
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
Title: What if I can't afford to pay my taxes in full by April 15th deadline? What should I do? 1 I'm totally freaking out right now. I just finished calculating my taxes for 2025 and I owe WAY more than I expected - about $6,300. The problem is I only have about $2,100 in my savings account right now. I'm self-employed and I guess I didn't pay enough in estimated taxes throughout the year. I know the filing deadline is April 15th, but I honestly don't know what to do since I can't pay the full amount. Will I go to jail? Get massive penalties? I heard the IRS is super aggressive with collections. Should I just not file until I have all the money? Put it on a credit card? Any advice would be seriously appreciated because I'm losing sleep over this.
Hey everyone, I'm reaching out for some advice on calculating my potential net salary. My US employer is discussing an intracompany transfer with me (I'm currently working in Poland), and this would be on an L1B visa. Here's my situation: My wife works in Poland and just started her maternity leave. Polish law gives 12 months of maternity leave, so our plan is for her to stay employed in Poland until she finishes her leave (plus using her remaining vacation days), then resign and look for work in the US. I'm confused about which US tax filing status I should use. I know there are five types: head of household, qualified widow(er), married filing jointly, married filing separately, and single. Given our situation - me working in the US on L1B while my wife is still technically employed in Poland on maternity leave - which filing status would apply to me? Would this change once she quits her job and joins me without employment? I'm trying to estimate my take-home pay accurately. Any advice would be super appreciated!
For net salary calculation specifically, you should also consider these non-tax factors: 1. Health insurance costs are likely much higher in the US than Poland. Expect $400-800/month for decent family coverage, even with employer subsidies. 2. 401k retirement contributions - most experts recommend putting at least 10% of your salary here, especially if your employer matches. 3. Cost of living varies DRASTICALLY depending on location. A $150k salary in San Francisco might give you a lower standard of living than $90k in Pittsburgh. 4. Don't forget state taxes - they range from 0% (Texas, Florida) to over 13% (California). From personal experience with intracompany transfers, a good rule of thumb is that your net take-home will be roughly 65-70% of gross in moderate tax states without 401k contributions, dropping to 55-60% with recommended retirement savings.
Really helpful breakdown! My transfer would be to North Carolina. Any idea where that falls on the state tax spectrum? And is there a good online calculator you'd recommend that lets me input all these factors?
North Carolina is actually pretty straightforward with a flat 4.75% state income tax rate - so middle of the road compared to other states. Not as high as California or New York, but not tax-free like Texas or Florida. For calculators, I recommend using the ADP Salary Paycheck Calculator (just Google it) - it lets you input your salary, state, filing status, and deductions including 401k and health insurance to get a realistic take-home estimate. SmartAsset's paycheck calculator is another good one that shows the breakdown of all taxes. Both are free and pretty accurate based on my experience relocating employees to various states.
Don't forget the foreign tax implications! I'm Polish and moved to the US 3 years ago. Since Poland taxes based on citizenship/residency, you may still have Polish tax obligations even while in the US. The US-Poland tax treaty helps prevent double taxation, but you must file properly. My mistake was assuming I only needed to deal with US taxes after moving. Also, ask your employer if they're providing any tax equalization benefits. Many companies with intracompany transfers will cover the difference if your US tax burden is higher than what you'd pay in your home country. This benefit alone added about 8% to my effective compensation!
So I have a friend who's not from this country and they're completely confused about Section 1446f withholding. I tried explaining it to them but honestly I'm not sure I understand it that well myself. From what I gather, it has something to do with selling partnership interests and withholding taxes for foreign sellers? My friend recently invested in a small business partnership here in the US and is now thinking about selling his interest. He's worried about how much tax will be withheld and what forms he needs to file. The whole thing is making my head spin! He keeps asking me questions about "effectively connected income" and what percentage gets withheld and whether there are any exceptions. I feel terrible that I can't give him proper advice. He's getting nervous because he heard something about a 10% withholding that could apply. Can someone please explain Section 1446f withholding in simple terms? Like explain it to me as if I'm trying to explain it to an alien who has zero knowledge of the US tax system? Thanks in advance!
Another thing to consider with Section 1446f that nobody mentioned yet - the requirements changed significantly in 2023. The IRS finalized regulations that expanded reporting and created new certification procedures. Some partnerships now have to determine if they're "publicly traded" under these rules, which affects withholding requirements. Make sure whatever guidance you're following is current with the 2025 filing requirements!
Does this mean the information my friend got last year might be outdated? He was told something about a "50% ECI test" by his previous advisor. Is that still a thing or has it changed with these new regulations you mentioned?
The good news is that the "50% ECI test" is still part of the regulations, but how it's applied and documented has evolved. Under current rules, the partnership can provide a certification that less than 50% of the gain would be effectively connected income, which may reduce withholding obligations. However, the certification process is more formalized now, with specific timing requirements (must be certified within 30 days before the transfer) and there are stricter penalties for improper certifications. The partnership needs to provide this in writing, and the documentation standards are higher than before. Also, publicly traded partnerships have different rules entirely under the current regulations. So while the basic concept remains, the implementation details have definitely changed.
Has anyone dealt with Section 1446f for a tiered partnership structure? My situation involves a foreign person selling an interest in a partnership that owns interests in other partnerships (some with US business, some without). Do you have to trace through all the lower-tier partnerships to figure out withholding?
Yes, unfortunately you do have to look through to the lower-tier partnerships in a tiered structure. This is one of the most complex aspects of Section 1446f compliance. The "look-through" rule requires examining each lower-tier partnership to determine if they have assets that would generate effectively connected income. Each tier needs to be analyzed separately, and the proportionate share of ECI assets needs to be calculated. This is why many sophisticated partnerships provide certifications to their partners - it's nearly impossible for a partner to make this determination without information from the partnership itself.
I'm filing jointly with my husband this year and everything was going fine until we got to the local taxes section. Now I'm totally lost. My husband had 2 different jobs plus received unemployment last year. For his first job, he started working at their physical office location but then switched to working remotely for about a month before leaving. The weird thing is, this employer didn't withhold ANY local taxes - not for our home city or for the city where their office is located. This seems really strange to me because I thought employers were required to do this? We now owe our city $325 plus around $65 in interest penalties, and we haven't even figured out what we might owe to the other city yet. For his second job, which he started toward the end of the year, he's been 100% remote so far. But this employer has their office in a completely different city than where we live, and eventually he might go into that office sometimes if he wants to. I have two main questions: 1) For job #1, since they didn't withhold anything, are we just stuck paying these taxes and penalties ourselves? Is there any way to get help with this since it was their mistake? 2) For job #2, should they be withholding taxes for the city where their office is located even though my husband hasn't physically worked there yet?
I work in payroll for a mid-sized company and can offer some insight on the employer side. When an employee works remotely, it creates significant complexity for employers because we have to track and apply tax rules for multiple jurisdictions. Your first employer absolutely should have been withholding local taxes. However, many payroll systems don't automatically update when an employee changes work location unless HR specifically updates your record. It's possible they simply didn't update your status when your husband went remote. For the second employer, they should be withholding based on where your husband physically performs the work (your home city) until he actually starts working in their office location. However, some cities have special rules where they can still tax income if the office is located there, even if the employee never physically works there. I'd suggest having your husband check with his current employer's HR department to make sure they have his work location correctly coded in their system.
If the first employer messed up, can the employee file some kind of complaint with a labor board or something? Or is this purely a tax issue between the employee and the tax authorities?
This is primarily a tax issue between you and the tax authorities. While the employer should have withheld correctly, the actual tax liability ultimately falls on the employee. Labor boards typically don't get involved in tax withholding disputes unless there's evidence of widespread and willful mishandling of employee withholdings. Your best bet would be to contact your state's department of revenue or taxation, as they might have procedures for reporting employers who fail to properly withhold local taxes. Some jurisdictions will contact the employer directly and may waive your penalties if they determine the employer was at fault.
Has anyone seen those "tax reciprocity" agreements between cities or states? I just found out my situation is covered by one of those and it saved me from double taxation. Might be worth checking if your cities have an agreement like that.
Title: What happens if audited for old returns with missing receipts for deductions? Will I need to amend & pay penalties? 1 I'm in panic mode right now. I just got a letter from the IRS saying they're auditing my 2022 tax return (filed in 2023). The problem is I claimed several business deductions as a self-employed contractor that totaled around $14,500, but I've moved twice since then and can't find ANY of my receipts or documentation. I remember claiming deductions for my home office, some equipment purchases (new laptop and printer), business travel to 3 conferences, and a bunch of client meals. It was all legitimate at the time, but now I have absolutely nothing to prove it. My old laptop crashed last year and I didn't back up my digital records either. The audit letter is asking for documentation for all these deductions within 30 days. What happens if I can't provide anything? Will they just disallow everything? Do I have to file an amended return removing all those deductions? And will I get hit with penalties on top of the additional tax I'd owe? I'm seriously freaking out about this.
19 I'm an accounting assistant and see this all the time with our clients. One thing no one's mentioned yet is that the IRS usually only audits a specific part of your return, not the whole thing. Check your audit letter carefully - it probably specifies exactly which deductions they're questioning. No need to worry about EVERYTHING if they're only asking about certain items. Also, substantiation requirements differ by type of expense. Business travel and meals have stricter documentation requirements than something like office supplies. Your best bet is focusing your reconstruction efforts on the specific items they're actually auditing.
1 You're right, the letter is specifically asking about my business travel expenses ($4,200) and home office deduction ($2,800). Does that mean they're accepting the other deductions without question? Should I just focus on these two categories?
19 Yes, focus on just those two categories they're specifically questioning. The IRS typically doesn't expand an audit unless they find serious issues with the items they initially selected. The travel expenses will need more substantiation since they have stricter requirements - try to find emails about the conferences, calendar entries, photos from the events, or even statements from clients or colleagues confirming your attendance. For the home office, measurements of the space, photos, and a statement explaining how it was used exclusively for business purposes will help. Also look for utility bills, internet bills, or other expenses that support your use of that space as an office. Remember that your records don't have to be perfect - you just need to show reasonable evidence that these were legitimate business expenses.
10 Has anyone had to pay penalties in this situation? I'm curious if they just make you pay the additional tax or if they add penalties too. I'm in a similar spot and trying to figure out how much this might cost me if I can't find my receipts.
3 When I went through an audit 2 years ago, they charged me the additional tax plus interest from the original due date. They didn't add accuracy-related penalties because they determined I made a good faith effort and had some backup documentation (even though incomplete). If they think you were negligent or deliberately claimed false deductions, that's when the 20% accuracy penalty kicks in.
Cameron Black
16 Has anyone tried requesting the 120-day extension to pay in full? My accountant mentioned this might be better than an installment agreement if you can pay within that timeframe since there's no setup fee like with an installment plan.
0 coins
Cameron Black
Author3 I did this last year. You can request it online through the IRS website or by calling. No setup fee, but you still pay interest and the failure-to-pay penalty during those 120 days. It was straightforward - I just needed to specify how much I owed and that I'd pay within 120 days. No financial statements needed.
0 coins
Cameron Black
23 Whatever you decide, DONT NOT FILE!!! That's the worst thing you can do. The failure-to-file penalty is 10x worse than the failure-to-pay penalty. File your return, pay what you can on April 15th, and then work with the IRS on the rest. The IRS is actually pretty reasonable to work with when you're proactive and communicate with them.
0 coins