


Ask the community...
As someone who works in tax preparation, I see this exact scenario probably 50+ times every tax season! You're absolutely on the right track thinking you can still claim him as a dependent for this final year. The key factors working in your favor: 1) He was a full-time student for 5+ months (January through May graduation), 2) He lived with you for more than half the year, and 3) You provided more than half his total support for the entire 12-month period. That $38,000 income actually doesn't matter at all for qualifying child dependents under age 24 - there's no income limit like there is for qualifying relatives. The IRS cares about support, not earnings. Just make sure when he files his own return (which he'll need to do since he earned over the filing threshold), he checks the box indicating he can be claimed as a dependent on someone else's return. This prevents any conflicts with the IRS systems. One last tip: if you paid any education expenses for his final semester, you might be eligible for education credits that could be worth more than the dependency exemption itself. Worth looking into!
This is so helpful, thank you! I'm new to dealing with these kinds of tax situations since this is my first child going through the college-to-work transition. Just to make sure I understand correctly - even though my son made significantly more money than I expected him to make in his first job, that income doesn't automatically disqualify him from being claimed as our dependent? I was honestly panicking a bit because $38,000 seemed like a lot for someone we're still claiming! And regarding the education expenses - we did pay for his final semester books and some lab fees, probably around $1,200 total. Would that be enough to qualify for any meaningful tax credits, or is there a minimum amount that makes it worthwhile? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra paperwork complexity.
I went through this exact same situation last year with my youngest daughter! She graduated in May and started her first "real job" in August making about $35,000 for those few months. I was so stressed about whether we could still claim her. After doing a ton of research and even calling a tax professional, I learned that the timing of graduation and job start actually works in your favor. Since your son was a full-time student for the first 5 months of the year, he still qualifies as a "qualifying child" under the IRS rules, regardless of his income. The support test is really what matters most. In our case, even though my daughter had income, we calculated that between rent (she lived at home), food, car insurance, health insurance, phone bill, and other expenses we covered, we definitely provided more than 50% of her total support for the year. One thing that helped me feel more confident was keeping a simple spreadsheet tracking major expenses we paid for her throughout the year - made it easy to show we met the support requirement if needed. The peace of mind was worth the extra record-keeping! Your son will need to file his own return and check the box saying someone else can claim him as a dependent, but you should be all set to claim him one final time. Good luck!
This is such a relief to read! I'm in almost the exact same boat with my son - he graduated in May and started working in September. I've been losing sleep over whether we messed up by planning to claim him as a dependent when he's making decent money now. Your spreadsheet idea is brilliant! I wish I had started tracking expenses earlier in the year, but I think I can still piece together most of the major costs. Between his room, our family health insurance premium, groceries, and car insurance, we're definitely over the 50% support threshold. Did your daughter have any issues when she filed her return? I'm worried about her accidentally not checking the "can be claimed as dependent" box and causing problems with our filing. The tax software makes it seem so complicated with all the dependency questions. Also, do you remember roughly how much the dependency exemption ended up being worth on your return? I'm trying to figure out if it's a significant tax benefit or just a small difference in our situation.
This whole thread has been incredibly helpful! I had the exact same confusion with my E*Trade 1099-B and was leaning toward answer (b) before reading everyone's explanations. What really clicked for me was understanding that E*Trade is essentially doing the math for you behind the scenes. When they show that $839,230 cost basis, they've already factored in all the wash sale adjustments that happened throughout the year. So that $89,700 "Wash Sale Loss Disallowed" figure represents adjustments that are already reflected in your cost basis - it's not something you need to add separately. I think the confusion comes from the fact that this column exists at all. It feels like it should be part of the calculation somehow, but really it's just there for transparency so you can see how much in losses were disallowed during the tax year. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with E*Trade support, the IRS, and tax professionals. It's reassuring to see the same answer confirmed through multiple sources. I'm definitely going with the $37,220 realized gain amount when I file!
Absolutely agree with your explanation! I went through this same confusion last year and it really does come down to understanding that E*Trade is handling all the wash sale calculations automatically in the background. What helped me was thinking about it this way: the "Wash Sale Loss Disallowed" column is like a receipt showing you what adjustments were made, but those adjustments have already been applied to your cost basis. It's similar to how a store receipt might show you the original price, the discount applied, and the final price - you wouldn't add the discount back to the final price because it's already been subtracted. The fact that multiple people in this thread got the same confirmation from E*Trade support, IRS agents, and tax professionals really gives me confidence that $37,220 is definitely the right answer. It's such a relief to have this cleared up before filing season gets too stressful!
This has been such a valuable thread! I'm dealing with the exact same E*Trade 1099-B situation and was completely lost until reading everyone's explanations. What really helped me understand this was the analogy about the receipt - the "Wash Sale Loss Disallowed" column is like documentation showing what adjustments were made, but those adjustments are already incorporated into the cost basis figure. E*Trade has done all the heavy lifting by automatically adjusting the cost basis upward to account for disallowed wash sale losses. I was initially leaning toward answer (b) and adding the $89,700 to the realized gain, but now I clearly see that would be double-counting. The $37,220 realized gain is already the correct taxable amount because it's calculated using the wash-sale-adjusted cost basis. Thanks to everyone who called E*Trade support, used the IRS callback services, and shared their experiences with tax professionals. Having multiple independent confirmations of the same answer gives me confidence to file correctly. This community really came through with practical, actionable advice!
I'm so glad I found this thread! I was literally about to file my taxes with the wrong numbers. I have a very similar E*Trade 1099-B situation and was convinced I needed to add the wash sale disallowed amount to my realized gains. The receipt analogy really made it click for me too. It's like E*Trade is showing you their work - here's what we disallowed ($89,700), and here's how we adjusted your cost basis to account for it, which resulted in your final taxable gain ($37,220). I was getting so frustrated trying to research this online because you get conflicting information everywhere. But seeing multiple people here confirm the same answer through different sources (E*Trade support, IRS agents, tax professionals) gives me the confidence I needed. One quick question though - when I enter this into TurboTax, should I just enter the $37,220 as my capital gain and ignore the wash sale column entirely? Or does TurboTax ask for that information separately somewhere?
The name change issue is definitely a major red flag here! I went through something similar after getting married - filed with my new name but SSA hadn't fully updated their records yet, which caused a 3+ month delay. The IRS basically puts your return on hold until they can verify your identity matches what's in the Social Security database. Here's what I'd recommend doing ASAP: 1) Call SSA at 1-800-772-1213 to verify your name change is properly recorded 2) Check both your return transcript AND account transcript - sometimes one updates before the other 3) Look for any mail from the IRS (sometimes verification letters get lost or look like junk mail) The "response date" is just their internal deadline but honestly means nothing - they're so backlogged they rarely meet their own deadlines anyway. A blank transcript after 6+ weeks with a recent name change almost always means identity verification issues. The good news is once they sort out the name mismatch, everything usually processes really quickly. I got my refund 4 days after they finally resolved my case. It's incredibly frustrating but hang in there - you're not alone in this mess!
This is super helpful advice! I never realized how much of a nightmare name changes could be for tax processing. It's crazy that something as simple as getting married can throw a wrench into the entire system for months. I'm definitely going to call SSA first thing tomorrow to verify everything is properly updated on their end. Thanks for breaking down the specific steps to take - it's nice to finally have a concrete action plan instead of just sitting here wondering what went wrong. Hopefully once the name mismatch gets sorted out, everything will move quickly like you experienced!
I'm dealing with the exact same frustrating situation! Filed on March 8th, accepted immediately, but my transcript has been completely blank for over 7 weeks now. The "Where's My Refund" tool just keeps showing that generic "still being processed" message with no actual timeline or explanation. From everything I've researched (and I've been obsessively googling this), the "response date" is basically just an internal IRS deadline that they set for themselves - but honestly, they're so backlogged this year that those dates don't mean much. A blank transcript after this long usually indicates either your return is stuck in their massive processing queue OR something flagged it for additional review. The name change after marriage that you mentioned is probably the main culprit here! I've seen this issue come up repeatedly in forums - even after updating your name with Social Security, there can be significant delays before their database properly syncs with the IRS system. This mismatch can hold up processing for months while they try to verify your identity. I'd definitely recommend calling SSA tomorrow to confirm your name change is fully processed and showing up correctly in their records. Also make sure you're checking both your return transcript AND your account transcript - sometimes updates appear in one before the other. The waiting is absolutely brutal when you're depending on that refund money for unexpected expenses. But based on what others have shared, once the name issue gets resolved, refunds typically process very quickly. Stay strong - we'll get through this mess eventually! š¤
This is exactly the kind of situation where maximizing your pre-tax retirement contributions can really pay off! As a fellow educator (I teach high school biology), I've been through this same calculation. One thing to consider is the timing of your contributions. If you're paid over 10 months like many teachers, you might want to front-load your 403b contributions earlier in the year to get a better sense of where your MAGI will land. This gives you more flexibility to adjust if needed. Also, don't forget about HSA contributions if either of your school districts offers high-deductible health plans with HSAs. Those contributions also reduce MAGI and you can use HSA funds for qualified medical expenses tax-free forever. With two college students, you might have some medical expenses that could benefit from this strategy. The key is running the numbers to see exactly how much you need to contribute to stay under that $160k threshold. Every dollar of education credits you preserve is worth way more than the tax deferral benefit of the retirement contribution alone!
This is really helpful advice about timing contributions! I hadn't thought about front-loading our 403b contributions earlier in the school year. We do get paid over 10 months, so that strategy makes a lot of sense. Quick question about HSAs - do you know if California teachers typically have access to high-deductible health plans through their districts? I know our benefits are pretty standardized across the state, but I haven't looked into whether HSA-eligible plans are even an option for us in the CalSTRS/CalPERS system. Also, when you mention running the numbers, do you use any specific tools or calculators to figure out exactly how much to contribute? I want to make sure I'm not over-contributing to retirement accounts if I don't need to for the education credits.
Great question about HSAs in California! Unfortunately, most California school districts don't offer HSA-eligible high-deductible health plans. The CalSTRS and CalPERS health benefits are typically more comprehensive traditional plans that don't qualify for HSA contributions. You'd need to check with your specific district's benefits office, but it's pretty rare in the California public education system. For running the numbers, I actually use a combination of approaches. I start with the IRS worksheets in Publication 970 to get a rough estimate, but honestly those can be confusing. For more precise calculations, especially when you have multiple income sources and deductions to consider, I've found that tax software or professional tools give much better results. The key is to model different contribution scenarios - like what happens if you contribute $15K vs $20K to your 403b - and see how that affects your final MAGI and education credit eligibility. You definitely don't want to over-contribute if you don't need to, since you could potentially use that money for other financial goals.
As a California educator myself (elementary school principal), I can confirm that 403b contributions absolutely reduce your MAGI for education credit purposes. This saved my family thousands when my daughter was in college. One strategy that worked well for us was to calculate our projected MAGI early in the tax year, then adjust our 403b contributions accordingly. Since we're paid over 10 months, I increased my contribution percentage mid-year when I realized we were close to the phase-out threshold. Also worth noting - if you're over 50, don't forget about catch-up contributions! The additional $7,500 you can contribute to your 403b in 2025 can make a real difference in staying under that $160k MAGI limit for married filing jointly. With $24,000 in qualified expenses for two students, you're potentially looking at $5,000 in American Opportunity Credits if you can keep your MAGI in the right range. That's definitely worth optimizing your retirement contributions for!
This is such valuable advice! As a newer educator (just started my third year teaching high school English), I'm still learning about all these financial strategies. I had no idea about catch-up contributions for those over 50 - that's something I'll definitely keep in mind for the future. Your point about calculating projected MAGI early in the year is really smart. Do you have any tips for estimating what our MAGI will be when we're still early in the tax year? I feel like there are so many variables with potential raises, different deduction amounts, etc. Is there a simple way to project this, or do you recommend working with a tax professional? Also, thank you for confirming the numbers - $5,000 in potential credits for two students really puts this in perspective. That's a significant amount that's worth planning for!
Lourdes Fox
Has anyone dealt with a situation where the house significantly appreciated between death and sale? My situation is similar but we didn't sell right away and now there's a huge gain from the stepped-up basis to sale price.
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
ā¢Yes, I went through this exact situation. If there's significant appreciation between the date of death (when the step-up occurred) and the sale date, that appreciation IS taxable. You'll still use Schedule D, but you'll have a gain to report based on the difference between the stepped-up basis and the final sale price. For example, if the property was worth $300k at death and sold for $375k two years later, you'd have a $75k capital gain to report and distribute to beneficiaries. Depending on how long the trust held it after death, it could be short-term or long-term capital gain.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now with my grandmother's estate. One additional thing to consider that hasn't been mentioned yet - if the property was used as a rental before your aunt passed, you may also need to deal with depreciation recapture on Schedule D. This gets reported as ordinary income rather than capital gains and can significantly impact the tax liability. Also, make sure you get a proper appraisal of the property as of the date of death to establish the stepped-up basis. The IRS may question the valuation later, especially with a $425,000 property, so having professional documentation is crucial. I learned this the hard way when they asked for supporting documentation during my grandmother's estate audit. For the K-1 distributions to 20 beneficiaries, consider whether any of them are minors or have special circumstances that might affect how they report their share of the gain. This can get complex quickly with that many people involved.
0 coins
Summer Green
ā¢This is really helpful about the depreciation recapture - I hadn't even thought about that possibility! Quick question though - how do you determine if there was rental use before death? Would that information typically be in the trust documents or do I need to look at previous tax returns? And if there was rental depreciation, does that change which forms I need beyond just Schedule D and Form 8949?
0 coins