< Back to IRS

Jackson Carter

Limited company vs. sole trader for my aesthetics clinic: Pros & cons for taxes and liability?

I run an aesthetics clinic that's currently set up as a limited company, but my accountant recently suggested I should switch to being a sole trader instead. The main reason I'm hesitant about going the sole trader route is the liability issue. If I get sued as a sole trader, I understand my personal assets like my house and car could be at risk, which makes me really nervous given the nature of my business. On the other hand, my accountant pointed out that with a limited company, I'm paying significantly more in taxes because of corporation tax plus the taxes on dividends when I take money out of the business. I'm completely torn on what structure makes the most sense for my situation. Is the extra tax burden of a limited company worth the protection it offers? Or am I overthinking the liability risks of being a sole trader? What are the pros and cons of each option for a small aesthetics clinic? Any advice from those who've been in a similar situation would be so helpful! I'm honestly feeling completely lost about this decision.

I've been a tax advisor for small businesses for over 15 years, and this is a really common dilemma in your industry. The liability protection of a limited company is significant, especially for an aesthetics clinic where you're performing procedures on clients. If something goes wrong, your personal assets would generally be protected (though professional insurance is still essential either way). Tax-wise, yes, limited companies face corporation tax (currently 19% for small profits) plus dividend tax when you extract profits. However, there can be tax advantages too - you can be more flexible with how and when you take income, potentially reducing your overall tax burden compared to a sole trader where all profits are taxed as income regardless of whether you withdraw them. Other factors to consider: limited companies have more administrative requirements and costs (annual accounts filing, confirmation statements, etc.), while sole traders have simpler accounting and reporting requirements. Given the nature of your business, I'd be curious why your accountant is specifically recommending sole trader status - there might be aspects of your specific situation I'm not seeing.

0 coins

Thanks so much for your insight! My accountant mentioned that as I'm reinvesting most profits back into the business right now (new equipment, etc.), and my personal drawings are relatively low, I'm not fully benefiting from the limited company structure. He said I'm essentially paying corporation tax on money that's going straight back into growing the business. Does that reasoning make sense? Also, I do have professional indemnity insurance (£5m coverage). Would that mitigate most of the liability concerns as a sole trader?

0 coins

Reinvesting profits back into the business is actually often more tax-efficient in a limited company structure. Equipment purchases can qualify for capital allowances, potentially reducing your corporation tax liability. Limited companies can currently benefit from the Annual Investment Allowance of £1 million, allowing full tax relief on qualifying expenditure. Professional indemnity insurance is essential, but it only covers claims related to professional services. It wouldn't protect your personal assets from business debts, supplier disputes, or claims outside your professional services. As a sole trader, your business and personal finances are legally the same entity - so any business debt is your personal debt, regardless of insurance coverage.

0 coins

I switched from sole trader to limited company for my cosmetic tattooing business last year and honestly wish I'd done it sooner! Check out https://taxr.ai - it really helped me understand the tax implications of both structures for my specific situation. You just upload your financial info and it gives you a side-by-side comparison of what you'd pay under each structure. For me, the limited company route saved me about £4,200 in taxes last year because I could keep some profits in the business and take a strategic salary/dividend mix. Plus the peace of mind knowing my house is safe if something goes wrong with a client (which is a real concern in our industry) is worth every penny of the extra accounting costs.

0 coins

Did you find the admin side of things much more complicated after switching? I've heard horror stories about the paperwork for limited companies.

0 coins

I'm curious - does that service actually tell you the best structure or just calculate the tax differences? Because there's way more to consider than just the tax savings, right?

0 coins

The admin side definitely increased, but it wasn't as bad as I expected. I pay my accountant about £85 a month now instead of the £40 I was paying as a sole trader, and they handle most of the extra paperwork. I just need to be a bit more organized with keeping business and personal expenses separate. The service actually does both - it calculates the tax differences based on your specific numbers, but also has a questionnaire about your business type, risk factors, growth plans, etc. that helps evaluate the non-tax factors too. It then gives a recommendation based on all those factors combined. It actually initially recommended I stay as sole trader based just on my year 1 numbers, but when I input my 3-year growth projections, it flipped to recommending limited company.

0 coins

Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai that @7 recommended. Super helpful for my situation! I run a small lash extension studio and was on the fence like you. The analysis showed I'd actually save about £2,800 in taxes as a limited company despite what my previous accountant told me. I think he wasn't factoring in all the equipment purchases I make. The tool explained that with a limited company, I can leave some profits in the business for future equipment upgrades without paying personal income tax on that money first. The liability protection aspect was the deciding factor for me though. The service had a really good risk assessment section that helped me realize I was underestimating the potential issues in our industry. One bad reaction or injury claim could be devastating as a sole trader.

0 coins

Something that worked for me when I was having IRS problems was Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was stuck trying to figure out how to handle my business classification for tax purposes and kept getting automated messages when calling the IRS. Was super frustrating! Claimyr got me through to an actual human at the IRS in about 20 minutes when I'd been trying for days on my own. The IRS agent walked me through the pros and cons of different business structures for my situation and helped me understand the specific tax implications. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Honestly, getting direct advice from the IRS was way more valuable than what I was finding online, which was mostly generic info that didn't apply to my specific situation.

0 coins

Wait, how exactly does this work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS without waiting for hours. Is this like paying to skip the line or something?

0 coins

This sounds like a total scam. How would some random service get you through to the IRS faster than calling directly? The IRS doesn't have a "VIP line" last time I checked.

0 coins

It's not skipping the line exactly. They use technology that continuously redials the IRS for you using their system until they get through, then they call you and connect you directly with the IRS person. So instead of you having to spend hours redialing and waiting on hold, their system does it for you. It's definitely not a scam. They don't talk to the IRS for you or claim to have special access - they just handle the frustrating part of constantly calling back and waiting on hold. When they finally get through, they connect you directly with the IRS agent and you handle your own business from there. I was skeptical too but it worked exactly as advertised.

0 coins

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself when I needed to ask about business structure tax implications. I was trying to reach the IRS for THREE DAYS on my own with no luck - constant busy signals or disconnects after waiting 45+ minutes. Used Claimyr yesterday and got connected to an IRS agent in about 25 minutes while I was just working on other things. The IRS person I spoke with gave me really specific guidance about the tax differences between sole trader vs LLC vs S-Corp for my particular income level. Saved me tons of research time and probably some mistakes too. So yeah, sorry for calling it a scam. It's actually legit and saved me hours of frustration.

0 coins

One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that there's a middle ground option too - you could be a sole trader WITH limited liability insurance. I run a small medspa and that's what I do. My accountant ran the numbers and I save about £6,700 a year in taxes by being a sole trader vs limited company (this will vary based on your profit level and how much you need to take out of the business). I then pay about £1,200 a year for comprehensive business liability insurance that covers me for up to £2 million. So I get most of the protection while keeping the tax benefits and simpler admin of being a sole trader. Something to consider!

0 coins

Does the liability insurance actually protect your personal assets though? I was told insurance has coverage limits and exclusions, while a limited company provides a more complete separation between business and personal assets?

0 coins

That's a fair question. The insurance does have limits and some exclusions (like if I was found to be grossly negligent or committed fraud). A limited company gives more comprehensive separation between personal and business assets. For me, it came down to a risk assessment. With the procedures I do, the worst-case realistic claim would likely be covered by my insurance limits. But if you're doing more invasive procedures with higher risk, the limited company route might give you better peace of mind. It's definitely a personal decision based on your specific risk profile.

0 coins

Has anyone here actually switched from limited company to sole trader? I'm also wondering about the process for that. My accountant mentioned something about a "deemed withdrawal" where I'd have to pay tax on all the retained earnings in the company as if I'd taken them as income? That sounded expensive if true.

0 coins

I did this last year. Yes, there's a process called "striking off" your limited company, and any assets left in the company (including cash) are treated as capital distributions to shareholders. If you have significant retained earnings in the company, there could be a tax hit when closing down. In my case, I had about £35,000 in the company and ended up paying around £6,300 in taxes to extract it all when closing down. If you're considering switching, it might be worth planning ahead and gradually extracting money from the company in the most tax-efficient way before closing it down.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience. That's really helpful information! The tax hit on extraction does sound significant. Did you notice any other unexpected challenges when switching? And have you found the sole trader structure to be better for your situation overall?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today