


Ask the community...
This is absolutely a red flag and you're right to be concerned. I work in banking compliance and can tell you that sharing login credentials violates virtually every bank's terms of service - if fraud occurs, your dad could be held liable since he willingly shared his access. The accountant's refusal to provide her SSN for read-only access is particularly suspicious. Licensed accountants routinely provide their SSN for client verification - it's standard practice. Her avoidance of this suggests she either isn't properly licensed or is trying to avoid creating an audit trail. Your dad should immediately: 1. Change his banking passwords 2. Set up read-only access through the bank's proper channels 3. If she still refuses, find a new accountant There are legitimate accounting software solutions that provide secure access without compromising bank credentials. Any accountant who insists on full login access in 2025 is either incompetent or potentially fraudulent. Trust your instincts on this one.
This is really helpful from a banking perspective. I'm curious - when you say "audit trail," what exactly would be tracked if she went through proper channels versus using shared credentials? Would there be different legal protections for my dad if something went wrong?
Great question! When an accountant uses proper channels (like read-only access), the bank maintains detailed logs showing exactly who accessed what information and when. The accountant's credentials are tied to their professional license and SSN, creating clear accountability. With shared login credentials, all activity appears to come from your dad's account - the bank can't distinguish between his legitimate access and the accountant's actions. If unauthorized transactions occur, your dad would need to prove he didn't authorize them, which becomes nearly impossible when he voluntarily shared his credentials. Legal protections are significantly stronger with proper access channels. Banks typically have specific fraud protection policies for business accounts, but these often become void when login credentials are shared. Additionally, if the accountant has her own credentialed access, there are professional liability and bonding requirements that protect clients - none of which apply when using someone else's login. Bottom line: proper channels create accountability and maintain your dad's legal protections, while shared credentials eliminate most of his recourse if something goes wrong.
As someone who works in financial fraud prevention, I can't stress enough how dangerous this situation is. Your dad's accountant is essentially asking for the keys to his financial kingdom, and her refusal to go through proper channels is a massive red flag. I've seen this exact scenario play out dozens of times - it usually starts with "just need access for bookkeeping" and ends with missing funds and a devastated business owner. The fact that she won't provide her SSN for legitimate read-only access tells you everything you need to know about her intentions. Here's what I'd recommend: Have your dad call his bank directly and ask them to walk through the proper accountant access options. Most banks have secure portals specifically designed for this purpose. If she still refuses these legitimate channels, that's your answer - find a new accountant immediately. Don't let your dad's trust override basic security practices. A legitimate accountant will understand and appreciate clients who insist on proper procedures. The sketchy ones will make excuses and push back, which is exactly what's happening here.
This is exactly the kind of professional perspective my dad needs to hear. The part about banks having secure portals specifically for accountant access is really helpful - I didn't know that was a standard option. Do you think it would be worth having my dad bring up your point about legitimate accountants appreciating proper security procedures? I feel like that might help him understand that a trustworthy professional wouldn't be pushing back against these basic safeguards. Right now he just sees it as "she's been doing my taxes for years so she must be fine" but maybe framing it as "good accountants actually prefer secure processes" would click better with him.
Has anyone successfully requested a "retroactive" corrective distribution in the year after the overcontribution? I'm in almost the identical situation (overcontributed about $600) and wondering if I have options in the new year if my employer won't help now.
Yes! I did this last year. The key is to request it before April 15th of the year following the overcontribution. Even though my employer initially refused, I sent a formal letter citing IRS Publication 525 which states the correction can be made up until the tax filing deadline. Worked like a charm - they processed it in February after refusing in December.
I went through this exact same situation last year - overcontributed by about $700 across two employers and hit the same wall with HR being unhelpful. Here's what I learned after sorting it all out: You're correct about the double taxation, but there are a couple of key details to get right. You'll need to file Form 5329 to report the excess contribution and pay the 6% excise tax. However, you can avoid the recurring 6% penalty in future years by reducing your 2025 contributions by the excess amount ($550). This essentially "applies" your 2024 excess to your 2025 limit. One thing I wish I had known earlier - if your current employer's plan administrator is different from HR, try contacting them directly with a formal written request. Sometimes the plan administrators are more knowledgeable about corrective distributions than the HR department. Include specific references to IRS regulations (like Revenue Procedure 2019-19) in your request. Also, double-check that you're actually over the limit when combining both employers. The 2024 limit was $23,000, and if there were any employer matching contributions, those don't count toward your personal contribution limit. If all else fails and you do end up paying the penalty, make sure to keep detailed records of the excess amount and the taxes paid. You'll need this documentation when you eventually withdraw those funds in retirement to avoid being double-taxed on the entire amount.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I hadn't thought about contacting the plan administrator directly - that's a great suggestion. I've been dealing exclusively with HR who clearly don't understand the regulations around corrective distributions. One quick clarification - when you mention reducing 2025 contributions by $550 to avoid the recurring penalty, do I need to document this anywhere specific on my tax forms? Or does the IRS automatically recognize the reduced contribution as correction for the prior year excess? I want to make sure I don't accidentally trigger penalties by not properly documenting the correction. Also, you mentioned Revenue Procedure 2019-19 - is that the main regulation I should cite when making a formal request to the plan administrator?
I'm in the middle of my OIC process and the waiting is brutal!!! Submitted everything 5 months ago and still showing as "pending" whenever I check the status online. Does anyone know if calling actually speeds anything up?
In my experience, calling doesn't speed up the process but can sometimes give you peace of mind about where things stand. My OIC took 13 months total, with several requests for additional information along the way.
I went through the OIC process last year and it was one of the most stressful but ultimately rewarding experiences dealing with the IRS. My situation was similar to yours - owed about $38,000 due to business failure and medical issues. A few key things I learned: First, be absolutely honest and thorough with your financial documentation. The IRS will verify everything, and any inconsistencies will delay or kill your application. Second, don't underestimate how long it takes - mine took 14 months from start to finish, with multiple requests for additional paperwork. I did use a tax professional for the initial application, which cost me $3,500, but it was worth it for the peace of mind. They helped me calculate a realistic offer amount ($11,200 for my $38,000 debt) and made sure all the forms were filled out correctly. One thing nobody tells you - during the application process, the IRS stops collection activities, which was a huge relief. No more threatening letters or calls. Just be prepared for the emotional rollercoaster of waiting months without updates. The acceptance letter arriving was one of the best days of my life. Don't give up hope - if your financial situation truly warrants it, the program can work. Just be patient and meticulous with your paperwork.
This is really encouraging to hear! I'm just starting to gather all my financial documents and feeling overwhelmed by the process. When you say they verify everything - do you mean they actually contact banks and employers directly, or do they just cross-reference with other tax records? I'm worried about missing something important that could derail my application. Also, did your tax professional help you determine what qualified as "allowable expenses" for the financial analysis? I keep reading conflicting information about what the IRS considers reasonable living expenses.
I completely understand your confusion - this 1099-K situation is tripping up a lot of sports bettors this year! You're absolutely right to question it. The 1099-K from PayPal is just reporting that $12,350 flowed through their payment system - it's not saying that's all taxable income. Think of it like a bank statement showing deposits and withdrawals, not a determination of what you owe taxes on. Your BetRivers win/loss statement is the document that actually matters for your taxes. Since you ended up with a net loss of $3,200 for the year, you're not in terrible shape tax-wise. You'll need to report your gross winnings (whatever that amount is from your BetRivers statement) as gambling income, and if you itemize deductions, you can deduct losses up to that winning amount. The most important thing is keeping all your documentation - the PayPal 1099-K, your BetRivers win/loss statement, and transaction records. If the IRS ever questions the discrepancy between the 1099-K amount and what you report, you'll have a clear paper trail showing those PayPal transactions were deposits to fund your account, not gambling winnings. Don't let TurboTax's prompts about the 1099-K stress you out. Focus on your actual gambling results from BetRivers' records, not PayPal's transaction summary. The IRS is seeing tons of these cases this year with the lower 1099-K reporting thresholds.
This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been going around in circles trying to figure out how to reconcile that huge PayPal 1099-K with my actual betting results. Your bank statement analogy really helps - PayPal is just showing money movement, not tax liability. I was so worried about getting flagged by the IRS for underreporting, but it makes total sense that they understand these payment processors are just covering their reporting requirements. I'm definitely keeping everything organized like you suggested - BetRivers statement, PayPal 1099-K, and all my transaction histories. It's reassuring to know this is a widespread issue this year and not just me being confused about tax rules. Thanks for the clear explanation!
I went through this exact same situation last year and completely understand your stress! The 1099-K from PayPal is essentially just a transaction report - it's showing that $12,350 moved through their system, but it's not determining what's taxable income. Here's what really matters: your BetRivers win/loss statement. That's the document that shows your actual gambling activity for tax purposes. Since you had a net loss of $3,200, you're actually in a better position than you might think. The way it works is you report your gross winnings (from the BetRivers statement, not the PayPal amount) as gambling income. If you itemize deductions, you can then deduct losses up to the amount of your winnings. But if your standard deduction is higher than what you'd get from itemizing (including the gambling loss deduction), you're better off just taking the standard deduction. Keep all your documentation - the 1099-K, your BetRivers win/loss statement, and any transaction records. If the IRS ever questions why your reported income doesn't match the 1099-K amount, you'll have clear evidence that those PayPal transactions were deposits and withdrawals, not gambling winnings. Don't let the 1099-K amount scare you into thinking you owe taxes on $12,350. Focus on what your actual gambling results were according to BetRivers' records.
Max Knight
I'm really sorry you're going through this frustrating situation! š I went through the exact same thing about 8 months ago and completely understand how overwhelming it feels, especially coming from a different country where you might be used to different government processes. The 6-month timeline your caseworker mentioned is unfortunately very real in many cases, though there are some factors that could make yours shorter. The biggest determining factor is whether your children's father filed his taxes jointly with a spouse or as a single filer. If he filed jointly, there's a mandatory 6-month waiting period because his spouse has the legal right to file an "injured spouse" claim to get their portion of the refund back. If he filed single, you might be looking at closer to 3-4 months instead. Here's what I wish someone had told me at the beginning: ⢠Call the Treasury Offset Program directly at 1-800-304-3107 - they handle the offset before it goes to your state and can give you much more specific information about where yours stands in the process ⢠Make absolutely sure you have direct deposit set up with your state's child support agency if you haven't already - this can save you several weeks compared to waiting for paper checks ⢠Ask your caseworker specifically about the father's filing status and which exact stage your offset is currently in - don't let them give you vague answers The multi-agency process (IRS ā Treasury Offset Program ā Your State ā You) is painfully slow, but the money will eventually come through. Mine took about 4.5 months total. I know how hard it is when you need that support money now, but try to think of this as the system finally working to get you what you're owed, even if it's frustratingly slow. You're not alone in this - so many of us have been through this exact wait! š
0 coins
Omar Hassan
ā¢@601c262df124 This is exactly the kind of detailed, practical information I needed to hear! Thank you so much for breaking down the process step by step and explaining why it takes so long. As someone still getting used to how things work here in the US, it's really helpful to understand that this isn't just random bureaucratic slowness - there are actual legal reasons for the delays. I'm definitely going to call that Treasury Offset Program number first thing tomorrow to get specific details about my case. The joint vs single filing distinction could make such a huge difference in my timeline, so I'm really hoping he filed single! It's reassuring to know that even though the wait is brutal, the system does eventually work and I will get the money my children are owed. Your timeline of 4.5 months gives me hope that maybe I won't have to wait the full 6 months. Thank you for taking the time to share such comprehensive guidance - it makes this overwhelming process feel much more manageable! š
0 coins
Isabella Oliveira
I went through this exact situation about a year ago and I completely understand your frustration! š The 6-month wait is unfortunately very real, but there are a few things that might help you navigate this process better. First, definitely find out whether your children's father filed jointly with a spouse or as single - this makes a HUGE difference in timing. Joint returns trigger the full 6-month wait due to injured spouse protections, but single filers usually see their offsets processed in 3-4 months. What really helped me was calling the Treasury Offset Program directly at 1-800-304-3107. They gave me way more specific information about where my offset was in the pipeline compared to what my caseworker could tell me. Also make sure you have direct deposit set up with your state's child support office - it can save you weeks compared to paper checks. I know it's incredibly frustrating when you're already struggling financially and then have to wait months for money that should be supporting your children. The multi-agency process (IRS ā Treasury ā State ā You) is painfully slow, but the money will eventually come through. Mine took about 4 months total. In the meantime, you might want to look into local community resources - some churches and nonprofits have small emergency funds specifically for families waiting on child support payments. It's not ideal, but every bit helps when you're stretched thin. Hang in there - you're definitely not alone in this frustrating journey! š
0 coins