IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Don't forget about investment interest expense if you have any margin loans or investment-related interest. Also, if you paid any tax preparation fees for your investments, those can be deductible too. I've been itemizing for years and it's usually worth it for me because of my mortgage interest and charitable giving combined. Oh, and definitely keep track of any major medical expenses including mileage to/from doctors appointments - those little trips add up if you had a lot of medical visits!

0 coins

I do have some investments but nothing on margin. What about tax preparation software? I usually spend around $150 on TurboTax Premium - is that deductible if I itemize?

0 coins

Unfortunately, tax preparation fees including software like TurboTax aren't deductible for individuals anymore. That deduction was eliminated for tax years 2018-2025 by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. However, if you have self-employment income or rental property income, you can still deduct the portion of your tax prep fees related to those business activities on Schedule C or Schedule E. But for regular personal tax preparation, those costs aren't deductible currently.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Has anyone tried "bunching" their charitable contributions? My CPA suggested donating double one year, then nothing the next, to alternate between itemizing and taking the standard deduction. Apparently it maximizes the tax benefit over a two-year period.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Bunching works really well! We do this with our church donations - double up in December and January of the same tax year, then skip a year. Our CPA ran the numbers and we save about $1,800 every two years compared to giving the same amount spread evenly. Just make sure your charities are cool with the irregular donation schedule.

0 coins

What tangible benefits do I actually receive from my tax payments as a US citizen?

I'm bringing home around $65k annually and roughly 25% of my paycheck goes straight to taxes. My rent is eating up $1850 a month for a basic apartment... I've checked into various assistance programs and keep finding I'm in that frustrating middle zone: - Too much income for subsidized housing options - Don't qualify for Medicaid - Only got a laughable $40 monthly discount on a $340 health insurance premium - Last year's tax refund was a whopping $520 (when I was making about $58k) The list of "nopes" continues: - No food assistance eligibility - No transit subsidies - No education grants or financial aid - No childcare assistance (I don't have kids, but I work in family law and see the qualification thresholds) Meanwhile, our city infrastructure is crumbling with no significant public improvements planned for the next decade. The only "development" is another luxury high-rise apartment building that's about to become the tallest in our city. Great, more unaffordable housing! I acknowledge I live in a relatively prosperous state and I'm not in dire poverty. But I'm definitely struggling financially. Between trying to save for retirement and the uncertainty around Social Security's future, I'm looking at working myself to exhaustion just to avoid elderly poverty. So my question is straightforward: What actual benefits am I receiving from my tax dollars? Is there some resource that breaks this down? To be clear, I'm seeking understanding, not just venting frustration. I'm fairly young and have a decent grasp of taxation basics. I've been researching economic systems globally, and while many countries have higher tax rates than the US, their citizens seem to receive tangible benefits - comprehensive healthcare, well-maintained public spaces, affordable childcare, accessible education, etc. What exactly are my tax dollars funding here?

KhalilStar

•

To directly answer your question: Your federal taxes mainly pay for Social Security (which you'll get later), Medicare (ditto), defense, and interest on national debt. State taxes typically fund education, transportation, and healthcare programs. Local taxes go to schools, police, fire departments, and parks. The reason you feel stuck is you're in what policy experts call the "subsidy cliff" - you make too much to qualify for assistance but not enough to feel comfortable. It's a real policy problem. What many don't realize is that other countries with stronger safety nets often have much higher taxes on EVERYONE, not just the rich. For example, European countries typically have higher VAT (sales taxes) affecting all citizens and higher income taxes on middle incomes.

0 coins

This subsidy cliff term is exactly what I've been experiencing but didn't have a name for! Do you know of any good resources that explain this phenomenon more? Or are there any efforts to address this problem in policy discussions?

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

The "subsidy cliff" is well-documented in healthcare policy discussions - the Kaiser Family Foundation has excellent resources explaining how it works, particularly with ACA marketplace subsidies. Urban Institute and Brookings also have published research on this topic. There are ongoing policy discussions about smoothing these cliffs through more gradual phase-outs of benefits rather than hard cutoffs. Some proposals include expanding premium tax credits, creating public options for various services, or implementing more universal programs that eliminate means-testing altogether. Unfortunately, these solutions require significant policy changes that have been difficult to achieve in our current political environment.

0 coins

The problem isn't how much tax we pay, it's WHO pays it. I make similar to you and pay ~25% while billionaires pay like 8% effective rates through loopholes and capital gains rates. The system is designed to burden workers while letting the wealthy off easy. If we closed corporate and billionaire loopholes, we could absolutely have universal healthcare, better infrastructure, and lower taxes for people making under $100k. But both parties are bought by corporate interests so nothing changes.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

This is partially true but oversimplified. The top 1% pay about 40% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 50% pay about 3%. The issue isn't that the wealthy don't pay taxes - it's that our tax system has inefficiencies, loopholes, and different treatment for different types of income. Capital gains being taxed lower than wages is a policy choice that benefits investors disproportionately.

0 coins

Best ways to extract funds from an S-Corporation while minimizing tax burden?

I run a successful S-Corporation with my business partner where I own 5% and they own 95%. The company is doing pretty well, generating about $250K in profit after expenses. We each get K-1s showing our respective profit shares (I get 5%, so around $12.5K) which we report on our personal returns. We both take regular salaries, but I'm also taking periodic distributions. Last year I withdrew a substantial amount, around $30K, which greatly exceeds my 5% profit share shown on my K-1. Here's my dilemma: If the company makes $250K, my partner gets a K-1 for $237.5K, I get one for $12.5K. We each pay taxes on those amounts, and theoretically the retained earnings can be withdrawn tax-free. But if I take out $30K, my partner is essentially paying tax on money I'm withdrawing! What I'd like to do is take a distribution (let's say $30K) and have that count as an expense BEFORE the K-1s are calculated. So the company would make $250K - $30K = $220K, partner gets a K-1 for $209K, I get one for $11K, and then I'd pay whatever tax is needed on that $30K. I've been treating these extra payments as bonuses in the past, but they're really profit-sharing distributions. How can I get these funds with minimal tax impact? We haven't filed our corporate return for 2024 yet, so if there's a more advantageous (but completely legal and ethical) approach, I'd love to know. I've read something about distributions being taxed at long-term capital gains rates if they exceed the shareholder's stock basis. Could this apply here? I'm also confused about my stock basis. I paid very little for my 5% back in 2015. How do these distributions affect my basis? If my basis was $15K and I took $30K last year, is my basis now $-15K? What's the relationship between stock basis and ownership percentage? Should we have been adjusting ownership percentages annually based on our bases? Is the stock basis the same as the K-1 amount? I'd love clarification on how these four elements interact in S-Corporation taxation: stock basis, ownership percentage, K-1 amounts, and shareholder withdrawals. And ultimately, how can I take money out of the S-Corp where I'm a 5% shareholder, in amounts significantly exceeding what's on my K-1? Thanks for reading all this!

One thing that hasn't been mentioned is a potential restructuring of your agreement with your business partner. If you're consistently taking distributions beyond your 5% ownership, maybe your ownership percentage doesn't actually reflect your value to the company. Consider renegotiating your equity stake to better align with the economic reality of the business. This would solve the distribution problem long-term because your K-1 would better reflect what you're actually taking from the business. Another approach is to look at compensation strategies beyond just salary and distributions. Could part of your compensation be structured as guaranteed payments? Unlike distributions, these ARE deductible by the S-Corp before profits are allocated via K-1s.

0 coins

Manny Lark

•

The idea of renegotiating my equity stake is interesting. My partner and I have been operating this way for years without really thinking about the tax consequences. Do guaranteed payments still incur self-employment tax like salary would?

0 coins

Yes, guaranteed payments do incur self-employment tax similar to salary. That's the downside compared to distributions. However, unlike regular salary which needs to meet "reasonable compensation" standards, guaranteed payments can be tied to specific services or capital you provide to the business. They're especially useful when partners contribute unequally in ways not reflected by ownership percentages. For the equity restructuring, you might consider a gradual approach where your percentage increases over time based on predefined performance metrics. This could help align your tax situation with the economic reality without creating a sudden shift in the business relationship.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

Has anyone here actually tried using a loan structure instead of distributions? Our S-Corp (I'm a 30% owner) established a shareholder loan program where we can take advances beyond our distribution percentages, and then either repay them or have them forgiven as future distributions when our basis is sufficient. Seems cleaner than just taking distributions beyond ownership percentage, but I'm not sure if there are downsides.

0 coins

I've done this. The key is proper documentation - you need a written loan agreement with reasonable interest and a realistic repayment schedule. Without that, the IRS might reclassify it as a distribution anyway.

0 coins

You need to file Form 3115 to change accounting methods if you want to switch from standard mileage to actual expenses. I learned this the hard way and got hit with penalties. Make sure your accountant knows what they're doing!

0 coins

Vince Eh

•

But doesn't the business vs personal use percentage still apply even if you use standard mileage rate? Like if the car was 70% business and 30% personal, wouldn't that affect how the gain/loss is calculated when selling?

0 coins

Yes, the business/personal percentage absolutely still applies. With standard mileage, you're only claiming deductions on the business portion anyway (your business miles). When you sell the car, you need to allocate any gain or loss based on that same business use percentage. So in your example with 70% business use, only 70% of any gain or loss would be business-related. But remember, the standard mileage deduction you've taken over time has already reduced your basis for the business portion of the car, which is why many people end up with a gain instead of a loss when they sell, even if they sell for less than they paid.

0 coins

Just went through this last year. I sold my delivery car for $5,000 after buying it for $17,000 four years earlier. My tax guy initially tried to claim an $8,000 loss on my Schedule C but then realized I'd already claimed about $13,000 in depreciation through the standard mileage rate over the years. Ended up having to report a $1,000 GAIN instead. So annoying.

0 coins

What form did you use to report this? Was it Schedule D or Form 4797? My accountant used Schedule D for my business vehicle sale which doesn't seem right.

0 coins

I've filed for R&D credits for several startups over the past 5 years. Here's my practical advice: Don't use a firm that charges a percentage of your credit - they're incentivized to push boundaries. Look for fixed-fee arrangements instead. Documentation is EVERYTHING. Start tracking immediately: developer time, project goals, technical uncertainties, and testing processes. The Section 174 changes suck, but the credit is still valuable. Just be aware you're now amortizing expenses over 5 years instead of getting immediate deductions. Watch out for offshore development - it's now amortized over 15 years vs 5 for domestic. For software startups: normal upgrades don't qualify, but creating new functionality or improving performance through technical uncertainty does. Small companies can still offset payroll taxes up to $250K, which is often more valuable than income tax offsets for pre-profit startups.

0 coins

This is super helpful, thank you! How detailed do the developer time logs need to be? We track time by project but not specifically by "R&D activity" - would that be a problem?

0 coins

Developer time logs don't need to be broken down to specific "R&D activities" - project-level tracking is usually sufficient as long as you can demonstrate which projects involved qualifying R&D. The key is being able to show that the projects involved technical uncertainty, experimentation, etc. What really strengthens your case is having documentation that shows the process: initial technical requirements, documentation of challenges/uncertainties faced, testing procedures, and outcomes (whether successful or failed). Failed experiments actually strengthen R&D claims since they demonstrate the experimental nature of the work.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

Has anyone used the R&D estimator tools in TurboTax or other tax software? Wondering if they're accurate with all the 174 changes or if it's just safer to hire a specialist firm.

0 coins

Luca Ricci

•

DON'T use TurboTax for R&D credits! We tried that last year and it missed so many qualifying expenses. The software is decent for basic returns but R&D credits are way too specialized, especially with the new capitalization rules. The software doesn't ask enough detailed questions to properly identify qualifying activities.

0 coins

Prev1...43434344434543464347...5645Next