


Ask the community...
Just adding another perspective - you might want to check if your country has a tax treaty with the US. I'm from India, and our treaty specifies different withholding rates for different types of income. For digital advertising revenue like AdSense, it should be 15% not 30%. If the withholding on your 1042-S is higher than your treaty rate, you might be able to file a simplified US tax return to get the difference refunded. I did this last year using Form 1040NR.
Thanks for this info! I just checked and Australia does have a tax treaty with the US. On my 1042-S form, it shows they withheld 5% - does that sound right for the Australia-US treaty? And would I need to do anything to get money back or is that the correct amount?
That 5% withholding rate sounds correct for Australia-US royalty payments (which is how AdSense income is typically classified). Since they've withheld at the correct treaty rate, you don't need to file anything with the IRS to get money back. Just make sure you claim this US tax paid as a foreign tax credit when you file your Australian taxes so you don't end up paying tax twice on the same income. Your Australian tax software or accountant should have a section where you can enter foreign taxes paid to get credit for them.
One important thing nobody mentioned - check Box 3 on your 1042-S form! It shows the type of income being reported. For most AdSense users it's usually code 12 (royalties) but sometimes they miscategorize it and it affects your withholding rate.
You should definitely look into whether you might be subject to the estimated tax penalty due to underpayment. If you normally get a W-2 and this RSU situation is unusual for you, you might qualify for a waiver of the penalty. There's a form called 2210 "Underpayment of Estimated Tax" where you can request a waiver due to unusual circumstances. Alternatively, if your total tax paid through withholding in 2024 was at least 100% of your 2023 tax liability (or 110% if your AGI was over $150k), you might qualify for a "safe harbor" exception and avoid the penalty entirely.
This is super helpful! I don't think I'll meet the safe harbor since my income went up quite a bit in 2024 compared to 2023. How complicated is the Form 2210 to fill out? And what kind of documentation would I need to provide to show this was an unusual circumstance?
Form 2210 is admittedly one of the more complex IRS forms, but you only need to complete certain parts depending on your situation. For the waiver request, you'll fill out Part I, check box A for "Request a waiver," and attach a statement explaining the circumstances (the timing of your RSU vest vs. the sell-to-cover transaction). You don't necessarily need formal documentation upfront, but keep your RSU statements and any communications with your company about the transaction timing. The key is to clearly explain that this was a one-time timing issue outside your control - the vest occurred in one tax year but the withholding happened in the next tax year. If you're using tax software, it should walk you through the process. The penalty itself is usually fairly modest compared to the tax owed, so some people just pay it rather than going through the waiver process, but it's worth trying if the amount is significant.
Has anyone had luck with their employer correcting this kind of situation? My company's stock admin team told me they couldn't do anything about the timing of the sell-to-cover transaction, but I'm wondering if HR might be able to help in some way since this affects a lot of employees.
Our company actually adjusted our year-end bonuses to help offset the tax impact when this happened. Worth asking your HR department if they're aware of the issue and if they have any programs to help employees caught in this situation. Some companies offer tax advance programs specifically for equity compensation.
Just wanted to mention that if your condo association qualifies as a homeowners association under IRC Section 528, you might be able to file Form 1120-H instead of 1041. Much simpler form and specifically designed for property associations. The qualifying requirements are: 1. 60% of revenue must come from member dues/fees 2. 90% of expenses must be for management/maintenance of association property 3. At least 85% of units must be residential For your small 2-unit condo, it sounds like you might qualify and save yourself the 1041 headache.
Do you know if a 2-unit building would even be considered an "association" under those rules? And would choosing 1120-H vs 1041 affect how much we pay in taxes?
Yes, a 2-unit building can still qualify as an association under IRC 528 as long as it meets the other criteria. There's no minimum unit requirement in the tax code for this purpose. The IRS looks at how the entity operates rather than its size. Regarding taxes, Form 1120-H allows the association to exclude income from member dues completely, taxing only "nonexempt function income" like interest earnings or commercial rental income at a flat 30% rate. For small associations with minimal interest income, this often results in zero tax liability or a very small amount. Form 1041 trusts calculate taxes differently, potentially subjecting more income to taxation depending on how the trust is structured. For a simple pass-through arrangement like yours with minimal bank interest, the 1120-H is usually advantageous.
Has anyone else noticed that TaxAct's interview questions for trust returns are weirdly worded? I've been using it for our 4-unit condo trust and some of the questions seem designed for giant commercial trusts with beneficiaries and distributions, not simple condo arrangements.
I switched to TurboTax Business for our condo trust and found their interview process much more straightforward. They have specific questions designed for small residential associations that made the whole process less confusing.
Just wanted to add my experience as someone who went through this last year. I used Sprintax while my green card was pending and it worked perfectly. The key thing to remember is that you file based on your CURRENT status, not what you've applied for. One thing to watch out for: once your green card is approved, you'll be a resident alien for tax purposes from that date forward. So if it gets approved mid-year, you might need to file what's called a "dual-status return" for that tax year, which can be complicated. That's when I had to switch from Sprintax to a regular tax preparer.
Did you do the dual status return yourself or hire someone? I'm worried my green card might be approved in the middle of this tax year and I hear dual status returns can't be e-filed.
I ended up hiring a tax professional for the dual-status year because it got pretty complicated. You're right that you can't e-file a dual-status return - it has to be paper filed. The preparer essentially had to prepare both a 1040NR for the part of the year I was a nonresident and portions of a 1040 for when I became a resident. If your case is simple (just W-2 income), you might be able to handle it yourself, but I had scholarships, some investments, and a side gig, so I didn't want to risk making mistakes. The peace of mind was worth the cost, especially since tax issues can potentially affect immigration cases.
Something no one mentioned yet - make sure you're correctly handling any FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare). As an F-1 student, you're normally exempt from these taxes, but once your green card is approved, you'll need to start paying them. If your employer mistakenly withheld these taxes while you were still on F-1, you can claim a refund. Conversely, if they didn't withhold after your status changed, you might owe money.
This is super important! My university payroll department automatically started withholding FICA taxes when I told them about my green card APPLICATION (not approval), and it took months to fix. Is there a specific form to request a refund for incorrectly withheld FICA?
Yes, if your employer incorrectly withheld FICA taxes while you were still on an F-1 visa (and within your 5-year exemption period), you need to first try to get a refund from your employer. If they refuse or are unable to refund you, you'll need to file Form 843 "Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement" along with supporting documentation. Make sure to include a statement from your employer showing the amount of incorrectly withheld Social Security and Medicare taxes, a copy of your visa documentation, and a statement explaining why you're exempt. This is another area where Sprintax can help - they generally have guidance on completing these forms for international students.
Ella rollingthunder87
3 Don't forget that if you owned the car for more than a year before selling it (which it sounds like you did), the profit would be taxed as a long-term capital gain rather than ordinary income. That could mean a lower tax rate depending on your income bracket.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
β’16 Wait, really? I thought capital gains only applied to investments like stocks and real estate. Cars are considered capital assets too?
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
β’3 Yes, cars are indeed considered capital assets for tax purposes. Any tangible property you own is generally a capital asset unless it's specifically excluded in the tax code. Since you owned the car for personal use (not as inventory in a business), when you sell it for more than you paid, that's a capital gain. And you're right that this distinction matters because long-term capital gains (assets held more than one year) are typically taxed at lower rates than ordinary income. Depending on your income bracket, you might pay 0%, 15%, or 20% on those gains instead of your normal income tax rate.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
10 Just to complicate things further - if the car was ever used for business purposes and you took depreciation deductions, you might need to "recapture" some of that depreciation when you sell. Did you ever use this vehicle for business?
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
β’17 This is a really good point. I used my last car for Uber driving part-time and had to deal with depreciation recapture when I sold it. Totally different tax situation than a personal vehicle sale.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
β’10 Exactly! Business use dramatically changes the tax treatment. When you claim depreciation deductions for business use of a vehicle, you're reducing your basis in the asset. Then when you sell it, you may have to "recapture" those deductions by reporting them as ordinary income, not capital gains. It creates this weird hybrid situation where part of your profit might be taxed as ordinary income (the recaptured depreciation) and part might be taxed as capital gains (any additional profit above the original basis minus depreciation). Definitely worth mentioning since many people have side gigs using their personal vehicles these days.
0 coins