IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Have you looked into charitable remainder trusts? I'm in a similar income bracket ($1.4M last year) and this strategy has been really effective for me. Basically, you set up a trust that provides you income for a set period while giving a significant tax deduction now. The remainder eventually goes to charity. With proper planning, you can get an immediate large tax deduction while still maintaining income from the assets. Works especially well if you have appreciated assets or are planning to sell a business eventually.

0 coins

This sounds interesting but a bit complex. Do you need a specialized attorney to set this up? And does it actually reduce your current tax liability significantly or is it more of a long-term strategy?

0 coins

You definitely need a team including a tax attorney who specializes in charitable planning and an accountant familiar with these structures. The tax benefits are both immediate and long-term. The immediate benefit is a current year tax deduction based on the present value of the future gift to charity, which can be substantial depending on how you structure it. For example, when I placed $500k of appreciated assets into my CRUT, I received a deduction of about $175k in the year I established it, which directly reduced my current tax liability.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

What type of business do you have? That makes a huge difference in available strategies. I've got a consulting business making about $900k and switching from pass-through to S-Corp status saved me about $30k in self-employment taxes alone.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

I second the S-Corp recommendation! My accountant also had me set a reasonable salary at about 40% of my business income with the rest as distributions. Huge savings on SE tax. Talk to a good CPA about whether that might work for your specific business type.

0 coins

I run a specialized software development firm focusing on financial services. Currently structured as an LLC taxed as a sole proprietorship. I've heard about the S-Corp strategy but wasn't sure if the administrative overhead was worth it. Sounds like the savings could be substantial though if you're saving $30k just on self-employment taxes. Do you find the added complexity with payroll and additional filings to be a major headache? And did you have to justify your salary-to-distribution ratio to the IRS at all?

0 coins

Opinion on this "Hybrid System" tax proposal that combines source-based taxation with existing laws

I've been researching different approaches to modernize our tax system, and came across this interesting proposal for a "hybrid tax system" that would blend destination-based and source-based taxation principles while working within existing U.S. tax frameworks. The approach focuses on using the Wayfair decision, marketplace facilitator laws, and interstate compacts to shift tax collection from consumers to sellers. It would essentially expand economic nexus laws to include use taxes and leverage marketplace facilitator laws that are already working in most states. What caught my attention is how it proposes dividing revenue between states - with about 20% going to the producing state and the rest to the consuming state. They suggest pilot programs for high-value goods like vehicles and machinery between major states (like California and Texas). The proposal also recommends tax incentives for local purchases (like a 5% use tax reduction for buying in-state) and automating compliance through existing technologies like Avalara. According to their numbers, this could recover around $13 billion in lost use tax revenue, reduce admin costs by 30%, and potentially create 65,000+ jobs from local manufacturing incentives. What do you all think? Is this a workable approach or just wishful thinking? Would states with high consumption like Florida ever agree to share revenue with producing states?

Jamal Brown

•

The hybrid system proposal seems interesting in theory, but I worry about implementation complexity. The tax code is already a nightmare. I own a small manufacturing business in Michigan that sells to customers in 8 states, and compliance is already eating up so much of my time and money. For this to work, the technology piece has to be flawless. Most small businesses can't afford expensive tax consultants to figure out how to split taxes between origin and destination states. The proposal mentions tools like Avalara, but those aren't cheap for small operations. Maybe the 20% revenue allocation to producing states makes sense for giants like California and Texas, but what about smaller production states? Would the administrative costs eat up any benefit they'd receive?

0 coins

That's a really good point about implementation costs for small businesses. Do you think a phased approach would work better? Maybe start with only high-value goods over $10,000 as they suggest for the pilot, then gradually expand if the systems prove manageable?

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

A phased approach would definitely make more sense. Starting with high-value goods creates a more manageable testing ground since there are fewer transactions to track and the tax revenue per transaction justifies the administrative effort. I think they'd also need to provide free compliance software for small businesses below a certain revenue threshold. South Dakota v. Wayfair actually mentioned the availability of affordable compliance software as one justification for allowing states to impose collection obligations on remote sellers. The same principle should apply here - if compliance is too burdensome, it could face legal challenges.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

Has anyone else noticed that they didn't address the constitutional issues at all? The Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause have historically limited states' abilities to tax out-of-state entities. Even post-Wayfair, there are still significant constitutional constraints. The proposal talks about leveraging existing legal frameworks, but creating a hybrid system where producing states get tax revenue from consumption in other states seems like it would face immediate legal challenges. Also, what happens with imported goods? If I buy something manufactured in China but sold by a California company to me in Texas, which state gets the "producer" portion? The proposal doesn't seem to address international commerce at all.

0 coins

Good points about imports. I work for a company that imports about 70% of our inventory from overseas, then distributes nationally. Under this system, would we be considered the "producer" state since we're the importer/distributor? Or would all imported goods follow a different rule? Without clarity on this, it seems like there'd be a massive loophole.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

Be really careful about underwithholding! Two years ago I claimed 4 allowances (on the old W-4) thinking I'd just pay at tax time, and ended up with a $4300 bill PLUS a $420 underpayment penalty. Learned my lesson the hard way. The new W-4 is actually designed to be more accurate so you don't get big refunds OR big bills. Fill it out honestly and it should get you pretty close. If you want a little more in each check, you can use Step 4(b) to claim some deductions if you itemize, have student loan interest, or contribute to retirement accounts.

0 coins

Does contributing to a 401k automatically reduce withholding or do I need to put that on my W-4 somewhere? My HR person was useless when I asked.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

401k contributions automatically reduce your withholding because they reduce your taxable income before taxes are calculated on your paycheck. You don't need to put this on your W-4 specifically. However, if you have other deductions like mortgage interest, charitable giving, or student loan interest that aren't reflected in your paycheck, you can estimate their annual total and put that amount on line 4(b) of your W-4 to reduce withholding further.

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

Has anyone tried those tax withholding calculators on TurboTax or H&R Block websites? Are they accurate or just trying to sell you something?

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

I tried both and they were ok but seemed to be pushing their paid services. The IRS withholding calculator is completely free and actually pretty good if your tax situation is straightforward. Doesn't work well with irregular income tho.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Have you checked your IRS transcript? That would tell you if someone already filed on your behalf or if an extension is already in place. You can access it online through the IRS website if you create an account. The transcripts show all activity on your tax account including extensions filed, returns processed, and payments received. It might save you a lot of time troubleshooting since you'll be able to see exactly what's in the IRS system under your SSN.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Creating an IRS account is a nightmare though. I tried to do this last year and they wanted me to verify my identity by entering information from a mortgage, car loan, or credit card - none of which I had at the time! Ended up having to mail in a form and wait 10 days for a verification code.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

That's a good point about the verification process. It can be difficult for some people to create an account. If you can't access your transcript online, calling the IRS transcript request line at 800-908-9946 is another option. They can mail your transcript to your address on record. The most important thing is confirming whether an extension or return has actually been filed under your SSN before worrying about potential identity theft or duplicate payments. This information can help determine your next steps.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Just a quick question - how much did you attempt to pay with your extension filing? Remember an extension only gives you more time to FILE, not more time to PAY. If you owed taxes for 2024, those were still due by April 18th regardless of an extension.

0 coins

I tried to pay about $2,700 which was what TurboTax estimated I would owe based on the information I entered so far. I understand extensions only give more time to file, not pay - that's why I attempted to submit the payment with my extension request. I'm just worried about where that money went since the extension was rejected!

0 coins

This is such an important point that people miss! I've seen so many friends get hit with penalties because they thought filing an extension meant they didn't have to pay until October. The interest and penalties on unpaid tax can add up fast - I think it's something like 0.5% per month plus interest.

0 coins

Just wanted to add one thing no one has mentioned yet - if your total self-employment income is under $433 for 2024, you don't have to pay self-employment tax at all! So depending on how much you made from these trials total, you might not have to worry about that 15.3% tax everyone's talking about. Also, there's a simplified version of Schedule C called Schedule C-EZ that you might be able to use if your business expenses are under $5,000 and you meet a few other criteria. Makes the whole process much less painful.

0 coins

Thanks for this info! Just to clarify, my total from all the trial work was about $540 for the year. Does that mean I definitely have to pay the self-employment tax? And is Schedule C-EZ still available? I thought I read somewhere that the IRS discontinued it a few years ago.

0 coins

Since your total is over $400, you would need to pay self-employment tax on that $540. It's 15.3% which comes out to about $82.62 in additional tax. You're right about Schedule C-EZ - I apologize for the confusion. The IRS did discontinue it after 2019. You'll need to use the regular Schedule C, but with such a straightforward situation and minimal income, it shouldn't be too complicated. Just list each payment as income and any legitimate expenses you had related to earning that income.

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

•

has anyone here actually gotten audited over small amounts like this? I made like $300 doing some test articles for a blog and honestly wasnt planning to report it at all. they didnt send me any tax forms and paid me through venmo. feels like more trouble than its worth tbh

0 coins

Mae Bennett

•

Technically you're supposed to report all income regardless of the amount or whether you received a tax form. But realistically speaking, the IRS isn't likely to audit someone over $300. They typically focus on much larger discrepancies. That said, if you're ever audited for other reasons, they could discover this unreported income. Your call, but personally I report everything just to avoid potential headaches later.

0 coins

Prev1...42264227422842294230...5645Next