


Ask the community...
Everyone's making this so complicated. The easy solution: file as "Married Filing Separately" and write "NRA" (Non-Resident Alien) where it asks for your spouse's SSN. You don't need an ITIN for your spouse unless they had US income or you're trying to claim certain credits. I've been doing this for years with my wife in Thailand. Most tax software can handle it, but you might need to override some error messages that pop up about missing SSNs. H&R Block's software has worked fine for me.
Thanks for this straightforward advice! Do you have to attach any special forms or documentation when you write "NRA" for your spouse? I'm worried about my return getting flagged for review if I just write that in.
No special forms needed when filing separately with an NRA spouse! The IRS is completely familiar with this situation. Just write "NRA" in the space for the SSN and proceed normally. I've been doing it for 7 years and never had a return flagged or questioned. The only time you need additional forms is if you're claiming your spouse as a dependent (which you generally can't), filing jointly (which requires an ITIN and a special election), or if your spouse had US income. For a simple MFS with an NRA spouse with no US ties, it's very straightforward.
Watch out for the "innocent spouse" rules if you're separated but still legally married. Since you're responsible for any tax issues on a joint return, filing separately is probably safest in your situation, especially if you don't have much contact with your spouse or visibility into his foreign income. Also, if you ever plan to divorce, consider how filing status might affect that process. Tax filings can sometimes be used as evidence in divorce proceedings regarding financial separation.
This is really important advice! My friend got stuck with a huge tax bill because her estranged husband in Germany had unreported income when they filed jointly. The IRS came after her even though she had no idea about his finances!
I'm actually not convinced Congress will let all the TCJA provisions expire. Historically, they tend to extend popular tax breaks even when they're set to sunset. Remember the "Bush tax cuts" that were supposed to be temporary? Many of those provisions became permanent for most taxpayers. I'm betting they'll at least extend the expanded standard deduction and child tax credit since those benefit many middle-class voters. The corporate tax rate might be allowed to increase somewhat, but I doubt they'll let it go all the way back to 35%.
Agree! It would be political suicide to let middle class families see their taxes go up right after an election. My money is on them extending at least some provisions, probably at the last minute in December 2025 like they always do. Makes planning almost impossible though.
Everyone's focusing on the income tax aspects, but don't forget about the estate tax exemption! That's also scheduled to drop significantly after the TCJA expires - from about $12.9 million per person down to around $6-7 million (adjusted for inflation). If you've done estate planning based on the current higher limits, you might need to revisit your strategy.
Omg thank you for bringing this up. My parents did their estate planning after 2018 and I don't think they've considered this. Going to make sure they talk to their attorney.
You're welcome! It's definitely something that caught many people by surprise. The current estate planning strategies that work with the higher exemption amounts may need significant revision when the exemption is cut roughly in half. For people in that potential danger zone (estates valued between $6-13 million), it might be worth looking into making larger gifts before the end of 2025 to lock in the higher exemption amount. The IRS has already issued regulations confirming they won't try to "claw back" the benefit of the higher exemption for gifts made while it was in effect, even after it expires. It's one of the few areas where proactive planning before the expiration can make a real difference.
Don't forget that some states have different rules too! The federal calculation might come out the same for you filing jointly vs separately, but your state might have different brackets or rules. I'm in California and we found a significant difference at the state level even when federal was a wash. My accountant told me it's really common for high-income dual-earner couples in California to see this.
Is there an easy way to figure out the state difference? I'm in New York and now I'm wondering if I've been leaving money on the table for years.
For New York specifically, the differences can be significant because NY has a pretty progressive tax rate structure. The easiest way is to run the calculations both ways using NY's tax tables, which you can find on the NY Department of Taxation website. The key thing to check is whether you and your spouse would fall into different tax brackets individually versus where your combined income lands. Also, NY has some credits that follow federal rules about filing status, so if you'd lose certain credits federally by filing separately, you might lose the corresponding NY credits too. I usually just run a quick calculation both ways in our state's online tax calculator to see the difference. Takes about 15 minutes but has saved us hundreds some years.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). If you're in a higher income bracket, the AMT can hit couples filing jointly differently than those filing separately. When my wife and I were in a similar income situation (both making around 100k), we actually got hit with AMT when filing jointly but not separately. Has anyone else run into this? Is this still a concern with the current tax laws?
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act significantly reduced the impact of AMT for many taxpayers by increasing the exemption amounts and phase-out thresholds. But it's still something to consider for higher incomes, especially if you have lots of certain types of deductions or exercise stock options. I got caught by this too, but in reverse - filing separately actually triggered AMT for us when jointly didn't. It's definitely worth running the numbers both ways if you're near those thresholds.
One thing nobody mentioned - make absolutely sure you check the right reason code on Form 8919. Since you've filed SS-8 but haven't received a determination, you should use reason code G: "I filed Form SS-8 and haven't received a determination letter." If you use the wrong code, it could delay processing or even trigger unnecessary review. Also, FreeTaxUSA definitely supports Form 8919 e-filing - I used it last year for the same situation. The key is entering the income as "Wages paid as a statutory employee" rather than as self-employment income.
Can you walk me through exactly where in FreeTaxUSA I should be entering this? I keep getting stuck at the part where it asks if I want to file Schedule C. Should I be saying no to that?
You should definitely say NO to filing Schedule C since you're not claiming to be self-employed. In FreeTaxUSA, go to the Income section, then select "Wages paid by an employer who did not withhold Social Security and Medicare taxes" (not the 1099-NEC section). When you get to the screen asking for details, enter your income amount from the 1099-NEC, select reason code G, and enter the employer information exactly as it appears on your 1099. The software will calculate only the employee portion of FICA taxes rather than self-employment tax.
I dealt with this exact situation last year while working for a tech startup. If you're using TurboTax, be careful - it's especially tricky with them. I had to manually override some calculations because it kept wanting to charge me self-employment tax even after I indicated I was misclassified. H&R Block online handled it better in my experience. The key with any software is checking your final tax calculation to make sure it's only charging you the employee portion (7.65%) rather than the full SE tax (15.3%).
H&R block was terrible when I tried to file with Form 8919 last year. They kept adding the income back as self employment even after I removed it. Ended up having to paper file.
Ethan Wilson
Don't stress too much about the tax brackets! Like the expert said, they're progressive. For example, if the 22% bracket starts at $44,725 and you made $50,000, only the $5,275 above the threshold gets taxed at 22%, not your whole income. I freaked out about this my first year with a big raise too!
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
ā¢That makes so much more sense! I was worried my entire income would get hit with the higher rate. What about the freelance income though? Is that taxed differently than my regular job income?
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
ā¢Your freelance income is subject to both income tax (at the same progressive rates as your W-2 income) AND self-employment tax, which is an additional 15.3% to cover Social Security and Medicare. This is because when you're self-employed, you're paying both the employer and employee portions of these taxes. You can deduct business expenses from your freelance income though, which helps reduce both taxes. Things like supplies, software subscriptions, and potentially a portion of your home office if it's used exclusively for the freelance work. Just keep good records of everything!
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
If your employer has an actual office u could go to, but u choose to work from home, you CANT take the home office deduction for that job if ur a regular W-2 employee. That deduction was suspended for employees from 2018-2025. You might be able to take it for your freelance work tho!
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
ā¢This is correct! I work as a tax preparer and see this mistake ALL THE TIME. The home office deduction is only for self-employed people (Schedule C filers) or certain statutory employees. Regular W-2 employees can't take this deduction anymore after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
0 coins