


Ask the community...
I'm a tax advisor who works with several fitness influencers. Here's the breakdown: ordinary food isn't deductible even if you eat more due to your profession. The IRS considers food a personal expense regardless of quantity needed. However, there are legitimate exceptions that many fitness influencers can use: - Food purchased EXCLUSIVELY for content creation (meal prep videos, etc.) - Business meals with clients or potential sponsors (50% deductible) - Food expenses while traveling for business (competitions, guest appearances) - Educational materials about nutrition that you use for business Document everything meticulously - keep separate receipts for personal vs. business food, note the business purpose, and take photos of food used in content creation.
What about protein powders and supplements that I feature in my workout videos? I often show what I'm using and how I prepare it before workouts. Would those count as "exclusively for content"?
Supplements shown in videos have a stronger case for deductibility since they're being used directly in your content creation. Make sure to document which supplements were used specifically for which videos or content pieces. Save the receipts and note the business purpose (e.g., "Protein powder for supplement review video posted 3/15"). Keep in mind that any portion used outside of content creation would still be considered personal usage. If you buy a container of protein powder, use some in a video, then consume the rest personally, only the portion used directly in content would potentially be deductible. Some influencers track this by percentage or even have separate supplies for business vs. personal use to make documentation cleaner.
Has anyone actually been audited over this? I've been deducting some of my protein and meal prep as business expenses for 2 years now since it's directly related to my fitness content. Wondering if I'm playing with fire here.
My cousin is a CPA and says food deductions are one of the biggest audit triggers for self-employed people. The IRS is especially picky about food because everyone needs to eat, so they scrutinize when people try to deduct it as business. Apparently they've been cracking down on fitness influencers specifically lately.
Just to add another wrinkle to consider - make sure your employer plan explicitly accepts rollovers of pre-tax IRA money. Some plans are weird about what they'll accept. I tried to do something similar in 2023 and my employer plan (through Fidelity) would only accept rollovers from previous employer plans, not from IRAs. Had to adjust my strategy completely. Call your plan administrator directly to verify before you start the process.
Thanks for mentioning this! I just checked with my HR department and they confirmed our plan (also Fidelity) does accept IRA rollovers, but only of the pretax portion. They said they'll need a statement from my IRA custodian that clearly shows the breakdown of pretax vs. after-tax amounts. That's really helpful to know before I start the process. One question though - do you know if there's a specific form that Fidelity requires for this? My HR person wasn't sure about the exact paperwork.
For Fidelity specifically, they have a form called "Transfer/Rollover/Exchange Form" that you need to fill out. You can find it on their website or they can send it to you. Make sure you check the box that indicates it's a direct rollover from an IRA to your employer plan. Additionally, you'll need a statement or letter from your current IRA custodian that clearly breaks down the pretax and after-tax portions. Some custodians have a specific form for this, others will just generate a letter if you explain what you need.
Don't forget about the pro-rata rule! If you do the backdoor Roth in the same year as the rollover to your work plan, you still have to include the pre-tax IRA money in the pro-rata calculation because the IRS looks at your IRA balances on December 31st of the year of conversion. The safer approach is: 1) Roll the pre-tax money to your work plan first, 2) Verify it's completed, 3) THEN do the Roth conversion of the remaining after-tax money.
This is super important! A buddy of mine got hit with an unexpected tax bill because he did these steps in the wrong order. The timing really matters.
For anyone still looking for an answer, I successfully filed Form 2350 from the UK last year. Here's what worked for me: 1) I used the Royal Mail international tracked service to mail my form directly from London to the IRS address in Austin (since I had a foreign address). 2) For payment, I used a US-based credit card through the IRS Direct Pay system as others mentioned. 3) I also kept digital copies of EVERYTHING - the form, tracking info, and payment confirmation. The most important thing is timing - mail it at least 3 weeks before the deadline. Mine took 12 days to arrive last year.
Did you have to do anything special with your bank to make the Direct Pay work? My US credit card always gets flagged for fraud when I try to use it from overseas for anything government-related.
I did have to call my bank first to put a travel notice on my card and specifically mention I would be making a payment to the IRS. Even with that, my first attempt was declined and I had to verify it wasn't fraud via text message. I recommend trying the payment a few days before you need to submit it, just in case you run into issues. My backup plan was to have my parents make the payment from their account in the US if my card kept getting declined. The IRS doesn't actually require the payment to come from your personal account - it just needs to be properly attributed to your tax ID/SSN.
Am I the only one who's confused about why we need Form 2350 instead of just using the regular 4868 extension form? I'm in Canada and my accountant mentioned this but didn't explain the difference well.
You're not alone in the confusion! Form 2350 is specifically for US citizens or residents who are abroad and need more time to meet either the bona fide residence test or the physical presence test to qualify for special tax treatments like the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. Form 4868 only gives you until October 15, while Form 2350 can potentially give you more time (up to a 6-month extension, and sometimes more if needed specifically to meet those residency/presence tests). If you're trying to qualify for those expat benefits, 2350 is usually better.
I think the real issue is that there's a huge difference between tax preparers vs tax planners. A lot of CPAs just focus on completing forms accurately based on what you give them (preparation) rather than actively looking for ways to optimize your tax situation (planning). When interviewing a new tax person, I'd specifically ask: "Do you provide proactive tax planning advice or just tax preparation?" A good tax planner should be having conversations with you throughout the year, not just at tax time.
That's a really helpful distinction. Do you think it's reasonable to expect both services from the same person? Or should I be looking for two separate professionals - one for planning and one for preparation?
Most comprehensive CPAs should be able to provide both services, but you may need to specifically request and possibly pay extra for the planning component. Many tax professionals offer tiered service packages - basic preparation at one price point and more comprehensive planning at a higher price. For someone in your situation with increasing income, business activities, and life changes like marriage, I'd definitely recommend finding one person who can handle both aspects. Just be clear about your expectations upfront and make sure they explicitly offer tax planning as part of their services.
Honestly, I ditched CPAs years ago and just use H&R Block premium online. It walks you through everything step by step and actually prompts you about stuff like HSA contribution limits, IRA opportunities, etc. It's way cheaper than a CPA and I've found it catches most of the same stuff.
Tax software is fine for simple situations but it misses a lot for complex cases. I tried this approach with my small business and rental properties and ended up getting audited because the software didn't properly handle some depreciation calculations. A good CPA is worth every penny for complicated tax situations.
You're right that it's not for everyone. I should have mentioned my situation is pretty straightforward - W2 income, mortgage, some investments. For folks with businesses, rental properties or more complex situations, a CPA probably makes more sense. I still think tax software has gotten much better at prompting for common deductions and credits though. Mine specifically asked about HDHP coverage and whether it was individual or family, then calculated the maximum HSA contribution automatically.
Javier Morales
Has anyone considered a Transfer on Death (TOD) arrangement instead? It's similar to naming a beneficiary but specifically designed for brokerage accounts. I set this up for my grandkids last year and my financial advisor said it accomplishes the same step up basis benefit while being slightly more straightforward for brokerage accounts specifically.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
β’How difficult was it to set up the TOD? Does it offer any advantages over just naming them as regular beneficiaries? I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible while still maximizing the tax benefits.
0 coins
Javier Morales
β’Setting up the TOD was extremely simple - just a form from my brokerage firm that took maybe 10 minutes to complete. The main advantage is that it's specifically designed for investment accounts and creates a cleaner transfer process. The TOD designation accomplishes essentially the same thing as a regular beneficiary designation, but it can sometimes process more quickly after death and avoids probate. Both methods will give your grandkids the full step up basis benefit. One thing to note - if you have multiple grandchildren and want to specify different percentages or specific assets going to specific grandchildren, the TOD forms typically allow for that level of detail.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
Whatever you do, DON'T set up an UTMA/UGMA account like I did before understanding the tax implications. When my grandkids turned 18, they got full control of the money (one bought a car, the other took a trip to Europe), AND the gains during all those years were taxed at my higher rate because of the kiddie tax. Complete disaster compared to the step up basis approach you're considering.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
β’Yeah, the UTMA/UGMA accounts are terrible for tax efficiency compared to getting the step up basis. My brother went that route and regretted it. Did you consider a trust at all? I've heard revocable living trusts can provide the step up basis while also giving you more control over when/how the kids get the money.
0 coins