


Ask the community...
I'm in a similar situation with my woodworking. I make furniture as a hobby but occasionally sell pieces. Does anyone know if there's a specific percentage threshold for business vs. personal use? Like if I use my table saw 70% for personal projects and 30% for items I sell, can I deduct 30% of the cost?
Yes, you can deduct the business percentage of expenses for mixed-use items. There's no specific percentage threshold - you just need to have a reasonable method for determining the business portion. Some people track hours of use, others track the number of projects, and some use square footage for workspace deductions. The most important thing is documentation. Keep a log showing when equipment is used for business vs. personal purposes. Take photos of business projects vs. personal ones. Track the income from business projects. In case of an audit, you need to be able to justify your allocation percentage.
Thanks for the clarification on mixed-use deductions! I've been keeping receipts but haven't been tracking usage time. I'll start keeping a simple log of hours spent on personal vs. sellable projects to document my business percentage. Do you think a spreadsheet would be sufficient documentation or should I be doing something more formal? I'm trying to do this right without creating an overwhelming amount of paperwork for what's still a relatively small operation.
Just a quick tip from someone who went through an IRS audit over hobby vs. business deductions - keep everything separate! Have a separate business bank account, separate credit card, separate space in your home if possible, and DETAILED records of anything that crosses between personal and business use. I had a photography side business and tried deducting camera equipment I also used for family photos. The IRS wanted to see logs showing EXACTLY what percentage was business vs. personal. Without proper documentation, they disallowed most of my deductions and hit me with penalties and interest. Painful lesson!
This is really helpful advice, thank you! Do you have a specific method you'd recommend for tracking the business vs. personal usage? I'm thinking of creating a spreadsheet or maybe using a time-tracking app, but I'm not sure what would be most acceptable to the IRS if I ever got audited.
For my photography business, I now use a simple but effective system. I have a digital calendar where I color-code business shoots versus personal use. I take a screenshot at the end of each month showing the breakdown. I also keep a simple spreadsheet tracking hours of use, project names (business clients vs. personal), and income generated from business projects. The key is consistency - whatever method you choose, use it regularly. The IRS doesn't require any specific format, but they need to see that your tracking is reasonable and applied consistently. Contemporaneous records (created at the time of use, not recreated later) are much more credible in an audit situation. Finally, keep all this documentation for at least 7 years along with your tax returns.
Quick clarification based on my experience as a tax preparer: Form 8885 is exclusively for the Health Coverage Tax Credit, which expired and was then reinstated several times. The confusion often happens because tax software sometimes includes questions about it in their interview process even though most people don't qualify. For the original poster - if you've never received any notification that you're eligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance benefits or pension payments from the PBGC, then you definitely don't qualify and should file an amended return.
Thank you all SO MUCH for the helpful responses! I definitely don't receive any Trade Adjustment Assistance or PBGC payments, so it sounds like I shouldn't have included Form 8885 at all. I'm going to file an amended return this weekend to remove it. Would it be better to use a different tax service than H&R Block for the amendment since they're the ones who confused me in the first place?
You don't necessarily need to switch tax services. H&R Block should be able to prepare an amended return for you. However, if you're not confident in them after this experience, you might consider using a different service or even consulting with a tax professional for the amendment. The most important thing is to file the amendment correctly to remove Form 8885 entirely. Make sure the amended return clearly shows you're no longer claiming the Health Coverage Tax Credit. Also keep in mind that amended returns can take 16+ weeks to process, so patience will be necessary after you submit it.
Did your tax software specifically ask you questions about this credit or did you somehow manually add Form 8885? I'm wondering because I've used TurboTax for years and never seen anything about this form.
Not OP but sometimes tax software will ask general questions about health coverage and depending on how you answer, it might add forms you don't actually need. I've had H&R Block try to add a premium tax credit form for me even though I had employer coverage and wasn't eligible.
The software asked me some questions about healthcare coverage, and I think I must have answered something incorrectly. I definitely didn't manually add Form 8885 - I had never even heard of it before this whole mess! I just checked my health insurance documentation, and I had regular employer coverage all year. Clearly I clicked something wrong in the interview questions. Lesson learned to pay closer attention to those details in the future!
Don't panic right away! I think your family might actually be in good shape to receive a substantial Premium Tax Credit. A few things to consider: 1. Full-time students with low income often don't impact the household income much 2. The marketplace calculates credits based on expected ANNUAL income, not just current situation 3. Having multiple family members with lower combined income usually means higher credits Call the marketplace back and ask them to explain how they calculated your credit. They can walk you through it and confirm if the information provided was correct.
Is there an income threshold where you have to pay back the entire premium tax credit? I heard something about 400% of the federal poverty level but not sure if that's still accurate.
Yes, there is a threshold, but the rules have changed recently. Previously, if your income exceeded 400% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), you would have to repay the entire Premium Tax Credit amount. This was often called the "subsidy cliff." However, the American Rescue Plan temporarily eliminated this cliff, and this provision has been extended through 2025. Now, regardless of income, no household is required to pay more than 8.5% of their income toward benchmark marketplace coverage. This means even if your income ends up higher than expected, you're still eligible for some amount of Premium Tax Credit if your insurance premiums exceed 8.5% of your household income.
Has your dad checked if he's eligible for his state's Medicaid program? If his income is low enough and your state expanded Medicaid, that might be a better option than marketplace insurance. Also, does his employer plan offer family coverage? Sometimes employer plans are actually more expensive than subsidized marketplace plans for families.
This! My husband's employer insurance wanted $650/month to add me, but I got a marketplace plan with Premium Tax Credit for $175/month. Just make sure your dad's plan is considered "affordable" for him only - if it is, and it only covers him (not dependents), you and your sister can still qualify for PTCs.
Exactly! The "family glitch" fix that went into effect means that affordability for family members is now calculated separately. So if adding dependents to the employer plan is expensive (which it often is), the dependents may qualify for Premium Tax Credits even if the employee has affordable coverage through work.
Just to clarify - checking the legally blind box does change your tax liability! The blind checkbox gives you an additional standard deduction amount. So definitely fix this, because it's not just an information error, it actually impacts your tax calculation. For 2023 taxes (filing in 2024), the additional standard deduction for blindness was $1,850 if you're single. If your income is relatively low, this deduction might not change your tax much, but it's still technically claiming a deduction you're not entitled to.
Oh wow, I didn't realize it actually changed the amount! I thought it was just an information field. Now I'm definitely going to file that amendment ASAP. Does that mean I'll owe more when I fix this?
Yes, you'll likely owe the tax difference between your original filing and the corrected amount. Since the legally blind status gives an additional $1,850 to your standard deduction, removing that will increase your taxable income by that amount. The actual tax impact depends on your tax bracket, but if you're in the 10% bracket, it would be about $185 additional tax. If you're in the 12% bracket, around $222. You'll also probably owe some interest on the unpaid amount, but since you're amending quickly, that should be minimal.
I've made a similar mistake before and filed a paper 1040-X. Something important to remember: if you owe additional tax because of the amendment, pay it as soon as possible to minimize interest and penalties! The IRS charges interest from the original due date regardless of when you amend.
Natasha Kuznetsova
Have you looked into potentially setting up your own Solo 401k instead? I was in a similar situation (1099 insurance agent) and found it much cleaner tax-wise to just establish my own plan rather than dealing with the affiliated service group complexity. The contribution limits are actually fantastic - you can contribute both as employee AND employer up to the combined limits. For 2025, that's $23,500 as employee plus up to 25% of your net self-employment income as employer contribution (total contribution cap of $69,000 if you're under 50). Fidelity and Vanguard both offer free Solo 401k plans with no setup or maintenance fees. Makes tax filing much simpler than the affiliated arrangement.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
β’I've considered that option but there's a specific reason I'm sticking with the company plan. They have access to some institutional funds with extremely low expense ratios that aren't available in individual plans. Plus the plan administrator handles all the compliance testing and Form 5500 filing, which I'd otherwise need to manage myself once the solo 401k exceeds $250k. Also, there's a potential opportunity in the future for me to be brought on as a W-2 employee, so staying in their plan makes that transition smoother. I just need to figure out the proper tax treatment for now.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
β’Those are excellent reasons to stick with the company plan. The institutional fund access alone can save you significant money over time with those lower expense ratios. And you're right about the Form 5500 requirements - that paperwork gets complex fast when you're handling it yourself. For the proper tax treatment, one additional document that might help your CPA get comfortable is IRS Notice 2012-8, which provides specific guidance on affiliated service group arrangements. It clarifies that contractors who qualify under 414(m) should treat their contributions similarly to self-employed individuals with their own plans, but within the structure of the larger company plan.
0 coins
Javier Morales
Has your CPA looked at IRS Form 8606? My accountant used that for documenting some of my nondeductible contributions when I was in a sorta similar situation. Not sure if it applies exactly to your case but might be worth checking out.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
β’Form 8606 is specifically for IRAs and reporting nondeductible contributions to traditional IRAs or Roth conversions. It doesn't apply to 401(k) contributions, whether in an affiliated service group or otherwise. Using this form would actually create more confusion.
0 coins