


Ask the community...
This might be a software issue more than a tax rule issue. I've found that sometimes the sequence of questions in tax software can trip you up. Try this: 1) Enter the 1098-C information first 2) When it asks if the vehicle was gifted, say NO initially 3) Complete the car donation section 4) Go back and edit your entries to indicate it was a gift, but make sure you enter the original purchase date and estimated value from when your family member bought it (not when they gave it to you) This worked for me last year with a similar donated car situation in H&R Block software.
Would this approach work in TurboTax too? I'm having almost the identical issue but with TT and a car my grandpa gave me that I donated to a local charity.
Yes, the approach works in TurboTax too. The key is the sequence of entering information. TurboTax tends to make assumptions if you immediately identify something as a gift. Enter the donation details first, then go back to modify the acquisition information. For TurboTax specifically, after entering the 1098-C information, look for the "Asset Information" section where you can edit the basis details. Enter what your grandfather originally paid for the car (estimate if needed) and when he purchased it originally. This establishes a proper basis instead of the $0 that TurboTax might default to.
I think everyone is overcomplicating this. If you have a 1098-C showing gross proceeds over $500, your deduction is simply limited to that amount - period. The gift aspect shouldn't matter at all for a vehicle donation. The charity sold it for $650, so that's your maximum deduction (assuming you itemize). Check if you selected "Noncash Charitable Contributions" correctly in your tax software. You may have accidentally selected a different type of donation that's triggering these basis questions.
That's not quite right. The basis absolutely matters with donated property, even vehicles. The deduction is limited to the LESSER of your basis or the gross proceeds reported on the 1098-C. So if your basis is $0 (which can happen with fully depreciated gifted property), your deduction would also be $0, even if the charity sold it for more.
I stand corrected! You're right about the "lesser of" rule. I checked Publication 526 and it does specify that for vehicle donations, your deduction is limited to the smaller of your basis or the gross proceeds from the charity's sale. This explains why the software is asking about the gift - it's trying to determine the basis. If the original owner had already fully depreciated the car (common for older vehicles), then the basis might indeed be $0, which would limit the deduction to $0 regardless of sale proceeds.
Something important to consider: If your mortgage interest deduction means you're now itemizing instead of taking the standard deduction, make sure you look at ALL potential itemized deductions! Don't forget: - State and local taxes (up to $10,000) - Charitable contributions - Medical expenses (if they exceed 7.5% of your AGI) - Other mortgage-related expenses like points or mortgage insurance You might find even more deductions you missed, which would mean a bigger refund!
That's a great point! I completely forgot about my charitable donations last year. I gave about $2,200 to various organizations and I have all the receipts. Would that be worth including in my amendment too? Also, do I need to send in copies of my mortgage interest statement and donation receipts with the amendment?
Absolutely include those charitable donations in your amendment! $2,200 is definitely significant and will increase your refund further. Combined with your mortgage interest, you're well over the standard deduction threshold. You don't necessarily need to send in the documentation with your amendment, but you should absolutely keep all those receipts, donation acknowledgments, and your Form 1098 mortgage interest statement with your tax records. The IRS can request substantiation later, especially for amended returns which tend to be reviewed more carefully.
Yes, you actually can e-file Form 1040-X now! The IRS started allowing this in 2020. Most major tax software (TurboTax, H&R Block, TaxAct, etc.) supports e-filing amendments. It's wayyy faster than paper filing and you get confirmation that they received it.
One thing to watch out for with the 1099-MISC and Schedule NEC filing - make sure you check if the company already withheld any taxes! Some US companies automatically withhold 30% from payments to foreign persons (called Chapter 3 withholding). If they did withhold, you would still file the 1040-NR with Schedule NEC, but you'd claim the amount already withheld as a credit against any tax due.
Thank you for mentioning this! I just checked the 1099-MISC more carefully and they actually did withhold some tax (about $405). So when I file the 1040-NR with Schedule NEC, do I just list that amount as already paid? Is there a specific line for this on the form?
Yes, you'll report the income on Schedule NEC, and then on Form 1040-NR, there's a line for "Federal income tax withheld" (typically line 25c or similar depending on the tax year). This is where you'll enter the $405 that was withheld. This is actually good news for two reasons: First, it shows the company properly classified you as a foreign person. Second, if you qualify for a lower tax rate under a treaty, you might get some of that withholding refunded back to you. Make sure you attach a copy of your 1099-MISC showing the withholding when you file your return. And remember that you'll likely need Form 8833 to claim any treaty benefits if you're eligible for a rate lower than 30%.
Has anyone used TaxAct or TurboTax for filing 1040-NR with Schedule NEC? I need to file something similar for royalty income and wondering if the standard software packages handle nonresident returns properly.
I tried TurboTax for my 1040-NR last year and it was a disaster. They don't really support all the international forms properly. I ended up using Sprintax which is specifically designed for nonresident returns. It handled Schedule NEC and treaty claims much better.
Has anyone tried H&R Block's free file option for self-employment? Their website says they support Schedule C but I'm not sure if that's only in their paid versions.
H&R Block's truly free version doesn't support Schedule C or self-employment income. You'd need their Self-Employed version which runs about $85 for federal filing plus another $37 per state. I switched from them to FreeTaxUSA last year and saved a ton of money. H&R Block isn't terrible, but they're almost as expensive as TurboTax for self-employment stuff.
One option nobody's mentioned yet is using the IRS's fillable PDF forms directly. They're free, and you can file electronically in most states. It's not as user-friendly as the guided options, but if you're comfortable with basic tax concepts, it's doable. I switched to this method after using TurboTax for years, and while there was a learning curve, I actually understand my taxes better now. Plus I save about $200 each year not paying for the self-employed version of commercial software.
I've thought about going the direct form route, but I'm a bit intimidated by figuring out depreciation schedules on my own. Did you find good resources for learning how to do that part correctly? I'm comfortable with the general Schedule C stuff but some of the more technical aspects make me nervous about doing it without software guidance.
I found Publication 946 from the IRS really helpful - it explains all the depreciation rules. There are also some free online depreciation calculators that can help you determine the right amounts. I created a spreadsheet that I update each year for tracking my business assets and depreciation. The first year was definitely the hardest, but now I just update my spreadsheet annually. I actually feel more confident now because I understand exactly what's happening rather than trusting software to make the right choices for me. If you're comfortable with spreadsheets, it's totally doable with a bit of research.
Diego Ramirez
Have you considered doing an 83(b) election for future RSU grants? It lets you pay ordinary income tax on the grant value upfront rather than the vesting value. That might help avoid this situation in future years if your company's stock keeps growing.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
ā¢Thanks for the suggestion, but isn't the 83(b) election only available for restricted stock, not RSUs? From what I've read, it doesn't apply to standard RSUs because there's no actual ownership until vesting. But I'd love to be wrong about this if it could help with future grants!
0 coins
Diego Ramirez
ā¢You're absolutely right, and I apologize for the confusion. The 83(b) election typically doesn't apply to standard RSUs because, as you correctly noted, there's no actual ownership until vesting. It's more applicable for restricted stock awards (RSAs) where you have immediate ownership with restrictions. For standard RSUs, tax planning is more about timing your sales after vesting to manage capital gains. Some companies offer programs where they automatically sell enough shares at vesting to cover tax obligations, which might be worth looking into for future grants.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
Oof, I went through almost this exact situation last year. What tax software are you using? I found that TurboTax didn't handle my RSUs very well, but H&R Block's premium version actually had a much better equity compensation section.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
ā¢I had the opposite experience! TurboTax Premier handled my RSUs perfectly but H&R Block kept giving me errors. Maybe it depends on the specific company's reporting format?
0 coins