


Ask the community...
Another thing to consider with Section 1446f that nobody mentioned yet - the requirements changed significantly in 2023. The IRS finalized regulations that expanded reporting and created new certification procedures. Some partnerships now have to determine if they're "publicly traded" under these rules, which affects withholding requirements. Make sure whatever guidance you're following is current with the 2025 filing requirements!
Does this mean the information my friend got last year might be outdated? He was told something about a "50% ECI test" by his previous advisor. Is that still a thing or has it changed with these new regulations you mentioned?
The good news is that the "50% ECI test" is still part of the regulations, but how it's applied and documented has evolved. Under current rules, the partnership can provide a certification that less than 50% of the gain would be effectively connected income, which may reduce withholding obligations. However, the certification process is more formalized now, with specific timing requirements (must be certified within 30 days before the transfer) and there are stricter penalties for improper certifications. The partnership needs to provide this in writing, and the documentation standards are higher than before. Also, publicly traded partnerships have different rules entirely under the current regulations. So while the basic concept remains, the implementation details have definitely changed.
Has anyone dealt with Section 1446f for a tiered partnership structure? My situation involves a foreign person selling an interest in a partnership that owns interests in other partnerships (some with US business, some without). Do you have to trace through all the lower-tier partnerships to figure out withholding?
Yes, unfortunately you do have to look through to the lower-tier partnerships in a tiered structure. This is one of the most complex aspects of Section 1446f compliance. The "look-through" rule requires examining each lower-tier partnership to determine if they have assets that would generate effectively connected income. Each tier needs to be analyzed separately, and the proportionate share of ECI assets needs to be calculated. This is why many sophisticated partnerships provide certifications to their partners - it's nearly impossible for a partner to make this determination without information from the partnership itself.
I work in payroll for a mid-sized company and can offer some insight on the employer side. When an employee works remotely, it creates significant complexity for employers because we have to track and apply tax rules for multiple jurisdictions. Your first employer absolutely should have been withholding local taxes. However, many payroll systems don't automatically update when an employee changes work location unless HR specifically updates your record. It's possible they simply didn't update your status when your husband went remote. For the second employer, they should be withholding based on where your husband physically performs the work (your home city) until he actually starts working in their office location. However, some cities have special rules where they can still tax income if the office is located there, even if the employee never physically works there. I'd suggest having your husband check with his current employer's HR department to make sure they have his work location correctly coded in their system.
If the first employer messed up, can the employee file some kind of complaint with a labor board or something? Or is this purely a tax issue between the employee and the tax authorities?
This is primarily a tax issue between you and the tax authorities. While the employer should have withheld correctly, the actual tax liability ultimately falls on the employee. Labor boards typically don't get involved in tax withholding disputes unless there's evidence of widespread and willful mishandling of employee withholdings. Your best bet would be to contact your state's department of revenue or taxation, as they might have procedures for reporting employers who fail to properly withhold local taxes. Some jurisdictions will contact the employer directly and may waive your penalties if they determine the employer was at fault.
Has anyone seen those "tax reciprocity" agreements between cities or states? I just found out my situation is covered by one of those and it saved me from double taxation. Might be worth checking if your cities have an agreement like that.
19 I'm an accounting assistant and see this all the time with our clients. One thing no one's mentioned yet is that the IRS usually only audits a specific part of your return, not the whole thing. Check your audit letter carefully - it probably specifies exactly which deductions they're questioning. No need to worry about EVERYTHING if they're only asking about certain items. Also, substantiation requirements differ by type of expense. Business travel and meals have stricter documentation requirements than something like office supplies. Your best bet is focusing your reconstruction efforts on the specific items they're actually auditing.
1 You're right, the letter is specifically asking about my business travel expenses ($4,200) and home office deduction ($2,800). Does that mean they're accepting the other deductions without question? Should I just focus on these two categories?
19 Yes, focus on just those two categories they're specifically questioning. The IRS typically doesn't expand an audit unless they find serious issues with the items they initially selected. The travel expenses will need more substantiation since they have stricter requirements - try to find emails about the conferences, calendar entries, photos from the events, or even statements from clients or colleagues confirming your attendance. For the home office, measurements of the space, photos, and a statement explaining how it was used exclusively for business purposes will help. Also look for utility bills, internet bills, or other expenses that support your use of that space as an office. Remember that your records don't have to be perfect - you just need to show reasonable evidence that these were legitimate business expenses.
10 Has anyone had to pay penalties in this situation? I'm curious if they just make you pay the additional tax or if they add penalties too. I'm in a similar spot and trying to figure out how much this might cost me if I can't find my receipts.
3 When I went through an audit 2 years ago, they charged me the additional tax plus interest from the original due date. They didn't add accuracy-related penalties because they determined I made a good faith effort and had some backup documentation (even though incomplete). If they think you were negligent or deliberately claimed false deductions, that's when the 20% accuracy penalty kicks in.
Has anyone tried just leaving the "Business name" field completely blank? When I finally got my W9 to work for ContentCreator platform, that's what worked. I was overthinking it and putting my channel name in that field, but it only wants your actual registered business name (if you have one) or nothing at all. Also make sure you're checking the right box at the top for individual/sole proprietor. I initially checked "Limited liability company" thinking that was right for being self-employed, but that was incorrect for my situation.
So if I'm just a regular person making videos, I should leave the business name blank even if I have a channel name? What about if I'm using a DBA ("doing business as") for my content?
If you're just a regular person making videos, yes, leave the business name field blank. Your channel name isn't relevant for tax purposes unless you've formally registered it as a business name. For a DBA situation, it gets a bit more complicated. If you've officially registered your DBA with your state or county, you can put that in the "Business name/disregarded entity name" field. But if you haven't formally registered it and just use it informally as your brand, many tax professionals recommend leaving that field blank and just using your legal name. The most important thing is that your name and SSN match what the IRS has on file.
Just a heads up to save everyone some time - make sure your address on the W9 matches EXACTLY what the IRS has on file too! I spent weeks trying different name formats before realizing the problem was actually my address. I had moved recently and even though I filed a change of address with USPS, the IRS still had my old address.
Sofia Perez
For net salary calculation specifically, you should also consider these non-tax factors: 1. Health insurance costs are likely much higher in the US than Poland. Expect $400-800/month for decent family coverage, even with employer subsidies. 2. 401k retirement contributions - most experts recommend putting at least 10% of your salary here, especially if your employer matches. 3. Cost of living varies DRASTICALLY depending on location. A $150k salary in San Francisco might give you a lower standard of living than $90k in Pittsburgh. 4. Don't forget state taxes - they range from 0% (Texas, Florida) to over 13% (California). From personal experience with intracompany transfers, a good rule of thumb is that your net take-home will be roughly 65-70% of gross in moderate tax states without 401k contributions, dropping to 55-60% with recommended retirement savings.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
ā¢Really helpful breakdown! My transfer would be to North Carolina. Any idea where that falls on the state tax spectrum? And is there a good online calculator you'd recommend that lets me input all these factors?
0 coins
Sofia Perez
ā¢North Carolina is actually pretty straightforward with a flat 4.75% state income tax rate - so middle of the road compared to other states. Not as high as California or New York, but not tax-free like Texas or Florida. For calculators, I recommend using the ADP Salary Paycheck Calculator (just Google it) - it lets you input your salary, state, filing status, and deductions including 401k and health insurance to get a realistic take-home estimate. SmartAsset's paycheck calculator is another good one that shows the breakdown of all taxes. Both are free and pretty accurate based on my experience relocating employees to various states.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
Don't forget the foreign tax implications! I'm Polish and moved to the US 3 years ago. Since Poland taxes based on citizenship/residency, you may still have Polish tax obligations even while in the US. The US-Poland tax treaty helps prevent double taxation, but you must file properly. My mistake was assuming I only needed to deal with US taxes after moving. Also, ask your employer if they're providing any tax equalization benefits. Many companies with intracompany transfers will cover the difference if your US tax burden is higher than what you'd pay in your home country. This benefit alone added about 8% to my effective compensation!
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
ā¢This is so important - I got hit with unexpected taxes from my home country after my transfer. Do you need to file Polish tax returns every year even after moving to the US? How does that work?
0 coins