


Ask the community...
Actually, I have a WISP template I can share that was approved for my husband's 3-person accounting firm. It's pretty straightforward and has all the required sections without too much corporate bloat. If you DM me I can send it over. Just make sure to customize the risk assessment for your specific business needs. The most important thing is documenting that you actually FOLLOW whatever security practices you put in the document. A simple WISP that you actually implement is better than a fancy one that sits in a drawer.
Thank you so much! I'll send you a message right away. When you implemented it, what was the most challenging part for a very small operation? And did you find any particular resources helpful for the risk assessment portion?
The most challenging part was definitely creating reasonable security controls for customer data without breaking the bank. Simple things like implementing password managers and enabling two-factor authentication gave us big security improvements without major costs. We also created a very basic security training that takes about 20 minutes to go through with new employees. For the risk assessment, NIST has a publication called "Small Business Information Security: The Fundamentals" (NISTIR 7621) that was incredibly helpful. It has a straightforward approach to identifying your most important information assets and the realistic threats to those assets. Much more practical than the enterprise-focused guides I found elsewhere.
I'm confused about whether a WISP is even required for a business that small? Our CPA told us we only needed one because we process credit card payments and store customer financial info. If the family business doesn't handle sensitive data, do they still need one??
Great question about applicability. A WISP is legally required in some states (like Massachusetts) for any business that collects personal information of residents, regardless of size. In other states, requirements vary. However, even when not strictly required by law, many client contracts and cyber insurance policies now require a documented security program. So it really depends on what kind of information the business handles, where their customers are located, and what contractual obligations they have. Since the original poster mentioned it's required for a new client, that's likely a contractual requirement rather than a statutory one.
I had this same issue happen to me. Filed Feb 2, got accepted Feb 3, then "approved" status for like 3 weeks! Finally got my deposit on March 1. The IRS is just really backed up this year. If they gave you a date of April 4, I'd bet money you'll get it that day or maybe even a couple days earlier. The system is usually pretty accurate once it gives you an actual date.
Did you get the full amount you were expecting? I'm worried because mine says "approved" but with a slightly different amount than I calculated.
Yes, I got exactly the amount shown on the "Where's My Refund" tool. If your approved amount is different than what you calculated, the IRS probably made an adjustment to your return. This happens a lot - they might have caught a math error or determined you qualified for a different credit amount than what you claimed. The good news is that once it shows "approved" with a specific amount, that's what you'll get deposited. You should receive a letter in the mail explaining any adjustments they made to your original return.
Pro tip: Check your bank account early morning on your deposit date! The IRS typically sends deposits in batches overnight, so many people see their refunds hit their accounts around 6-7am on the scheduled date. Also, some banks post deposits a day or two early, especially online banks. My credit union consistently posts my tax refund about 24 hours before the official IRS date.
As a policy idea, making commuting tax deductible would be incredibly expensive for the government. Think about it - almost everyone commutes, so that's hundreds of billions in deductions. They'd have to raise tax rates elsewhere to make up for it. BUT there are some existing commuter benefits worth looking into. Some employers offer pre-tax commuter benefits (up to $300/month for transit/vanpool) through Section 132 fringe benefits. This can significantly reduce commuting costs. Ask your HR department if they offer this program.
Our company actually does offer those pre-tax transit benefits, but most employees don't take advantage of them. Do you know if there's any way to make driving expenses pre-tax too? Most of our staff drives rather than using public transportation.
For driving expenses, the pre-tax benefits primarily cover parking costs at or near your workplace, up to $300/month. The actual driving expenses (gas, maintenance, etc.) can't be made pre-tax unless it's part of a qualified vanpool arrangement. If your employees are mostly drivers, highlight the parking benefit since it can save them 20-37% on those costs depending on their tax bracket. Some companies also offer incentives for carpooling or subsidize vanpools to help with commuting costs. These can be provided as tax-free fringe benefits under certain conditions. Worth exploring if you're trying to encourage more in-office work.
I don't think commuting should be tax deductible at all. People should live closer to their jobs or find jobs closer to their homes. Tax incentives for commuting would just encourage more sprawl, traffic and pollution.
That's incredibly privileged thinking. Many people can't afford to live near their workplace, especially in high cost cities. And "just find a job closer to home" isn't realistic for specialized careers or in areas with limited job options.
You're right, I didn't consider the housing affordability crisis in many areas. I was thinking purely from an environmental perspective, but there are social equity issues too. Maybe a better approach would be targeted deductions for lower-income workers who are forced to commute long distances due to housing costs, rather than blanket deductions that would mostly benefit higher-income taxpayers. Or better yet, improve public transportation and make that more widely available as a pre-tax benefit.
Something nobody mentioned yet - whoever claims the child gets both the dependent exemption AND the child tax credit. In your income bracket ($43k vs her $75k), you'd probably benefit more from these tax breaks than your ex would, especially with the phase-out limits for higher incomes. Also, since you're the custodial parent, you might qualify for Head of Household filing status, which gives better tax rates and a higher standard deduction than filing as Single. Your ex wouldn't get that benefit regardless of whether she claims your daughter as a dependent or not.
I didn't even think about the Head of Household status! Does that make a big difference in the tax calculation? And would I still qualify for that even if I end up letting her claim our daughter as a dependent this year?
Yes, Head of Household status makes a significant difference! For 2024 taxes (filed in 2025), the standard deduction for HOH is $21,900 versus just $14,600 for Single filing status. That's a $7,300 difference in taxable income right off the bat, which could save you thousands depending on your tax bracket. You can still qualify for Head of Household even if you let your ex claim your daughter as a dependent, as long as your daughter lives with you more than half the year and you pay more than half the cost of maintaining the home. The dependent exemption and Head of Household status are separate benefits.
My ex and I solved this by alternating years. I get even years, she gets odd years. We put it in writing and signed it to prevent future arguments. It's not perfect but it's fair and prevents the nightmare of competing claims that could trigger IRS audits for both of us.
Jackson Carter
Sadly, your coworker's view is pretty common. I teach basic finance at a community college, and I do a whole lecture about this exact misconception. About half my students come in thinking tax refunds are free government money. The bigger problem is that this thinking leads to poor financial decisions. People who see refunds as "bonus money" tend to spend it frivolously rather than recognizing it's part of their annual income that could have been better used throughout the year. I use a simple exercise: I ask students if they'd loan me $100 every month with the promise I'll give them $1200 back at the end of the year. They all say no. Then I explain that's exactly what they're doing with the IRS when they overpay throughout the year. The lightbulbs usually start going on at that point!
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
ā¢Do you have any simple resources I could share with people who think this way? My dad is convinced the government "gives" him money every year and gets annoyed when I try to explain otherwise.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
ā¢I recommend the IRS's own Tax Withholding Estimator on their website, which visually shows how withholding relates to your final tax bill. There's also a YouTube channel called "Two Cents" that has a great 5-minute video called "Tax Refunds Explained" that uses simple graphics to show how the money flows. For some people, seeing their own numbers makes the biggest difference. Have him look at his W-2 form, Box 2 (Federal income tax withheld) and compare that to his refund amount. If his refund is less than what's in Box 2, that clearly shows he's just getting his own money back. If it's more, that's when tax credits are coming into play.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
Omg your coworker is not alone š My roommate legitimately thought the same thing until last year! She would always talk about how she was gonna "win big on her taxes" and I was like... that's not how any of this works! She kept insisting that because she "got back more than she paid in" it must be free money. What she didn't understand was that the withholding shown on her paystub wasn't her total income - it was just what was taken for taxes. She thought her entire paycheck was "what she paid in" so when she got a refund it seemed like bonus money. It took me sitting down with her actual paystubs and tax forms to show her the math. The look on her face when she finally understood was priceless. Now she's all about adjusting her W-4 to get more money throughout the year instead!
0 coins
Julia Hall
ā¢Wait I'm confused. Are people here saying I should be getting less money back at tax time? I look forward to my refund every year to pay off holiday debt. If I change my withholding doesn't that mean I might end up OWING money??
0 coins