


Ask the community...
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that if the original owner of the annuity was taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) before they passed, you'll need to continue taking at least that amount annually. This can affect your tax planning significantly. Also worth noting - if you're inheriting from a spouse, you have different options than inheriting from a non-spouse like a parent or aunt. Spouses can often roll the annuity into their own name, which non-spouses can't do.
This is super important! My brother and I both inherited annuities from our mom, but his was qualified (inside an IRA) and mine was non-qualified. We had COMPLETELY different tax situations and options. The qualified annuity had never been taxed yet, while the non-qualified one had already had some taxes paid.
You're absolutely right about the qualified vs non-qualified distinction. That's a crucial factor I should have mentioned. Qualified annuities (inside IRAs or 401ks) have never been taxed before, so all distributions are generally fully taxable as ordinary income. Non-qualified annuities (purchased with after-tax dollars) will only have their earnings portion taxed, not the original investment amount that's considered the "basis.
Does anyone know if you can disclaim an inherited annuity? My uncle left me one but I'm already in a high tax bracket and it might make more sense for it to go to my kids who are in college and have almost no income.
Yes, you can disclaim an inheritance including an annuity! My financial advisor had me do this with an inherited annuity from my grandmother. You need to: 1) Not accept any benefits from it 2) Provide written refusal within 9 months of the death 3) Not direct who gets it next (it follows the contingent beneficiary designations) Made a huge difference for my family tax-wise.
Just a heads up for anyone dealing with unemployment repayments - the IRS has a specific publication that covers this: Publication 525 under "Repayments." I went through this last year and found that if your repayment is under $3,000, it's usually better to just take it as an itemized deduction in the year you made the repayment. But if you don't itemize (like me), you might be out of luck for smaller repayments since the standard deduction is probably higher. For larger repayments over $3,000, definitely look into the claim of right provision - it saved me about $1,800 compared to the deduction route.
Does anyone know if the repayment has to be voluntary to qualify for these options? My wages were garnished to repay overpaid unemployment from 2021, so I'm not sure if that counts as a "repayment" for tax purposes.
Great question about garnished wages. Yes, involuntary repayments like wage garnishment absolutely count as repayments for tax purposes. The IRS doesn't distinguish between voluntary and involuntary repayments in this case. What matters is that you included the original unemployment amount in your taxable income in a prior year, and now you've repaid it (whether by choice or through garnishment). Make sure you get documentation from the unemployment office showing the total amount garnished during the year, as you'll need that to support your deduction or claim of right adjustment.
Has anyone successfully e-filed a return with a claim of right adjustment for unemployment repayment? I'm using TurboTax and it seems completely confused when I try to enter this. It keeps putting the repayment as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to 2% AGI which I know is wrong!
I had this same issue with TurboTax last year! You need to go to "Deductions & Credits" then "I'll choose what I work on" then scroll down to "Miscellaneous Tax Deductions" and you should see an option for "Claim of Right" or sometimes "Repayments Under Claim of Right." If you don't see it, try searching for "IRC 1341" in the search box.
You guys are ignoring a simple solution. The employee and her husband could just do the math themselves to figure out how much extra to withhold. That's what my wife and I do. Take both your annual salaries, add them together, use a tax calculator online to estimate your total tax bill for the year, then divide by number of paychecks. Compare that to what's currently being withheld and add the difference to line 4(c) of the W-4. It's not rocket science and doesn't require special tools or services. Just basic math.
Not everyone is comfortable doing tax math though. My eyes glaze over whenever I try to calculate this stuff, and I inevitably make mistakes. I think the point is that the employer shouldn't be blamed for following the W-4 instructions correctly.
Fair point. I forget that not everyone is comfortable with tax calculations. You're right that the employer isn't at fault here - they processed the withholding correctly based on the form provided. A simpler approach would be to just use the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator online. It walks you through everything step by step and tells you exactly what to put on each line of the W-4. No math required.
Side note: has anyone noticed that the withholding tables seem completely off lately? Even with the "married, but withhold at higher single rate" option checked on old W-4s, we still had people underwithholding. The new W-4 multiple jobs section is better but still not perfect.
I think the problem is that the withholding system is based on outdated assumptions about household income. The tables were designed when it was common to have one primary earner in a family. Now with two similar incomes, the system gets confused without specific instructions.
For what it's worth, I paid $230 last year for tax prep with a similar situation (W-2 + about $5k in freelance income). The preparer found enough additional deductions compared to what I'd have found on my own that it more than covered her fee. Business mileage alone saved me over $300 in taxes. Just make sure whoever you hire will help you maximize legitimate deductions but not push you into gray areas. A good preparer should explain everything and make you feel comfortable with what you're claiming.
Do you think there's value in going back to the same preparer each year? Or should I shop around for the best price annually?
There's definitely value in building a relationship with the same preparer over time. They learn your specific situation and can provide more tailored advice as they get to know your financial patterns. They'll also notice changes year-to-year that might indicate new tax opportunities. Shopping based on price alone can backfire. The cheapest preparers are often the least experienced or may rush through returns during busy season. If you find someone who does quality work and you're comfortable with them, the continuity is usually worth any small premium you might pay compared to shopping around.
I do my own taxes with FreeTaxUSA and it only costs me $15 for state filing (federal is free). Has all the forms for 1099 income. Why pay hundreds to someone else? Seems like a waste of money tbh.
Oliver Zimmermann
Something nobody mentioned yet - whoever claims the child gets both the dependent exemption AND the child tax credit. In your income bracket ($43k vs her $75k), you'd probably benefit more from these tax breaks than your ex would, especially with the phase-out limits for higher incomes. Also, since you're the custodial parent, you might qualify for Head of Household filing status, which gives better tax rates and a higher standard deduction than filing as Single. Your ex wouldn't get that benefit regardless of whether she claims your daughter as a dependent or not.
0 coins
StarSailor}
ā¢I didn't even think about the Head of Household status! Does that make a big difference in the tax calculation? And would I still qualify for that even if I end up letting her claim our daughter as a dependent this year?
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
ā¢Yes, Head of Household status makes a significant difference! For 2024 taxes (filed in 2025), the standard deduction for HOH is $21,900 versus just $14,600 for Single filing status. That's a $7,300 difference in taxable income right off the bat, which could save you thousands depending on your tax bracket. You can still qualify for Head of Household even if you let your ex claim your daughter as a dependent, as long as your daughter lives with you more than half the year and you pay more than half the cost of maintaining the home. The dependent exemption and Head of Household status are separate benefits.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
My ex and I solved this by alternating years. I get even years, she gets odd years. We put it in writing and signed it to prevent future arguments. It's not perfect but it's fair and prevents the nightmare of competing claims that could trigger IRS audits for both of us.
0 coins
Javier Torres
ā¢Does that alternating years agreement need to be part of the formal custody arrangement, or can it just be a separate signed document between the two parents?
0 coins