Thanks so much! That's super helpful. One more question - did you have to do anything special to indicate that you made contributions for two different tax years in the same calendar year? That's the part I'm most worried about messing up.

For contributions to different tax years, you report the contribution for the previous tax year on that year's return (so your 2023 contribution would be on your 2023 return), but all conversions go on the return for the year when they actually happened. If you already filed your 2023 return without reporting the contribution, you'll need to amend it. In FreeTaxUSA, go to the "Amend 2023 Return" option from your account page. Then both conversions will be reported on your 2024 return since they both happened in 2024.

You're in the ideal situation for a backdoor Roth! With no existing Traditional IRA balances, you don't have to worry about the pro-rata rule. It is indeed as simple as: 1. Report the nondeductible Traditional IRA contribution 2. Report the conversion to Roth Since you have no pre-tax money in any Traditional IRAs, your conversion will be tax-free (except for any earnings between the contribution and conversion). The pro-rata headaches only come into play when you have existing pre-tax money in Traditional IRAs. Consider yourself lucky!

My brother works as a tax attorney and he says these FTC actions sometimes end with settlements that include customer refunds. But don't hold your breath - even if H&R Block settles, it could take a year or more before any money gets distributed. And the amounts are usually pretty small per person.

Thanks for the info. I figured it might be a long shot. I'm just annoyed that they've been getting away with this for so long. Definitely switching to something else next year.

You're probably not in their "target demographic" for the free version then. The FTC complaint isn't saying H&R Block is bad at doing taxes - it's saying they trick people who qualify for free filing into paying. If you have a more complex tax situation with lots of deductions, you probably should be paying for tax help anyway.

Does the recapture amount decrease the longer you've had the qualified property in service? Or is it an all-or-nothing situation regardless of timing?

The recapture amount actually does decrease over time. The IRS reduces the recapture amount by 20% for each full year the property remains in qualified use. So if you maintain qualifying use for 1 full year, you'd face 80% recapture if you discontinued in year 2. After 2 full years, it drops to 60% recapture, and so on until you hit the 5-year mark, after which there's no recapture risk. It's definitely not all-or-nothing, which provides some relief if business conditions change.

When I went through the process last year, there wasn't a specific minimum investment threshold in the regulations, but realistically, the application process is competitive and favors larger projects with bigger environmental impacts. That said, $1.2M isn't necessarily too small, especially if you're in an energy community or creating jobs in an underserved area.

While they might be targeting the ultra-wealthy first, don't be naive. Once they ramp up enforcement capabilities and hire more auditors, those resources will eventually trickle down to auditing middle-class folks too. The IRS has always had a higher audit rate for lower-income taxpayers claiming EITC than for many millionaires.

That's a fair point about historical audit patterns, but the specific language in the funding legislation directs resources toward high-income individuals and corporations. The Treasury Department has explicitly stated they won't increase audit rates for households making under $400,000 compared to historical levels. You're right that we should stay vigilant though. The best approach is to keep good records, report honestly, and be prepared to substantiate your claims if questioned. The goal isn't to scare people, but rather to collect from those who have been intentionally avoiding their obligations for years.

Actually, part of the funding is supposed to go toward modernizing their systems and improving customer service. In theory, this should make processing faster, not slower. My tax preparer told me they're already seeing improvements in processing times compared to the covid backlog years.

16 Do you know if H&R Block offers the same feature? That's what I've been using for years and would prefer to stick with it if possible.

21 Yes, H&R Block does offer 1099 filing capabilities in their small business versions. You'd need their Premium & Business or Business & Investment packages to access those features. However, if you're only filing one 1099, it might be more cost-effective to use one of the standalone services others have mentioned, since the upgrade cost for H&R Block might be higher than just paying for a single 1099 form processing. The benefit of using your existing tax software is everything stays in one system, which makes record-keeping easier for future years.

1 Thanks for this reminder! I completely forgot about that aspect. Would this go under "Contract labor" on the Schedule C, or should I list it somewhere else? I've never had this expense before.