


Ask the community...
There's also a historical reason for these different tax treatments. The Johnson Amendment (which prohibits 501(c)(3) organizations from endorsing political candidates) was actually introduced by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1954 when he was a senator. The story goes that he was facing opposition from certain nonprofit organizations in Texas that were campaigning against him, so he introduced this amendment to silence them. This wasn't specifically targeted at churches initially, but rather at all 501(c)(3) organizations. Over time, it's become particularly contentious with religious organizations.
That's fascinating! I had no idea the prohibition had such a political origin. Has there ever been any serious attempt to repeal the Johnson Amendment? I've heard some politicians talk about it, but nothing seems to happen.
There have been several attempts to repeal or modify the Johnson Amendment, most notably during the Trump administration. In 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that he claimed would reduce enforcement of the Johnson Amendment against religious organizations, but legal experts generally agreed it didn't actually change anything substantive in how the law is applied. There were also provisions in early drafts of the 2017 tax bill that would have repealed the Johnson Amendment for churches, but these were ultimately removed from the final version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act due to procedural rules in the Senate. The debate continues, with strong advocates on both sides - those who see it as a free speech issue and those who believe tax-exempt status shouldn't subsidize political speech.
The whole system is ridiculous. Churches should be taxed like any other business. They rake in billions tax-free and then have massive political influence anyway through their members. The pastor just tells everyone "I can't explicitly endorse candidate X, but as Christians we should consider issues A, B, and C" which is basically the same thing as an endorsement.
Not all churches are mega-churches with huge incomes. Most religious organizations are small community churches, synagogues, mosques and temples that barely keep the lights on. Taxing them would literally shut many of them down and harm the community services they provide like food banks, homeless shelters, and counseling services.
One thing ur brother in law should definitely check is if there's a time limit for responding!!!! My cousin ignored one of these notices thinking it was a mistake and ended up owing way more in penalties. I think they give u like 90 days or something but don't quote me on that. Also tell him to make copies of EVERYTHING he sends them and send it certified mail so they can't claim they never got it. The IRS is notorious for "losing" paperwork.
This is really good advice, thanks! The letter does mention a 90-day period to respond. Do you know if we need to use any specific forms when sending the documentation? Or just include a letter explaining everything with copies of the supporting documents?
For a notice of deficiency, he should definitely include a written letter that references the notice number (should be in the top right corner of what they sent). No specific form is needed, but make sure he includes his social, the tax year in question, and contact info. I'd organize everything super clearly - like "Regarding item 1 on the notice, here are documents A, B, C that prove..." Makes it easier for whoever reviews it. And yeah, certified mail with return receipt is absolutely essential. My cousin learned that lesson the hard way.
has anyone else noticed how the IRS seems to be sending wayyy more of these deficiency notices lately? feels like they're just throwing them at the wall to see what sticks. my neighbor, my coworker and now ur brother all got them within the last few months. i wonder if they have some kinda quota to meet π
Important thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure the insurance payout actually covers your transportation needs! When my car was stolen, I had to buy a replacement before the insurance check came through, and I ended up spending way more than what insurance gave me. The tax stuff is important, but also make sure you're getting a fair settlement that actually covers a comparable replacement in today's market. My insurance company tried to lowball me based on "comparable vehicles" that were actually in much worse condition than mine.
Did you negotiate with the insurance company or just accept their first offer? I've heard you can push back if their valuation seems low.
I absolutely negotiated! Their first offer was almost $3,200 below what comparable vehicles were selling for in my area. I collected screenshots of similar listings, documentation of recent maintenance and upgrades I'd done, and sent it all to the adjuster. After about a week of back-and-forth, they increased their offer by about $2,700. Still not perfect, but much closer to reality. Definitely don't just accept the first number they throw at you - most insurance companies expect some negotiation.
Something else to consider - if you had a loan on the car, the insurance payout might go directly to the lender first to pay off the loan. If there's anything left over after that, you'll get the remainder. If you were "underwater" on the loan (owed more than the car was worth), you might still owe money to the lender even after the insurance payout is applied. That's where gap insurance comes in, if you had it.
Something similar happened to me, but I discovered you only have 30 days from the date on that CP22E notice to respond if you want to dispute it! After that, they'll start collection procedures. Two options: 1. Call the number on your notice and request more time to gather documents 2. File a formal protest letter if you have all your documentation One thing that helped me was getting an official transcript of my tax account from the IRS website. It shows exactly what they changed on your return and why. In my case, they disallowed one dependent but kept my head of household status.
Thanks for the info about the 30-day deadline! I think I'm still within that window. How exactly do I get the tax account transcript you mentioned? Does it show specifically which documents they accepted vs. rejected?
You can get your tax account transcript by going to IRS.gov and searching for "Get Transcript Online." You'll need to create an account if you don't already have one. The verification process is pretty strict - you'll need a credit card, mortgage, or loan account number plus a mobile phone in your name. The transcript won't explicitly state which documents were accepted or rejected, but it will show the specific adjustments they made to your return. Look for codes like "420" (examination/audit), "300" (additional tax assessed), or "290" (additional tax assessed after examination). The amounts next to these codes show exactly what changed. The transcript is super helpful because it gives you the exact dollar amounts they adjusted, which helps you understand which credits or deductions were disallowed. That way, you know exactly what documentation to focus on for your reconsideration.
make sure you request the audit reconsideration in writing!! i made the mistake of just calling and they said they had no record even though i talked to someone for like 45 mins. also get certified mail with tracking when you send anything to irs!!
This is important advice! I learned this lesson the hard way too. Also make copies of EVERYTHING you send them, including your cover letter requesting reconsideration. They lose stuff all the time and you need proof of what you submitted and when.
Emma Anderson
Don't forget to consider whether either of you has income-based student loan payments! My husband and I discovered that filing jointly significantly increased his income-based repayment amount because they factored in my income too. We ended up filing separately even though we paid more in taxes because the student loan payment savings more than made up for it.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
β’This! My spouse and I actually calculated both ways - the tax savings from filing jointly versus the student loan payment increase from combining our incomes. We saved about $1,400 in taxes by filing jointly, but her income-based repayment would have gone up by $230/month, so filing separately made more sense for us.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
β’I hadn't even thought about student loans! My husband is on an income-based repayment plan for his federal loans. I'll definitely need to calculate if the tax benefits of filing jointly would be offset by higher student loan payments. Thank you for bringing this up!
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
One more thing to consider - if either of you has past-due child support, back taxes, or defaulted federal student loans, filing jointly could put your refund at risk of being seized. My friend learned this the hard way when their entire joint refund was taken for the spouse's defaulted loans. Just something to keep in mind if that might apply to your situation.
0 coins