IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Zainab Ahmed

•

Quick question for anyone who knows - does the vehicle have to be new to qualify for deductions, or can it be used? Looking at a 3-year old SUV that would be perfect for my client visits.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

Used vehicles absolutely qualify for business deductions! Whether you use standard mileage rate or actual expenses method, the vehicle can be new or used - doesn't matter to the IRS. If you go with actual expenses, you'll depreciate the purchase price based on what YOU paid for it, not the original value when it was new. And if the vehicle is over 6,000 lbs GVWR, it can still qualify for Section 179 even if used. The advantage of a used vehicle in your situation is that you've avoided the initial depreciation hit, which might make the actual expenses method more favorable depending on your specific circumstances.

0 coins

As someone who works in tax preparation, I want to emphasize the importance of keeping meticulous records during your 1099 contractor period. Since you're receiving mileage reimbursements that exceed the IRS standard rate, you'll need to report the excess as taxable income. Here's what I'd recommend: Start tracking ALL your vehicle expenses immediately - gas, maintenance, insurance, registration fees, etc. Also keep a detailed mileage log separating business vs personal use. This gives you the data to calculate both methods (standard mileage vs actual expenses) and choose whichever saves you more money. One thing people often miss: when you transition to W-2 employee status mid-year, your tax situation changes completely. Employee business expenses are generally no longer deductible, so make sure you're maximizing deductions during your contractor months. Given the complexity of your situation with the mid-year status change and above-standard reimbursement rates, I'd strongly suggest consulting with a tax professional before making any major vehicle purchase decisions. The wrong choice could cost you thousands in missed deductions or unexpected tax liability.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

This is incredibly helpful advice! I hadn't even thought about the fact that the reimbursement rate being higher than the IRS standard rate creates taxable income. That completely changes how I need to approach this. One follow-up question - when you say "maximizing deductions during your contractor months," are there other business expenses besides vehicle costs that I should be tracking? I'm wondering if things like my phone bill, laptop for tracking mileage/expenses, or even work clothes might be deductible during those first 6 months. Also, do you happen to know if there are any specific deadlines I need to be aware of for choosing between the standard mileage vs actual expenses method? I want to make sure I don't accidentally lock myself into the wrong choice.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

I just ignored a $8.50 use tax I owed last year and nothing happened lol. The state has bigger tax cheats to go after than someone who didn't pay a few bucks on an online purchase. But technically yes you're supposed to pay it.

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

This is bad advice. While they might not come after you for small amounts, many states are getting more aggressive about use tax collection. Plus it all adds up on their revenue sheets. Just pay what you owe.

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

This is bad advice. While they might not come after you for small amounts, many states are getting more aggressive about use tax collection. Plus it all adds up on their revenue sheets.

0 coins

For your specific situation with the $5.40, here's my practical advice: Yes, technically you're required to pay use tax, but realistically the enforcement risk for such a small amount is essentially zero. However, I'd recommend getting into good habits now. Most states let you report use tax on your annual income tax return - there's usually a line where you can enter the total amount of use tax owed for the year. You can either track individual purchases or use your state's estimation table based on income (much easier). Since you're just starting to deal with this, I'd suggest setting up a simple system: keep a running tally of untaxed online purchases throughout the year, then report the total when you file your state taxes. The deadline is typically the same as your income tax filing deadline. Don't stress too much about this particular $5.40 purchase, but use it as a learning experience for bigger purchases in the future. Better to understand the system now than be caught off guard with a larger amount later!

0 coins

This is really helpful practical advice! I like the idea of keeping a running tally throughout the year instead of trying to figure it out at tax time. Quick question - when you mention the estimation table based on income, is that usually more or less than what people actually spend? I'm wondering if it's worth the extra effort to track individual purchases or if the table method tends to be pretty accurate for most people's shopping habits.

0 coins

What does IRS Code 898 on transcript mean? Partner's $1,055 refund shows as "Applied to non-IRS debt" despite being issued

Can someone help me understand what my partners transcript means? I noticed something weird when looking at his tax refund info. He filed his taxes and got a refund of $1,055 in late February, but when I look at his transcript there's a bunch of codes that don't make sense to me. His transcript shows: RETURN DUE DATE OR RETURN RECEIVED DATE (WHICHEVER IS LATER) Apr. 15, 2025 PROCESSING DATE Mar. 10, 2025 TRANSACTIONS CODE EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION - CYCLE - DATE - AMOUNT 150 Tax return filed - 20250805 - 03-10-2025 - $764.00 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding - 04-15-2025 - -$1,819.00 846 Refund issued - 02-26-2025 - $1,055.00 898 Refund applied to non-IRS debt: - 03-10-2025 - $0.00 $1,055.00 This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data What confuses me is that it shows a tax return filed with a tax amount of $764, withholding of $1,819, then a refund issued on 02-26-2025, and then something about "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" with $0.00 but then his refund amount of $1,055 again. What does all this actually mean? Is part of his refund being taken for something? Did he actually get the full $1,055? The dates are also confusing - some dates like 04-15-2025 are in the future, but the processing date is 03-10-2025 and we're still in early 2025. And what's that "CYCLE" number 20250805 mean? Does the code 898 "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" mean they're taking his refund for something else? But then why does it show $0.00? I'm really confused about what happened with his money.

Eve Freeman

•

This thread has been so educational! I'm bookmarking it for future reference. The way everyone explained the 898 code and those confusing IRS processing dates really helped demystify what looks like complete gibberish on these transcripts. It's wild that "we checked for debts and found none, so you get your full refund" gets translated into cryptic codes that make everyone panic. The IRS could save so much confusion by just using plain English! But thanks to this amazing community, at least we can help each other decode their ancient hieroglyphics šŸ˜‚ For anyone else stumbling across this thread with similar transcript confusion - this is definitely the place to get answers!

0 coins

Keisha Taylor

•

I'm so glad this thread has been helpful for everyone! As someone who's also struggled with understanding IRS transcripts, it's really reassuring to see how this community comes together to explain these confusing codes. The 898 code definitely seems to be a common source of panic - I think we've all had that moment of seeing "debt" mentioned and immediately assuming the worst! But it's actually pretty clever of the IRS to automatically check for offsets, even if their way of displaying it is unnecessarily cryptic. What strikes me most about this whole discussion is how many people have dealt with the exact same confusion. It really shows that the IRS needs to seriously rethink how they present this information to taxpayers. Instead of codes that require a decoder ring, they could just say something simple like "Debt offset check: $0 - Full refund issued" Thanks to everyone who took the time to explain these codes so thoroughly. This thread is going to help so many people who find themselves staring at their transcripts wondering if they're reading alien technology! 😊

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

One thing nobody mentioned - make sure the information on your 1095-C is actually correct! My employer had me listed with coverage for months I wasn't employed there and it caused a huge headache. Check the coverage months in Part II to make sure they match when you actually had the insurance.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

This is good advice. How would you go about fixing it if the information is wrong? Contact HR?

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

Just to add another perspective - if you're someone who frequently switches between different health insurance plans or has gaps in coverage, the 1095-C becomes more important for your records. Even though TurboTax doesn't ask for it directly, having this form helps you track your coverage timeline, especially if you need to reconcile any Premium Tax Credits you received through the marketplace. I learned this the hard way when I had overlapping employer coverage and marketplace coverage for a few months. The 1095-C helped me sort out which months I was covered by what plan when the IRS had questions later.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

That's a really important point about overlapping coverage! I actually had a similar situation where I left one job mid-year and started another with different insurance. Having both 1095-C forms helped me figure out exactly which months I was covered by which plan when I was doing my taxes. It's especially helpful if you received any advance premium tax credits from the marketplace - you need to be able to show you didn't have qualifying employer coverage during those months to avoid having to pay back the credits.

0 coins

Has anyone checked if there might be a simple data entry error? I once had a $900 difference just because I entered a number wrong in the federal withholding box. Double-check the withholding amounts on both W2s and make sure they're entered exactly right in TaxAct.

0 coins

This happened to me too! I accidentally put my state withholding amount in the federal withholding box and it completely messed up my refund calculation. Definitely double check all the numbers.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This is a really frustrating situation but unfortunately pretty common! I work as a tax preparer and see this happen a lot when people try to do their own taxes after getting a professional estimate. A few things that could explain the $1,400+ difference: 1. **Multiple job withholding calculation**: With two W-2s from different parts of the year, the withholding tables at each job might not have accounted for your total annual income. This can result in under-withholding that reduces your refund, but tax software sometimes miscalculates this. 2. **State tax considerations**: Make sure you're looking at the same thing - federal refund vs. total refund including state. Sometimes people compare apples to oranges here. 3. **Filing status**: Even small differences in how filing status is determined can make a huge impact on your refund amount. My advice: Ask your tax preparer for a detailed breakdown of exactly what deductions and credits she's claiming. She should be able to show you line by line what's creating the difference. If everything looks legitimate, it might be worth paying her fee to get the larger refund. But if you can't get a clear explanation of where that extra $1,400 is coming from, I'd be cautious about proceeding.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm wondering though - if the tax preparer finds legitimate deductions that result in a much higher refund, wouldn't those same deductions show up when using professional tax software like TaxAct? I mean, the software should be asking about all the same potential deductions and credits, right? Or are there some things that only experienced preparers know to look for that the software might not prompt you about? I'm in a similar situation where I'm trying to decide between DIY software and paying a professional, and this kind of discrepancy makes me nervous about missing out on money I'm entitled to.

0 coins

Prev1...877878879880881...5643Next