


Ask the community...
Something nobody has mentioned yet - check if you might qualify for the substantially equal periodic payments exception (SEPP or 72t distribution). If you're unemployed and need income, you could potentially convert your one-time withdrawal into the first of a series of payments that would exempt you from the 10% penalty. You'd need to continue taking distributions for at least 5 years or until you reach 59.5 (whichever is longer), but it's a legitimate way to access 401k funds penalty-free. There are calculators online to figure out how much you'd need to withdraw each year.
Isn't that super complicated to set up though? I looked into 72t distributions once and it seemed like if you make even a tiny mistake with the calculation or withdrawal timing, the IRS hits you with penalties for everything you've taken out. Has anyone here actually done this successfully?
It's definitely more complex than a standard withdrawal, but not impossible to manage. The key is getting the initial calculation right and being absolutely consistent with the withdrawals. You're right that any mistakes can trigger penalties on all distributions, which is why I recommend having a tax professional help set it up initially. But for someone who's lost their job and needs ongoing income, it can be worth the effort. I helped my brother set one up three years ago when he lost his job at 53, and it's been working fine - he just makes sure to take the exact calculated amount each year.
Just wondering - did you already file your taxes reporting this distribution? If not, you might consider rolling the distribution back into a qualified retirement account if you have the funds available. The IRS allows 60 days from the date you received the distribution to roll it back in without penalty. January 14th to now might be cutting it close, but if you're within that window, it could save you the headache of dealing with exceptions and penalties altogether.
This is exactly what I did when I had a similar issue! I didn't realize there were timing requirements for qualifying for the penalty exception. Once I found out my distribution didn't qualify, I scraped together the money and rolled it back into my IRA just under the 60-day limit. Saved me from the penalty completely AND preserved my retirement savings.
One thing to consider - if your late S election is accepted, make sure you understand the payroll tax requirements going forward! My accountant never told me I needed to set up payroll and pay myself a "reasonable salary" once my S Corp election went through. Ended up with penalties the next year because I just kept taking owner draws like I did as an LLC. The tax savings are great but there are definitely more compliance requirements.
What's considered a "reasonable salary" though? I've heard everything from 30% to 60% of profits should be salary. Is there an actual rule or is it just whatever you can justify?
There's no fixed percentage that's automatically considered "reasonable" - it depends on your industry, location, duties, and what comparable positions would earn. I've found that industry salary surveys are helpful for documenting your decision. For my construction management business, I settled on about 40% of profits as salary after researching what project managers in my area typically earn. The key is having documentation to support whatever number you choose. The IRS is mainly concerned with people taking a tiny salary and huge distributions to avoid payroll taxes. As long as you can justify your salary with market research, you're generally in good shape.
Don't forget about state taxes too! I had my federal S-Corp election accepted but then discovered my state doesn't automatically recognize S-Corps and required a separate election form. Had to pay state taxes as a C-Corp for a year before fixing it.
Oh crap I didn't even think about that. What state are you in? I'm in California and now I'm wondering if I need to do something separate for state taxes.
One option nobody has mentioned yet is filing Form 8919, "Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages." You'd use code G or H which covers cases where you should've been classified as an employee. This way you're still paying your portion of Social Security/Medicare but not the employer half that gets added with self-employment tax. The downside is you need to file Form SS-8 simultaneously, and this might cause issues with the employer who sent the 1099. But if the amount is significant enough, it might be worth considering.
Would filing Form 8919 cause problems for future tax returns if the SS-8 determination takes a long time? I've heard those can take 6+ months to process. Also, since we have literally zero documentation (no emails, texts, or anything in writing about employment), would this approach even work?
Filing Form 8919 won't directly cause problems for future returns, but if the SS-8 determination eventually comes back not in your favor, you might need to file an amended return and pay the additional self-employment tax plus potential interest. It's a bit of a gamble. With zero documentation, your case for employee classification is definitely weaker. The SS-8 form asks about specific factors like who controlled the work schedule, provided tools/equipment, determined how the work was done, etc. If the answers to these questions indicate contractor status, or if you can't provide any supporting evidence, the determination might not go your way. For only $2,100, the Schedule C route might be simpler unless you have strong verbal evidence of employee status.
Has anyone considered that filing Schedule C might actually be BETTER in this situation? Yes, you pay self-employment tax, but you can also deduct business expenses you couldn't take as an employee. Did your fiancΓ© use his own car? Home internet? Phone? Computer? Tools? Those could all be partial deductions. When I was in a similar situation, I actually came out ahead by claiming mileage, home office, and equipment costs.
This is absolutely true! I was misclassified last year and after adding up all my legitimate expenses (mileage, portion of phone bill, home office, supplies), I actually ended up with less tax liability than if I'd been properly classified as an employee. Just make sure you have documentation for everything in case of an audit.
Everybody's giving great advice here but I just want to emphasize DO NOT SEND CASH in the mail!!! I made that mistake years ago and it never arrived. Write a check or get a money order. And definitely make a photocopy of EVERYTHING before you send it - your completed forms, your check, everything. That way if anything gets lost, you have proof you tried to file. And use certified mail with tracking so you have proof of when you sent it and when the IRS received it.
Should I write my SSN on the check? I heard that's what you're supposed to do but it feels weird writing my full social on something going through the mail.
Yes, you should write your SSN on the check - but only the last four digits for security. Also include the tax year (2022) and write "Form 1040" on the memo line. This helps the IRS properly apply your payment if it gets separated from your return. Writing this info on the check is actually a security measure to ensure your payment gets credited to the right account, so don't skip this step even though it seems counterintuitive.
Late to this thread but I work at a tax firm and have some insights. For anyone filing super late returns (like 2022 in 2025), here's what you need to know: 1) Yes, always include payment with your return if you owe 2) Make the check out to "United States Treasury" (not "IRS") 3) On the check: write tax year, last 4 of SSN, and "Form 1040" 4) Send it CERTIFIED MAIL with tracking 5) Keep copies of everything 6) Different states have different mailing addresses - check IRS.gov or your tax software for the right one For tiny amounts like $14, honestly, the penalties will be minimal - maybe another $10-15 total. The IRS might even decide it's not worth the paperwork to bill you for such a small penalty amount, but don't count on that.
Thanks for this detailed breakdown! This helps a ton. I'll definitely send it certified with tracking. Do you think I should wait for them to bill me for the penalties or should I call them after sending the return to see what the total is?
Just wait for them to bill you for the penalties. There's no need to call them proactively - it'll just waste your time with their long hold times. They'll automatically send you a notice with any additional amount due, and you'll have time to pay it. If you don't receive anything within 3-4 months after sending your return, then you might want to call to confirm everything was processed correctly. But most likely, you'll either get a small bill for penalties or nothing at all if they decide the amount is too small to pursue.
Mila Walker
I actually did something similar last year with construction equipment. One thing to watch for that my CPA missed initially - if you're financing 90% of the cost but taking 100% of the purchase price as a Section 179 deduction, you need to be careful about the "at-risk" rules. You can only take deductions up to the amount you're personally at risk for. In my case, we had to restructure the loan to make sure I was personally liable for the financed portion in order to claim the full deduction. Otherwise, I would have been limited to deducting just my 10% down payment in the first year. Also, don't forget about state taxes - not all states conform to the federal Section 179 limits, so you might not get the same benefit at the state level.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
β’Thanks for this insight - this is exactly the kind of real-world experience I was hoping to hear about. Did you use a specialized leasing company or did you find and manage your own customers? I'm trying to determine how hands-on I need to be with the day-to-day for this to work properly from a tax perspective.
0 coins
Mila Walker
β’I worked with a specialized company that handled finding customers and managing the equipment, but I made sure to document my involvement in major business decisions. I maintained records of regular meetings where I reviewed leasing terms, approved maintenance expenses, and made decisions about lease renewals. For tax purposes, material participation is key - I spend about 5-7 hours per week on this business, tracking my time carefully. The leasing company does the daily work, but I'm involved in all significant decisions. My tax advisor recommended this level of involvement to satisfy the active participation requirements, especially since I'm using the losses to offset other income. Document everything - calendar entries, emails, meeting notes - it all helps establish your legitimate business involvement.
0 coins
Logan Scott
Has anyone considered the impact of this strategy on the qualified business income deduction (Section 199A)? I'm in a similar situation and was told that large Section 179 deductions can potentially reduce my QBI deduction, partially offsetting the benefit. Also wondering about how this affects social security tax planning. If you're reducing taxable income dramatically through the S-corp with these equipment deductions, are you also reducing your future social security benefits?
0 coins
Chloe Green
β’Great point about QBI - this is something to consider. Section 179 deductions do reduce QBI, which can impact your 199A deduction. It's definitely a balancing act. On the Social Security question, remember that W-2 wages from an S-corp are still subject to FICA taxes regardless of the business's profit or loss. If you're taking a reasonable salary from your S-corp, those earnings will still count toward your Social Security earnings record even if the business shows a large loss due to Section 179 deductions.
0 coins