
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm trying to figure out if I can claim my son who's in college as a qualifying child on my taxes but not as a full dependent. I'm a single mom and we're trying to make the most financially smart decision for our situation. My son is 19 and just finished his first year at university. He lived in the dorms during the school year but was home with me during breaks and summer (about 5 months total). I provided over 50% of his support including tuition, books, food, and his car insurance. He had a part-time job on campus and made around $8,200 last year. We're trying to figure out the best approach for both our tax situations. Can I claim him as my qualifying child but not as a full dependent? Or is it an all-or-nothing situation where I either claim him fully or not at all? I'm really confused about the qualifying child tests and how they apply to college students.
I've been digging into the recent IRS guidance about R&E amortization under Section 174 (where programming costs need to be amortized over five years, unless it's maintenance programming which can be expensed in the current year) and I'm scratching my head on implementation. Here's what I'm considering: going through all our codebase for the year and marking each code line as either maintenance or new development. If programmer Jane wrote 15,000 lines of code and 3,000 was maintenance, I'd expense 20% of her salary this year and amortize 80% over five years. But I see some issues with this approach: * Time spent coding isn't consistent per line - maybe those 3,000 maintenance lines took just 2 weeks while the remaining lines took 50 weeks. Should I instead track task time and categorize tasks as maintenance vs. new development? But then what about mixed tasks? * Lines of code vary wildly between languages and coding styles. If one dev works in both Python and Java in the same year, the line count comparison becomes meaningless. Has anyone implemented this Section 174 stuff in practice? I've talked to three accountants and they all seem equally confused about real-world application. Any insights from those who've figured out a workable approach?
We just implemented a hybrid approach at our company that seems to be working well. Rather than counting lines of code (which is problematic for all the reasons you mentioned), we: 1. Had each development team estimate the percentage of maintenance vs. new development for their area 2. Set up time tracking codes that developers use when logging hours 3. Created a review process where tech leads and finance meet quarterly to review the classifications 4. Document everything with written justifications for how we classified each major component Our CPA seemed satisfied with this approach, though she emphasized that we need to be consistent and have solid documentation of our methodology.
I like this approach! For the quarterly reviews, are you finding that classifications change over time? For example, does new development eventually become maintenance in subsequent quarters?
Yes, we've definitely seen that transition from new development to maintenance over time. As features mature, work on them tends to shift from primarily new development to mostly maintenance and refinement. We actually created a simple lifecycle model where new features start as 100% development, then after initial release they transition to a mixed classification, and finally to predominantly maintenance after they've been in production for a certain period. The exact timing varies by feature complexity, but having this framework helps us be more consistent in our classifications over time.
Has anyone figured out how to handle open source contributions under Section 174? Our developers contribute to open source projects as part of their job, and I have no idea if that should be classified as R&E or something else entirely.
This is actually a nuanced question. Open source contributions can potentially qualify as R&E if they're related to your business and provide some benefit to your company's products or services. The key is whether these contributions represent research or experimentation that might lead to development of new products or improvements to existing ones.
I bought a condo in a 45-unit complex that was built in 2020. Turns out the construction quality was terrible and now we're dealing with serious water damage in multiple units. Several neighbors have discovered dangerous mold levels and had to move out temporarily. Our HOA board is considering legal action against the builder while mold remediation is underway. They're talking about getting the builder to test all units, but that's been "in discussion" for months with no action. My unit hasn't shown any water issues, but I'm trying to sell and get out of this nightmare building. Given the health concerns and potential disclosure requirements, I paid $750 out of pocket for a private mold inspection (thankfully it came back negative). I contacted the builder requesting reimbursement for the test, copying our property management company. They agreed to reimburse me but asked me to fill out a W9 form first. This seems odd to me. I'm not a contractor or vendor providing services. Does this mean they'll report this $750 as income to the IRS? Will I end up paying taxes on money that was simply reimbursing me for an expense I shouldn't have had to pay in the first place? Any advice would be appreciated!
One thing to consider - you might be able to deduct the mold inspection as a medical expense if you can document that you did it for health concerns. IRS Publication 502 covers medical expense deductions, and preventative care can sometimes qualify. You'd need to itemize on Schedule A, and only medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of your AGI are deductible. Since you're selling the property, another option is to add the cost of the mold inspection to your basis in the property, which would reduce any potential capital gains tax when you sell. Keep all documentation for this.
Thanks for this perspective! Since I'm planning to sell soon, adding it to the basis makes the most sense for me. Do I need any special documentation beyond the receipt and my communication with the builder to prove this should be part of my basis?
You'll want to keep the inspection report, receipt, and any communication with the builder or HOA that shows the inspection was necessary due to building defects. Also document that other units had confirmed mold issues, as this strengthens your case that the inspection was a necessary expense related to your property. For your basis calculation, maintain a file with all improvement costs, including this inspection. When you sell, you'll use IRS Form 8949 and Schedule D to report the sale, where your adjusted basis will offset the sale proceeds to determine your gain or loss.
If the builder is asking for a W9, I'm betting they're planning to issue a 1099-MISC in box 3 (Other Income). This is their standard procedure for paying non-employees. But here's the thing - the IRS actually has guidance on reimbursements vs income. If you want to avoid the tax impact entirely, try asking the builder if they'll pay the testing company directly instead of reimbursing you. Then no W9 is needed since you're not receiving any money.
Last year I made about $175,000 and received a $6,750 refund mainly due to the child tax credit. I was honestly surprised it was that much. This year my income jumped to $202,000, but now I'm being told I OWE $1,350 in federal taxes! Literally nothing in my life changed - same job (just got a promotion), same number of kids, same house, same deductions as far as I can tell. Did I mess something up when filing? Or is this normal to see that much of a swing in taxes when your income increases by about $27k? The weird thing is that my California state refund is almost identical to last year's. All my kids are under 17 so I should still qualify for the full child tax credit. I'm really confused about what happened here.
This happened to me a couple years ago. Check if your employer correctly adjusted your tax withholding after your raise. Mine didn't, and I got hit with a huge bill. The higher your income goes, the more you need to pay attention to withholding. I'd recommend filling out a new W-4 form and submitting it to your HR department ASAP so this doesn't happen again next year. You might even want to add a little extra withholding to cover the difference.
Is there some calculator you can use to figure out the right withholding amount? I always struggle with this and either get a huge refund or end up owing.
Yes, the IRS has a Tax Withholding Estimator on their website that's pretty accurate. Just google "IRS withholding calculator" and it should be the first result. You'll need your most recent pay stub and tax return handy when you use it. The calculator will tell you exactly how to fill out your W-4 based on your specific situation. It even lets you adjust whether you want a bigger refund or more money in each paycheck. I use it every time I get a raise or my life circumstances change, and it's kept my tax bill/refund pretty balanced.
Have you looked at the actual tax brackets for both years? With $202k income for married filing jointly, part of your income is definitely getting taxed at 24% now. The difference between 22% and 24% brackets might not seem like much, but applied to thousands of dollars it adds up fast. Also check your pay stubs to see if your employer is withholding at the correct rate. Sometimes payroll systems don't automatically adjust withholding when you get promoted.
Exactly this. I work in payroll and see this all the time. Payroll systems calculate withholding based on the assumption that each check is what you'll make all year. So if you get a raise midyear, the system doesn't know about your previous lower income months and doesn't withhold enough.
I've been thinking about setting up an investment account for my grandkids that would maximize the step up basis benefit when I eventually pass away. I definitely want to avoid UGMA (Uniform Gift to Minors) accounts, and I'm not really interested in 529 plans unless there's some amazing advantage I'm missing. Initially, I was leaning toward a joint tenant or tenants in common arrangement, but after researching more, it seems like my grandchildren would only get half the step up basis when I die since they didn't contribute any funds to the account (I'm providing all the money). So now I'm wondering - would it be better to just set up the account solely in my name, give my grandkids viewing access, and name them as beneficiaries? That way they'd inherit the account with 100% step up basis when I pass? I'm hoping someone with tax knowledge can confirm if this is the smartest approach! I realize that while I'm alive, the account would use my SSN and I'd be responsible for paying taxes on any gains, dividends, etc. Any insights would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Has anyone considered a Transfer on Death (TOD) arrangement instead? It's similar to naming a beneficiary but specifically designed for brokerage accounts. I set this up for my grandkids last year and my financial advisor said it accomplishes the same step up basis benefit while being slightly more straightforward for brokerage accounts specifically.
How difficult was it to set up the TOD? Does it offer any advantages over just naming them as regular beneficiaries? I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible while still maximizing the tax benefits.
Setting up the TOD was extremely simple - just a form from my brokerage firm that took maybe 10 minutes to complete. The main advantage is that it's specifically designed for investment accounts and creates a cleaner transfer process. The TOD designation accomplishes essentially the same thing as a regular beneficiary designation, but it can sometimes process more quickly after death and avoids probate. Both methods will give your grandkids the full step up basis benefit. One thing to note - if you have multiple grandchildren and want to specify different percentages or specific assets going to specific grandchildren, the TOD forms typically allow for that level of detail.
Whatever you do, DON'T set up an UTMA/UGMA account like I did before understanding the tax implications. When my grandkids turned 18, they got full control of the money (one bought a car, the other took a trip to Europe), AND the gains during all those years were taxed at my higher rate because of the kiddie tax. Complete disaster compared to the step up basis approach you're considering.
Yeah, the UTMA/UGMA accounts are terrible for tax efficiency compared to getting the step up basis. My brother went that route and regretted it. Did you consider a trust at all? I've heard revocable living trusts can provide the step up basis while also giving you more control over when/how the kids get the money.
Aiden RodrΓguez
Don't forget about the other benefits of claiming your college student as a dependent! If you meet the tests, you could qualify for: 1) Head of Household status (better tax rates than single) 2) AOTC or Lifetime Learning credit for education expenses 3) Higher income limits for certain deductions 4) Possibly child tax credit if they're under 17 for part of the year But remember your child can't claim their own exemption if you claim them as a dependent. My son and I actually calculate it both ways each year to see which saves our family more in total.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
For the education credits, if I'm claiming my daughter as a dependent, do I have to be the one who claims the education credit even if she paid some of her tuition herself from her 529 plan?
0 coins
Aiden RodrΓguez
Yes, if you claim your daughter as a dependent, you're the only one who can claim the education credits for her - even if she paid some expenses herself. The person who claims the dependent gets the education credits, period. However, for 529 plan withdrawals, they need to be coordinated with education credits. You can't claim expenses paid with tax-free 529 funds for the education credit (that would be double-dipping). So you'd want to document which portion of the tuition was paid from taxable funds versus 529 funds.
0 coins
Ava Kim
The qualifying child tests can be confusing! Here's what helped me figure it out for my college kid: Relationship: Your child, stepchild, foster child, sibling, or descendant of any of these Age: Under 19 OR under 24 and full-time student for at least 5 months of the year Residency: Lived with you for more than half the year (temporary absences for education count as time living with you) Support: Child didn't provide more than half of their own support Joint Return: Child isn't filing a joint return (unless it's just to claim a refund) The tricky part for college students is calculating "support" - scholarships don't count as the student providing their own support!
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
What counts as "support" exactly? Does paying for their phone bill and car insurance count? What about if my son uses student loans to pay for his housing?
0 coins