
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
So I'm in a bit of a weird situation with my taxes this year. I work for a marketing agency and had to arrange this big client event in Denver. I ended up fronting about $3,700 for flights and hotel rooms for myself and two team members because our company credit card was maxed out (don't even get me started on our accounting department). The client eventually reimbursed me directly for all these expenses about 3 weeks later. Now I'm wondering if I can still deduct these business travel expenses on my taxes even though I got paid back for them? It was technically my money for a while and I took on the risk of fronting it. My accountant is on vacation until after the filing deadline and I need to figure this out ASAP. Any help would be appreciated!
I've been helping my brother with his taxes every year, and we've run into a complicated situation. About 5 years ago, he bought a house with his girlfriend, but they split up around 3 years ago. When they broke up, she wanted to keep the house and paid him about $15,000 as a buyout, and he signed papers giving up his claim to the property. The problem is, she never actually refinanced to remove him from the mortgage or deed (his name stayed on both). She ended up selling the house in 2024, but my brother didn't get any money from the sale. Now I'm confused about how to handle this on his 2024 taxes. Does he need to report this house sale on his tax return even though he didn't receive any of the proceeds? What information should go on Schedule D? And does he need to somehow coordinate with his ex-girlfriend about reporting this sale? I'm worried about him getting in trouble with the IRS if we don't report it correctly.
Has anyone used the primary residence exclusion in this type of situation? If he lived there 2 out of 5 years before the "buyout," could he exclude his portion of gain under the $250k exclusion?
Yes, this is an important consideration! If he met the ownership and use tests (owned and lived in the home as his main residence for at least 2 out of the 5 years before the interest was disposed of), he could potentially exclude up to $250,000 of gain. In this case, it sounds like he might have taken a loss rather than a gain, but the timeline matters. The 5-year lookback period would start from when he effectively "sold" his interest (the buyout), not the final sale date of the house. So if he lived there for at least 2 years before accepting the buyout payment, he would qualify for the exclusion if there had been a gain.
This is a tricky situation but definitely manageable with proper documentation. Since your brother's name remained on the deed, he'll need to report this on his return even though he didn't receive proceeds from the 2024 sale. The key is treating the buyout as his actual "sale date" rather than the 2024 transaction. On Schedule D, report his cost basis as his original investment in the property, and his proceeds as the $15,000 he received during the buyout. Include a statement explaining that he disposed of his interest in [year of buyout] and received full compensation at that time. Make sure to keep all documentation from the original buyout agreement - this will be crucial if the IRS has questions. You'll also want to get the sale details from his ex (sale price, date, etc.) to properly complete the forms, even though his "sale" technically happened years earlier. The good news is that if he lived in the home as his primary residence for 2+ years before the buyout, he may qualify for the primary residence exclusion on any gain (though it sounds like he likely has a loss anyway). Consider consulting with a tax professional if the numbers are significant, as this type of split ownership situation can have nuances that are worth getting right the first time.
I'm currently finishing up my master's in accounting, but I've realized that a Master's in Taxation (MST) probably makes more sense for my career path since my bachelor's was already in accounting. The problem is my GPA isn't stellar enough to get me into the top-tier programs like NYU or UIUC that everyone talks about. I stumbled across this website ranking different MST programs across the country, but I'm not sure how legit their rankings are or if they're just trying to sell something. For those who've gone through tax programs or work in the field - which schools have good reputations for taxation that might be more accessible for someone without a perfect academic record? Are there any mid-tier schools with strong tax programs that fly under the radar? Any advice on programs, application tips, or even if the MST is worth it compared to just taking the tax route in public accounting would be super helpful!
Don't forget to look at the CPA exam pass rates for the schools you're considering! Some MST programs are fantastic at preparing you for the REG section specifically. My school (Bentley) has a REG pass rate well above the national average for their MST grads. Also check what kind of tax research tools they teach. Some programs still focus heavily on CCH while others use Bloomberg or Checkpoint. Firms sometimes prefer candidates who already know their preferred research platform.
As someone who went through a similar decision process a few years ago, I'd strongly recommend looking at the University of Alabama's MST program. It's often overlooked but has an excellent reputation in the Southeast and very reasonable admission standards - they focus more on your statement of purpose and career goals than just GPA. What really sold me on their program was the flexibility to tailor coursework to your interests. They have strong concentrations in both individual and business taxation, plus some unique offerings like state and local tax policy that many programs don't have. The faculty includes several former Big 4 partners and IRS attorneys, so you get real-world perspective alongside the academic foundation. Their career services team also has solid connections with regional and national firms - I had three internship offers before graduating. One practical tip: reach out directly to admissions counselors at schools you're interested in. Many MST programs are looking for motivated students and will work with you even if your GPA isn't perfect, especially if you can demonstrate genuine interest in tax through relevant work experience or coursework.
I filed my taxes about a week ago using TaxAct's electronic filing service. I got the confirmation email from TaxAct saying they submitted everything to the IRS, but my status is still showing as "pending" in the system. I'm starting to get a bit nervous since the May 17th deadline is coming up fast. What happens if it continues to show as pending even after the deadline passes? And what if it gets rejected for something silly like an incorrect PIN or some other small error? Should I just print everything out and mail a paper copy to cover myself? I really don't want to deal with late filing penalties if something goes wrong with the electronic submission. Has anyone else experienced long pending times with TaxAct this filing season?
Anyone know if TaxAct has a way to see if it was actually transmitted to the IRS beyond just the email? I'm in the same boat, filed 2 weeks ago and still pending!
I went through this exact same worry last month! Filed with TaxAct and it stayed "pending" for almost 2 weeks. What really helped calm my nerves was understanding that "pending" doesn't mean there's a problem - it just means the IRS hasn't finished processing yet. The key thing to remember is that your filing date is locked in when you hit submit in TaxAct, not when the IRS finishes processing. So even if it's still pending after May 17th, you're not late as long as you submitted before the deadline. I'd suggest checking the IRS "Where's My Refund" tool - it often shows acceptance before the tax software updates. And definitely don't file a paper copy unless you get an actual rejection notice. Duplicate filings can create way more headaches than just waiting for the electronic processing to finish. Hang in there - the waiting is the worst part, but TaxAct is reliable and your return is almost certainly fine!
I run a small digital marketing agency (structured as an LLC) that's completely remote. We've been lucky enough to grow and now have clients in about 39 different states, which is awesome for business but making me nervous about tax compliance. I'm really struggling to find clear information about state income tax nexus thresholds specifically for service-based businesses like mine. Almost everything I find online focuses on sales tax nexus for e-commerce or retail businesses selling physical products. Just to be clear - we don't have any employees or office space in the state where I personally live and work. It's just me managing contractors who are scattered across different states. What I really need help understanding is: 1. Do states apply the same economic nexus thresholds for income tax that they use for sales tax? Or are they different? 2. If they are different, what ARE the thresholds for service businesses regarding state income tax? 3. Is this something states are actively enforcing for digital service providers? I know they're cracking down on sales tax for physical products, but what about purely digital services? I feel like I'm missing something obvious, but I've been searching for days and can't find a straightforward answer. Any experience or resources would be super helpful!
One thing to consider that I haven't seen mentioned - Public Law 86-272 provides some protection from state income taxes for certain businesses, but it typically doesn't apply to service businesses like digital agencies. It only protects sellers of tangible personal property. This caught me by surprise last year when my accountant explained why my SaaS business couldn't use this protection despite having no physical presence in many states where we had customers.
Wow, that's a really important distinction! So basically as a service business, we have even fewer protections than physical product sellers? That seems backwards considering we use even less of the state resources/infrastructure...
Yes, it's counterintuitive but that's exactly right. PL 86-272 was enacted in 1959, long before digital service businesses existed at scale. It specifically protects businesses that sell tangible personal property when their only activity in a state is soliciting orders that are approved and fulfilled from outside the state. Service businesses don't get this protection, which means you can potentially create income tax nexus more easily than a company selling physical products. Many tax professionals believe PL 86-272 needs to be updated for the digital economy, but until then, service businesses need to be especially careful about multi-state compliance.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who just started expanding my freelance digital consulting business beyond my home state, I had no idea the complexity I was walking into. I've been putting off addressing this because it seemed so overwhelming, but reading everyone's experiences makes it clear I need to tackle this sooner rather than later. The voluntary disclosure programs mentioned sound like a lifeline for those of us who may have inadvertently created nexus already. One question I haven't seen addressed - for those of you who went through the multi-state compliance process, how did you handle ongoing compliance? Are you now filing quarterly estimates in multiple states, or do most states allow annual filings for smaller service businesses? The administrative burden of maintaining compliance in multiple jurisdictions seems almost as daunting as figuring out the initial requirements.
Andre Laurent
Has anyone dealt with partial reimbursement? My company only reimburses 80% of meals while traveling, meaning I'm covering the other 20%. Can I deduct that 20% portion?
0 coins
StarStrider
Unfortunately, probably not. Since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act went into effect (2018-2025), unreimbursed employee business expenses are no longer deductible for most employees on federal taxes. This includes that 20% of meal costs your company doesn't cover.
0 coins
Savannah Weiner
This is a common misconception that trips up a lot of business travelers! The key principle here is that you can only deduct expenses that you actually bear the cost of. Since you were fully reimbursed by the client, you have no net out-of-pocket expense to deduct. Think of it this way - if you could deduct the $3,700 AND keep the $3,700 reimbursement, you'd essentially be getting paid to take a business trip, which isn't how the tax code works. The timing of when you fronted the money versus when you got reimbursed doesn't matter for tax purposes. What matters is that by the end of the tax year, you were made whole. Make sure to keep all your receipts and documentation of the reimbursement though - the IRS likes to see the paper trail showing these were legitimate business expenses that were properly reimbursed, especially when the amounts are significant like yours.
0 coins