Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing nobody's mentioning is that the €750M threshold is actually pretty high! This only affects the very largest multinational companies. Small and medium businesses (even fairly large ones by most standards) won't be directly impacted by these rules. Also worth noting that the implementation timeline keeps getting pushed back. Originally supposed to start in 2023, now many jurisdictions are talking about 2024 or even 2025 before they have local legislation in place. The US delay is particularly problematic since so many multinationals are headquartered there.
Does that €750M threshold apply to the global company or just operations in a specific country? Like if a company makes €800M worldwide but only €100M in France, would it still be subject to the minimum tax in France?
The €750M threshold applies to global consolidated revenue of the multinational group, not the revenue in each specific country. So in your example, a company with €800M worldwide revenue would be subject to the minimum tax rules even if they only had €100M in France. This is actually one of the key points of the agreement - it's designed to capture large multinationals that might have relatively small operations spread across many countries. The threshold was set to target the largest 10-15% of multinational enterprises while excluding smaller companies that would face disproportionate compliance burdens.
As someone who works with emerging markets, I think the impact on developing countries is being overlooked. Many use tax incentives to attract foreign investment because they can't compete with developed nations on infrastructure, workforce, etc. This agreement potentially removes one of their few competitive advantages. That's likely why Kenya and Nigeria haven't signed on. They see it as developed nations protecting their tax bases at the expense of developing economies' growth strategies. The revenue redistribution under Pillar One is supposed to address this, but the formulas tend to favor larger economies.
That's a really good point. Do you think there's any chance the OECD will modify the agreement to address these concerns? Or are developing nations just going to be left behind?
Join the conversation
I was in almost the exact same situation last year (two W-2s from different states, unemployment, and education credits). I used FreeTaxUSA and it worked perfectly fine for me. The interface is really clear about which state you earned income in and when. For your education credits, I'd suggest going with what the first commenter said - AOTC is only for undergrad, regardless of how many years you've been in school. Even if you technically were in your "4th year" of higher education, graduate courses only qualify for the Lifetime Learning Credit. One tip: make sure you have your actual living dates for each state documented somewhere. FreeTaxUSA will ask for the exact dates of your residency in each state, and it matters for determining your tax liability.
Thanks for sharing your experience! Did FreeTaxUSA make it easy to figure out how to divide the income between states? I'm worried I'll mess that up since some of my unemployment was while I was preparing to move but technically still in Michigan.
It really does make it pretty straightforward! When you enter your W-2 information, it asks which state the income was earned in, and when you enter your 1099-G for unemployment, it asks similar questions. For the unemployment specifically, you'll need to allocate it based on where you were living when you received it. So if you received unemployment payments while still physically living in Michigan (even if you were planning to move), those payments would be considered Michigan income. FreeTaxUSA asks for your residency dates for each state and then guides you through allocating everything correctly. Just make sure you know which unemployment payments came when, so you can properly assign them to the right state.
Last year I had even more complicated taxes (3 states, 4 W-2s, unemployment, AND education credits) and while FreeTaxUSA was good enough, looking back I wish I'd just paid for a CPA. I ended up making a mistake on my state allocations that resulted in me having to file amended returns for two states, which was a huge headache and cost me more in the long run. If you can afford it, I'd recommend at least consulting with a CPA for your first time filing a multi-state return, especially with education credits involved. The software is only as good as the information you put in, and if you misunderstand a question, it can lead to filing errors. With your specific question about AOTC vs LLC, that's exactly the kind of nuance a professional would catch immediately.
I disagree - paying for a CPA seems excessive for this situation. I had a similar multi-state situation and FreeTaxUSA worked fine. Just take your time and read each question carefully. Maybe have a friend who's good with taxes review it before submitting if you're worried.
Join the conversation
Since everyone's talking about bonuses and taxes, anyone know if it's better to get your bonus in December or January from a tax perspective? My company lets us choose and I never know which is better.
January is almost always better because you defer the taxes for a whole year. I always push mine to January.
Join the conversation
One thing nobody's mentioned yet about your situation is state taxes. Depending on which state you're in, you might not get the same foreign tax credits at the state level as you do federally. Georgia (if I'm remembering correctly from your post) does allow FTCs but they calculate them differently than the federal version. Also, track your days in each country carefully! The substantial presence test has exceptions under the treaty that might apply to you depending on your specific situation.
That's a really good point about state taxes that I hadn't considered. I am indeed in Georgia, so I'll need to look into how they handle FTCs. Do you know if there's a substantial difference in how they calculate it compared to federal? And regarding the day counting - I've been tracking pretty carefully since I arrived in May, but are there specific thresholds I should be aware of under the treaty?
Georgia's FTC is more limited than the federal credit. They only allow credit for taxes paid to foreign countries on income that's also taxed by Georgia. The calculation is based on the ratio of your foreign income taxed by Georgia to your total Georgia taxable income. So if some of your Canadian income isn't subject to Georgia tax, you can't claim FTC for taxes paid on that portion. For the treaty's substantial presence test exceptions, there's the "closer connection" exception that might apply. If you maintain more significant ties to Canada (permanent home, family, economic connections, etc.) and are present in the US for fewer than 183 days in the calendar year, you might be able to claim that your tax home is still Canada despite meeting the substantial presence test. You'd need to file Form 8840 to claim this exception.
Don't forget about Social Security/Medicare taxes! This is often overlooked in international situations. There's a "totalization agreement" between the US and Canada that prevents double taxation of social insurance contributions. If you're working temporarily in the US (usually defined as 5 years or less), you may be able to continue contributing only to the Canadian system and get a certificate of coverage to exempt you from US Social Security taxes.
This is super important! My company messed this up when I was working between UK and US. I ended up paying into both systems for 2 years before realizing I could have been exempt from one. Getting a refund for the overpaid social security was a nightmare.
Ellie Simpson
Have you looked into becoming an authorized FIRE system user? Our county had the same problem with 1098-F forms last year. You need to complete Form 4419 (Application for Filing Information Returns Electronically) to get a Transmitter Control Code (TCC). Once approved, you can use the FIRE system to upload your forms in the proper format. It's not super intuitive, but it's better than manual filing for sure.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
•Thanks for mentioning this! I've heard of the FIRE system but wasn't sure if it applied to 1098-F forms specifically. How long did the approval process take for you? We're working on a pretty tight timeline with our new reporting requirements.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•The approval process took about 3 weeks for us, but that was during a slower period. If you're approaching year-end or tax season, it might take longer. I'd recommend submitting the Form 4419 application as soon as possible. One thing to note is that you'll need to create files in a very specific format for the FIRE system. The IRS has detailed specifications for each information return type. We ended up using a programmer to help create the proper file structure for our 1098-F submissions.
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
Just wanted to add that you need to be very careful about the filing requirements for 1098-F. We messed this up last year and it was a headache. Make sure your agency has a clear understanding of which settlements/orders actually require a 1098-F. Not all penalties need to be reported! Only certain ones that meet specific criteria like being related to violation of law, investigation/inquiry by government, etc.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•Totally agree with this. We had to go back and review hundreds of cases to determine which ones met the reporting threshold. The IRS guidance is a bit vague. Does anyone have a good checklist or process for determining what needs to be reported on 1098-F?
0 coins