smartest way to navigate their incredibly slow system. Thanks for adding your experience to this thread - it really helps to know we're not going through this frustrating wait alone! Hopefully we'll all start seeing some movement in our tracking soon.
I'm new to this community but unfortunately dealing with the exact same Austin processing center situation! My amended return has been stuck at "Arrived at Post Office, Austin, TX 73301" for 5 days now, and I was starting to get anxious until I found this incredibly helpful thread. Reading through everyone's experiences has been both frustrating and reassuring - it's absolutely wild that we can track a pizza order in real-time but have zero visibility into tax documents potentially worth thousands of dollars. The fact that this 2-3 week "black hole" period is apparently just standard operating procedure for the Austin center is honestly mind-boggling. I'm definitely taking all the wisdom shared here to heart, especially about using certified mail with return receipt for future submissions. The extra cost seems trivial compared to months of stress wondering if your documents disappeared completely. It's ridiculous that we have to pay extra for basic proof of delivery from a government agency, but that's clearly the reality we're dealing with. The strategic advice about waiting until 5-6 weeks before calling and asking for case reference numbers even when they can't locate documents yet seems really smart. Having that systematic approach gives me hope there's at least some way to be proactive during this endless waiting period. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and keeping the rest of us sane through this bureaucratic nightmare - this thread has been infinitely more helpful than the official IRS website!
Welcome to the community and this frustrating waiting game! I'm also new here and dealing with the exact same situation - my amended return has been stuck at that same "Arrived at Post Office, Austin, TX 73301" status for about a week now. This thread has been incredibly helpful in understanding that what feels like a crisis is apparently just the IRS's normal glacially slow process. It's honestly shocking that we live in an age where I can watch my Uber driver's exact location but have zero insight into whether my tax documents worth thousands of dollars are sitting in a pile somewhere or actually making progress. The certified mail with return receipt advice from everyone here seems like absolute gold - I'm definitely using that approach for anything else I need to send. The peace of mind of having actual proof of delivery seems worth way more than the extra few dollars, especially when you're potentially waiting months for substantial refunds with zero confirmation they even received your paperwork. I'm also really appreciating the strategic advice about waiting 5-6 weeks before calling and creating that paper trail with case reference numbers. At least it gives us some kind of proactive approach to navigate this incredibly opaque system. Hang in there - sounds like we're all riding this same frustrating wave together!
Make sure you keep detailed daycare receipts too! I got audited over this exact credit because one parent was job-hunting. Had to provide proof of both the job search activities AND the daycare payments. Keep emails from job applications, interview confirmations, and make sure your daycare provides detailed receipts showing dates of service and amounts paid.
Did you have to show the IRS that the job search was during the same hours as the childcare? Wondering because my husband does most of his job searching at night after I get home from work, but the kids are in daycare during the day.
The IRS doesn't require that job search activities happen during the exact same hours as childcare. What matters is that the childcare expenses enable the job search to occur. In your situation, having the kids in daycare during the day allows your husband the flexibility to schedule interviews, attend networking events, or conduct other job search activities when opportunities arise - even if he also searches at night. The key is that the childcare is necessary for the overall job search effort, not that it coincides hour-by-hour.
Great thread with lots of helpful information! Just wanted to add that if you're using Form 2441, make sure to carefully fill out Part II where you list your care providers. You'll need their name, address, and tax ID number (usually their SSN or EIN). Many people forget to get this information from their daycare provider ahead of time and then scramble at tax filing season. Also, since your wife was employed for part of the year and then became unemployed while job searching, you might want to consider whether your family qualifies for any other unemployment-related tax benefits for 2025. The combination of job loss and continued childcare expenses can sometimes open up additional deductions or credits that aren't immediately obvious. One last tip: if your wife does find employment later in 2025, make sure to keep tracking those childcare expenses too - they'll continue to qualify once she's working again.
This is really helpful advice! I didn't realize we'd need the daycare's tax ID number for Form 2441. Our daycare is a small family-run business - would they have an EIN or just use the owner's SSN? Also, you mentioned other unemployment-related tax benefits - could you give an example of what to look for? My wife has been collecting unemployment benefits while job searching, so I'm wondering if that affects our tax situation in other ways we should be aware of.
Lena Kowalski
I'm in the exact same boat! Completed my ID verification through ID.me on Monday and still seeing that frustrating blinking bar. Reading through everyone's experiences here is actually really reassuring - sounds like 9-15 business days is pretty normal even though it feels like forever when you're waiting for your refund. I'm going to try checking my transcript like some of you suggested. Does anyone know if there's a specific code that shows up when verification is actually complete in their system? Also curious if anyone has noticed if filing early vs. late in the season affects these processing times at all. Thanks for sharing your timelines - it really helps to know this delay is normal and not a sign something went wrong!
0 coins
Justin Chang
ā¢Hey Lena! I just went through this same process a few weeks ago. For the transcript codes, look for TC 971 (which shows verification was received) followed by TC 570 (hold on your account) and then TC 571 (release of hold). Once you see the 571 code, that usually means verification is complete and processing should resume within a few days. As for filing timing - from what I've observed, early filers (January/February) seem to get through verification faster, maybe because there's less volume in the system. But honestly, the IRS is so unpredictable that it's hard to say for certain. The good news is that once verification clears, your refund should process pretty quickly since you're already in the system. Hang in there - the waiting is the worst part but it does resolve! @ede23eb59764
0 coins
James Maki
I went through identity verification last month and it was nerve-wracking! Mine took exactly 11 business days from completion to WMR update. What helped me stay sane was setting up IRS account access to check my transcript weekly instead of obsessively checking WMR daily. One thing I learned - the verification confirmation email/number just means they received your documents, not that they've processed them yet. There's still a manual review step that happens behind the scenes. Also, if you're really anxious about the timeline, you can call the verification line directly (not the main IRS number) at 1-800-830-5084 with your reference number. They can at least confirm if your verification is still in process or if there are any issues. Just be prepared for long hold times! The waiting period is absolutely brutal, but try to remember that no news is usually good news with the IRS. Your refund is coming - they just move at their own pace!
0 coins
Charlie Yang
ā¢This is really helpful information! I didn't realize there was a separate verification line - that's definitely worth trying if I don't see movement in the next few days. The distinction between receiving documents vs. actually processing them makes a lot of sense too. Quick question - when you called that verification line, were you able to get through relatively quickly compared to the main IRS number? And did they give you any specific timeline or just confirm it was still being processed? Thanks for sharing the transcript tip too. I think checking weekly instead of daily WMR obsessing is probably better for my sanity! @09d6b59cb75f
0 coins