


Ask the community...
Not a tax professional, but just my two cents - the market for crypto is looking really strong right now with the new ETF approvals. Personally, I'd hold onto the crypto and just use the $3k annual deduction against regular income for the next several years. Unless you really need the cash or think crypto has peaked, those stock losses can be useful for years to come.
Thanks for the input! That's definitely something I've been considering. Do you think there's any benefit to at least harvesting some gains to "reset" my cost basis higher in case the crypto keeps appreciating? I'm torn between letting it ride versus locking in some gains tax-free while I can.
That's a good point about resetting your cost basis. If you're confident in the crypto's long-term prospects, selling and rebuying to establish a higher cost basis could definitely help you in the future if prices continue to climb. I'd probably take a middle approach - maybe harvest enough gains to use up a portion of your losses while keeping some losses in reserve for future years. That way you're getting some tax benefit now while also positioning yourself better for future growth. It really comes down to your outlook on where crypto prices are headed and your personal cash needs.
Quick question - are u sure wash sale rules don't apply to crypto? I thought the new rules changed that starting in 2023? Anyone know for sure?
As of the 2025 filing season, wash sale rules still don't apply to cryptocurrency. There have been proposals to change this, but they haven't been implemented yet. This is one of the few tax advantages crypto still has - you can sell at a loss and immediately repurchase to harvest the tax loss without waiting 30 days (which would be required for stocks and securities). Just make sure you're keeping detailed records of all transactions since the IRS is paying more attention to crypto reporting these days.
Something else to consider - if this babysitting was a one-time thing and not something you're doing regularly as a business, you might be able to report it as "other income" on line 8 of Schedule 1 instead of as self-employment income on Schedule C. This means you wouldn't have to pay self-employment tax (which is an extra 15.3% on top of regular income tax). But it's kind of a gray area and depends on your specific situation.
Hmm that's interesting! So how do I know if my situation counts as "regular business" vs just "other income"? I did babysit for them for about 3 weeks but it was just while their regular childcare was unavailable.
It comes down to whether you're in the "trade or business" of babysitting. If this was a one-off situation where you were helping out a family temporarily with no intention of continuing to offer babysitting services to the general public, you could make a case for "other income." But if you advertise your services, do this for multiple families, or plan to continue babysitting regularly, the IRS would likely consider it self-employment. Since you mentioned it was just for a few weeks during a specific situation, it sounds more like "other income" to me, but this is definitely a gray area where reasonable people disagree.
I think you're overcomplicating this. I've babysat for years and never reported any of it lol. If they didn't send you a tax form, the IRS has no idea about this money. It's cash/venmo. No one is tracking $765.
This is terrible advice. Venmo now reports transactions to the IRS if you receive more than $600 in payments for goods and services. Plus not reporting income is literally tax evasion.
Venmo only reports if you have a business account or mark the payments as goods and services. Regular personal payments aren't reported. And let's be real, the IRS isn't coming after babysitters making a few hundred bucks. They want the big fish.
22 If you're transitioning from solo 401k to a plan that includes employees, don't forget about the filing requirement differences. Solo 401ks don't require Form 5500 until you have $250k in assets, but most other plans require annual filing regardless of asset size. This is something I learned the hard way and ended up with penalties. For a landscaping business your size, a SIMPLE IRA might be the most straightforward option. Lower administrative burden, reasonable contribution limits, and the mandatory employer contribution (up to 3% match) is usually manageable for small businesses. The reduced paperwork compared to a 401k is significant.
15 Does the SIMPLE IRA allow for Roth contributions like his current solo 401k? I thought SIMPLE IRAs were all traditional pre-tax money. If he's been doing Roth contributions, wouldn't switching to a SIMPLE change his tax strategy pretty significantly?
22 You're absolutely right about the Roth consideration. SIMPLE IRAs don't have a Roth option currently - they're all traditional pre-tax money. This would be a significant change from the solo Roth 401k strategy. If maintaining Roth contribution capability is important, then a regular 401k plan with a Roth option would be needed despite the higher administrative costs. Some providers have started offering more affordable 401k options for small businesses that include Roth capabilities. The tax strategy difference is substantial - immediate tax deduction with traditional contributions versus tax-free growth and distributions with Roth.
5 Anyone have experience with Vanguard's small business 401k for a company with less than 10 employees? Their website mentions options for businesses transitioning from solo plans but doesn't give many details about the process or costs.
11 I use Vanguard for my small construction business (7 employees). The transition from solo 401k was pretty straightforward - about $1200 setup fee and $800 annual administration fee. The bigger issue was the timeline - took about 2 months to get everything set up, so if you're planning to hire in March/April, start the process ASAP. The investment options are solid though, and their customer service has been helpful with the transition questions.
Has anyone tried just leaving the "Business name" field completely blank? When I finally got my W9 to work for ContentCreator platform, that's what worked. I was overthinking it and putting my channel name in that field, but it only wants your actual registered business name (if you have one) or nothing at all. Also make sure you're checking the right box at the top for individual/sole proprietor. I initially checked "Limited liability company" thinking that was right for being self-employed, but that was incorrect for my situation.
So if I'm just a regular person making videos, I should leave the business name blank even if I have a channel name? What about if I'm using a DBA ("doing business as") for my content?
If you're just a regular person making videos, yes, leave the business name field blank. Your channel name isn't relevant for tax purposes unless you've formally registered it as a business name. For a DBA situation, it gets a bit more complicated. If you've officially registered your DBA with your state or county, you can put that in the "Business name/disregarded entity name" field. But if you haven't formally registered it and just use it informally as your brand, many tax professionals recommend leaving that field blank and just using your legal name. The most important thing is that your name and SSN match what the IRS has on file.
Just a heads up to save everyone some time - make sure your address on the W9 matches EXACTLY what the IRS has on file too! I spent weeks trying different name formats before realizing the problem was actually my address. I had moved recently and even though I filed a change of address with USPS, the IRS still had my old address.
Charlotte Jones
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - have you considered the Section 179 deduction for some of your business assets? You might be able to immediately expense some purchases rather than depreciating them over time. Doesn't work for inventory you're reselling, but could help with storage equipment, computers, etc.
0 coins
Amelia Cartwright
ā¢Thanks for mentioning Section 179! I do have some shelving units and a computer system I use exclusively for the business. Would those qualify? And what's the max I can deduct this way?
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
ā¢Those shelving units and computer
0 coins
Lucas Bey
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like you're conflating cash flow with profit. Just because you use your profits to pay down debt doesn't mean you're not making a profit for tax purposes. They're separate calculations.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
ā¢Exactly this! I made this same mistake my first two years in business. The IRS doesn't care what you do with your profits - reinvest them, pay debt, whatever. They care about revenue minus deductible expenses. Paying down loan principal isn't a deductible expense.
0 coins