IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Confused about wash sale rules for day trading the same stock daily

I'm getting really confused about these wash sale rules and hoping someone can explain it to me in simple terms. I day trade the same stock ticker every single day, constantly jumping in and out with both winning and losing trades. Now I'm starting to worry that my losses won't offset my gains properly because of wash sale rules. As of right now, I have about $54k in gains and around $49k in losses. So my actual profit is only about $5k. But here's what's freaking me out - would I be paying taxes just on that $5k of actual profit, or would I be on the hook for taxes on the entire $54k of gains because of these stupid wash sale rules? I really don't understand how wash sales work when you're trading the same stock every day. Does it matter that I'm buying and selling the same ticker constantly? Any help would be super appreciated!

I'm still confused about one thing - if I have wash sales throughout the year but close out ALL my positions by December 31st and don't rebuy for 30+ days, do I still get to claim all my net losses for the year?

0 coins

Yes, that's correct. If you close all positions by year-end and don't repurchase the same or substantially identical securities within 30 days (including into January of the next year), then all your disallowed losses would be recognized in the current tax year. This is a common strategy for active traders - completely exit positions in securities where you've taken losses by year-end and stay out for at least 30 days. This ensures you don't push losses into the next tax year.

0 coins

As someone who went through this exact same confusion last year, I can tell you that you're likely overthinking it. With $54k in gains and $49k in losses, you're probably looking at paying taxes on roughly your $5k net profit, not the full $54k. The wash sale rule doesn't eliminate your losses - it just defers them by adding them to the cost basis of your replacement shares. Since you're day trading the same stock constantly, those adjusted cost bases are getting realized when you sell those shares throughout the year. The real trap is if you have significant wash sale losses at year-end that carry into January. That's when you could get stuck paying taxes on gains while having your losses deferred to next year. My advice: Track your actual realized gains/losses carefully (not just the gross numbers), and if you're worried, consider using one of the software tools mentioned above to get a clearer picture of your true tax situation. Don't panic - you're probably in better shape than you think!

0 coins

Great question! I found that broker statements can be misleading because they don't properly account for wash sale adjustments in real-time. What I did was keep a simple spreadsheet tracking my net position in each security throughout the year. For each trade, I'd note: date, symbol, shares, price, and whether it was opening or closing a position. The key insight was realizing that if I'm constantly trading the same stock, the wash sale adjustments are mostly "washing out" within the same tax year as those adjusted basis shares get sold. The real danger zone is December - that's when I'd carefully track any losing trades to make sure I wasn't carrying disallowed losses into January. I'd also use my broker's year-end tax documents as a double-check, but never relied on them alone during the year. Honestly, after going through it once manually, I switched to using tax software specifically designed for traders. It was worth every penny to avoid the headache and potential errors.

0 coins

Great question! From my experience, broker statements can be misleading because they show gross P&L without accounting for wash sale adjustments. What I ended up doing was creating a simple spreadsheet that tracked three things: 1) Date and details of each trade, 2) Whether it potentially triggered a wash sale (any loss followed by repurchase within 30 days), and 3) Running tally of "clean" realized gains/losses vs. potential wash sale deferrals. The key insight was realizing that if I had a loss on Monday and bought back the same stock on Tuesday, that Monday loss wasn't really "realized" for tax purposes - it got added to Tuesday's cost basis. So my real P&L was different from what my broker was showing me. Using one of those tax software tools mentioned earlier (like taxr.ai) would probably automate this whole process, but doing it manually at least helped me understand what was actually happening with my trades. The main thing is just being aware that your broker's P&L summary might not reflect your actual tax situation if you're frequently trading the same securities.

0 coins

Do I need to pay Estimated Taxes if my prior year tax liability (1040 line 24) was $0?

Hey folks, I'm new to this whole situation and could use some help. Recently retired and trying to figure out the tax game now that my only income is from dividends, interest, and occasionally selling some investments for long-term capital gains. So here's my situation - I sold some stock from my taxable account about a month ago, and I realized estimated taxes are due on September 15th. But when I was looking through the IRS rules, it seems like I might not need to pay estimated taxes if I had zero tax liability last year (2024). I spent almost 2 hours on the phone with the IRS trying to confirm this. Finally got someone who verified that line 24 on Form 1040 is indeed what determines my "tax liability" from last year. She pulled up my 2024 return and confirmed it was zero. But when I specifically asked if that meant I don't need to pay estimated taxes now, she tried transferring me to another department - and then I got disconnected after waiting another hour! So frustrating! If it's true that I don't need to pay estimated taxes based on having no tax liability the prior year, that would be amazing news. It would give me another 6+ months breathing room and even let me consider selling more investments later this year. Any insights would be really appreciated! Thanks in advance!

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar boat - retired last year and trying to navigate the tax implications of living off investment income. Just wanted to add one more consideration for folks in this situation: even though you don't have to make estimated payments with zero prior year liability, it might still be worth making voluntary payments if you expect a large tax bill. The IRS doesn't charge penalties, but you're essentially giving yourself an interest-free loan to the government for the year. I've been setting aside about 20% of my capital gains in a high-yield savings account so I can earn some interest on the money rather than sending it to the IRS early. When April comes around, I'll have the tax money plus a little extra from the interest earned. Just another way to think about it!

0 coins

This has been such a valuable thread! I'm also recently retired and was completely overwhelmed trying to figure out estimated taxes for the first time. Like many others here, I had zero tax liability last year but was panicking about quarterly payments after some recent stock sales. The confirmation from multiple sources about the safe harbor rule is incredibly reassuring. What really stands out to me is how many people mentioned the same struggle - getting conflicting information or being disconnected during IRS calls. It's clear this is a common pain point for new retirees. I'm particularly grateful for the practical tips about setting aside money in a high-yield savings account rather than making voluntary payments. As someone who's always been conservative with money, I was leaning toward making estimated payments "just to be safe," but the opportunity cost argument really makes sense. Why give up 4-5% interest when I'm not required to make the payments? The resources mentioned here (taxr.ai for projections and Claimyr for IRS calls) sound really helpful for someone like me who wants professional guidance but doesn't want to pay full CPA fees for every question. One question for the group - for those who've been doing this for a while, do you find it gets easier to estimate your annual tax liability once you have a year or two of retirement tax returns under your belt? I'm hoping this uncertainty is just part of the learning curve!

0 coins

Welcome to the retirement tax planning club! You're definitely asking the right questions, and yes, it absolutely gets easier once you have a year or two of data to work with. I'm just finishing up my second year of retirement taxes, and having that first year's return as a baseline made such a huge difference. You start to understand your typical dividend income patterns, how your spending from investments translates to realized gains, and where you fall in the tax brackets. The uncertainty you're feeling right now is totally normal - we've all been there! The high-yield savings approach really is the way to go when you're not required to make estimated payments. I kicked myself last year for making voluntary quarterlies when I could have been earning interest on that money. This year I'm keeping it in a dedicated account earning about 4.8% - it's not huge money, but every bit helps on a fixed income. One tip that helped me in year two: keep a simple spreadsheet tracking your monthly dividend income and any stock sales throughout the year. It makes the year-end projections so much easier and helps you spot patterns. You'll start to see which months tend to be higher income and can plan accordingly. The learning curve is real, but you're in good company here, and it sounds like you're approaching it thoughtfully. The fact that you're asking these questions now puts you way ahead of where most of us were starting out!

0 coins

First time LLC/S-Corp filing - should I use a CPA or TurboTax for maximum benefits?

I'm freaking out about my 2024 taxes and need some serious advice! I worked as a W-2 employee for most of the year but started an LLC (registered as an S-Corp) in August and did contract work for the last quarter. I've filed all the S-Corp election paperwork and kept my business earnings completely separate in a dedicated business account, but honestly that's as far as I've gotten. I was really hoping to find a good tax professional to help me navigate filing this year and make sure I'm taking advantage of all the LLC/S-Corp benefits I keep hearing about. The problem is I've struck out finding anyone local who can help (do they even need to be local?). I'm terrible with finances/administrative stuff and was hoping to find someone who could walk me through everything step by step so I could ask a ton of questions and actually learn the process. I know I could probably Google everything, but I learn way better with someone explaining things to me directly. I've used TurboTax for the past couple years when I just had super basic returns. I don't have any complicated investments - just a 401K and a tiny Acorns account, no stocks or crypto. So my big question is: can TurboTax adequately handle my situation and help me maximize my returns with the LLC/S-Corp, or should I keep trying to hunt down a CPA who can guide me through this?

Just to give a different perspective - I tried doing my S-Corp taxes with TurboTax Business last year and deeply regretted it. Spent 20+ hours struggling through it, thought I'd done everything right, and still got notices from the IRS about missing forms 6 months later. Had to hire a CPA to fix everything anyway and ended up paying way more than if I'd just gone to them in the first place.

0 coins

Same experience here. The business version of TurboTax doesn't explain the specific S-Corp requirements very well. I missed the whole thing about needing to file Form 1120-S by March 15th (NOT April 15th like personal returns) and got hit with penalties. Now I just hand everything to my accountant and it's worth every penny.

0 coins

As someone who's been through the exact same transition from W-2 to S-Corp, I'd definitely recommend going the CPA route for your first year. The complexity isn't just in filing the returns - it's understanding all the ongoing compliance requirements that TurboTax won't teach you. Since you mentioned you've only been taking owner's draws instead of paying yourself a salary, you're going to need professional help to sort that out anyway. The IRS is pretty strict about S-Corp owners paying themselves reasonable compensation through payroll, and getting that wrong can trigger audits or penalties. One thing I wish someone had told me: start interviewing CPAs now, not in March when everyone's swamped. Many good ones are already booking up for tax season. Look for someone who specializes in small business and can explain things clearly - you want to learn the process, not just hand everything off blindly. The investment in professional guidance your first year will save you headaches (and probably money) down the road. Once you understand the S-Corp requirements and have proper systems in place, you can always consider doing simpler years yourself later.

0 coins

1099-NEC filing with free tax software alternative to TurboTax

So I had this weird employment situation where I started as a contractor for my current company and then they brought me on full-time after a month. Just got my 1099-NEC in the mail today and tried to file it with TurboTax's free version, but of course they're telling me I need to upgrade to the $59 version to handle the 1099-NEC. I already have my W-2 loaded in there from the full-time portion of my job but really don't want to pay almost $60 just because I worked as a contractor for a few weeks. Are there any actually free tax filing services that will let me file both my W-2 and 1099-NEC without charging me? The contract work wasn't even that much money so paying for the upgrade feels ridiculous.

If you're comfortable doing a bit more work yourself, you could try using the Free Fillable Forms directly from the IRS. It's not as user-friendly as the guided options like TurboTax, but it's completely free and handles all forms including 1099-NEC. You just need to know which forms to fill out and how to do the calculations yourself.

0 coins

I tried Free Fillable Forms once and it was a nightmare. No guidance, no error checking until the very end, and then it rejected my return for some obscure reason I couldn't figure out. Ended up having to start over with paid software anyway. Wouldn't recommend unless you really know what you're doing.

0 coins

Another option worth considering is TaxSlayer's Simply Free edition - it handles both W-2 and 1099-NEC forms without any upgrade fees for federal filing. I used it last year when I had a similar contractor-to-employee situation and it walked me through everything step by step. The interface is pretty straightforward and they don't hit you with surprise charges at the end like some other services do. State filing does cost extra (around $30) but federal is genuinely free even with 1099 income. Just make sure you're using the "Simply Free" version and not their regular free trial which does have limitations.

0 coins

What expenses qualify for reimbursement under Treas. Regs. ยง1.62-2(d) Accountable Plan rules?

Title: What expenses qualify for reimbursement under Treas. Regs. ยง1.62-2(d) Accountable Plan rules? 1 Hi all, my small business has started using an Accountable Plan for the first time since the TCJA made employee business expenses practically useless. I'm trying to figure out what's legit to reimburse my team for without causing issues. Two scenarios keep coming up that I'm not sure about: First, one of my employees works fully remote and has a dedicated home office (about 12% of their house). They just replaced their HVAC system for $8,200 and asked if they can submit the proportional amount ($984) for reimbursement under our Accountable Plan. Second, I have another employee who likes to work from coffee shops 2-3 times a week instead of their home office. They want to submit receipts for their coffee and snacks ($7-12 each visit) saying the coffee shop is essentially a "coworking space" even though they don't have specific client meetings there. Are these legitimate Accountable Plan reimbursements? What's actually fair game under Treas. Regs. ยง1.62-2(d)? I don't want to be too restrictive but also don't want to cause tax problems.

3 Has anyone actually been audited over their Accountable Plan? I've been reimbursing employees for home office equipment, internet, and occasional coffee shop visits for years with no issues. As long as they provide receipts and a business justification, I've approved them under our Accountable Plan per Treas. Regs. ยง1.62-2(d).

0 coins

11 I have a client who was audited specifically on their Accountable Plan reimbursements last year. The IRS was particularly interested in home office-related expenses. They disallowed reimbursements for home improvements (including partial reimbursement for painting and flooring) and reclassified them as taxable wages, resulting in additional employment taxes plus penalties.

0 coins

3 That's concerning to hear. Were they reimbursing for major improvements or just regular expenses? Did the employees have legitimate home offices that were used exclusively for business?

0 coins

The distinction between repairs and improvements is crucial here, and I'd be very conservative with both scenarios you've described. For the HVAC system, this is clearly a capital improvement that increases the home's value permanently. Even though 12% is used for business, the IRS will likely view this as primarily benefiting the employee as a homeowner. I'd avoid reimbursing this under your Accountable Plan - it's exactly the type of expense that gets flagged in audits and reclassified as taxable compensation. For the coffee shop visits, the key question is business necessity. Can the employee document why they couldn't work from their home office that day? "I like the atmosphere" won't cut it - you need legitimate business reasons like client calls requiring a quiet background, internet outage at home, or specific work that benefits from a different environment. Even then, food/beverage costs are subject to the 50% meal limitation and need detailed documentation. My recommendation: Create a clear written policy defining what qualifies before approving any reimbursements. For home office expenses, stick to supplies, equipment, and utilities rather than improvements. For alternative workspace costs, require written justification for each occurrence explaining the business necessity.

0 coins

Prev1...861862863864865...5645Next