


Ask the community...
Just a heads up for anyone dealing with unemployment repayments - the IRS has a specific publication that covers this: Publication 525 under "Repayments." I went through this last year and found that if your repayment is under $3,000, it's usually better to just take it as an itemized deduction in the year you made the repayment. But if you don't itemize (like me), you might be out of luck for smaller repayments since the standard deduction is probably higher. For larger repayments over $3,000, definitely look into the claim of right provision - it saved me about $1,800 compared to the deduction route.
Does anyone know if the repayment has to be voluntary to qualify for these options? My wages were garnished to repay overpaid unemployment from 2021, so I'm not sure if that counts as a "repayment" for tax purposes.
Great question about garnished wages. Yes, involuntary repayments like wage garnishment absolutely count as repayments for tax purposes. The IRS doesn't distinguish between voluntary and involuntary repayments in this case. What matters is that you included the original unemployment amount in your taxable income in a prior year, and now you've repaid it (whether by choice or through garnishment). Make sure you get documentation from the unemployment office showing the total amount garnished during the year, as you'll need that to support your deduction or claim of right adjustment.
Has anyone successfully e-filed a return with a claim of right adjustment for unemployment repayment? I'm using TurboTax and it seems completely confused when I try to enter this. It keeps putting the repayment as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to 2% AGI which I know is wrong!
I had this same issue with TurboTax last year! You need to go to "Deductions & Credits" then "I'll choose what I work on" then scroll down to "Miscellaneous Tax Deductions" and you should see an option for "Claim of Right" or sometimes "Repayments Under Claim of Right." If you don't see it, try searching for "IRC 1341" in the search box.
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that if the original owner of the annuity was taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) before they passed, you'll need to continue taking at least that amount annually. This can affect your tax planning significantly. Also worth noting - if you're inheriting from a spouse, you have different options than inheriting from a non-spouse like a parent or aunt. Spouses can often roll the annuity into their own name, which non-spouses can't do.
This is super important! My brother and I both inherited annuities from our mom, but his was qualified (inside an IRA) and mine was non-qualified. We had COMPLETELY different tax situations and options. The qualified annuity had never been taxed yet, while the non-qualified one had already had some taxes paid.
You're absolutely right about the qualified vs non-qualified distinction. That's a crucial factor I should have mentioned. Qualified annuities (inside IRAs or 401ks) have never been taxed before, so all distributions are generally fully taxable as ordinary income. Non-qualified annuities (purchased with after-tax dollars) will only have their earnings portion taxed, not the original investment amount that's considered the "basis.
Does anyone know if you can disclaim an inherited annuity? My uncle left me one but I'm already in a high tax bracket and it might make more sense for it to go to my kids who are in college and have almost no income.
Yes, you can disclaim an inheritance including an annuity! My financial advisor had me do this with an inherited annuity from my grandmother. You need to: 1) Not accept any benefits from it 2) Provide written refusal within 9 months of the death 3) Not direct who gets it next (it follows the contingent beneficiary designations) Made a huge difference for my family tax-wise.
Does anyone know how the child tax credit works when you're separated but not divorced? My wife and I split in June and our divorce won't be final until next year sometime. We have 3 kids who live with her most of the time but I have them every weekend.
Make sure you consider how your separation affects your stimulus eligibility too! My spouse and I were separated in 2024 but still filed jointly for that tax year. For 2025, we're filing separately, and I discovered my lower individual income actually qualified me for some credits I wouldn't have gotten filing jointly with our combined income.
As someone who's been freelancing for years, my advice is to use tax software like FreeTaxUSA or TaxSlayer for your first year since they're cheaper than TurboTax but still walk you through the self-employment sections. With only $2700 in income, you qualify for free filing through several services. Make sure you track EVERYTHING going forward - I use a simple spreadsheet with income, expenses, and mileage. For 2024, gather whatever receipts you can find and estimate the rest as reasonably as possible. The IRS is generally more understanding with first-time filers who make honest attempts to comply.
Do the free versions of those tax programs actually include self-employment forms? I tried using one of the big free tax sites last year for my regular job and it kept trying to upsell me for everything.
You're right to be cautious. Many "free" tax sites do try to upsell, especially for self-employment forms. FreeTaxUSA includes Schedule C in their free version, but you pay about $15 for state filing. TaxSlayer's free version covers simple returns but charges for self-employment - their "Classic" tier ($29.95 last I checked) includes all self-employment forms. The IRS Free File program is also worth checking - if your income is under a certain threshold (usually around $73,000), you can access truly free filing options including self-employment forms. The key is to access these through the IRS Free File portal rather than going directly to the company websites.
Don't forget about the Qualified Business Income deduction! As a self-employed person you can deduct 20% of your net business income right off the top. It's on Form 8995 and it's super easy to miss if you're new to this. With your income level you probably won't owe much federal income tax after standard deduction, but the self-employment tax (15.3%) still applies to profits over $400.
I think we're overcomplicating things for someone who made $2,700. At that income level after taking the standard deduction, they'll likely only owe the self-employment tax portion. That's about $381 in SE tax (15.3% of $2,500 assuming minimal expenses).
Javier Cruz
You guys are ignoring a simple solution. The employee and her husband could just do the math themselves to figure out how much extra to withhold. That's what my wife and I do. Take both your annual salaries, add them together, use a tax calculator online to estimate your total tax bill for the year, then divide by number of paychecks. Compare that to what's currently being withheld and add the difference to line 4(c) of the W-4. It's not rocket science and doesn't require special tools or services. Just basic math.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
ā¢Not everyone is comfortable doing tax math though. My eyes glaze over whenever I try to calculate this stuff, and I inevitably make mistakes. I think the point is that the employer shouldn't be blamed for following the W-4 instructions correctly.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
ā¢Fair point. I forget that not everyone is comfortable with tax calculations. You're right that the employer isn't at fault here - they processed the withholding correctly based on the form provided. A simpler approach would be to just use the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator online. It walks you through everything step by step and tells you exactly what to put on each line of the W-4. No math required.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
Side note: has anyone noticed that the withholding tables seem completely off lately? Even with the "married, but withhold at higher single rate" option checked on old W-4s, we still had people underwithholding. The new W-4 multiple jobs section is better but still not perfect.
0 coins
NeonNebula
ā¢I think the problem is that the withholding system is based on outdated assumptions about household income. The tables were designed when it was common to have one primary earner in a family. Now with two similar incomes, the system gets confused without specific instructions.
0 coins