


Ask the community...
Something else to consider - did your husband have any business expenses related to this contractor work? Make sure to deduct those on Schedule C too! Things like home office (if he worked from home), supplies, software subscriptions, mileage if he drove for business purposes, etc. No sense in paying more tax than you need to.
That's a great point! He definitely had some expenses - mostly software subscriptions and a new laptop he had to buy specifically for this job. I wasn't sure if we could deduct the full cost of the laptop or if we needed to depreciate it.
For the laptop, it depends on when he purchased it and how much it cost. If it was under $2,500, you can potentially use Section 179 to deduct the full cost in one year, assuming it was used more than 50% for business. For the software subscriptions, those are generally fully deductible as business expenses in the year paid. Just make sure you keep receipts for everything. You might also want to look into home office deduction if he was working from home - you can either use the simplified method ($5 per square foot up to 300 square feet) or the regular method which calculates the actual expenses.
Don't forget about self-employment taxes! Since this is 1099-NEC income, you'll need to pay both the employer and employee portions of Social Security and Medicare taxes, which comes out to about 15.3% on top of regular income tax. Make sure you're setting aside enough to cover that.
Is there any way to reduce the self-employment tax hit? That 15.3% is brutal when you're already paying regular income tax too.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet - if the payment was specifically designated as "alimony" in the divorce decree, the tax treatment would be different depending on when your divorce was finalized. For divorces finalized AFTER Dec 31, 2018, alimony is NOT taxable income to the recipient (and not deductible by the payer). For divorces before that date, alimony IS taxable income. But from your description, this sounds like a property settlement, not alimony, so it should be non-taxable regardless. Just make sure your sister keeps good documentation in case of an audit.
The divorce was finalized in 2019, but the agreement definitely doesn't call it alimony. It's labeled as "property settlement" in the divorce decree. Is that clear enough for the IRS or does she need additional documentation? And would the extra amount he paid her ($2,500 over the agreed amount) fall under the same category?
If the agreement specifically labels it as "property settlement" in the divorce decree, that's very clear documentation for the IRS. That's exactly what you want - language that explicitly categorizes the payment as division of marital assets rather than support payments. For the extra $2,500, that's a bit trickier. Since it wasn't specified in the original agreement, the IRS might consider it as a separate transaction. If her ex specifically characterized it as interest or compensation for the delay, it could be considered taxable income. If it was presented as an additional property settlement or a gift, it would likely not be taxable to her. I'd recommend documenting any communication about that extra amount (emails, texts) that explains the nature of that additional payment.
Has your sister already received a tax form for this payment? If her ex reported it as income paid to her, she may get a 1099-MISC, which would mean the IRS is expecting her to report it as income. If that happens, she'll need to file her return correctly (as a non-taxable property settlement) and include an explanation with documentation.
This is a really good point. When I went through my divorce, my ex-spouse incorrectly issued me a 1099 for a property settlement payment. I had to file Form 8275 (Disclosure Statement) with my tax return to explain why I wasn't reporting the amount as income. Saved me from an automatic audit flag when the IRS computers saw the 1099 but didn't see matching income on my return.
She hasn't received any tax forms yet, but that's a really good point! I'll tell her to wait before filing her taxes to make sure she doesn't get a 1099 from him. If she does, we'll definitely need to file that Form 8275 with an explanation. The divorce was such a mess that I wouldn't be surprised if he reports it incorrectly just to cause problems.
Have you considered talking to your attorney about structuring the settlement specifically to minimize tax implications? I learned the hard way that how the settlement agreement is worded makes ALL the difference in how it's taxed. Make sure they specify what portions are for: - Recovery of basis in the property (not taxable) - Emotional distress (partially taxable) - Punitive damages (fully taxable) - Reimbursement for repairs (potentially not taxable) Don't let your attorney just accept a general settlement without specifying these breakdowns!
Thanks for this! Did you have to specifically ask your attorney to break it down this way? My lawyer seems focused only on getting the highest dollar amount and doesn't seem to understand or care about the tax implications.
Yes, I had to specifically ask - actually, I had to insist on it. Most attorneys are focused solely on the gross settlement amount rather than your net after taxes. I ended up printing out IRS Publication 4345 "Settlements ā Taxability" and bringing it to my attorney to show him exactly what I needed. Even if your attorney isn't knowledgeable about tax implications, you can request that the settlement agreement specifically allocate amounts to different categories. For example, you want as much as possible categorized as "compensation for diminution in property value due to undisclosed defects" rather than "damages for fraud." The former is more likely to be treated as a reduction to basis while the latter might be considered ordinary income. Don't be afraid to push back - this is your money and your tax situation!
Would a deduction for casualty losses apply here? I thought those were eliminated for everything except federally declared disasters?
You're right that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act severely limited casualty loss deductions for tax years 2018-2025. For non-business casualties, they're only deductible if they result from a federally declared disaster. This is why structuring the settlement properly is so important. What you can't claim as a casualty loss might still be handled favorably if properly categorized as a recovery of capital or reduction in basis. However, fraud victims specifically have had a tough time under current tax law since the casualty loss limitations went into effect.
Here's a simple breakdown of what qualifies as self-employment income vs hobby: - Self-employment: You do it regularly, keep business records, depend on the income, work at it consistently, have expertise in it, make changes to increase profitability - Hobby: You do it irregularly, don't really need the money from it, do it mainly for fun, don't spend much time on it If you have a hobby, you still report the income but don't pay self-employment tax and can't deduct losses. With $8700, chances are its self-employment. Most of my "hobby" friends who started making real money had to switch to treating it as a business after they crossed about $2000 in annual income.
Does having a separate bank account matter for proving it's a business? I just use my personal checking for everything.
Having a separate bank account isn't required but it's extremely helpful for proving business intent. It shows you're treating the activity professionally and makes tracking income and expenses much easier. It's one of the factors the IRS considers when determining if something is a business vs. hobby. Other factors include business cards, a business name, proper recordkeeping, and marketing efforts. The more business-like behaviors you demonstrate, the stronger your case for self-employment treatment.
Don't forget that if your net self-employment income is over $400, you need to make estimated quarterly tax payments throughout the year! I learned this the hard way and got hit with penalties my first year.
Marcus Williams
Has anyone considered just bringing ERC preparation in-house? We hesitated initially, but ended up creating an ERC division with dedicated staff. The learning curve was steep for the first 2-3 months, but now it's a significant revenue stream (we charge 12% contingency).
0 coins
Lily Young
ā¢What kind of resources did you need to dedicate to get this off the ground? We've thought about it but worried about the compliance risks given how the IRS is scrutinizing these claims.
0 coins
Marcus Williams
ā¢We started with one full-time CPA who spent about 8 weeks becoming our in-house expert (lots of CPE, IRS notice reading, and conference attendance). Then added a dedicated admin person for documentation collection and organization. The compliance risk is manageable if you're conservative and thorough with documentation. We built a 27-point checklist that every claim must satisfy before filing. It took about $30K in startup costs (mostly training and building templates/processes), but we've generated over $400K in fees since starting 14 months ago.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
Be very careful with ERC partners right now. The IRS has been cracking down hard on fraudulent claims. We partnered with a firm that seemed legit but had 3 client claims rejected and now those clients are facing penalties. Totally damaged our reputation with them. If you do partner with someone, get EVERYTHING in writing about who bears responsibility if a claim is rejected. Most of these ERC shops have fine print that puts all the risk on you and your client while they keep their fees.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
ā¢This is so important. We had a similar disaster with an ERC firm that disappeared when the audits started coming in. What red flags should people watch for when vetting these firms?
0 coins